Connect with us

Published

on

NHL Awards are not typically won in the first month of the season — but there are always exceptions.

Look at the NHL Awards Watch from one year ago. Quinn Hughes ended up winning the Norris Trophy and Connor Bedard was the eventual Calder Trophy winner. But 2023-24 award winners like Nathan MacKinnon (Hart) and Connor Hellebuyck (Vezina) weren’t really on the radar with voters quite yet, something that changed rather quickly as the season carried on.

Some of the current leaders will no doubt still be leading at the end of the season, while others are just getting their moment in the spotlight before fading from the finalists’ picture. The question is: which players are which?

We’ve polled a wide selection of Professional Hockey Writers Association voters anonymously to get a sense of where the wind is blowing for the current leaders. We’ve made sure it’s a cross section from the entire league, trying to gain as many perspectives as possible.

Bear in mind that the PHWA votes for the Hart, Norris, Calder, Selke and Lady Byng finalists; broadcasters vote for the Jack Adams; and general managers handle the Vezina.

All stats are from Hockey-Reference.com, Natural Stat Trick and Evolving Hockey.

Jump ahead:
Ross | Richard | Hart
Norris | Selke | Vezina
Calder | Byng | Adams

Art Ross Trophy (points leader)

Current leader: Nathan MacKinnon, Colorado Avalanche (29)
Watch out for: Kirill Kaprizov, Minnesota Wild (28)
Long shot: Cale Makar, Colorado Avalanche (24)


Maurice ‘Rocket’ Richard Trophy (leading goal scorer)

Current leader: Sam Reinhart, Florida Panthers; Nikita Kucherov, Tampa Bay Lightning; William Nylander, Toronto Maple Leafs; Tage Thompson, Buffalo Sabres (11)
Watch out for: Alex Ovechkin, Washington Capitals (10)
Long shot: Cole Caufield, Montreal Canadiens (10)


Hart Trophy (MVP)

Leader: Kirill Kaprizov, Minnesota Wild
Finalists: Nikita Kucherov, Tampa Bay Lightning, Nathan MacKinnon, Colorado Avalanche

It’s not even close.

Kaprizov captured 78% of the first-place ballots from our voters, as they viewed the dynamic winger as the engine behind the Wild’s impressive 10-2-3 start. Through 15 games, Kaprizov was second to MacKinnon in scoring, which included nine goals and 20 even-strength points. He was tied with Carolina defenseman Dmitry Orlov with a plus-14 rating.

“Making the Minnesota Wild exciting is some real hero stuff,” a voter said, cheekily.

Kaprizov was seventh for the Hart in 2021-22 when he tallied 108 points and 47 goals. He’s been one of the NHL’s premier goal scorers over the last three seasons: His 133 goals tied him for fifth in that span with Colorado’s Mikko Rantanen.

“With 10 multi-point outings already, Kaprizov has failed to register a single point in only three of 15 contests,” another voter said. “If he plays 80 this year, or very near that number, the league’s most underrated superstar will serve as a genuine Hart contender when it matters most.”

Early on, Kaprizov has one of the bellwether stats for a Hart Trophy candidate: The gap between his numbers and the next highest scorer on his team. Through 15 games, he led Matt Boldy by 12 points. No other current playoff team has a gap that large between its top two scorers.

“I mean, this guy has been absolutely ridiculous this year and you can see the value both in terms of his numbers and everyone’s favorite way to determine ‘value,’ how much he is carrying the load for his team,” another voter backing Kirill the Thrill said. “Kaprizov’s insane start has helped take this team from one that lacks offensive firepower, but has a steady core, and turned it into a playoff contender. I think that covers both ends of what an MVP means.”

Despite Kaprizov’s support for the Hart, some see the race closer.

“Kaprizov and Kucherov are neck and neck, with a slight edge to Kaprizov for where the Wild are [in the standings],” a voter said.

Kucherov has 23 points in 14 games for the Lightning, and is tied for the NHL lead in goals (11). His line with Brayden Point and Jake Guentzel is one of the most dominant in the NHL. Kucherov won the Hart in 2018-19 and was second in the voting last season, despite a career-high 144 points.

