Connect with us

Published

on

With spring ball underway, it’s becoming more and more apparent how our Way-Too-Early Top 25 teams will perform come fall. But whether it’s inexperience showing or a complete makeover of a wide receiver room, there are plenty of things these teams are leaning on, such as an elite defense or a veteran quarterback.

Our college football experts break down every team’s strength and weakness.

Strength: Star power. The Buckeyes have arguably the top offensive and defensive players returning in college football in wide receiver Jeremiah Smith and safety Caleb Downs. Both standouts figure to be on every preseason All-America team after playing massive roles during Ohio State’s national championship run through the playoff.

Weakness: Inexperience. With the bulk of last season’s title team now preparing for the NFL draft, the Buckeyes will introduce eight new starters on defense and a bevy of new faces on offense. That includes quarterback, where freshman Julian Sayin will enter the spring as the favorite to succeed Will Howard. — Jake Trotter


Strength: Impact defenders. The Longhorns lose star power on the back end with Jahdae Barron and Andrew Mukuba gone, but between edge rushers Colin Simmons and Trey Moore, linebackers Anthony Hill Jr. and Liona Lefau and safety Michael Taaffe, defensive coordinator Pete Kwiatkowski will disrupt offenses while new players fit into place.

Weakness: Growing pains. Steve Sarkisian centered his Texas rebuild around the need for “big humans,” and the Longhorns’ offensive and defensive lines were strengths during their past two playoff runs. Both will see wholesale makeovers this year, with one full-time starter returning on the OL and just two scholarship interior defensive lineman coming back. There is a lot of talent, of course, but not much time for the newcomers to grow up, with a road trip to Ohio State kicking off the season and the SEC schedule awaiting. — Dave Wilson


Strength: An elite defense. The Nittany Lions had good defenses earlier in coach James Franklin’s tenure, but they reached a higher rung in the past two seasons under coordinators Manny Diaz and Tom Allen. Now they’ve plucked playcaller Jim Knowles from national champion Ohio State to oversee a unit that, despite losing Abdul Carter and others, returns impressive contributors in end Dani Dennis-Sutton, linebacker Dominic DeLuca, safety Zakee Wheatley and others.

Weakness: Wide receiver. Penn State’s drop-off at wide receiver has been glaring at a time when the team’s overall talent has improved. After losing Mackey Award-winning tight end Tyler Warren to the NFL, the Nittany Lions need reliable options to emerge for quarterback Drew Allar in his final year. Penn State returns Liam Clifford and went to the portal for transfers Kyron Hudson (USC) and Devonte Ross (Troy). — Adam Rittenberg


Strength: The secondary. Losing Xavier Watts and Benjamin Morrison might be a huge red flag at a lot of schools. Not at Notre Dame, where the defensive backfield remains elite. Start with sophomore corner Leonard Moore, who established himself as one of the top young prospects in the country last season, allowing less than 40% completions and racking up 11 pass breakups and two picks. Christian Gray was a solid performer on the other side, while Adon Shuler blossomed at safety. Notre Dame added a solid option at safety in Virginia Tech transfer Jalen Stroman. The back end of the defense should be the strength of this unit, just as it was a year ago.

Weakness: Quarterback. Perhaps “weakness” is the wrong word here. Marcus Freeman likes what he has to work with at the position. But after two straight years with veteran QBs, Notre Dame will turn to someone without much playing time under his belt in 2025. Who? Well, that’s the big question. Steve Angeli has a leg up based on experience — even though he doesn’t have much of it — but redshirt freshman CJ Carr has a chance to be special. The battle to see who leads the offense will be among the most watched in all of college football, and finding the right answer might be the biggest obstacle between now and another playoff bid for Notre Dame. — David Hale


Strength: Linebackers. Even after losing star linebacker Jalon Walker, a potential first-round pick in the NFL draft, and three-year starter Smael Mondon Jr., Georgia’s linebackers figure to be the heart of the defense in 2025. CJ Allen is the leader of the unit after ranking second on the team with 76 tackles to go with three tackles for loss and five quarterback hurries last season. Gabe Harris Jr. and Raylen Wilson got plenty of action last season, and Chris Cole was named to the All-SEC freshman team by the league’s coaches. Allen, Cole and Wilson were ranked either the No. 1 or No. 2 linebacker prospects in the classes of 2023 and 2024 by ESPN’s recruiting analysts. Georgia coach Kirby Smart also added freshman Zayden Walker, the No. 1 outside linebacker prospect in the class of 2025.

Weakness: Running backs. As hard as it is to believe, the program that produced NFL running backs Nick Chubb, D’Andre Swift and James Cook in recent years might have a question mark at the position going into the season. Nate Frazier returns after leading the team with 671 yards as a freshman in 2024. Trevor Etienne, who had 631 yards with nine touchdowns last season, left for the NFL. Injuries have hampered top backups Branson Robinson and Roderick Robinson II, who combined for only 29 carries last season. They’re missing spring practice, because of knee and ankle injuries, respectively. The Bulldogs also bring back third-down back Cash Jones, Chauncey Bowens, Dwight Phillips Jr. and add freshman Bo Walker. Georgia averaged only 124.4 rushing yards in 2024, which ranked next to last in the SEC and was the worst mark in the Smart era. — Mark Schlabach


Strength: Front seven. Despite the departures of Jordan Burch and Derrick Harmon to the NFL, this is where Dan Lanning’s recruiting — and Oregon’s development — has shined. With both Matayo Uiagalelei (16 tackles for loss, 12.5 sacks, 4 pass breakups, an interception and 2 forced fumbles) and Teitum Tuioti (12 tackles for loss, 7.5 sacks, 2 pass breakups) set to enter their junior seasons, the once-youthful freshmen who made an impact right away are ready to lead a group of edge rushers who could make up one of the strongest units in the nation.

