Kristen Shilton is a national NHL reporter for ESPN.
Feb 5, 2024, 07:53 AM ET
NHL All-Star Weekend offers a relaxed atmosphere for players, as they hang with friends and family while taking a break from the 82-game regular-season grind. Which is a perfect opportunity to get some candid answers to an array of questions.
Here are around a dozen All-Stars giving us their takes on an NHL team in Salt Lake City, how they’d change overtime rules, their most coveted pieces of sports memorabilia and how superstitious they are (or are not) and much more.
How would you change NHL overtime rules?
Jake Oettinger, Dallas Stars: I would do a 10-minute overtime. Still 3-on-3. Try that out for a bit. And then if that doesn’t work, because everyone likes to keep possession, maybe you do a no over-and-back rule.
Clayton Keller, Arizona Coyotes: I like it how it is. But if there’s a penalty, I’d like to see us go 3-on-2 [on the power play] instead of 4-on-3. It think it should be easier to score I guess. You can tee it up from up close.
Leon Draisaitl, Edmonton Oilers: I’d keep it the way it is, even if we’re not great at it this season. [Laughs.] But I wouldn’t change it a whole lot.
Frank Vatrano, Anaheim Ducks: I think the red line should be a blue line. I think they should take both blue lines out and have the red line act as a blue line. It would open the zone more. When you see guys taking it back, it’s all about possession. So take the blue lines out and have the red line be the blue line for both sides.
Jesper Bratt, New Jersey Devils: There have been so many thoughts about it lately, from the shot clock to the NBA offside rule. But our team has been doing pretty well in the overtimes this year so I think we should stick with whatever works. [Laughs.]
Tomas Hertl, San Jose Sharks: I like it. If anything, I might extend it a little, but there are so many regular-season games that it could be really tiring. I think the 3-on-3 is a really fun game.
Mathew Barzal, New York Islanders: Maybe once you get over the blue line, changing the blue line to the red line. So, the red line is now the offensive zone. Because it’s very possession-based right now, right? You see teams just circle back, circle back; I don’t know. I think the o-zone sometimes when you’re man-on-man can get a little bit stagnant. I think if you open it up, it’ll allow guys to create a lot more speed and might change things up a little bit.
Brady Tkachuk, Ottawa Senators: Not bringing the puck past the red line. If you have it, you have to keep it in the offensive zone or just before the red line, but not crossing it.
Sam Reinhart, Florida Panthers: Not just an OT [thing], but sometimes [a rule] doesn’t fit the crime. Like, sometimes you could get tapped in the face and you could be bleeding and [the other guy] gets a four-minute penalty. But sometimes, you could get smoked in the face and you’re not bleeding and they get only two minutes. I don’t have an answer of how to change it. But certainly it’s something I’ve thought about that doesn’t always seem to fit the situation.
What do you think of Salt Lake City as an NHL city?
Jeremy Swayman, Boston Bruins: I’d love it. I got to visit Salt Lake City a couple of summers ago. They’ve got some pretty great mountains there, so I know I’ll enjoy that trip. Any city that’s willing to put an NHL rink there, I’m in love with.
Boone Jenner, Columbus Blue Jackets: From what I’ve heard, that’s a great city. I’ve never been out there but whenever you get talks like that [around expansion], it’s exciting and we’ll see what happens with it.
Kyle Connor, Winnipeg Jets: It’d be really cool. I think it’d be an awesome market. The Jazz do really well there and they’ve got the Winter Olympics coming there [in 2034]. You don’t have too many [pro] teams out west and a lot of those teams are growing though. I think it’d be a great market, great winter activity to do for fans as well. I think as players it’d be a great opportunity. If you look at the success of Seattle and Vegas, the template is there and they’ve had success right away.
Rasmus Dahlin, Buffalo Sabres: That would be great news. It’s really good to expand the league, get more fans involved, get more kids playing and growing the sport in Utah and places like that. It’s a good thing that we expand hockey as much as possible.
Hertl: We played there this year for one of our preseason games. I think it was a cool spot and the fans when we played were great. So I think it would be a good opportunity for expansion or whatever team, but I think it’s a good city.
Oettinger: I’d be great. I don’t know much about it. But I did watch “The Last Dance” Michael Jordan documentary when he played against the Jazz and it seemed like a great sports town.