“Kucherov should’ve won it last year and is proving it again this season,” another voter said. “Kaprizov is a close second, followed by MacKinnon.”

When it comes to MacKinnon as the other finalist, we’re breaking with protocol a little bit. He did not receive a first-place vote on any of the ballots we received. But the sheer number of voters that had MacKinnon in their top three, or mentioned him as a player to watch in the race, tells us there’s momentum to his candidacy.

MacKinnon won his first Hart Trophy last season with 137 first-place votes — way down from Connor McDavid‘s rout in 2022-23 (195) but higher than Auston Matthews‘ win in 2021-22 (119). It’s been 15 seasons since the NHL had back-to-back Hart Trophy winners. The last player to win two in a row was Alex Ovechkin in 2007-8 and 2008-09.

What’s fascinating about MacKinnon this season is that it could present a different set of circumstances for his MVP candidacy. Last season was a statistical romp: 140 points, which was 36 more than Rantanen and 50 more than Cale Makar. This season, MacKinnon is putting up great numbers — 29 points in 15 games — and seen as the player keeping a ragged, injured Avalanche team in contention.

“What MacKinnon is doing to prop up an injury ravaged Avs team shouldn’t be overlooked,” a voter said.

The only two players who received first-place vote other than Kaprizov and Kucherov where defenseman Quinn Hughes of the Vancouver Canucks, who won the Norris Trophy last season and was seventh in the Hart voting; and Vegas Golden Knights winger Mark Stone, who has 21 points in 13 games and continues to be one of the best two-way forwards in the NHL.

Obviously, any discussion of the Hart Trophy must include the player that’s won it three times and been a finalist for it six times in 10 seasons: Connor McDavid of the Edmonton Oilers, who missed some time with a lower-body injury but scored 13 points through 12 games so far this season. It’ll be interesting to see where McDavid lands in the next poll.

Finally, a shout out to the voter who filled in their Hart Trophy favorite with “everyone in Winnipeg.”


Norris Trophy (top defenseman)

Leader: Cale Makar, Colorado Avalanche
Finalists: Quinn Hughes, Vancouver Canucks; Josh Morrissey, Winnipeg Jets

Coming off the highest points-per-game rate of his career last season (2.8), Makar seemed primed to become the seventh defenseman in NHL history to break 100 points, and the first since Erik Karlsson tallied 101 points with the 2022-23 San Jose Sharks.

His 24 points in 15 games to start this season opened up another possibility: Could Makar become the second defenseman in NHL history to lead all skaters in scoring? The other guy was Bobby Orr, who did it: in 1969-70 (120) and then in 1974-75 (135).

“That level of production with everyone around him hurt is wild,” a Makar voter said.

Makar’s dominant start was reflected in the voting, as the Avalanche defenseman captured 68% of the first-place ballots. He finished third in the voting for the Norris in consecutive seasons after winning the award in 2021-22. Makar has been a Norris finalist in four of his five NHL seasons.

“Just imagine how tough Colorado’s start would’ve been without him,” another voter noted.

But here’s the catch with Makar’s Norris candidacy: He’s a minus-6 on the season through 15 games. No one else in the top 10 scorers among defensemen was that far in the red.

“I don’t care that he’s a minus on a team with everyone hurt and questionable goaltending,” another voter argued. “It’s also a function of how much he plays.”

Or as another voter put it: “Plus/minus, schlus/schlinus … the dude’s on pace for 134 points.”

Hughes won the Norris last season fairly emphatically (172 first-place votes) in a three-way race with Nashville’s Roman Josi (12) and Makar (9). He leads the Canucks with 15 points through 13 games and has been absolutely outstanding defensively with a 1.76 expected-goals against per 60 minutes at 5-on-5.

“Makar’s points are great, but Hughes has dominated every inch of the ice whenever he’s playing,” a voter explained. “Two-way dominance.”

Morrissey has 16 points in his first 15 games during this torrid start for the Jets, playing 24:22 per game. In his 10th NHL season, he’s sniffed around the top three for the Norris in the last two seasons, finishing fifth in 2022-23 and seventh last season. He was the only defenseman to earn a first-place vote besides Makar and Hughes.


