Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks to the press as they stand next to a Tesla vehicle on the South Portico of the White House on March 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images
Tesla CEO Elon Musk turned Delaware’s corporate law into a hot-button topic last year after a judge there ruled that his $56 billion pay package from 2018 was illegally granted and should be rescinded.
In social media posts, Musk smeared the judge and became an outspoken critic of Delaware’s judiciary, moving the site of incorporation for Tesla and his other companies out of the state while encouraging others to follow suit. Dropbox moved its site of incorporation to Nevada, and Bill Ackman said his Pershing Square Capital Management would exit Delaware. Meta and Walmart are reportedly considering leaving.
After a flurry of such announcements, Delaware’s Senate Majority Leader Bryan Townsend, a corporate attorney by trade and former clerk for Delaware’s Court of Chancery, began looking into the matter with fellow elected leaders. He then moved to sponsor a bill, known as SB 21, aimed at making Delaware a more attractive state for businesses.
On Thursday, the state Senate voted to pass an amended version of SB 21. If it passes Delaware’s House of Representatives, in a vote expected next week, and gets signed by the governor, the bill would change the state’s corporate law. Notably, it would alter howcompanies can use independent directors and other officials to ensure deals they’ve made will pass muster in court, and limit the records that shareholders can obtain from companies when investigating possible wrongdoing.
Townsend told CNBC that the aim of the bill is to ensure Delaware corporate law is clearer and more predictable, and that the state remains attractive to both investors and corporate leaders.
Many institutional investors, legal scholars and shareholders’ attorneys have opposed the bill, arguing that it would harm minority shareholders and allow boards and executives to make decisions based on their own interests rather than for the broader investor base.
The International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN), consisting of investors with more than $90 trillion in combined assets under management, spoke out against the bill on Tuesday. According to its website, ICGN members include Alliance Bernstein, the Swedish AP funds, BlackRock, CalPERS, CalSTRS, Franklin Templeton, Norges and Vanguard.
ICGNCEO Jen Sisson cautioned in a letter sent to Delaware state senators and representatives that SB 21 “will be detrimental to shareholder rights, with potentially significant negative implications for long-term returns for investors, including people saving for their retirements, current retirees and other individuals investing their savings.”
Sisson also said the bill would “reduce judicial oversight” and diminish shareholders’ trust that they can “seek remedies through litigation, when necessary.”
The anti-Delaware sentiment has at least some political motivations. While aligning themselves with President Donald Trump, executives like Musk and Ackman are trying to publicly undermine what they describe as “activist judges” who have issued rulings they found disagreeable.
Musk also has a lot of money potentially at stake. If adopted, legal scholars have argued, the new law could help the world’s richest person in his effort to reverse the court’s order in January 2024 that rescinded his mammoth pay package.
Unusual rollout
In her ruling, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen McCormick said Musk’s compensation plan had been inappropriately set by Tesla’s board, which was controlled by Musk, and approved by shareholders who were misled by Tesla’s proxy materials before being asked to vote on the matter. Musk filed for an appeal, and the case is now in the hands of the Delaware Supreme Court.
As CNBC previously reported, Richards, Layton & Finger, a corporate defense firm whose clients include Musk and Tesla, helped draft the bill. The firm told CNBC that it wasn’t working on behalf of any specific client and that it was “part of a group, including highly respected lawyers, professors, and former jurists.”
Other shareholders’ attorneys have opposed SB21, or called for significant revisions, in part because of the bill’s unusual rollout.
Changes to Delaware corporate law historically have been drafted by a broad coalition of attorneys representing companies, executives and minority shareholders, and who are part of the Delaware State Bar Association’s Corporation Law Council (CLC).
SB 21 was introduced to Delaware’s legislature on Feb. 17, without any initial review or participation by the CLC.
Matt Meyer, candidate in the 2024 Delaware gubernatorial election to replace term-limited incumbent governor John Carney.
Courtesy: New Castle County
Townsend said Delaware’s elected leaders had fielded complaints from a number of public companies, or attorneys representing them,which he declined to name. Their frustrations had reached a “boiling point” he said, while other states like Texas and Nevada were making a concerted effort to provide an alternative.
“We wanted to address what we can legislatively,” Townsend said.
If Delaware’s House passes the bill, it would hit the desk of DemocraticGov. Matt Meyer.