Bratt: I’ve heard it’s a really cool place. Obviously adding another team would be great for the league and for the fans.
Draisaitl: I think it would be great. Anytime a new team comes into the league it’s exciting. Everyone would love it. Great spot.
Barzal: I think it’d be cool. Never been out there, but I think it’d be great. It’d be cool to have a new city like that. I’d be excited about it.
Vatrano: Never been there, but my cousins played there in the ECHL, and they loved it. So it sounds exciting.
Reinhart: I’ve never been but I’ve only heard some of the best things. If the NHL could expand there, I think it would be pretty exciting.
Tkachuk: I don’t know too much about it, but my dad still talks about the 2002 Olympics and that silver medal. Funny story: I got to take that medal to show-and-tell in second grade, so that was pretty cool.
Any thoughts on Lewis Hamilton moving to Ferrari?
Hertl: I love F1. I just found out about this while I was leaving and I was really surprised. I’m a Red Bull guy because I have some things going on with Red Bull. But it’s interesting. I can imagine seeing Hamilton in the red because he’s a merciless guy.
Bratt: That was a little bit of a shock. Mercedes is probably thinking about having to move on and start something fresh. And George Russell is there and doing really good. So it’s an interesting move, but it’s going to be good seeing him with Ferarri.
Reinhart: I became a fan from “Drive To Survive” from a couple of years ago. It’s made it pretty easy to follow and get coverage in America. But Lewis Hamilton to Ferrari? It’s lookin’ weird already. [Laughs.]
If you could have any piece or hockey or sports memorabilia, what would it be? Or do you own something unique?
Bratt: When I was like 6 or 7 years old, I got a signed stick from Peter Forsberg. It said “good luck with hockey” or “work hard” or something like that. I had it in my room growing up. It’s still in my parents’ house. I would look at it when I woke up in the morning because it was a cool piece of advice. I appreciated that signed stick. I saw him a couple of years ago but didn’t really have a chance to tell him what it meant to me, so hopefully I can tell him one day.
Oettinger: For my whole career, I’ve been dying to get a Henrik Lundqvist signed stick and I just got one two weeks ago. It’s the best gift I’ve ever gotten in my life. My guy at Bauer hooked me up. He had a case that he gave me. I thought it was going to be an All-Star stick. He’s like “open it up” and I open it up and it was one of his used sticks, signed. One of the coolest things I’ll ever own.
Keller: Michael Jordan’s shoes from his last game in the NBA.
Vatrano: A Sidney Crosby stick. I hope I can get one this weekend. I don’t like asking guys, putting them on the spot. It’s not in me to ask people for things. Maybe our media [relations] person can ask for me.
Hertl: I got a Cristiano Ronaldo jersey signed. That’s probably the best thing I’ll ever get. He’s one of my favorite athletes. My brother got it for me. It’s a really cool thing.
Reinhart: I’ve got a couple of signed Barcelona things. I’ve got an Andrés Iniesta signed photo that was personalized. I have a few signed Messi things. All pretty cool being a big soccer fan.
Connor: I’m a big Detroit Lions fan, so maybe like a Calvin Johnson jersey from back in the day; he was my guy. Or Barry Sanders. That would be pretty cool. I’d take something from Tiger Woods too, I’m a huge golf fan. You can’t go wrong.
Swayman: A Stanley Cup would be nice.
On a scale of 1-to-10, how superstitious are you as an athlete?
Oettinger: I’m going to go like 4 or 5. You can ask my teammates or my fiancé or my friends. Nothing too crazy. I just try to go out there and have fun.
Keller: I shouldn’t call it superstition. “Routine,” I would call it. And I’d say I’m about a 7. I like to wear the same socks if we win or if I played well. [Q: “So if you were on an Oilers streak, that’d be kinda gross?”] Yeah I’d probably have to wash them at some point.
Draisaitl: I’m an 8 to 9. Pretty superstitious. A lot of things I do that are exactly the same. Like, I always leave my house at the same time for games. Stuff like that.
Vatrano: I don’t like to use the word superstitious. More like “routine.” So I’d say a 5. Like, I have to put everything on my left side on first. My stick can’t touch the ground after I tape it. But, you know, other than that … but I’m not crazy. If my stick touches the ground, I’m not going to go re-tape it. I’m a 5. I’m right in the middle. Anything over 5 is crazy.