Calder Trophy (top rookie)

Leader: Logan Stankoven, Dallas Stars
Finalists: Lane Hutson, Montreal Canadiens; Matvei Michkov, Philadelphia Flyers

The rookie of the year race has been turbulent thus far. We’ve had some first-year players who have run scolding hot and then ice cold, like Michkov. We’ve had some rookies that haven’t stayed in the lineup due to injury (Macklin Celebrini) or demotion (Josh Doan). We’ve had a handful of high-profile rookies that just haven’t achieved liftoff yet, like Cutter Gauthier of the Anaheim Ducks (to the delight of Flyers fans after he demanded a trade last season).

Stankoven has been steady and strong for the Stars. He had points in eight of 13 games, leading all rookie skaters with 12 points (two goals and 10 assists). Stankoven has skated to a plus-4 rating in 15:49 of average ice time. He’s played with Jamie Benn down the lineup, and in between Roope Hintz and Jason Robertson on their top line.

This is Stankoven’s rookie season, but he’s got a bit more experience than some other players here. He played 24 regular-season games in 2023-24, which was one away from last season being his official rookie season. He also played 19 games in the 2024 playoffs.

“The (just barely) rookie is stomping about at a near point-per-game pace,” one voter concluded.

Stankoven led all rookies with 61% of the first-place votes. Running second with roughly 17% of the first-place votes was Hutson, the smooth skating 20-year-old who has eight points in 15 games, skating to a minus-8. He’s hit the highlight reel several times, skating a hefty 23:12 in ice time per game, easily the highest for any rookie defenseman.

Both Michkov and Macklin Celebrini of the San Jose Sharks had a pair of first-place votes, but Michkov appeared on more ballots. Michkov had 10 points in his first 13 games before coach John Tortorella made him a healthy scratch. But that doesn’t tell the whole story: Michkov had nine points in his first eight games, and then a stretch of five games with just one assist.

Some voters think Michkov can build a Calder case this season, but are a little wary about his coach’s role in building it.

“It’s Michkov, unless Torts screws this up,” one voter noted.

“John Tortorella is giving Matvei Michkov learning time in the press box ‘as part of the process.’ Not necessarily a bad idea from a development perspective, but hurts Michkov’s shot at the Calder if such routine becomes habit,” another voter said.

The biggest game-changer in the Calder race is Celebrini, the first overall pick in the 2024 draft. He’s been limited to just four games thanks to a hip injury, but has three goals and one assist in those games.

Some voters made it clear that the only thing holding them back was Celebrini’s sample size.

“Macklin Celebrini has been the most impactful rookie. Michkov is a close second but Celebrini is my pick,” a voter said. “If Celebrini stays healthy, I think he will win the Calder.”

“Part of me thinks Macklin Celebrini can sneak back into this race after the setback from the injury, because he showed he is legit at the NHL level in the few games he had played,” another voter said. “But being realistic, Stankoven has been playing great hockey alongside great linemates and he has settled in quite nicely into a top-six role in Dallas. He will likely continue to put up big numbers.”

One other rookie received a first-place vote: Goalie Joel Blomqvist of the Pittsburgh Penguins. He was 3-4-0 in seven games for Pittsburgh this season, riding in from the AHL to rescue their goaltending. He’s the only goalie of the Penguins’ trio — which has featured Tristan Jarry and Alex Nedeljkovic — who has played to an above-expected level.

The Penguins have a steep climb back into playoff contention. If Blomqvist plays a major role in a rally, he could have a seat at the final table for the Calder.


Vezina Trophy (top goaltender)

Note: The NHL’s general managers vote for this award

Leader: Connor Hellebuyck, Winnipeg Jets
Finalists: Lukas Dostal, Anaheim Ducks; Igor Shesterkin, New York Rangers

With due respect to Dostal, the only other goalie to receive a vote for the Vezina, this is unmistakably a two-netminder race between Hellebuyck and Shesterkin.

Hellebuyck won the Vezina last season for the second time in his career. He’s been a finalist four times. Hellebuyck is 11-1-0 with a .935 save percentage, a 1.83 goals-against average and three shutouts already during the Jets’ historic hot streak to start the season. Money Puck has him third (7.2) and Stathletes has him seventh (5.1) in goals saved above expected.

