Burning questions for all 32 NHL teams: John Gibson’s impact in Detroit, a Sidney Crosby trade?
More Videos
Published
1 month agoon
By
admin
-
Ryan S. Clark
-
Kristen Shilton
Sep 17, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
The Florida Panthers hoisted the Stanley Cup for the second straight season back on June 17. The 2025 NHL draft was decentralized, but there was no shortage of memorable moments and celebrity cameos. Finally, free agency was not quite as frenetic as in years past, but hundreds of players signed new deals.
And then, the hockey world went into its hibernation period for the rest of July and August.
But as a chill enters the air, the leaves start to change color and many pumpkin-themed items appear on food and drink menus, it’s time to get ready for another NHL season.
To help you get fully prepared for the coming weeks of the preseason — as teams make final decisions on rosters, lineups and goaltending tandems — let’s take a look at the biggest lingering question for all 32 clubs, thanks to ESPN reporters Ryan S. Clark (Western Conference) and Kristen Shilton (Eastern Conference).

Atlantic Division

No one could fault Swayman for chasing a big-time contract extension after the way he carried Boston at the end of the 2024-25 campaign. But after the netminder secured the bag — with a protracted contract negotiation last summer culminating in a seven-year deal worth $8.25 million per season — he was meant to perform like one of the league’s highest paid goalies.
That didn’t happen. Swayman posted career-worst numbers in 2024-25 with an .892 SV% and 3.11 GAA. Without a genuine tandemmate to back him up — as he had with Linus Ullmark before the latter departed to Ottawa — Swayman carried a hefty 58-game schedule and didn’t wear it well.
Boston requires better this season, especially considering the Bruins still don’t have a bona fide backup for Swayman (that would be Boston’s Burning Question, Part II). Regardless of who is second though, Swayman must prove he can be a true No. 1 — and what will it mean for the Bruins’ chances this season if he can’t?

Buffalo Sabres
Will Buffalo finally end its postseason drought?
It’s the overarching theme for Buffalo seemingly every year: Can the Sabres actually snap their historically long skid as non-playoff contenders? Or in other words: Is Buffalo’s rebuild over yet?
It’s only been …15 years now since Sabres fans saw their team in postseason action. And the better part of this decade has been an exercise in slow progress. For every step forward Buffalo has taken — most notably building its enviable young core — the Sabres have repeatedly stalled short of reclaiming a place as playoff contenders.
GM Kevyn Adams made a risky move acquiring oft-injured forward Josh Norris; but if Norris can stay healthy, that’s a potential No. 1 center for Buffalo. And the Sabres have intriguing newcomers Josh Doan and Michael Kesselring to fill out their roster.
What impact could those fresh faces — plus improvements from players like goaltender Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen (already dealing with a “tweak” heading into training camp) and forward Jack Quinn — have on Buffalo’s chances? Every little bit helps. Ottawa and Montreal have proven to be quicker studies that Buffalo in rising through the Atlantic Division ranks. Is it the Sabres’ time now to do the same?

It’s not like Detroit hasn’t had decent goaltending in recent years. What the Red Wings have lacked is consistency. For all the good runs Ville Husso and Petr Mrazek managed to put together, they inevitably bookended too many subpar stretches that, combined with Detroit’s below-average defensive play, held the Red Wings back from fulfilling their potential.
Well, the midseason addition of head coach Todd McLellan yielded improvement. And now, enter John Gibson. GM Steve Yzerman traded for the veteran netminder from Anaheim in a bold offseason move that could be the difference between whether Detroit sinks or swims this season.
Gibson struggled a bit with the rebuilding Ducks, but the Red Wings are a more established team with enough talent to support him. He still posted a .911 save percentage in 29 appearances last season, showing he has the potential to reclaim his form as a No. 1 goalie. If Gibson can indicate early on he’s a reliable presence in the crease, then confidence should spread in Detroit and give the club a boost that’s been missing. Can Gibson provide all that in Year 1? We’ll find out.

Florida Panthers
Are the Panthers built for a three-peat?
Listen, what Florida GM Bill Zito pulled off this offseason was quite impressive. While the Panthers were basking in a second straight Stanley Cup victory, Zito managed to re-sign Sam Bennett, Aaron Ekblad and Brad Marchand, while also acquiring an intriguing backup goalie in Daniil Tarasov.
All good … right? Florida can’t be concerned about their depth when they’ve kept so many key players in the fold … correct?
It’s at least worth wondering whether the Panthers might run into issues there, given all they’ve invested salary-cap-wise in their top skaters. There’s an excellent chance that growth from within — from top young players like Mackie Samoskevich — will give Florida quite an edge in their bottom six. But there’s also the fact Matthew Tkachuk‘s health status is in doubt — that torn adductor and sports hernia issue suffered at the 4 Nations Face-Off has been a problem for Tkachuk ever since, and may hold him out to start the season — and there’s no telling what shape Tkachuk will be in when he can return.
Then, of course, there’s fatigue. Of course, we’ve wondered about that in regards to Florida before and they’ve shown serious mettle in reaching three straight Cup Finals (winning the last two). Do the Panthers have it in them to do it all over again?