Weakness: Quarterback. It might be too early to say that this position is a true weakness until we see Dante Moore play inside this offense, but he will have big shoes to fill after the Ducks’ past two quarterbacks (Bo Nix and Dillon Gabriel) turned Autzen Stadium into their playground. Moore is in good hands; he’s working with offensive coordinator Will Stein, who should help him improve and excel. Moore is also coming off two unusual seasons in the sport: starting as a true freshman at UCLA and being thrown right into the fire, then sitting a year behind Gabriel. Now that Oregon is handing the reins to Moore, we’ll quickly be able to see how much he has learned and how much the Ducks allow him to do within the offense. — Paolo Uggetti


Strength: Quarterback. Cade Klubnik enters his third full season as the starter, so this has to be a strength for the Tigers. We have watched Klubnik mature over the past two seasons from an often-unsure first-time starter to a player in far more command of the offseason last year, and he had an under-the-radar great performance in 2024 (3,639 yards, 36 TDs, 6 INTs). Clemson returns its top three receivers, and it gets Tyler Brown back from injury, so the potential is there for this to be the Tigers’ best offense since Trevor Lawrence‘s last season in 2020.

Weakness: Running back. We have pointed out previously that this is the biggest question mark on the team following the departure of starter Phil Mafah (NFL draft), injury to Jay Haynes (knee rehab) and general lack of experienced depth. That is why, at least for now, this position is considered a “weakness.” There is plenty of talent, starting with freshman Gideon Davidson, but we simply don’t know how the rotation will shape up and who is going to get the bulk of the reps. — Andrea Adelson


Strength: Quarterback. What a luxury it is to enter a season with a proven, experienced quarterback who is the leading returning passer in the SEC. Garrett Nussmeier will be in his fifth year on campus and his second season as a starter. He threw for 4,052 yards, 29 touchdowns and 12 interceptions last season. Nussmeier is 10-4 as a starter, and he is now fully in charge of the LSU offense and should be poised for his most productive season. He has a group of talented pass catchers to throw to, including transfers Nic Anderson and Barion Brown, as well as speedy slot receiver Aaron Anderson, who had a breakout season a year ago with 61 catches for 884 yards.

Weakness: Retooling the offensive line. The Tigers lose four starting offensive linemen from a year ago, including projected first-round NFL draft pick Will Campbell at left tackle. Josh Thompson, a transfer from Northwestern, could play tackle or guard, and LSU likes its young talent up front. But there will be a lot of new faces in new places. Sophomore Weston Davis has a big opportunity to win the right tackle job after playing sparingly as a highly touted true freshman last season. The only returning starter, DJ Chester, is likely to move from center to guard. — Chris Low


Strength: Overall defense. It would definitely be fair to point to the return of quarterback Jake Retzlaff as an obvious strength; anytime you return the starting quarterback from an 11-win team, you’re in good shape. But this BYU team won with defense, and it has enough key players returning to expect it to be one of the best units in the country again.

Weakness: Defensive line. As good as the defense will be, there are some holes to fill on the line. This is nitpicking, though. Tyler Batty‘s departure is the one that looms largest, both in terms of production and leadership. But Blake Mangelson, Isaiah Bagnah and John Nelson were also key contributors, and the depth without them is questionable. — Kyle Bonagura


Strength: Front seven. The Gamecocks powered one of the nation’s stingiest defenses with a dominant front in 2024, and that unit should carry South Carolina again this fall despite significant offseason turnover. All-SEC freshman Dylan Stewart looks poised for a Year 2 jump and will start opposite senior Bryan Thomas Jr., who logged 4.5 sacks a year ago. Down five starters from last season’s front seven, the Gamecocks hit the portal for key reinforcements including transfer tackles Gabriel Brownlow-Dindy (Texas A&M) and Zavion Hardy (East Mississippi CC) and linebacker transfers Justin Okoronkwo (Alabama) and Shawn Murphy (Florida State).

Weakness: Interior offensive line. South Carolina enters 2025 without the center (Vershon Lee) and both starting guards (Kamaar Bell and Torricelli Simpkins III) who paved the way for the SEC’s fourth-ranked rushing attack last fall. Troy transfer Boaz Stanley projects to take over at center, and newcomers Nick Sharpe (Wake Forest) and Rodney Newsome Jr. (Western Kentucky) arrive as the likeliest options to fill in the guard spots. Can that trio — playing between starting tackles Josiah Thompson and Cason Henry — jell well enough to protect LaNorris Sellers and move bodies for transfer running back Rahsul Faison? — Eli Lederman


Strength: Quarterback. Rocco Becht, who threw for 3,505 yards with 25 touchdowns in 2024, will return for his third year as ISU’s starter. There were some inconsistencies throughout last season, but Becht will be among the best quarterbacks in the Big 12. He was particularly good in the bowl game against Miami, throwing for three touchdowns in a 42-41 win.

Weakness: Receiver. Let’s just call it a question mark. The Cyclones relied on two of the best receivers in the country last season — Jaylin Noel and Jayden Higgins — and they accounted for 167 of the 277 catches on the team (60.3%). No other true receiver had more than 11 catches. With that type of production to replace, the team is starting over. — Bonagura


Strength: Defensive front. It starts in the interior with 325-pound Tim Keenan III, who’s back for his redshirt senior season, and James Smith, a prime candidate to be Alabama’s top breakout player on defense and a dynamic playmaker in the middle of that defensive line. LT Overton is also back for his senior season after leading the team with nine quarterback hurries in 2024. He was Alabama’s most impactful pass rusher. Florida transfer Kelby Collins is a key addition, an edge rusher who has shown he can get to the quarterback going up against SEC tackles.

Weakness: Receiver depth. Ryan Williams had an exceptional freshman campaign, especially the way he torched defenses the first part of the season. The challenge now is to find more dependable playmakers around him at the receiver position. Germie Bernard is back after leading Alabama with 50 catches last season. The Alabama coaches are excited about the talent at receiver, but which players are going to emerge as options 3, 4 and 5? Miami transfer Isaiah Horton is one to watch. — Low


Strength: Overall experience. Illinois didn’t suffer the normal experience drain that comes with winning 10 games for the first time since 2001. A few key players had their eligibility expire, but Illinois retained several potential NFL draft departures, and it avoided critical portal losses. Quarterback Luke Altmyer is back for a third season as the starter, and he will play behind a seasoned line. All-Big Ten selections Xavier Scott and Gabe Jacas lead a defense that returns mostly intact.