The last line of defense is the first person you think of as the secret to the Jets’ success. There’s a reason he earned 72% of our voters’ first-place ballots.

“Best goalie on the best team. Repeat Vezina come June?” a Hellebuyck voter pondered.

Shesterkin was the clear second choice. He finished fourth for the award last season after winning in 2021-22. Shesterkin is 6-3-1 on the season, with a .920 save percentage and a 2.62 goals-against average plus one shutout. Money Puck has him even with Hellebuyck in goals save above expected, while Stathletes has him first with 10.5 goals save above expected.

“Pay that man his money,” a Shesterkin backer quipped.

“Take away the clunker against Buffalo and it is Igor Shesterkin’s to lose,” another Igor voter said, in reference to the five goals he gave up against the Sabres. “Without him, the Rangers aren’t near the top of the standings.”

Keep in mind that Hellebuyck has another way to boost his case that Shesterkin doesn’t: The 4 Nations Face-Off midseason tournament, where Hellebuyck is expected to start for Team USA. Obviously, those games shouldn’t factor into the Vezina voting … but perceptions matter and international dominance can certainly bolster one’s reputation. Just ask Ryan Miller, 2010 Olympic star and 2009-10 Vezina winner.

As mentioned, Dostal was the only other goalie to receive a vote. The Ducks netminder was only 4-5-2 in 11 games, but put up respectable numbers (.922 save percentage, 2.73 goals-against average) while facing the most shots of any goalie in the league so far this season. Stathletes has him third overall in goals saved above expected (7.6).


Selke Trophy (best defensive forward)

Leader: Aleksander Barkov, Florida Panthers
Finalists: Nico Hischier, New Jersey Devils; Jordan Staal, Carolina Hurricanes

Barkov has official reached his “default choice” era in Selke consideration. Like Patrice Bergeron and Pavel Datsyuk before him, Barkov’s name is now penciled in as the favorite until he gives voters a reason to erase it.

“It’s gonna be him in the end anyway,” a Barkov voter noted.

“Until we get further into the season it will be hard to see if there are some other standouts but Barkov just dominates a game defensively,” another said.

Barkov won the Selke for the second time last season, and his legend only grew with his performance in helping the Panthers win the Stanley Cup. This season, he’s been his usual dominant self defensively (2.1 goals against per 60 minutes at 5-on-5) although his action was limited early on due to injury.

While Barkov is the clear leader with 22% of the first-place votes, no less than 11 different players received at least one as well. Hischier had the next most support (17%), as the Devils’ captain was averaging 1.43 goals against per 60 minutes at 5-on-5 through 18 games. He also falls squarely into the “he’s due” category of Selke seekers, as he was second for the award in 2022-23.

Speaking of “he’s due,” the final finalist is Jordan Staal. He received votes for the Selke in 16 of his 18 previous NHL seasons. He was second to Barkov for the award last season, the second time Staal has been a finalist. His combo with winger Jordan Martinook might be the best tandem of defensive forwards in the NHL. Staal is averaging 1.1 goals against per 60 minutes of 5-on-5 play.

“There are three worthy Canes with Staal, [Seth] Jarvis and Martinook,” a Staal voter said. “Wouldn’t be surprised if that splits the vote and costs one of them the trophy.”

Tampa Bay Lightning center Anthony Cirelli was right behind Staal for the final finalist spot. Other players who received at least one first-place vote included Adam Lowery of the Winnipeg Jets, Leon Draisaitl of the Edmonton Oilers, Sam Reinhart of the Panthers, Joel Eriksson Ek of the Minnesota Wild, Sidney Crosby of the Pittsburgh Penguins, Anze Kopitar of the Los Angeles Kings, and Mark Stone of the Vegas Golden Knights.

“High time we give this trophy to a winger,” the Stone voter said.


Lady Byng Trophy (gentlemanly play)

This is the part where I mention that the Lady Byng Trophy for gentlemanly play should be voted on by the league’s on-ice officials or by the NHL Players’ Association instead of the PHWA.