Montreal Canadiens
Can the Canadiens’ youth movement produce another playoff run?
Montreal was a surprise postseason contender last season thanks to a 91-point campaign that provided just enough juice to secure the second wild-card spot. Was that a fluke? Or are the Canadians more ready to step forward than we thought?
GM Kent Hughes improved Montreal with the offseason addition of defenseman Noah Dobson and physical winger Zack Bolduc. Now the Canadiens are eager to see if their internal growth can continue as well.
All eyes will be on how 2024’s fifth-overall pick Ivan Demidov develops, how Lane Hutson keeps maturing and what sort of gains Juraj Slafkovsky can make, too. It’ll be a combination of factors — from Montreal’s established stars in Nick Suzuki and Cole Caufield — to it’s burgeoning skaters and questionable returnees (what does Kirby Dach have to offer when he’s healthy?) that will ultimately decide what trajectory the Canadiens take this year.
While their first-round experience in 2024-25 was valuable, there’s no telling what a regular season of sustained success could also do for Montreal’s core confidence. Certainly Hughes has put his weight behind this roster to signal his own assurance that they’re capable of reaching last season’s threshold.

Ottawa Senators
Has Ottawa adequately addressed its offensive depth?
It’s no secret the Senators struggled to score at 5-on-5 last season. Ottawa tallied the second-fewest even-strength markers in 2024-25, and if it wasn’t for a strong power play, it’s possible the Senators wouldn’t have forced their way into the playoffs at all. Despite what alarm bells could be ringing in that respect from Canada’s capital, GM Steve Staios didn’t do much to alter the Senators lineup in free agency, save for adding defenseman Jordan Spence and veteran Lars Eller.
The lack of significant movement indicates Ottawa is likely banking on internal improvement to win the day. That would have to include better performances from Dylan Cozens — still finding his way post-trade from Buffalo — and Fabian Zetterlund — a deadline pickup from San Jose — now that they’re acclimated to the organization. But will that be enough to give the Senators’ offense a true boost? Claude Giroux is also back in the fold — although where he plays in the lineup is up in the air — and Shane Pinto should be a top offensive driver coming off a gold medal-winning showing at the men’s world championships.
Ottawa just needs to find its mojo more often in the coming year — and that’s going to require a stronger collective effort up front.

Tampa Bay Lightning
Can Tampa Bay’s offense maintain an elite scoring level?
It’s easy to gloss over the fact Tampa Bay was the NHL’s highest-scoring team last season, given how their playoff run ended (with a first-round thud against Florida). The Lightning were formidable up front though all season long, averaging 3.56 goals per game and owning a top-five power play.
Four Lightning skaters eclipsed the 35-goal mark, two hit 40-plus (there were only eight players in the league who reached that benchmark) and Nikita Kucherov won the Art Ross Trophy (again) with 121 points.
Suffice to say, Tampa Bay felt confident in running it back with a similar roster of offensive threats. Is that wise, though?
Oliver Bjorkstrand and Yanni Gourde will have a better handle on the Lightning system after coming in at the deadline, but beyond those new faces Tampa Bay is counting on a repeat from Brayden Point, Jake Guentzel, Kucherov & Co. to maintain their place as perennial postseason contenders. Given how the Lightning continually find ways to keep the spark alive, so to speak, it won’t be shocking if they maintain their status quo. But it’s worth wondering how far they can stretch when their Atlantic rivals keep loading up around them.

The Maple Leafs accepted a true gut punch when trading Marner to Vegas before he could walk away (for nothing) in free agency. And no disrespect to Nicolas Roy — the returning player in that transaction — but losing a top-line, 102-point producer who appears in every situation — including as one of your most reliable penalty killers — creates a crater no team would envy trying to fill. The Leafs’ success this season will depend on their ability to do just that.
More responsibility than ever falls on Auston Matthews, William Nylander, Matthew Knies and John Tavares to anchor Toronto’s top two lines, while depth performances will be more critical than ever to keep the Leafs from falling too far off a cliff offensively.
What sort of strategy will head coach Craig Berube employ to have Toronto evolve into a new chapter for the franchise? Don’t forget: former president Brendan Shanahan is gone, too, and there are new voices behind the scenes being amplified. This is a transitional time for the Leafs in multiple respects. What sort of maturity have they cultivated to be able to handle what’s ahead?

Metropolitan Division

Carolina Hurricanes
Did Carolina do enough to tackle its scoring woes?
The Hurricanes landed a big fish in free agency when Nikolaj Ehlers came on board with a six-year, $51 million contract. That cemented him as the consistent scoring winger Carolina’s been lacking in previous seasons (particularly when it came to the postseason).
But even with Ehlers in the mix, Carolina has questions to answer about its offense.
The Hurricanes have been using Jesperi Kotkaniemi in a second-line center role for which he’s not wholly suited. Carolina opted not to re-sign free agent Jack Roslovic — who remains a free agent, and could be an option in that spot — and there’s no obvious upgrade over Kotkaniemi at the moment.
Will Logan Stankoven or Seth Jarvis have to move off the wing to cover for Carolina’s flimsy depth down the middle? Or will GM Erik Tulsky look at what’s available on the market before the season starts and make a change? It has to still sting the way Carolina produced just 10 total goals in their Eastern Conference finals loss against Florida last spring. If the Hurricanes expect to advance to the Cup Final, they’ll need to have the scoring prowess to match the competition.