Bratt: I wouldn’t say I’m superstitious. I just have some routines. If I don’t do them it’s not like I’m breaking down because of it. I can change a routine, but a superstition is something that you can’t live without. So when the routines kick in, I’d say around an 8 or a 9. But superstitious I’m only around a 4.
Hertl: I’m a 5. Right in the middle. I don’t know if it’s superstition. It might be more like routines. But I do them all the time so maybe it is superstition. I don’t know. It’s probably both a routine and a superstition.
Barzal: Honestly, I’ll occasionally get superstitious. Like, it’s not an everyday thing; it’s more like if something random occurs one day, and I have a good game that night, maybe I’ll try to recreate that random moment that I had. I don’t know what it would be. But maybe somebody called me that hasn’t called me in a while. Maybe I will call him again the next game day.
Jenner: I’d be, like, an 8 or a 9. Probably it used to be at 9½. Got it down to an 8 now. It was just getting to be too much. We were getting too close to a 10.
Tkachuk: I’m a 1. I trust in my abilities.
Swayman: I’m like a negative-2. Although maybe that’s why I’m superstitious — because I’m not superstitious.
Lane Kiffin could not resist taking a shot at Brent Venables, sarcastically accusing the Oklahoma coach of a “hot take” in his evaluation of last weekend’s game against Ole Miss.
Kiffin and the seventh-ranked Rebels rallied for a 34-26 victory Saturday in Norman, Oklahoma, against Venables and the Sooners. Venables said Sunday that he thought Oklahoma was “the better team” before conceding that Ole Miss “out-executed us.”
“That’s an interesting take. That’s a hot take [that] they have the better team,” Kiffin said Monday when asked about Venables’ comments. “I wouldn’t have thought that people watching would say that.
“I felt that one, we won at their place in weather that — as a defensive head coach — you would normally wish for, and won by eight points. And I think we left a lot out there. I think we should have won by a couple of scores. So I don’t know how he evaluated that game that they were the better team.”
Kiffin cited Ole Miss’ 26-14 victory last season at home against Oklahoma before mentioning other previous games he has coached against Venables’ teams.
“Maybe they had the better team last year, too, when we beat them,” said Kiffin, who shrugged before apologizing for interrupting a reporter’s follow-up question. “Sorry … maybe he had the better team in Oklahoma, when we beat him 55-19 in the national championship — maybe.
“Maybe he had the better team at Clemson, when we beat him 45-40 in the national championship at Alabama. Next question, my bad.”
Kiffin was an assistant under Pete Carroll at USC when the Trojans beat the Sooners for the national title after the 2004 season. Venables was a defensive assistant on that Oklahoma team.
The coaches squared off again for the national championship 11 years later, when Kiffin was the offensive coordinator for the Nick Saban-coached Alabama team that beat Clemson for the NCAA title after the 2015 season. Venables was the Tigers’ defensive coordinator that year.
Kiffin’s Rebels were successful offensively Saturday against the Sooners, finishing with 431 yards of total offense against a Venables-coached team that led the nation in total defense and ranked second in scoring defense heading into the weekend.
“We had way more yards, 21 first downs to 14, and we played 87 plays of offense and they had one sack and didn’t force any turnovers,” Kiffin said. “That’s an interesting take. But whatever he needs to say.”
Ole Miss is scheduled to visit Oklahoma again next season. The Rebels (7-1, 4-1 SEC) host South Carolina in their next game Saturday, while the Sooners (6-2, 2-2) visit No. 14 Tennessee.
The SEC has asked the NCAA to rescind a pending rule change that will allow athletes and athletic department staff members to bet on professional sports beginning on Nov. 1, according to a copy of a memo obtained by ESPN.
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey sent a letter to NCAA president Charlie Baker on Oct. 25, stating that during an Oct. 13 conference meeting, “The message of our Presidents and Chancellors was clear and united: this policy change represents a major step in the wrong direction.”
Last week, the NCAA’s Division I cabinet approved a rule change to allow betting on professional sports, and Division II and III management councils also signed off on it, allowing it to go into effect on Saturday. NCAA athletes are still prohibited from betting on college sports and sharing information about college sports with bettors. Betting sites also aren’t allowed to advertise or sponsor NCAA championships.