It’s early, but Roman Josi of the Nashville Predators had only two penalty minutes in his first 15 games of the season. And frankly, given the state of his team, that guy had every reason to lash out at somebody out of frustration.


Jack Adams Award (best coach)

Note: The NHL Broadcasters’ Association votes on this award.

Leader: Scott Arniel, Winnipeg Jets
Finalists: Rod Brind’Amour, Carolina Hurricanes; Spencer Carbery, Washington Capitals

At first glance, it’s obvious why Arniel would be the early-season leader for coach of the year. The Jets are the first team in NHL history to win at least 14 of its first 15 games of a season. Winnipeg is the second team in NHL history to record multiple six-game win streaks through its first 15 games. The Jack Adams doesn’t always go to the coach of the season’s best team — since 1973-74, only 10 winners came from teams that captured the Presidents’ Trophy — but it’s undeniable that Arniel has turned a good team into a steamroller early in the season.

But within context of the Jack Adams, Arniel’s case is even stronger. He’s in his first year as Winnipeg’s head coach after serving as associate coach under Rick Bowness, so he’ll earn credit for any increase in the standings over their 110-point season in 2023-24. But keep in mind the voters were already impressed with the Jets: Bowness was a Jack Adams finalist last season.

Voters love a redemption story, too: Please recall Arniel had two unsuccessful years with Columbus from 2010-11, paid his dues and got his second chance over a decade later.

“As boring a pick for the Jack Adams as Hellebuyck is for the Vezina, the Jets would have to implode badly for Arniel to lose his grip on pole position in the race for Coach of the Year,” an Arniel voter explained.

That said, Arniel garnered only 55% of the first-place ballots. Carbery was a very strong second with 28% of the votes, having placed seventh in the voting last season. Carbery coached the Capitals to an unexpected playoff spot last season. Washington has a .714 points percentage through 14 games, and is playing better at 5-on-5 in Carbery’s second season.

Those who believe in Carbery really believe in him.

“Spencer Carbery, and it’s not even close,” a voter said.

“We assumed the 2024-25 Capitals were all about one individual’s chase for a record. The team looks legit, and Carbery deserves credit for the group buy-in,” another Carbery voter explained.

The other finalist is Rod Brind’Amour, who won the award in 2020-21. The Hurricanes continue to play Rod The Bod’s system to perfection, with a plus-20 goal differential through 13 games.

“This feels obvious, so it probably won’t happen,” a Brind’Amour backer said.

The only other coach to receive support from our voters was Paul Maurice of the Florida Panthers, a loquacious bench boss whose victory would obviously be worth it for the speech.

Continue Reading

Sports

Red Sox activate 3B Bregman from 10-day IL

Published

on

By

Red Sox activate 3B Bregman from 10-day IL

BOSTON — The Red Sox activated All-Star third baseman Alex Bregman from the 10-day injured list before Friday’s game against Tampa Bay.

Bregman, who has been sidelined since May 24 with a right quad strain, returned to his customary spot in the field and was slotted in the No. 2 spot of Boston’s lineup for the second of a four-game series against the Rays. He sustained the injury when he rounded first base and felt his quad tighten up.

A two-time World Series winner who spent the first nine seasons of his big league career with the Houston Astros, Bregman signed a $120 million, three-year contract in February. At the time of the injury, he was hitting .299 with 11 homers and 35 RBI. Those numbers led to him being named to the American League’s All-Star team for the third time since breaking into the majors with the Astros in 2016.

Bregman missed 43 games with the quad strain. Earlier this week, he told reporters that he was trending in a direction where he didn’t believe he would require a minor league rehab assignment. With three games left before the All-Star break, the Red Sox agreed the time was right to reinstate a player to a team that entered Friday in possession of one of the AL’s three wild-card berths.

“He’s going to do his part,” Red Sox manager Alex Cora said before Friday’s game. “Obviously, the timing, we’ll see where he’s at, but he’s been working hard on the swing … visualizing and watching video.”

Continue Reading

Sports

How Jim Abbott changed the world

Published

on

By

How Jim Abbott changed the world

JIM ABBOTT IS sitting at his kitchen table, with his old friend Tim Mead. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, they were partners in an extraordinary exercise — and now, for the first time in decades, they are looking at a stack of letters and photographs from that period of their lives.