The Blue Jackets didn’t have trouble scoring goals last season. It was keeping pucks out of the net that held Columbus back.
GM Don Waddell’s priority was addressing the latter issue this offseason and, well, he did. Sort of. As some of the top free agent defensemen were snapped up on July 1, Waddell opted to simply re-sign Ivan Provorov to a seven-year, $59.5 million contract.
Meaning there has been no specific upgrade on a blue line that — while anchored by a Norris Trophy-worthy performance from Zach Werenski — ranked eighth-worst in the NHL in goals against last season (3.26 per game). Considering Columbus was also eighth overall in goals scored (with 3.26 per game), it’s clear the defensive deficiencies were a serious factor in the Blue Jackets falling just shy of making the playoffs.
Are they doomed to a similar fate this season? Coach Dean Evason was transparent about Columbus’ need to improve on the back end; the only question is whether there’s enough internal improvement to make that a reality early and often. Steady goaltending would help in this regard as well; will the low-risk move of trading for Ivan Fedotov give the Blue Jackets some insurance behind (or beside) Elvis Merzlikins?

It’s not every team that has a single player capable of making or breaking their success. Jack Hughes is that for New Jersey, though.
The top-line forward just isn’t available as much as the Devils need him to be. Hughes has been hampered by injuries throughout his young career, limited to 62 or fewer games in two of his six seasons, and currently coming off shoulder surgery that cost him the final 25 regular-season games and five playoff contests.
Hughes is practically a point-per-game player when he’s healthy, and the 24-year-old is inarguably New Jersey’s best, most impactful skater. But what more might the Devils be able to do in helping Hughes maintain his on-ice presence? Is there something amiss in their training protocols? Does he require more rest days? Whatever the recipe for keeping Hughes on the ice ultimately has be New Jersey’s priority to figure out. The Devils can’t afford to lose more of what a generational talent like Hughes can bring to their lineup on a nightly basis.

The Islanders made a no-brainer decision by drafting defenseman Matthew Schaefer at No. 1 overall in June. The just-turned 18-year-old has all the makings of a franchise blueliner who will capably patrol New York’s back end for years to come. The question is whether that NHL tenure starts immediately, or if the Islanders ease Schaefer into the pro game. It’s a trajectory that will have ripple effects at multiple levels of the organization.
There’s a scenario where Schaefer jumps right into the Islanders’ lineup, joining Adam Pelech, Alexander Romanov and Ryan Pulock to punctuate their top-four rotation and start this new era for a New York defense corps that saw Noah Dobson depart via trade on draft night. Throwing Schaefer directly into that mix would be a strong statement about how the Islanders’ view their coveted new addition. But defensemen notoriously take longer to thrive in the NHL than their forward counterparts, and New York won’t want to shake Shaefer’s confidence out of the gate, either.
It’s a delicate balance, and how the Islanders choose to manage him ahead of their season opener could have short- and long-term effects on the team’s year overall.

New York Rangers
How will Mike Sullivan restructure the Rangers?
There’s no doubt New York needed a new voice behind the bench. And it’ll fall on Mike Sullivan to build the Rangers back into a contender.
Sullivan’s first task will be deciding where exactly Mika Zibanejad should be playing — at center or on the wing. Zibanejad turned in a disappointing 62 points over 82 games last season — his lowest output through a full campaign since 2017-18 — and it wasn’t until Zibanejad moved from center to J.T. Miller‘s wing in the latter half of the season that he began to look like himself again. Will that encourage Sullivan to load up the Rangers offense by keeping Miller and Zibanejad together? Or will he put Zibanejad back at center so as not to disrupt the team’s overall depth?
And beyond where to place Zibanejad, who exactly will Sullivan find to make up for the contributions that left with Chris Kreider — looking at you, Will Cuylle?
But before we move on from the subject of who plays where, how will Sullivan piece together the blue line now that Vladislav Gavrikov is in the lineup? Fortunately for Sullivan, he has had a long summer to think about what might work for the Rangers. The preseason will be a valuable time to tinker with the various options to get this team back among the postseason contenders.

Philadelphia Flyers
Have the Flyers upgraded enough at the right spots?
Philadelphia had two glaring needs after last season: better center depth and stronger goaltending.
The Flyers acquired Trevor Zegras from Anaheim in the hopes he could slot into a top-six center role despite the 24-year-old having spent the better part of the previous two seasons pushed off to the wing. Zegras maintains he’s more comfortable at his natural center position, and that should be music to Philadelphia’s ears — if Zegras’ defensive game can match his offensive capabilities. Going after him was a low-risk, high-reward move for the Flyers. New coach Rick Tocchet should give him every chance to excel there.
But then there’s the Flyers’ goaltending. GM Danny Briere brought in veteran Dan Vladar to play opposite Samuel Ersson, but given the numbers each netminder produced last season (with an .898 SV% and .883 SV%, respectively), there’s reason to wonder whether Philadelphia is truly better off with that tandem. Vladar stated his case to suit up in more than 30 tilts as he did a year ago, and if sharing an even workload gives Ersson more confidence when he is in the crease, the experiment might work.
Time will tell if Briere’s offseason changes will move the needle for Philadelphia.