Weakness: Lack of explosiveness on offense. Illinois finished last season ranked 92nd nationally in yards per game and 71st in yards per play. The team also loses most of its receiving production with Pat Bryant (54 catches, 984 yards, 10 touchdowns) and Zakhari Franklin (55 catches, 652 yards, 4 touchdowns) departing. Illinois likely will need an uptick in rushing production from a group of ball-carriers to help offset the wideout losses. — Rittenberg


Strength: Coaching. We’re mostly focusing on players here, but let’s make an exception at ASU. The job Kenny Dillingham has done at his alma mater is one of the most impressive turnarounds we’ve seen in college football in recent years. To go from the bottom of the Pac-12 to the playoff in consecutive seasons is almost inconceivable. It should give ASU fans the confidence that they’ll be competitively relevant as long as he’s around.

Weakness: Running back. The question here is how the Sun Devils will fill the void left by Cam Skattebo. He ran for 1,711 yards, had another 605 in receiving yards and was one of the best players in college football. Maybe it’s unfair to say their running backs are a weakness; the opportunity to prove otherwise just wasn’t there last season. Kanye Udoh‘s arrival from Army, where he ran for 1,117 yards last season, is promising, though, and Kyson Brown did have a 100-yard rushing performance against Arizona. — Bonagura


Strength: Tight end RJ Maryland looked like one of the best tight ends in the ACC and a genuine NFL prospect through the first half of last season before going down with an injury. Matthew Hibner picked up the slack the rest of the way and didn’t miss a beat. Maryland should be back to 100 percent for the season, and Hibner returns, giving SMU a terrific one-two punch that should equate to some dynamic options in the passing game. Given the turnover at wideout, this could be a big area for SMU to rely on as the Mustangs look to make it back to the College Football Playoff.

Weakness: Established skill players. The three leading receivers from last season are gone, including do-it-all tailback Brashard Smith, meaning there’s a big void as SMU searches for reliable playmakers. There are options, including Romello Brinson, Jordan Hudson and a pair of talented freshman at receiver and LJ Johnson Jr., Miami transfer Chris Johnson and Derrick McFall at tailback — but none of those players is a sure thing. Last year, Smith was as dynamic as anyone in the country — an explosive runner, an effective pass catcher, a better-than-expected blocker. Is there anyone who can become that guy this year? Or will SMU need to dip back into the portal to fill out its ranks? — Hale


Strength: Big plays. In his second season as the starting quarterback, Avery Johnson (responsible for 32 TDs last year, one of three Power 4 QBs with 2,700 yards passing and 600 rushing) can get the ball to running back Dylan Edwards, (7.4 yards per carry), Jayce Brown (17.5 yards per catch) and New Mexico transfer WR Caleb Medford, who has averaged 18.5 yards per catch on 29 career receptions.

Weakness: A DB makeover. The Wildcats lost the Big 12 Defensive Lineman of the Year, Brendan Mott, who was a pass-rush disruptor, along with their three top corners (including draft prospect Jacob Parrish), from a defense that ranked 77th versus the pass last season. But they have added transfer corners Jayden Rowe (Oklahoma) and Amarion Fortenberry (South Alabama) along with safeties Gunner Maldonado (Arizona) and Mar’Quavious Moss (West Georgia), so we’ll see if they can fill the gaps left behind. — Wilson


Strength: Defensive star power is back. The faces of Indiana’s defense won’t look much different from those who helped propel the team to a 10-0 start and a CFP appearance. Three first-team All-Big Ten defenders return in end Mikail Kamara, linebacker Aiden Fisher and cornerback D’Angelo Ponds. Indiana also retained coordinator Bryant Haines, a Broyles Award finalist. Haines will need to build depth at all three levels, but he can lean on productive players to lead the way.

Weakness: Interior line play. For all the great things Indiana did in 2024, its line play, especially on offense, was exposed in losses to Ohio State and Notre Dame. The offensive line will look dramatically different, and Indiana will need immediate contributions from transfers like Pat Coogan (Notre Dame), Kahlil Benson (Colorado) and Zen Michalski (Ohio State). The defensive line also suffered significant losses with the departures of James Carpenter and CJ West. If IU can’t hold up in the middle of its lines, a drop-off is likely. — Rittenberg


Strength: Offensive line. The Gators bring back four starters — including All-America center Jake Slaughter — to a unit that gave up 20 sacks last fall, tied for 40th-best nationally and down from 39 sacks allowed in 2023. That continuity bodes well as Florida continues to build around quarterback DJ Lagway and Freshman All-SEC rusher Jadan Baugh. The Gators have a hole to fill at right tackle following the graduation of 11-game starter Brandon Crenshaw-Dickson; redshirt sophomore Bryce Lovett and veterans Devon Manuel and Kamryn Waites should all factor into competition for the open tackle spot opposite Austin Barber.

Weakness: Wide receiver. Florida has its quarterback in Lagway, but the state of the Gators’ receiving corps is less certain following the departures of leading pass catchers Chimere Dike and Elijah Badger. Eugene Wilson III, a freshman All-American in 2023, returns after suffering a season-ending hip injury last fall, and UCLA transfer J. Michael Sturdivant stands as another proven downfield target after four seasons with the Bruins. Freshmen Vernell Brown III, Dallas Wilson and Naeshaun Montgomery represent a trio of less experienced options, but each could be called upon to play a role in the passing for the Gators in 2025. — Lederman


Strength: Big-play defenders. Defensive line depth was the backbone of Tennessee’s playoff team last season. Some key pieces from that defensive line are gone, but several of the Vols’ impact defenders are back, starting with leading tackler Arion Carter at linebacker and Joshua Josephs at defensive end. They combined for 15.5 tackles for loss last season. In the middle of the defensive line, Bryson Eason and Jaxson Moi are both back, while cornerback Jermod McCoy — albeit coming off a torn ACL in January — and safety Boo Carter are stalwarts in a deep secondary.

Weakness: Proven playmakers at receiver. As quarterback Nico Iamaleava steps into his second season as Tennessee’s starting quarterback, he’ll do so without four of his top five pass catchers from a year ago. The Vols were lacking when it came to explosive plays in the passing game last season, which means it’s time for former five-star prospect Mike Matthews to step up and be a bona fide downfield threat after catching just seven passes last season. The same goes for holdovers Chris Brazzell II and Braylon Staley, Alabama transfer Amari Jefferson and maybe even Carter, who’s planning to pull double duty at safety and receiver. — Low


Strength: The ground game. No Power 4 running back (minimum 100 carries) had a better rushing average last year than Louisville’s Isaac Brown (7.11). Lower the qualifying amount to 60 carries, however, and Brown is fourth. Instead, it’s his teammate, Duke Watson, who leads the way at 8.91 yards per rush. The pair of rising sophomores were as explosive a combination as there was in the country last season, racking up nearly 1,800 rushing yards and 18 touchdowns combined. They’re a year older now, and they’ll be running behind one of the best offensive lines in the ACC. The Cards will want to be balanced offensively, but put the ball in the hands of either Brown or Watson enough times and a home run is just waiting to happen.