“On behalf of our universities, I write to urge action by the NCAA Division I Board of Directors to rescind this change and reaffirm the Association’s commitment to maintaining strong national standards that keep collegiate participants separated from sports wagering activity at every level,” Sankey wrote. “If there are legal or practical concerns about the prior policy, those should be addressed through careful refinement — not through wholesale removal of the guardrails that have long supported the integrity of games and the well-being of those who participate.”
If the rule goes into effect, it would mark a shift in a long-held policy that had become difficult to enforce with an increase in legal sports betting in the United States. The NCAA has faced an uptick in alleged betting violations by players in recent years. In September, the NCAA announced that a Fresno State men’s basketball player had manipulated his own performance for gambling purposes and conspired with two other players in a prop betting scheme. The NCAA is investigating 13 additional players from six schools regarding potential gambling violations dealing with integrity issues.
On Oct. 22, when the NCAA announced the adoption of the new proposal, it stated that approving the rule change “is not an endorsement of sports betting, particularly for student-athletes.”
“Our action reflects alignment across divisions while maintaining the principles that guide college sports,” said Roberta Page, director of athletics at Slippery Rock and chair of the Division II Management Council, in the NCAA’s news release. “This change recognizes the realities of today’s sports environment without compromising our commitment to protecting the integrity of college competition or the well-being of student-athletes.”
Sankey wrote that the “integrity of competition is directly threatened when anyone with insider access becomes involved in gambling.” He also said the SEC is “equally concerned about the vulnerability of our student-athletes.”
“The SEC’s Presidents and Chancellors believe the NCAA should restore its prior policy-or a modified policy-communicating a prohibition on gambling by student-athletes and athletics staff, regardless of the divisional level of their sport,” Sankey wrote. “While developing and enacting campus or conference-level policy may be considered, the NCAA’s policy has long stood as an expression of our collective integrity, and its removal sends the wrong signal at a time when the gambling industry is expanding its reach and influence.”
Data analyst and reporter for ESPN’s Enterprise and Investigative Unit.
Winner, 2014 Alfred I. duPont Columbia University Award; finalist, 2012 IRE broadcast award; winner, 2011 Gannett Foundation Award for Innovation in Watchdog Journalism; Emmy nominated, 2009.
Former LSU coach Brian Kelly’s $54 million buyout would bring the amount of money owed to FBS head football coaches fired this season to $167.7 million, according to publicly available data and reports.
Kelly’s buyout, which is still being negotiated with LSU, is the highest of the 2025 season so far, topping the $49 million owed to Penn State‘s ex-coach James Franklin, who was fired on Oct. 12.
Also included in the $167.7 million:
$21 million for Billy Napier, fired from Florida Oct. 19.
$15 million for Mike Gundy, fired from Oklahoma State Sept 23.
$9.8 million owned to Sam Pittman, fired from Arkansas Sept. 28.
$6 million for Brent Pry, fired from Virginia Tech Sept. 14.
$5 million for DeShaun Foster, fired from UCLA Sept. 14.
$4 million for Trent Bray, fired from Oregon State Oct. 12.
$2.4 million for Trent Dilfer, fired from UAB Oct. 12.
$1.5 million for Jay Norvell, fired from Colorado State Oct. 19.
Buyout totals are subject to change in certain circumstances; for example, if Kelly or Franklin land new jobs, the schools that fired them owe them less money. Napier’s contract with Florida, on the other hand, did not include offset language, and half of his buyout is owed to him within 30 days of his firing.
Kelly’s buyout is the second largest in college football history, behind Texas A&M‘s record $76 million buyout of Jimbo Fisher in 2023. Both coaches were hired by current LSU athletic director Scott Woodward, who ran the Texas A&M athletic department from 2016 to 2019.
“We had high hopes that [Kelly] would lead us to multiple SEC and national championships during his time in Baton Rouge,” Woodward said when he announced the firing, which came a day after the Tigers’ 49-25 loss to Texas A&M. “Ultimately, the success at the level that LSU demands simply did not materialize, and I made the decision to make a change after last night’s game.
The $168.1 million applies to coaches who have been fired since the start of the 2025 season and does not include coaches who were fired over the offseason.