There’s no such thing as an un-moveable star. If the Edmonton Oilers would trade Wayne Gretzky, well, it could happen to anyone.
Is this the year Pittsburgh completes a once-unfathomable transaction of its own by trading franchise icon Sidney Crosby? If the Penguins were ever going to do it, is now the time?
Crosby is under contract with Pittsburgh through the 2026-27 season (thanks to a team-friendly extension he inked last year). But the 37-year-old wants (and deserves) another chance or two at not just competing in the playoffs, but contending for the championship. Those aren’t necessarily opportunities Pittsburgh can offer him now. The Penguins are young and hungry, and they are being guided by a first-year NHL coach in the newly instated Dan Muse.
Evgeni Malkin is in the final season of his contract, too, signaling that more changes are to come in the next 12 months for the Penguins. It might be in everyone’s interest — Crosby’s and Pittsburgh’s — to part now while the return can help the Penguins in their ongoing retooling. And while Crosby wearing another NHL sweater would be jarring, there’s no denying he has earned the right to make the final years of his career as successful as they can be. But whether the Penguins could find a suitable partner who checks all the boxes on both sides remains to be seen.

Washington Capitals
Can Washington’s offense run deeper than before?
The Capitals had an enviable 2024-25 season, producing 111 points as the Eastern Conference’s top squad — and having Alex Ovechkin break Wayne Gretzky’s all-time goals record. The problem is, Washington was top-heavy. It leaned on its top six to produce, and while Dylan Strome, Ovechkin, Pierre-Luc Dubois & Co. were happy to oblige with impressive output, relying too much on too few is rarely a championship-winning strategy.
So, the question must be asked: Is Washington deeper now than it was last year?
Connor McMichael is key to that answer. If he can step into a third-line center role for Washington — and build off his career-best totals from last season in goals, points and assists — then the Capitals will be in good shape. They’d be better off, though, knowing how various personnel will deploy on the wing. Lars Eller, Taylor Raddysh and Andrew Mangiapane are gone. The Capitals then will turn to their own internal skaters — like Ryan Leonard and Hendrix Lapierre, plus trade acquisition Justin Sourdif — to fill in the gaps.
Washington can’t count on a repeat of the extraordinary years that guys such as Ovechkin and Strome had in 2024-25. Coach Spencer Carbery will need to maximize the Capitals’ collective talent to see their success stretch beyond just the regular season.

Central Division

Chicago Blackhawks
How much advancement does their rebuild make in 2025-26?
Suggesting this is one of the most frustrating stretches in Blackhawks history isn’t quite as hyperbolic as it sounds.
Having a fifth straight season of less than 70 points is the franchise’s longest streak of that regard since it went seven consecutive campaigns of doing the same from 1953 through 1960 — when the NHL had only six franchises.
Many items contributed to why the Blackhawks finished with the second-fewest points in the NHL last season. They were in the bottom 10 in goals scored per game, goals allowed per game, shots per game, shots allowed per game and team save percentage per 60.
Finding a solution to those challenges is what awaits Jeff Blashill in his first season in charge of a team that will seek to find cohesion with its young core led by Connor Bedard and a veteran group that added Andre Burakovsky in the offseason.

Colorado Avalanche
Is their supporting cast enough or do they need to add more?
Signing Brent Burns and Victor Olofsson was an indication of two items facing the Avalanche entering the season. The first is the need to find proven depth at a team-friendly price, which is why Burns signing for $1 million and Olofsson for $1.575 million has its own value.
The second is: Do the Avs have enough options within their supporting cast, or should they use the rest of their $1.325 million in projected cap space to do so?
Burns is expected to play on the Avs’ third defensive pairing with Sam Malinski, while Olofsson looks as if he’ll be on the third line with Ross Colton and Jack Drury. It leaves them a fourth line that could have Parker Kelly, Joel Kiviranta and rookie Ivan Ivan.
What complicates the decision to spend their remaining cap space is Logan O’Connor. He underwent knee surgery and is slated to come back some time in November or December, meaning they’ll need space for him when he does return.

Dallas Stars
What adjustments will Glen Gulutzan make to reach the Cup Final?
Are there other questions that could be asked about the Stars? Sure. It’s just that any question that’s worth considering all comes back to if it can be the difference between the Stars winning the Stanley Cup or falling in a fourth straight Western Conference finals — or possibly not returning to the conference finals at all.
Championship windows are difficult to open, with the argument that they might be even harder to sustain for an extended period. Part of the reason why the Stars hired Gulutzan, who previously coached the team from 2011 to 2013, was his experience as an Oilers assistant. He has been on teams that advanced to the conference finals three times in four years — and the Cup Final two years in a row — with their two most recent appearances coming after a coaching change.

Any time a star player or a team’s most important player is in the final year of his contract, it’s always going to be a primary topic of conversation. The discussion around Kaprizov further intensified on Sept. 10 when Frank Seravalli reported that Kaprizov turned down an eight-year extension worth $128 million that would have given him the highest average-annual-value deal in the NHL.
Wild GM Bill Guerin said on a podcast later that day that he and Kaprizov’s agent have “a very good relationship” while both sides were “working through things.” Guerin stated that he didn’t want the market to go into “an all-out panic mode” while noting he believes the Wild are “in a really positive place” with their star winger. But this remains a significant question until pen is put to paper on a new deal.