Weakness: Interior D-line. Jordan Guerad and Rene Konga both return from a 2024 squad that wasn’t exactly great, and the depth behind them comes entirely from the portal (Denzel Lowry, Jerry Lawson). There’s upside here — especially after a fairly strong finish to 2024 by Guerad — but this is a group that still has a lot to prove. Wesley Bailey and Clev Lubin should be solid edge performers, but shoring up the middle of the defense will be an offseason priority, and it starts at the line of scrimmage. — Hale


Strength: Running game. The Wolverines always find a way to produce on the ground, and 2025 should be no different. Bowl game MVP Jordan Marshall and Alabama transfer Justice Haynes provide Michigan with a viable rushing duo. Key pieces up front, headlined by Giovanni El-Hadi, are back as well. The running game stands to benefit from what should be an improved passing attack.

Weakness: Pass catching. The Wolverines had just one player total more than 250 receiving yards last season, tight end Colston Loveland, who’s now preparing for the NFL draft. Inconsistent quarterbacking played a part. But Michigan’s wideouts didn’t produce nearly enough plays to strike fear in the opposition. The Wolverines are banking that a pair of portal additions in Donaven McCulley (Indiana) and Anthony Simpson (UMass) can bolster the playmaking on the perimeter. — Trotter


Strength: Stability. Mike Elko’s first task upon his hiring last year was just to build a team from a collection of individuals following a frantic re-recruiting process of his own roster, while patching holes in the portal. This year, the offensive line is much improved, and Marcel Reed is the entrenched starter at quarterback now with Conner Weigman‘s transfer to Houston. That’s something to build on.

Weakness: Familiar faces at receiver. The Aggies threw just 18 TD passes last year, and eight of them went to Noah Thomas, who transferred to Georgia. With Thomas gone, the Aggies lost their top five receivers. A&M landed Micah Hudson, a former five-star recruit from Texas Tech, in the portal, but he’s no longer with the team. KC Concepcion (NC State) and Mario Craver (Mississippi State) join sophomore Terry Bussey, a former five-star and a dynamic athlete, in the WR room’s extreme makeover. — Wilson


Strength: Running game. The Hurricanes believe they have the potential to field their best offensive line under Mario Cristobal, anchored by rising junior Francis Mauigoa and Anez Cooper on the right side. With Mark Fletcher Jr. and Jordan Lyle returning as the top two running backs, the Hurricanes should be able to run the ball more consistently this season.

Weakness: Secondary. This was a huge weakness last season when Miami struggled down the stretch with inconsistent play and a lack of depth. Miami added three highly rated players from the transfer portal to help shore up the unit and perhaps force turnovers. Miami had 14 total interceptions last season, ranking in the bottom fourth of the country and in particular had a drop-off in its safety play. Miami needs a far better performance from this group in 2025. — Adelson


Strength: Quarterback. After being the guy who simply handed the ball off to Ashton Jeanty for most of the season and then turning into the guy who nearly helped the Broncos upset Penn State with his marvelous play under center, 2025 could be Maddux Madsen‘s breakout year. Madsen was impressive throughout last season managing the offense (3,080 yards, 23 touchdowns and only six turnovers), avoiding mistakes and playing winning football. Another year in the offense will only do wonders for Madsen and sure, he won’t have the safety blanket that was Jeanty behind him, but if anyone can figure out how to evolve as a player in these circumstances, Madsen has shown he has more talent and ability than first meets the eye.

Weakness: Running back. Let’s not go too far away from Madsen under center. This is an obvious pick, but it’s obvious for a reason. Replacing Jeanty, his leadership, energy, production and overall gravity, are an impossible task, but if Boise State wants to return to the College Football Playoff this coming season, they’ll need to at least partially or collectively try to get as close as they can to replicate Jeanty’s 374 carry, 2,601, 29-touchdown season. Good luck with that. — Uggetti


Strength: Defensive line. Walter Nolen, Princely Umanmielen, JJ Pegues and Jared Ivey — four high-impact players who charged one of the nation’s best defensive lines last fall — all are gone. Still, Ole Miss has the talent to make this unit a difference-maker in a renovated defense in 2025. Suntarine Perkins will again be one of the keys to the pass rush after turning in 10.5 sacks last fall, second most among SEC defenders. LSU transfer Da’Shawn Womack and Nebraska’s Princewill Umanmielen will add to that edge depth. Inside, Zxavian Harris, the towering, 6-foot-7, 320-pound nose tackle, is poised to slot into the spots where Pegues and Nolen were so effective a year ago.

Weakness: Secondary. Defensive coordinator Pete Golding’s best-in-the-nation run defense helped balance a bottom-half SEC secondary last season. Assuming even a slight regression in the Ole Miss front seven in 2025, there will be more pressure on a wholly unproven Rebels defensive unit. Junior cornerback Chris Graves Jr. returns as the most experienced member of a secondary down its top eight snap-getters from a year ago. Ole Miss turned to the transfer portal to retool around him. Safety Sage Ryan arrives from LSU with 19 career starts in 43 games, and Jaylon Braxton (Arkansas) and Kapena Gushiken (Washington State) bring experience as well, but this is a new-look unit that will have to jell quickly in the fall. — Lederman

Continue Reading

Sports

Trends and shocking takeaways from the Stanley Cup playoffs’ second round

Published

on

By

Trends and shocking takeaways from the Stanley Cup playoffs' second round

The second round of the 2025 Stanley Cup playoffs has passed the midway point, with all but one series through Game 4.

What have been the biggest lessons learned through the first part of the second round? Which teams and players have surprised (in either a good or bad way)? How will all of it matter when it comes to the rest of the postseason?

ESPN reporters Ryan S. Clark, Kristen Shilton and Greg Wyshynski break it all down:


Could a recent playoff trend be a good omen for the Stars?