Even though Delaware is a heavily Democratic state — Trump lost by almost 15% in the 2024 election — the legislation has support from some prominent party leaders, including the governor, as well as corporate defense attorneys, legal scholars and former Delaware litigants unhappy with prior rulings in the state.
Meyer said in an interview on Tuesday with CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin that attorneys and corporate executives have told him that “there is some loss of clarity, predictability and fairness” in Delaware’s corporate law that he believes should be remedied.
A group of 21 law firms, including Cravath, Swaine & Moore, Gibson Dunn and Latham Watkins, sent a letter of encouragement to the state’s general assembly dated March 11.
The group wrote that the bill “provides statutory definitions and safe harbors that enhance clarity and will facilitate proactive evaluation of director appointments, conflicts cleansing and transactional planning.” SB 21 could also help companies incorporated in Delaware to “streamline corporate decision-making and transactional execution,” the lawyers wrote.
In his CNBC interview, Meyer downplayed fears that a so-called DExit was underway, a reference to a mass exodus of companies out of Delaware to incorporate in other states.
Delaware boasts 2.2 million corporate entities from around the world that are registered in the state, including 81% of U.S. companies that went public last year, Meyer said, adding, “The idea that we’re losing something is not totally accurate.”
When he was running for governor, Meyer’s campaign was heavily supported by entrepreneur Phil Shawe, a former Delaware litigant who became an outspoken critic of the state’s Court of Chancery after he was sanctioned in a case concerning who should maintain ownership of a business he started with his ex-fiancee. In 2018, he moved incorporation of the company, TransPerfect, to Nevada.
Last year, Shawe spent $2 million on an ad campaign slamming Delaware, and supporting Musk, all while encouraging other companies to flee the state. Shawe also contributed over $1 million to fund a political action committee supporting Meyer.
Shawe told CNBC, in an emailed statement, that he was not involved in drafting SB21 but “had lots of concerns and ideas” about Delaware’s Court of Chancery, and was “proud to have been at the forefront of this important discussion.”
Gov. Meyer’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks next to SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son after U.S. President Donald Trump delivered remarks on AI infrastructure at the Roosevelt Room in the White House in Washington on Jan. 21, 2025.
Carlos Barria | Reuters
OpenAI said last week that it would restructure in a format that allows its non-profit entity to retain ultimate control, a plan that on Tuesday received the blessing of one of the U.S. artificial intelligence startup’s biggest backers — Japanese giant SoftBank.
The endorsement of SoftBank — the first time the company has publicly green lit the plan — is key because the Japanese firm’s $30 billion investment in OpenAI announced this year was contingent on a change in structure.
In March, OpenAI closed a $40 billion funding round, receiving $30 billion from SoftBank. But if OpenAI doesn’t restructure into a for-profit entity by Dec. 31, SoftBank has previously said it could reduce its portion of the financing to $20 billion.
OpenAI announced this month that it would not fully turn into a for-profit entity after pressure from civic leaders and former employees. Instead, the non-profit arm would retain control of the company, while the limited liability company, which handles all of the business operations, would turn into a public benefit corporation. That means this division will have the ability to generate profit, but will also focus on social good.
The AI startup was originally looking to remove the control of the non-profit, a plan that drew criticism from many in the tech space, including rival and initial OpenAI co-founder Elon Musk.
Since the non-profit would retain control, and the original restructure plan was ditched, it was unclear if OpenAI’s major investors were on board.
But SoftBank’s finance chief Yoshimitsu Goto said during an earnings press conference on Tuesday that “nothing has really changed.”
“I don’t think that’s the wrong direction … that’s something that we expected,” Goto said, according to a company translation of his comments in Japanese.
He reiterated that OpenAI needs to complete the restructure by the end of this year.
There could still be stumbling blocks along the way. Microsoft, one of OpenAI’s biggest investors, has not approved the restructure, according to a Bloomberg report earlier this month. The Financial Times on Sunday reported that OpenAI and Microsoft are rewriting the terms of their multibillion-dollar partnership. Microsoft is the key holdout to OpenAI’s restructure plan, the FT added.
SoftBank’s Goto did not mention any other companies, but acknowledged that OpenAI has many stakeholders.
“Our conversation is based on the assumption that the reorganization will take place. There are different staekholders however and some people may intervene in this project and this may not go as smooth as we hope,” Goto said.
“But that’s out of our control. We will wait and see what happens.”