Nashville Predators
Can the Predators find the defensive stability that eluded them last season?
The Predators’ 2024-25 challenges can be viewed in one of two ways. The first is that Brady Skjei, who played in all 82 games, was the only Preds defenseman who played more than 70 games in 2024-25. Another is that he was one of 15 defensemen whom the team used to get through a campaign that began with high expectations — only to end with Nashville being high in the draft lottery.
Adding Nicolas Hague and Nick Perbix in the offseason gave the Preds a pair of proven options who have been top-four fill-ins when needed. But how will they handle being a consistent top-four option for the first time in their careers?
The same questions exist for Justin Barron and Nick Blankenburg. Barron emerged as a top-four option after he was traded to the Predators, and Blankenburg played more games last season than he had in his previous three combined.

St. Louis Blues
Where do they fit in the Western Conference landscape?
The Blues scraped together a playoff appearance last season. The moves they made in the offseason — adding Nick Bjugstad, Logan Mailloux and Pius Suter — along with the idea that prized prospect Jimmy Snuggerud is expected to challenge for a top-six place, suggest that they are in a window to return to the playoffs for the foreseeable future.
But what if the Blues are more than just “a playoff team”? Should they be included in the group of top Stanley Cup contenders in the Western Conference?
They return seven players who finished with more than 16 goals, with the expectation that Snuggerud can join that group. Meanwhile, Suter scored a career-high 25 goals in 2024-25. Couple that with how they responded to systematic changes made by Jim Montgomery, and the Blues should be setting their sights higher in 2025-26.

Utah Mammoth
Will they make the playoffs in 2025-26?
Exactly what was it that prevented the Mammoth from making the playoffs in their first season in Salt Lake City? Was it not scoring enough goals? Was it goal prevention? Was it both?
Or was it something different altogether?
Mammoth GM Bill Armstrong’s actions in the offseason saw him provide a potential answer to those questions.
Armstrong traded for one of the most sought-after top-six winger options in JJ Peterka, with the hope he can help the Mammoth improve upon being 21st in goals per game. Their defensive concerns led to them signing a proven two-way, bottom-six forward in Brandon Tanev, a veteran top-six defenseman in Nate Schmidt and goalie Vitek Vanecek.
Schmidt and Vanecek, who won the Stanley Cup with the Panthers, now give the Mammoth five players in their defensive setup with a championship ring, joining Ian Cole, Olli Maatta and Mikhail Sergachev.

Winnipeg Jets
Can their new-look second line find continuity amid change?
Options aren’t necessarily the challenge facing Scott Arniel and his staff when it comes to what they’ll do with their second line. If anything, it’s more about what’s the best way to manage their second-line situation, with the realization that change might be the constant, at least to start the season.
Nikolaj Ehlers is gone. Adam Lowry is recovering from a hip surgery but told reporters last week that he is targeting a late October/early November return. Jonathan Toews is coming back to the NHL after missing the past two seasons with inflammatory and immune system issues. Gustav Nyquist is seeking cohesion on his third team in the past year, and Cole Perfetti could be in line for a breakout season after scoring a career-high 50 points.
It appears the Jets might use Perfetti, Nyquist and Toews on their second line to start the season, with the idea they’ll face a decision about finding the strongest possible combination when Lowry returns.

Pacific Division

Anaheim Ducks
Is this the season the Ducks reach the playoffs again?
While still young, their homegrown core has varying levels of experience, from Troy Terry going into his seventh season to Cutter Gauthier seeking to build on a 20-goal rookie campaign. Over time, the Ducks have insulated that group with veterans. What began with getting Alex Killorn and Frank Vatrano years ago continued this offseason as they added Chris Kreider and Mikael Granlund.
They finished the 2024-25 campaign with 80 points for the first time since the 2018-19 season, which gives the Ducks confidence to reach the next stage of their rebuild — that stage being the end of the rebuild itself.
So, is this the season in which the Ducks transition from promising project to the latest perennial playoff contender? Or is this the campaign that allows them to understand what gaps they must fill in order to reach that desired destination?

One of the Flames’ most important players is entering the final year of his contract. This is nothing new for them, based on recent history. But Andersson’s circumstances are different from those of Noah Hanifin and Elias Lindholm because this version of the Flames is in contention for a playoff spot.
Teams will be willing to pay a premium for a proven top-pairing, right-handed defenseman like Andersson. The Flames need to determine the strongest window for them to maximize any potential return if they can’t re-sign Andersson.
Does it make more sense for them to see how they start the season before making a decision? Do they wait until closer to the trade deadline? Could they hold off if they’re in a playoff spot or close to one at the deadline, and seek to add help instead? What can they receive for him? Or do they possibly risk losing him for nothing?
It’s going to be fascinating to watch this saga play out.

Edmonton Oilers
Is this version of the Oilers as good as the past two seasons?
There will be frequent conversations surrounding 2026 free agent Connor McDavid and his future — and if that future includes staying with the Oilers or heading elsewhere next summer.
But another issue that’s likely to be raised is whether this can be the season in which the Oilers win another Stanley Cup and, in turn, allow the game’s premier player to win a title and stay with the only pro team he has known.
Edmonton parted ways with veterans such as Viktor Arvidsson, Connor Brown, John Klingberg, Evander Kane and Corey Perry in cost-cutting decisions this offseason. That opened the door for them to make the trade for Isaac Howard, with the intent that having young forwards such as Howard and Matthew Savoie can provide the Oilers with promising talents on cheap cap hits.
Like any team, the Oilers face questions about what lies ahead, and if there are any other changes that need to be made prior to the postseason. It’s just that those questions are ramped up with the world’s best player on an expiring contract.