Of course, there’s still quite a bit that can change in the Winnipeg JetsDallas Stars series. But let’s just say that the Stars go on to win the series and advance to the Western Conference finals. It would be their third consecutive conference finals appearance, and their fourth visit since 2020. While they have yet to win the Stanley Cup during that window, does that level of consistency make them the preeminent team in the West?

There’s no shortage of challengers, with the Vegas Golden Knights winning the Cup in 2023, and the Edmonton Oilers coming within a game of doing so last season. If Dallas makes it to the next round, it will face one of those two.

But what makes the Stars’ situation one worth contextualizing is how it compares to other teams’ since the NHL moved to the Eastern/Western format in 1994. Beating the Jets and getting to a third straight conference finals would make the Stars just the fourth team under the current format to earn that distinction. The Detroit Red Wings did it first (from 1995 through 1998) and won two Stanley Cups. They did it again from 2007 through 2009, winning another title in 2008.

The most recent team was the Chicago Blackhawks, who did it from 2013 through 2015 and won two Cups. — Clark


Toronto needs a new tactic

The Maple Leafs looked like fish out of water in Game 4 against the Florida Panthers, a brutal 2-0 shutout loss in which the reigning Stanley Cup champions were in top form. Florida smothered Toronto with sustained offensive zone pressure, leading the Leafs to take multiple penalties and generally kill any ounce of momentum they tried to generate.

If it weren’t for a stellar (wasted) performance from goaltender Joseph Woll, the final score would have been a blowout, because Toronto had no answers for Florida’s heat.

play

0:52

Sam Bennett nets goal to double Panthers’ lead

Sam Bennett’s goal gives the Panthers a 2-0 lead halfway throughout the third period.

Unlike earlier in the series, when the Leafs were capitalizing on rush chances and literally spinning Sergei Bobrovsky in circles, the Panthers battened down the hatches to keep Toronto on the outside while boxing out better in front of Bobrovsky. If they can maintain that, and the Leafs can’t make adjustments, the Panthers are looking at a third straight Eastern Conference finals appearance.

Should Toronto want to make one of its own, it’s time to make some changes, and for its top skaters to step up. Mitch Marner doesn’t have a shot on goal since he scored the winner in Game 2. Auston Matthews doesn’t have a goal yet in the second round and hasn’t registered one against Florida in nine career postseason tilts.

Toronto coach Craig Berube said after Sunday’s loss that there are players the Leafs need more from — no names required. It’s clear. Both teams have owned home ice in the series so far. Toronto has that advantage still as this one becomes a best-of-three. The question is, what sort of counterpunch will the Leafs throw now that Florida’s claws are out and sharpened? — Shilton


Can Hellebuyck be trusted for the Olympics?

The first question Team USA’s brain trust will need to answer before the 2026 Winter Olympic men’s hockey tournament: Are the contests in Milan considered home games or road games? Because the answer could determine its starting goaltender.

At this point, Winnipeg Jets goalie Connor Hellebuyck‘s struggles on the road in the Stanley Cup playoffs have reached the point of absurdity. He has won the Vezina Trophy twice in his career and will win it again this season. He’s a finalist for the Hart (MVP). There isn’t much debate, statistically or anecdotally, that he’s the best goaltender in the world … in the regular season.

In his past 20 playoff games, Hellebuyck is 7-13 with a .866 save percentage and a 3.90 goals-against average. The balance of those putrid numbers have come on the road, where Hellebuyck has lost eight of his past nine starts with an .835 SP and a 5.20 GAA.

After the first round of the playoffs against the St. Louis Blues, the bar for Hellebuyck was set at “can he get through a road game without being pulled?” The good news in Game 3 against Dallas is that he cleared that bar. The bad news is that he lost again and wasn’t very good, letting in a fluttering Roope Hintz shot for Dallas’ first goal, and then scoring what the NHL ruled was an own goal on Alex Petrovic‘s kicked puck in the third.

“He had to make some big stops. Him and [Dallas goalie Jake] Oettinger, they were going kind of toe to toe,” Jets coach Scott Arniel said after the game. “But we’re going to be judged — not just Connor — by what happens on the road. We’ve got to win.”

Oettinger, by contrast, is 12-11 with a .909 SP and a 2.63 GAA in his past 23 road playoff games. That’s not great, but it certainly isn’t getting pulled three times in the first round, either.

The U.S. has a deep goalie pool, but Oettinger is seemingly the next man up, having served as Hellebuyck’s backup at the 4 Nations Face-Off in February. His play in this series and in other clutch moments — like the Stars’ Game 7 win against Colorado in Round 1 — should spark a conversation about the American’s Olympic starter, given Hellebuyck’s struggles when the games matter most.

However, it should be noted that Hellebuyck was outstanding at 4 Nations, with a 1.59 GAA and .932 SA in three games. Which begs the question: Perhaps you can trust him more playing in back of an All-Star team rather than the Winnipeg Jets, no matter where the games are played? — Wyshynski


The depth that has given the Oilers life could be the death of the Golden Knights

Seeing Adam Henrique score the first two goals in Game 4 before Evander Kane scored another did more than stake the Oilers to a 3-0 victory that now has them a win away from a second consecutive Western Conference finals appearance. It once again reinforced how the Oilers can rely on a level of depth that, by comparison, is lacking for the Golden Knights.

The statistic that has made that most clear is how the Oilers’ generational duo of Leon Draisaitl and Connor McDavid have combined to score just three of their team’s 15 goals. Draisaitl scored in Game 1, but the rest of those contributions, including the game winner, came from elsewhere in the lineup. Draisaitl did score the game winner in Game 2, but the previous four goals were scored by his teammates. In Game 3, Corey Perry scored the first two goals.

Now compare that to the Golden Knights. The trio of Ivan Barbashev, Tomas Hertl and Brett Howden combined to score 78 regular-season goals. They have been goalless through the first four games of their series against the Oilers. Vegas’ six primary defensemen combined to score 35 regular-season goals, with 17 of them belonging to Noah Hanifin and Shea Theodore. The group has only one goal in the series.

It’s a lack of scoring depth that has been further compounded by the fact that Jack Eichel, who led the Golden Knights with 94 points in the regular season, hasn’t scored in the series. Meanwhile, leading goal scorer Pavel Dorofeyev, who missed the first two games with an injury, has also been blanked since his return. — Clark


Own goals for everyone?