Crypto.com logo displayed on a phone screen with representation of cryptocurrencies.
Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images
Dubai’s Department of Finance announced a partnership with crypto platform Crypto.com that will allow government service fees to be paid with cryptocurrencies.
The memorandum of understanding between Dubai government officials and Mohammed Al Hakim, president of Crypto.com UAE, was signed Monday on the sidelines of the Dubai FinTech Summit.
Government officials said in a press release that the partnership will help achieve the “Dubai Cashless Strategy,” which seeks to solidify Dubai’s status as a leading digital city. The strategy aims to reach 90% cashless transactions across Dubai’s public and private sectors by 2026.
Once technical arrangements for the initiative are finalized, individuals and “businesses customers of government entities” will be able to pay service fees through digital wallets on Crypto.com.
“The platform will securely convert these payments into Emirati dirhams and transfer them to Dubai Finance accounts, ensuring a streamlined, secure, and innovative payment framework,” Dubai Finance added.
Crypto.com’s Al Hakim called the initiative a “truly global first programme.” However, the announcement did not clarify what types of digital currencies the department of finance would accept, or for which types of government fees covered by the agreement.
Crypto.com and Dubai Finance did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC.
Crypto.com first received a license for its Dubai entity to offer regulated virtual asset service activities in 2023. Last month, the company said Dubai’s virtual asset regulatory body had also issued a limited license to offer derivatives.
SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son delivers remarks next to U.S. President Donald Trump at an ‘Investing in America’ event in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 30, 2025.
Leah Millis | Reuters
Softbank‘s Vision Fund business on Tuesday posted a loss in the fiscal year ended March as it booked slowing gains at its massive tech investment arm.
SoftBank said it notched a gain on investment at its Vision Funds of 434.9 billion yen in the fiscal year, a 40% fall from the 724.3 billion yen booked in the previous year.
In its fiscal fourth quarter — the three months ended March — SoftBank’s Vision Funds segment recorded a 26.1 billion yen gain, helped by a rise in the value of TikTok owner ByteDance.
The Vision Fund segment overall logged a pretax loss of 115.02 billion yen ($777.7 mllion) versus a profit of 128.2 billion yen in the previous fiscal year.
For the latest fiscal year, SoftBank saw gains on its investments in Chinese ridehailing company Didi as well as South Korean e-commerce firm Coupang. However, the performance of its investment arm was hurt by a drop in value of companies including AutoStore.
The Vision Funds are a key focus for investors who are looking for signs of improvement at SoftBank’s huge investment arm, after it swung to a surprise loss in the company’s fiscal third quarter.
SoftBank’s investment division can be inconsistent, as it is driven by changes in public and private financial markets.
SoftBank’s stock is down about 17% this year as volatility in financial markets and concerns about the macroeconomic environment continues to weigh on the company.
SoftBank hits back at Stargate funding report
SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son has sought to position company as a key player in artificial intelligence through various investments and acquisitions. The firm owns the majority of semiconductor designer Arm and announced plans this year to acquire server chip designer Ampere Computing for $6.5 billion. Ampere’s semiconductors are designed to run AI applications.
One of SoftBank’s biggest AI bets has been on OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT. SoftBank invested $30 billion in OpenAI as part of a broader $40 billion financing round in March that valued the startup at $300 billion.
Softbank is also involved in Stargate, a joint venture that was unveiled by U.S. President Donald Trump in January, calling for hundreds of billions of dollars of investment into AI infrastructure.
There are still questions about how SoftBank plans to finance these ventures and whether it will need to sell down some of its holdings in companies like Arm.
Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg had on Monday reported that dozens of financial players are reassessing investment in data centers due to growing economic volatility, and SoftBank has yet to come up with a financing template for Stargate.
Yoshimitsu Goto, chief finance officer at SoftBank, said during a Tuesday press conference that media reports of banks hesitating to fund SoftBank’s efforts are not true.
“We are very much making progress,” Goto said.
He added there are around 100 proposals being made for sites to build data centers as part of Stargate, with the first facilities likely to be in Texas.
SoftBank swings to profit
SoftBank posted its first annual profit in four years at 1.15 trillion yen.
While the Vision Fund was an overall drag on profit, it was a big gain in SoftBank’s older investments in Alibaba, T-Mobile and Deutsche Telekom, that helped drive its overall profit.
Arm and SoftBank’s telecommunications business also contributed positively to the group’s overall profitability.