Los Angeles Kings
Does the regular season really matter that much for the Kings?
Posing that particular question is usually reserved for teams that have won a championship, or ones that are in a championship window, mainly with the idea that the regular season is a necessary formality in order for them to advance to the postseason.
This current iteration of the Kings hasn’t won a championship. Nor has it shown it is in a tangible championship window. What the Kings have shown is that they’re a perennial playoff team that can finish with more than 100 regular-season points.
But failing to get beyond the first round for a fourth straight postseason ultimately cost GM Rob Blake his job and led to a summer overhaul that saw his replacement — Hall of Famer Ken Holland — sign numerous veterans. Above all, it’s also led to the reality that any of the major questions about the Kings won’t be answered until the end of the first round of the playoffs.

San Jose Sharks
Can they win 30 games this season?
The strongest sign concerning the state of the Sharks’ rebuild was witnessing the three main pillars of the young core — Macklin Celebrini, William Eklund and Will Smith — finish in the top four on the team in points in 2024-25. More growth is expected from that trio this season, with the expectation that goaltender Yaroslav Askarov could be the next promising prospect to carve out a key role.
Part of the team’s growth was fostered thanks to veterans such as Tyler Toffoli. The addition of more experience in the form of John Klingberg, Dmitry Orlov and Jeff Skinner this summer could lead to additional gains.
Is that enough for the Sharks to win 30 games this season? They’ve finished with fewer than 30 wins for three straight campaigns. That’s only the second such sequence in franchise history. In fact, the Sharks have won 30 games just once since their most recent playoff appearance in 2019.

Seattle Kraken: What changes will new coach Lane Lambert make?
Through their first five years of existence, the Kraken are already on their third head coach, with Dan Bylsma lasting one season before they hired Lambert. In that time, they’ve gone through a number of questions that essentially come back to the same place: What must the Kraken do to attain consistency throughout all facets of their game?
Although they were 13th in 5-on-5 goals and 16th in goals per game last season, they finished in the bottom 10 in high-danger scoring chances, total scoring chances and shots per game. They also had a power play that was 23rd, with an 18.9% success rate.
Their defensive play also faced struggles, as the Kraken were in the top 10 in most goals allowed, most high-danger scoring chances allowed and total scoring chances allowed in 5-on-5 play, with a penalty kill that was 21st with a 77.2% success rate.

Vancouver Canucks
Is their current center situation good enough for them to compete in the loaded West?
There was Elias Pettersson‘s decline from finishing with 89 points in 2023-24 to scoring nearly half that amount (45 points) a year later. The friction between Pettersson and J.T. Miller going public led to Miller being traded, with the Canucks losing another proven scoring option down the middle. That was further compounded when Pius Suter and his 25 goals left for the Blues in free agency this summer.
Entering training camp, there’s a belief that Pettersson could rediscover the spark that allowed him to emerge as a franchise center. But what does that mean for the rest of the group?
Second-line center Filip Chytil, who came over in the Miller trade, has one 20-goal season in his career, which was also his only 40-point campaign on an NHL résumé that has been interrupted by injuries.
As for the Canucks’ bottom six? Teddy Blueger‘s two-way consistency makes him a consistent contributor who can chip in more than 25 points a season. Aatu Raty‘s stint with the club last season included seven goals and 11 points in 33 games, in his longest run in the NHL to date.

Yes, the Knights made the splashiest move of the offseason in landing Mitch Marner. But there was major news on the blue line, as Pietrangelo will miss this season while recovering from femur reconstruction surgery and might never play again.
That poses questions about how the Golden Knights will fill the void left by a physically imposing, right-shot, top-pairing defenseman who led them in average ice time and was second in short-handed minutes — while trying to win another Stanley Cup after winning one in 2023.
Vegas’ current top-four setup could have Brayden McNabb partner with Shea Theodore on the top line, while Noah Hanifin could be joined by Zach Whitecloud, who lost his longtime defensive partner, Nicolas Hague, in a trade with the Predators. That would slot Kaedan Korczak and Jeremy Lauzon as the third pairing.
Under that potential configuration, Korczak and Whitecloud are the Golden Knights’ only right-handed defensemen.
You may like
Sports
Preds irked as Wild net winner with net displaced
Published
4 hours agoon
November 5, 2025By
admin