The letters are mostly handwritten, by children, from all over the United States and Canada, and beyond.

“Dear Mr. Abbott …”

“I have one hand too. … I don’t know any one with one hand. How do you feel about having one hand? Sometimes I feel sad and sometimes I feel okay about it. Most of the time I feel happy.”

“I am a seventh grader with a leg that is turned inwards. How do you feel about your arm? I would also like to know how you handle your problem? I would like to know, if you don’t mind, what have you been called?”

“I can’t use my right hand and most of my right side is paralyzed. … I want to become a doctor and seeing you makes me think I can be what I want to be.”

For 40 years, Mead worked in communications for the California Angels, eventually becoming vice president of media relations. His position in this department became a job like no other after the Angels drafted Abbott out of the University of Michigan in 1988.

There was a deluge of media requests. Reporters from around the world descended on Anaheim, most hoping to get one-on-one time with the young left-handed pitcher with the scorching fastball. Every Abbott start was a major event — “like the World Series,” Angels scout Bob Fontaine Jr. remembers. Abbott, with his impressive amateur résumé (he won the James E. Sullivan Award for the nation’s best amateur athlete in 1997 and an Olympic gold medal in 1988) and his boyish good looks, had star power.

That spring, he had become only the 16th player to go straight from the draft to the majors without appearing in a single minor league game. And then there was the factor that made him unique. His limb difference, although no one called it that back then. Abbott was born without a right hand, yet had developed into one of the most promising pitchers of his generation. He would go on to play in the majors for ten years, including a stint in the mid ’90s with the Yankees highlighted by a no-hitter in 1993.

Abbott, and Mead, too, knew the media would swarm. That was no surprise. There had been swarms in college, and at the Olympics, wherever and whenever Abbott pitched. Who could resist such an inspirational story? But what they hadn’t anticipated were the letters.

The steady stream of letters. Thousands of letters. So many from kids who, like Abbott, were different. Letters from their parents and grandparents. The kids hoping to connect with someone who reminded them of themselves, the first celebrity they knew of who could understand and appreciate what it was like to be them, someone who had experienced the bullying and the feelings of otherness. The parents and grandparents searching for hope and direction.

“I know you don’t consider yourself limited in what you can do … but you are still an inspiration to my wife and I as parents. Your success helps us when talking to Andy at those times when he’s a little frustrated. I’m able to point to you and assure him there’s no limit to what he can accomplish.”

In his six seasons with the Angels, Abbott was assisted by Mead in the process of organizing his responses to the letters, mailing them, and arranging face-to-face meetings with the families who had written to him. There were scores of such meetings. It was practically a full-time job for both of them.

“Thinking back on these meetings with families — and that’s the way I’d put it, it’s families, not just kids — there was every challenge imaginable,” Abbott, now 57, says. “Some accidents. Some birth defects. Some mental challenges that aren’t always visible to people when you first come across somebody. … They saw something in playing baseball with one hand that related to their own experience. I think the families coming to the ballparks were looking for hopefulness. I think they were looking for what it had been that my parents had told me, what it had been that my coaches had told me. … [With the kids] it was an interaction. It was catch. It was smiling. It was an autograph. It was a picture. With the parents, it ran deeper. With the parents, it was what had your parents said to you? What coaches made a difference? What can we expect? Most of all, I think, what can we expect?”

“It wasn’t asking for autographs,” Mead says of all those letters. “They weren’t asking for pictures. They were asking for his time. He and I had to have a conversation because this was going to be unique. You know, you could set up another player to come down and sign 15 autographs for this group or whatever. But it was people, parents, that had kids, maybe babies, just newborn babies, almost looking for an assurance that this is going to turn out all right, you know. ‘What did your parents do? How did your parents handle this?'”

One of the letters Abbott received came from an 8-year-old girl in Windsor, Ontario.