Fans love seeing goals scored as much as players enjoy scoring them — except when it’s on their own net. And we’ve seen some doozies in that latter category this round.

There was the own goal in Game 3 between Dallas and Winnipeg on Sunday, when Petrovic’s go-ahead goal was found (after a lengthy official review) to have gone off Hellebuyck’s stick into the net. The night before, it was Draisaitl’s stick that put a puck past Stuart Skinner to give Vegas a buzzer-beating goal (with 0.4 seconds left on the clock) and its first win of the series.

play

1:07

Golden Knights stun Oilers with Reilly Smith’s buzzer-beating goal

Reilly Smith scores a miraculous goal for the Golden Knights with 0.4 remaining to give them the win.

Morgan Rielly‘s stick guided a puck in past Woll in Game 3 of Toronto’s series against Florida to cut into the Leafs’ 2-1 advantage. Toronto eventually lost 5-4 in overtime.

It’s not like there’s a good moment to score on your own net, but could the timing on any of them have been worse? If you’ve ever wondered why “just put pucks on net” is a time-honored hockey cliché, here’s your answer: Because anything can happen. — Shilton


Coaching in his 10th postseason, Dallas Stars coach Pete DeBoer has witnessed some startling individual playoff performances from his players. Like Ilya Kovalchuk‘s 19 points in 23 games for the Devils in 2012. Or Joe Pavelski‘s 14 goals in 24 games for the Sharks in 2016.

But nothing like the postseason that Rantanen is putting together for the Stars.

“It’s the best performance I’ve gotten to witness, standing where I’m standing,” DeBoer said after Dallas’ Game 3 win. “But for me, he’s just getting started. He’s just warming up here. I think he’s on a mission.”

Through 10 games, Rantanen leads the playoffs in goals (nine) and points (18). At one point, he had scored or assisted on 15 of 16 goals for the Stars, dating back to the first round. He’s the first player in Stanley Cup playoffs history with five three-point games through a team’s first 10 playoff games.

“Huge pickup at the deadline. He’s been awesome for us,” defenseman Alexander Petrovic said. “He’s a great guy in the room. He’s been on a tear.”

play

1:07

Steve Levy to McAfee: We should be talking more about Mikko Rantanen, Stars

Steve Levy joins Pat McAfee and breaks down Mikko Rantanen’s hot play in the postseason for the Stars.

He has done all of this after a turbulent season in which he was traded twice — from Colorado to Carolina and then to Dallas — before signing a blockbuster extension with the Stars. He has answered questions about his offensive prowess without having the benefit of Nathan MacKinnon on his team. He entered the playoffs as one of the NHL’s best postseason scorers of the past several seasons. He has blown away those expectations and is the current leader for the Conn Smythe Trophy (postseason MVP).

Yet though all of this torrid scoring recently, the Jets blanked him in their Game 2 shutout in Winnipeg.

“The biggest thing is time and space,” Arniel said. “I know that you hear that a lot in hockey, but at the end of the day, the more he holds onto it, the more he’s comfortable, the harder it is to deny what he’s trying to do next.”

But The Moose was back on the loose in the Stars’ Game 3 win, with a goal and two assists.

“I’m trying to stay in the moment. I’m happy to help the team and try to keep doing that as much as I can, both ends of the ice,” Rantanen said.

It’s certainly Mikko Rantanen’s moment. — Wyshynski


Ovechkin, Perry defying Father Time

Corey Perry will turn 40 on Friday, while Alex Ovechkin will hit that milestone in September. Perry and Ovechkin are part of a five-member group of players age 39 or older who have played more than one game this postseason. But to suggest Ovechkin and Perry are each having strong postseason campaigns for players their age only partially explains what they have done so far.

In fact, they’re having two of the best postseason campaigns for two players in their age-39 season in NHL history.

Perry, a Stanley Cup winner who ranks 38th in career playoff goals, has scored five times this postseason. Ovechkin, a fellow Stanley Cup winner who is tied with Mario Lemieux for 12th in playoff goals, has four. They’re both within striking distance of the most playoff goals in an age-39 season, per Quant Hockey. That mark is currently held by Jean Béliveau, with Le Gros Bill scoring six goals in 1971. — Clark


But have the Hurricanes solved Ovi?

Some might accuse Ovechkin’s game of being increasingly “one note.” But when played right, it’s a damn good note. And right now, the Washington Capitals are desperate for more of his contributions to their orchestra, at least at even strength.

Ovechkin’s line has been stifled by Carolina’s defense — namely Jaccob Slavin and Brent Burns — so far in the series, and they’ve had far fewer shot attempts and chances than the opposition at 5-on-5. Ovechkin and linemate Dylan Strome especially thrive on creating chances off zone entries, and the Hurricanes aren’t giving them much in that respect.

Ovechkin continues to fight for open ice and does lead the Capitals in even-strength shots, but that hasn’t materialized into anything on the scoresheet; Ovechkin’s only goal of the series has been on the power play in Game 4.

Considering the Caps were just whacked 4-0 in Game 3 and 5-2 in Game 4, they are searching for consistent offensive contributions to carry them through. This is when Ovechkin has to start spinning his proverbial straw into gold again at full strength.

Washington got lucky in Game 2 after it was outshot 33-14 by the Hurricanes but still managed to come away with a 3-1 victory. If Carolina is finding its offensive groove now and beginning to solve Logan Thompson, then Washington must find ways to generate more offensive opportunities. That’s easier said than done against the Hurricanes’ smothering collective defensive game. — Shilton


Carolina is no joke

If you’ve been following the second round, you’ve undoubtedly come across a joke or two (or 10) about the relative quality of the Carolina Hurricanes‘ series against the Washington Capitals compared to that of the other three playoff series. Perhaps you’ve made a few yourself.

Monday night’s Game 4 was the outlier in what has otherwise been a grinding, tight-checking series in which four or fewer total goals were scored in each of the first three games, including a 4-0 shutout by goalie Frederik Andersen in Game 3.

The Hurricanes are the Hurricanes. Coach Rod Brind’Amour couldn’t care less about the entertainment value of this series or any series. His team’s mission is to vampirically suck the life out of opponents with a combination of puck possession, defensive zone coverage, reliable goaltending and elite penalty killing. Through four games, it has been mission accomplished.