-

Greg WyshynskiNov 5, 2025, 12:35 AM ET
Close- Greg Wyshynski is ESPN’s senior NHL writer.
The Nashville Predators disagreed that a “weird” Minnesota Wild overtime goal scored with the net displaced Tuesday night should have counted.
Wild forward Kirill Kaprizov sent a pass across the crease to teammate Marcus Johansson just as Predators goalie Justus Annunen pushed the net off its moorings. Johansson’s shot hit the side of the net as the cage continued to slide out of place. He collected the puck and then backhanded it over the goal line and off the end boards with the net dislodged.
The referee signaled a goal at 3:38 of overtime, and it was upheld after an NHL video review. Minnesota won, 3-2, overcoming an emotional letdown when Nashville’s Steven Stamkos tied the score with just 0.3 seconds left in regulation.
“The explanation was that, in [the referee’s] opinion, it was a goal. I disagree with his opinion, but that’s the way it is,” Nashville coach Andrew Brunette said.
Stamkos wasn’t pleased with the goal call after the game.
“Obviously, a weird play. I can see the confusion, but the confusing part for us was why it was so emphatically called [a goal]. I get it. Listen, the net came off. If the puck goes in right away, no problem if the net is off. But he missed the net, and the puck actually bounced back to him because the net was sideways,” he said.
The NHL’s Situation Room upheld the goal because it felt Annunen caused the net to be displaced prior to an “imminent scoring opportunity” by Johansson and cited Rule 63.7 as justification. The rule reads:
“In the event that the goal post is displaced, either deliberately or accidentally, by a defending player, prior to the puck crossing the goal line between the normal position of the goalposts, the Referee may award a goal. In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have been displaced by the actions of a defending player, the attacking player must have an imminent scoring opportunity prior to the goal post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.”
Stamkos didn’t believe that Johansson’s goal-scoring shot was only made possible by the net having come off its moorings.
“I understand the net came off. I don’t think there was any intent from our goaltender to knock it off — it came off twice today. From our vantage point, we thought the puck came back to him on the second attempt because the net was off. If not, the puck goes behind the net, and we live to fight another day. So, that’s where we didn’t agree with the call,” he said.
Brunette doesn’t believe his goalie intentionally pushed the net off its moorings.
“I don’t think just by the physics of pushing that’s what he was trying to do. I thought they missed the net. If the net didn’t dislodge, you would have ended up hitting the net,” he said.
“Unfortunately, they didn’t see it the same way. And you move on.”
This was the second win in a row for the Wild, moving them to 5-6-3 on the season. Nashville dropped to 5-6-4, losing its second straight overtime game.
“We deserved a lot better, for sure. One of our best games of the season, for sure,” Stamkos said.
Sports
Week 11 Anger Index: BYU’s long-standing beef with the CFP committee
Published
6 hours agoon
November 5, 2025By
admin

-

David HaleNov 4, 2025, 08:22 PM ET
Close- College football reporter.
- Joined ESPN in 2012.
- Graduate of the University of Delaware.
The College Football Playoff committee has released its first top 25 ranking of the season, which is the sport’s version of Walmart opening its doors at midnight on Black Friday. Things are about to get ugly, and someone’s going to end up bloodied while fighting Oklahoma for a spot in the top 12. In other words, it’s the best time of year.
This year, the committee has said it is considering a new “record strength” metric, designed to provide some math-based guidance in the process and to soon replace “game control” as the country’s most hated made-up statistic.
Ten weeks into a season filled with a lot of chaos and few seemingly great teams, however, the committee needs all the help it can get. For example, just eight teams in the country have already beaten more than one of the committee’s current top 25 — and one of those eight teams is NC State. Utah, Iowa, Oregon, Pitt, Washington, Missouri and Tennessee — all ranked this week — are a combined 0-12 against other teams in the committee’s top 25. The ACC doesn’t have a team ranked higher than 14th, and the Group of 5 doesn’t have a team ranked at all, making these rankings less about the coveted top 12 than a need to be in the top 10.
In other words, there’s a lot still in flux as we dive deeper into the final month of the season. But that means our anger toward the committee is just simmering for now, waiting for the rage to boil over in the weeks to come.
Still, a few schools have a pretty good case for outrage already.