She wrote, “Dear Jim, My name is Tracey Holgate. I am age 8. I have one hand too. My grandpa gave me a picture of you today. I saw you on TV. I don’t know anyone with one hand. How do you feel about having one hand? Sometimes I feel sad and sometimes I feel okay about it. Most of the time I feel happy. I hope to see you play in Detroit and maybe meet you. Could you please send me a picture of you in uniform? Could you write back please? Here is a picture of me. Love, Tracey.”

Holgate’s letter is one of those that has remained preserved in a folder — and now Abbott is reading it again, at his kitchen table, half a lifetime after receiving it. Time has not diminished the power of the letter, and Abbott is wiping away tears.

Today, Holgate is 44 and goes by her married name, Dupuis. She is married with four children of her own. She is a teacher. When she thinks about the meaning of Jim Abbott in her life, it is about much more than the letter he wrote back to her. Or the autographed picture he sent her. It was Abbott, all those years ago, who made it possible for Tracey to dream.

“There was such a camaraderie there,” she says, “an ability to connect with somebody so far away doing something totally different than my 8-year-old self was doing, but he really allowed me to just feel that connection, to feel that I’m not alone, there’s other people that have differences and have overcome them and been successful and we all have our own crosses, we all have our own things that we’re carrying and it’s important to continue to focus on the gifts that we have, the beauty of it.

“I think sometimes differences, disabilities, all those things can be a gift in a package we would never have wanted, because they allow us to be people that have an empathetic heart, an understanding heart, and to see the pain in the people around us.”

Now, years after Abbott’s career ended, he continues to inspire.

Among those he influenced, there are professional athletes, such as Shaquem Griffin, who in 2018 became the first NFL player with one hand. Griffin, now 29, played three seasons at linebacker for the Seattle Seahawks.

Growing up in Florida, he would watch videos of Abbott pitching and fielding, over and over, on YouTube.

“The only person I really looked up to was Jim Abbott at the time,” Griffin says, “which is crazy, because I didn’t know anybody else to look up to. I didn’t know anybody else who was kind of like me. And it’s funny, because when I was really little, I used to be like, ‘Why me? Why this happen to me?’ And I used to be in my room thinking about that. And I used to think to myself, ‘I wonder if Jim Abbott had that same thought.'”

Carson Pickett was born on Sept. 15, 1993 — 11 days after Abbott’s no-hitter. Missing most of her left arm below the elbow, she became, in 2022, the first player with a limb difference to appear for the U.S. women’s national soccer team.

She, too, says that Abbott made things that others told her were impossible seem attainable.

“I knew I wanted to be a professional soccer player,” says Pickett, who is currently playing for the NWSL’s Orlando Pride. “To be able to see him compete at the highest level it gave me hope, and I think that that kind of helped me throughout my journey. … I think ‘pioneer’ would be the best word for him.”

Longtime professional MMA fighter Nick Newell is 39, old enough to have seen Abbott pitch for the Yankees. In fact, when Newell was a child he met Abbott twice, first at a fan event at the Jacob Javits Center in Manhattan and then on a game day at Yankee Stadium. Newell was one of those kids with a limb difference — like Griffin and Pickett, due to amniotic band syndrome — who idolized Abbott.

“And I didn’t really understand the gravity of what he was doing,” Newell says now, “but for me, I saw someone out there on TV that looked like I did. And I was the only other person I knew that had one hand. And I saw this guy out here playing baseball and it was good to see somebody that looked like me, and I saw him in front of the world.

“He was out there like me and he was just living his life and I think that I owe a lot of my attitude and the success that I have to Jim just going out there and being the example of, ‘Hey, you can do this. Who’s to say you can’t be a professional athlete?’ He’s out there throwing no-hitters against the best baseball players in the world. So, as I got older, ‘Why can’t I wrestle? Why can’t I fight? Why can’t I do this?’ And then it wasn’t until the internet that I heard people tell me I can’t do these things. But by then I had already been doing those things.”

Griffin.

Pickett.

Newell.

Just three of the countless kids who were inspired by Jim Abbott.

When asked if it ever felt like too much, being a role model and a hero, all the letters and face-to-face meetings, Abbott says no — but it wasn’t always easy.