Brind’Amour was asked about fans and media from other markets boiling down the Hurricanes’ virtues to simply being a monotonous “shot volume” team.

“It’s lazy. It’s lazy. Because you’re not really watching the game then. You’re picking out part of it,” he said. “But there’s a method to all of it. It doesn’t irk me.”

When the Canes don’t have the puck, they’re preventing shots: Carolina is allowing an average of 24.6 shots per game this postseason, third best among active teams.

“There have been times through this series when I’ve thought in my head, ‘shoot the puck.’ But then we have to get that puck through,” Washington coach Spencer Carbery said.

Again, this is what the Hurricanes do. This is what the Hurricanes have done. And this is what they’ll continue to do in the Eastern Conference finals unless the Capitals have a rally in them. Which would be exciting. But the Hurricanes aren’t about that excitement.

“You don’t want to give them any life or give them any hope,” Canes winger Seth Jarvis said of Thursday’s Game 5 back in D.C. — Wyshynski

Continue Reading

Sports

Are the Rockies even worse than the 2024 White Sox? Here’s what the numbers say

Published

on

By

Are the Rockies even worse than the 2024 White Sox? Here's what the numbers say

Apparently, even the Colorado Rockies have their limits.

On Sunday, the day after an embarrassing 21-0 loss to the San Diego Padres dropped the team’s record to 6-33, the Rockies finally fired longtime manager Bud Black — despite general manager Bill Schmidt giving Black a vote of confidence prior to Saturday’s game. Colorado is careening toward not just a seventh consecutive losing season, but a season that could be headed in the same direction as the Chicago White Sox in 2024: chasing the modern record for losses in a season.

Yep, here we go again.

Saturday’s loss capped a remarkable seven-game stretch in which the Rockies allowed six, nine, eight, 10, 11, 13 and 21 runs, respectively. They became the first team in MLB history to allow at least eight runs and then increase their runs allowed in each of their next four games. The 21-0 loss was the third-biggest shutout margin in the major leagues since 1901. The Rockies’ pitching line over that seven-game skid: 62 IP, 96 H, 25 BB, 49 SO, 11 HR, .353 batting average and 9.00 ERA.

And the ERA was 9.00 only because 16 of the 78 total runs they allowed were unearned.

That unearned runs total might suggest that the Rockies, contrary to owner Dick Monfort’s claim back in February, will not have one of the best infield defenses in “history.” Instead, the Rockies rank 28th in the majors in defensive runs saved across all positions — and last in runs allowed and second-to-last in runs scored.

Now, this isn’t all Black’s fault, of course. The Rockies have been headed in this direction for years, trying to build mostly from within as they rarely make trades or sign free agents (and when they did, it was for Kris Bryant, who has barely been on the field in four seasons with the team). The belief across the sport is the Rockies remain well behind other organizations in applying analytics and that they’ve made major mistakes, such as not getting enough in return for Nolan Arenado or letting Trevor Story head to free agency without trading him.

The Rockies did rally to win on Sunday in what would be Black’s final game after nine seasons to improve to 7-33, with third-base coach Warren Schaeffer taking over as interim manager for the rest of the season and former Rockies manager Clint Hurdle, recently named the team’s hitting coach, taking over as bench coach.

“While we all share responsibility in how this season has played out, these changes are necessary,” Monfort said in a statement. “We will use the remainder of 2025 to improve where we can on the field and to evaluate all areas of our operation so we can properly turn the page into the next chapter of Rockies Baseball.”

Comparisons to the White Sox are inevitable. The Rockies’ record through 40 games, prior to Monday’s loss to Texas, put them on a pace to finish 28-134 — which would be a remarkable 13 games worse than Chicago’s 41-121 record.

It’s not like the Rockies haven’t earned that win-loss record: They have been outscored by 128 runs, the second-worst run differential through 40 games since 1900, with only the 2023 Oakland Athletics worse at minus-144. Those A’s were 9-31 through 40 games and 12-50 through 62 games — a 31-win pace — but they at least managed to play a little better the rest of the way and finished 50-112.

So, maybe there’s hope for the Rockies.

Indeed, that’s what made the White Sox so amazing last year — it took a lot of consistently awful baseball to lose 121 games. They were 12-28 through 40 games and 14-30 through 44 games before the losing really kicked in:

  • May 17 to June 6: 1-18

  • July 10 to Aug. 5: 0-21

  • Aug. 17 to Sept.13: 3-22

To the White Sox’s credit, they did manage to win five of the final six games, so while they have the most losses since 1900, their .253 winning percentage is not the worst, with the 1916 A’s (.235), 1935 Braves (.248), 1962 Mets (.250) and 1904 Senators (.252) all worse.

But the Rockies are playing from ahead with such a historically bad start. They have a chance at setting a new single season loss record. And here are the three reasons they might catch the White Sox:

1. The starting pitching is terrible

The Rockies have a 7.09 ERA through 40 games, which is the worst by a National League team since … the 2004 Rockies had a 7.33 ERA. Only two other teams, the Baltimore Orioles and Miami Marlins, have a rotation ERA higher than 4.62 this season. On the other hand, the 2024 White Sox managed to rank 25th in the majors in rotation ERA. They had two excellent starters in Garrett Crochet (6-12, 3.58 ERA, 4.1 WAR) and Erick Fedde (7-4, 3.11 ERA, 4.6 WAR), at least until Fedde was dealt at the trade deadline.

The Rockies, meanwhile, are still relying on Kyle Freeland, German Marquez and Antonio Senzatela — the same trio featured in the rotation when the Rockies made the playoffs in 2017 and 2018. They were worth a combined 13.2 WAR in 2018, but that was seven years ago, and the Rockies’ loyalty in contract extensions to all three hasn’t paid off. Freeland signed a five-year, $64 million extension in 2022 but has a 5.01 ERA and just 3.4 WAR since then. Marquez signed a two-year, $20 million extension coming off Tommy John surgery in 2023, but he has an 8.27 ERA this season. Senzatela has won four games since signing a $50.5 million deal in 2022.

In 2025, they’re a combined 2-17 with a 6.79 ERA while allowing a .349 average. Chase Dollander was the team’s top prospect entering the season but has 6.88 ERA through seven career starts and poor Bradley Blalock was left in to allow 12 runs on Saturday. And it’s not just that they’re pitching at Coors Field, either. Certainly, injuries have played a role with Marquez and Senzatela, but Freeland has been mostly healthy … and has a 4.51 ERA on the road since 2022.

In other words, while the White Sox’s rotation at least kept them in games at times, the Rockies are often out of it before they can get to their bullpen.

2. The offense might be worse

The White Sox hit .221/.278/.340 while scoring just 507 runs in 2024 — a remarkable 97 fewer than the next lowest team. The Rockies are hitting .219/.286/.360 through their first 40 games and are on pace for 539 runs. They have marginally better raw stats, but that doesn’t factor in Coors Field. They’re hitting .189 in 20 road games.

The 2024 White Sox were a historically bad offense. The only player with regular playing time to finish with an above-average OPS+ was Tommy Pham, who posted a 103 OPS+ in 297 plate appearances. Their top three players in plate appearances were Andrew Vaughn (98 OPS+), Andrew Benintendi (94) and Gavin Sheets (89). The down-roster players were even worse than that with the likes of Miguel Vargas (.104 average in 135 at-bats), Martin Maldonado (.119 average in 135 at-bats) and Dominic Fletcher (.206 average, one home run in 223 at-bats).

The Rockies do have two players with an above-average OPS+ in catcher/DH Hunter Goodman (127) and outfielder Jordan Beck (131). While I’m skeptical whether either player can keep that going, they do have other hitters who might improve, including Ezequiel Tovar, Brenton Doyle and Michael Toglia, who each ran an OPS+ above 100 last season (although, just barely).

Chicago finished with a wRC+ (weighted runs created plus) of 75. That figure adjusts for home park and era, and it is tied for 13th worst since 1947 and ranks third worst since 2000. Meanwhile, Colorado currently has a wRC+ of 66. That would be the worst since 1947 — worse than the 1963 Mets, who hit .219/.285/.315 on their way to a wRC+ of 69.

Still, the Rockies had the second-worst wRC+ last season ahead of only the White Sox — and brought back almost entirely the same group of players. Like the White Sox, the Rockies also aren’t particularly young. The average age of Chicago in 2024, adjusted for playing time, was 27.8, right at the MLB average of 27.9; Colorado is at 28.0 years old, just a notch below the MLB average of 28.2.

Is there help on the way? Infield prospect Adael Amador is up in the majors now and hitting .173 through his first 20 games. Former first-round pick Zac Veen was up for a spell and hit .118 in 34 at-bats. Outfielder Yanquiel Fernandez is one of the team’s top prospects and is hitting .208 in Triple-A. And the rest of their hitting prospects are further away. They will get a boost when Tovar returns from the injured list, but any improvement is going to have come from players already on the roster.

3. They have a tougher schedule

While the AL Central saw three teams make the playoffs and four teams finish above .500 in 2024 — beating up on the White Sox helped in that regard — the 2025 NL West looks like a much tougher division. Some numbers:

  • In 2024, the four other AL Central teams were 226-213 outside the division (.522).

  • So far in 2025, the four other NL West teams are 80-58 outside the division (.579).

The catch here is the Rockies have played only 13 games so far within their division — and have gone 2-11. They still have 39 of their 52 division games left to play. It doesn’t help that with the Rockies playing their worst baseball right now, they’re in the midst of a difficult stretch: Their only series between now and June 12 against teams with losing records are the current series against Texas (the Rangers entered the series 20-21) and one against the Marlins June 2-4.

So, can the Rockies lose 122 games?

They weren’t forecasted to be this bad. In fact, FanGraphs projects them playing close to .400 ball the rest of the way and finishing 55-107.

The biggest difference between the 2025 Rockies and the 2024 White Sox is the bullpen. Chicago had a bad bullpen that went 15-49 with a 4.73 ERA and was particularly bad in close games, finishing with minus-11.22 win probability added, the worst total for any bullpen since 2000.

Colorado ranks 19th in bullpen ERA at 4.07, and its high-leverage relievers have been solid, with the Rockies also ranking 19th in the majors with a bullpen WPA of 0.57 — though they’re 0-3 in extra-inning games (the White Sox went 4-10 in extra-inning games). Jake Bird and Seth Halvorsen have been effective while Zach Agnos has a couple saves and only one earned run allowed in 10 ⅓ innings, although he has struck out only four batters. If the Rockies can hold the leads they do get, they should be able to avoid the fate of the White Sox.

They’ll have to get those leads to begin with, though. Eleven of the Rockies’ 34 losses are considered “blowout” losses — five or more runs. That’s around 32%. The 2024 White Sox had a 31% blowout loss rate. The 1962 Mets were also at 31%. That tells us that the Rockies have a chance to chase down last year’s historic White Sox club.

It’s an astonishingly bad start to a season. But here’s maybe the most astonishing number of all: The Rockies drew 38,423 fans for that 21-run loss on Saturday.

Give the Rockies’ marketing people a raise.

Continue Reading

Sports

Cristobal: QB Beck cleared for summer workouts

Published

on

By

Cristobal: QB Beck cleared for summer workouts

AMELIA ISLAND, Fla. — Miami coach Mario Cristobal said Monday that quarterback Carson Beck has been cleared to participate in all team summer activities and is approaching 100 percent following elbow surgery last year.

Cristobal said Beck has been throwing for the past three weeks as part of his rehab regimen. Beck missed all of spring practice and has yet to throw to Miami’s receivers as part of organized team activities. But that is all about to change when Miami begins summer workouts next week.

“He’s good to go,” Cristobal told ESPN at the ACC spring meetings. “He’s exceeding every benchmark.”

Beck underwent surgery on his right elbow to repair his ulnar collateral ligament, which he injured on the final play of the first half in second-ranked Georgia‘s 22-19 overtime win against Texas in the SEC championship game Dec. 7.

Beck started at Georgia for two seasons, going 24-3, and ESPN’s Mel Kiper Jr. had him rated as the No. 5 quarterback for the 2025 draft. But given his injury and inconsistent performance in 2024, Beck entered the portal in January. He quickly opted for Miami, where he will replace No. 1 NFL draft pick Cam Ward.

Beck threw for 7,426 yards over his two seasons as Georgia’s starter, fifth most among all FBS passers since 2023, with 57 total touchdowns and 23 turnovers.

Continue Reading

Trending