“I had incredible people who helped me send the letters,” he says. “I got a lot more credit sometimes than I deserved for these interactions, to be honest with you. And that happened on every team, particularly with my friend Tim Mead. There was a nice balance to it. There really was. There was a heaviness to it. There’s no denying. There were times I didn’t want to go [to the meetings]. I didn’t want to walk out there. I didn’t want to separate from my teammates. I didn’t want to get up from the card game. I didn’t want to put my book down. I liked where I was at. I was in my environment. I was where I always wanted to be. In a big league clubhouse surrounded by big league teammates. In a big league stadium. And those reminders of being different, I slowly came to realize were never going to go away.”

But being different was the thing that made Abbott more than merely a baseball star. For many people, he has been more than a role model, more than an idol. He is the embodiment of hope and belonging.

“I think more people need to realize and understand the gift of a difference,” Dupuis says. “I think we have to just not box everybody in and allow everybody’s innate light to shine, and for whatever reasons we’ve been created to be here, [let] that light shine in a way that it touches everybody else. Because I think that’s what Jim did. He allowed his light to permeate and that light, in turn, lit all these little children’s lights all over the world, so you have this boom of brightness that’s happening and that’s uncontrollable, that’s beautiful.”

“Southpaw – The Life and Legacy of Jim Abbott,” a new edition of ESPN’s “E60,” debuts Sunday at 9 p.m. ET on ESPN; extended version streaming afterward on ESPN+.

Continue Reading

Sports

Cubs’ PCA on track for $1.1M from bonus pool

Published

on

By

Cubs' PCA on track for .1M from bonus pool

NEW YORK — Chicago Cubs center fielder Pete Crow-Armstrong is projected to receive the largest amount from this season’s $50 million pre-arbitration bonus pool based on his regular-season statistics.

Crow-Armstrong is on track to get $1,091,102, according to WAR calculations through July 8 that Major League Baseball sent to teams, players and agents in a memo Friday that was obtained by The Associated Press.

He earned $342,128 from the pool in 2024.

“I was aware of it after last year, but I have no clue of the numbers,” he said Friday. “I haven’t looked at it one time.”

Pittsburgh pitcher Paul Skenes is second at $961,256, followed by Washington outfielder James Wood ($863,835), Arizona outfielder Corbin Carroll ($798,397), Houston pitcher Hunter Brown ($786,838), Philadelphia pitcher Cristopher Sánchez ($764,854), Cincinnati shortstop Elly De La Cruz ($717,479), Boston catcher Carlos Narváez ($703,007), Red Sox outfielder Ceddanne Rafaela ($685,366) and Detroit outfielder Riley Greene ($665,470).

Crow-Armstrong, Skenes, Wood, Carroll, Brown, De La Cruz and Greene have been picked for Tuesday’s All-Star Game.

A total of 100 players will receive the payments, established as part of the 2022 collective bargaining agreement and aimed to get more money to players without sufficient service time for salary arbitration eligibility. The cutoff for 2025 was 2 years, 132 days of major league service.

Players who signed as foreign professionals are excluded.

Most young players have salaries just above this year’s major league minimum of $760,000. Crow-Armstrong has a $771,000 salary this year, Skenes $875,000, Wood $764,400 and Brown $807,400.

Carroll is in the third season of a $111 million, eight-year contract.

As part of the labor agreement, a management-union committee was established that determined the WAR formula used to allocate the bonuses after awards. (A player may receive only one award bonus per year, the highest one he is eligible for.) The agreement calls for an interim report to be distributed the week before the All-Star Game.

Distribution for awards was $9.85 million last year, down from $11.25 million in 2022 and $9.25 million in 2023.

A player earns $2.5 million for winning an MVP or Cy Young award, $1.75 million for finishing second, $1.5 million for third, $1 million for fourth or fifth or for making the All-MLB first team. A player can get $750,000 for winning Rookie of the Year, $500,000 for second or for making the All-MLB second team, $350,000 for third in the rookie race, $250,000 for fourth or $150,000 for fifth.

Kansas City shortstop Bobby Witt Jr. topped last year’s pre-arbitration bonus pool at $3,077,595, and Skenes was second at $2,152,057 despite not making his big league debut until May 11. Baltimore shortstop Gunnar Henderson was third at $2,007,178.

Continue Reading

Trending