![]()
In all the hubbub over last year’s final playoff rankings that left a trio of SEC teams out, what went overlooked was that BYU might have had more to be angry about than Alabama, Ole Miss or South Carolina. Two of those teams, at least, had taken a bad loss. Each of those teams had three losses. BYU, on the other hand, checked in on the committee’s final ranking behind each of them despite a 10-2 record and two close losses to solid teams.
So, certainly the committee would feel some compassion for the Cougars this year and consider the Cougars with a bit more optimism, right?
Ah, no.
Let’s take a look at some blind résumés.
Team A: No. 3 strength of record, No. 33 strength of schedule, 4-0 vs. SP+ top-40 opponents, best win vs. No. 11 in the committee’s poll.
Team B: No. 4 strength of record, No. 45 strength of schedule, 3-0 vs. SP+ top-40 opponents, best win vs. No. 13 in the committee’s poll.
Sure, Team A has a slight edge, but the résumés look pretty similar.
Well, Team A is the committee’s No. 1 team, Ohio State. Surely, if another team’s résumé looks more or less the same, that team would be staring down a bye in the first round of the playoff, right?
Nope. Team B is BYU, and the Cougars sit behind three SEC teams with a loss, all three of which are ranked lower in ESPN’s strength of record metric.
Given that BYU has a massive showdown with Texas Tech upcoming, perhaps the committee just punted on any tough decisions on the Cougars for this week. After all, given how much love the committee has shown the Big Ten in these rankings, punting would be a fitting play.
![]()
We get it. As a conference, the ACC might, in fact, just be an episode of “Punk’d” that Ashton Kutcher started in 2008, then got distracted and forgot to let everyone know it was a prank. The conference’s train wreck in Week 10 certainly showed up in these rankings — more on that in a moment — but it’s almost as if the committee just threw Louisville into the mix, deciding the Cardinals were guilty by association.
Let’s take another look at some blind résumés, shall we?
Team A: No. 10 strength of record, No. 58 strength of schedule, one win vs. SP+ top 40, best win vs. committee’s No. 13 team, lone loss vs. an unranked team.
Team B: No. 13 strength of record, No. 56 strength of schedule, three wins vs. SP+ top 40, best win vs. committee’s No. 18 team, lone loss to committee’s No. 14 team.
This is basically a coin flip, though given the additional wins vs. high-level opponents and a better loss, it would be hard to argue against Team B, right? Add to that, Team B’s lone loss came in double overtime in a game when it outgained its opponent by 150 yards. Surely, you would be on Team B’s side now, right?
Well, not surprisingly, Team B is Louisville. Team A is Texas Tech, ranked seven spots higher at No. 8.
![]()
There seems to be a desire to write Miami off because of two losses in the past three games and given the strife the team seems to be enduring on offense, perhaps that’s wise.
But two things are supposed to be true of the committee’s evaluation process. One, the committee is not supposed to care when wins and losses happen. Losing in September isn’t better than losing in November. A loss is a loss. Second, the committee is not supposed to make assumptions about the future. Sure, Miami’s offense is a mess at the moment, but assuming that will result in future losses isn’t part of the deal.
And yet, putting Miami at No. 18 — eight full spots behind another two-loss team the Canes beat head-to-head — can only be explained by the vibes. Notre Dame’s season is rolling right along now. Miami has hit some stumbling blocks. Never mind the Canes are two late Carson Beck interceptions away from still being undefeated. Never mind that Miami has four wins vs. FPI top-35 teams, twice as many as any other two-loss team except Oklahoma. Never mind that Miami has that head-to-head against the No. 10 team in the committee’s rankings or that it walloped a Florida team that took No. 5 Georgia to the wire and actually beat No. 11 Texas. Never mind that Miami beat a then-ranked USF by 37.
Instead, the committee has assigned Miami to the scrap heap now — which is a shame because Miami would probably have done this to itself anyway, and it’s so much funnier when it happens in the last game of the season.
4. The Group of 5
A year ago, Boise State found its way into a first-round bye ahead of the champion of a Power 4 league, which was probably pretty embarrassing for that Power 4 league except that the ACC embarrasses itself often enough to be pretty well immune to shame.
The rules have changed this year. The top four conference champs aren’t guaranteed a first-round bye now. But that doesn’t seem to have stopped the committee from stacking the deck anyway, just to be safe.
Not one team outside the Power 4 found its way into these initial rankings, though the committee notes that Memphis currently is in the lead for the long Group of 5 playoff bid.
So, surely the Group of 5 should be pretty upset, right?
Yes, but not about being snubbed from the top-25 party. None of the leaders in the Group of 5 have a great case — certainly none like Boise State had a year ago. But Memphis? Really? The same team that lost by a touchdown to a UAB team had just fired its coach?
In the committee’s new guidance to consider record strength, there is an assumption that really bad losses are weighted heavily, but that certainly hasn’t been the case this time around.
North Texas has one loss to SP+ No. 27.
James Madison has one loss to SP+ No. 16 (and the No. 15 team in the committee’s rankings).
San Diego State has one loss to SP+ No. 73 has one loss to SP+ No. 119.
Memphis has one loss to SP+ No. 119.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the Tigers weren’t punished at all for a terrible loss.
![]()
5. The SEC
The latter half of the committee’s top 25 is usually the equivalent of the phone lines for a Finebaum episode — just a place where a lot of mediocre SEC folks hang out, patiently waiting for their turn. But this time, the committee has stuffed the bottom of the rankings with Big Ten teams — No. 19 USC, No. 20 Iowa, No. 21 Michigan and No. 23 Washington — and that might actually matter in the long run.
One of the committee’s favored metrics is wins over ranked opponents. We’re dubious about how many Big Ten teams deserve a little number next to their name. The league still has four teams that have yet to win a conference game, and the bottom third is a complete dumpster fire. It’s easy to rack up some wins when half your conference schedule has already been embarrassed by UCLA’s interim coaching staff.
But the SEC — that’s where the real depth is. Nearly half the SEC’s conference games this season have been one-possession affairs. Mississippi State, a team that had gone nearly two years without an SEC win, already knocked off last year’s Big 12 champ. LSU, a team that fired its coach, has a win over last year’s ACC champ. Florida beat Texas. Putting a bunch of undeserving teams at the bottom of the rankings only serves to prop up the résumés of teams such as Oregon, which hasn’t beaten anyone of consequence. And frankly, the committee is supposed to do that for the SEC, not the Big Ten.
Also angry: Virginia Cavaliers (8-1, No. 14, behind four two-loss teams), USF Bulls (6-2, unranked), Arizona State Sun Devils (6-3, unranked), Cincinnati Bearcats (7-2, unranked), Brian Kelly (just angry for other reasons).
Sports
CFP Bubble Watch: Where do things stand following the first committee ranking?
Published
6 hours agoon
November 5, 2025By
admin

The ACC is already playing from behind, and it’s only the first ranking of the season. With no teams ranked in the College Football Playoff selection committee’s initial top 12 on Tuesday night, the lone ACC team in the bracket if it were released today would be No. 14 Virginia. The Cavaliers would earn a spot as the fourth-highest ranked conference champion.
As for No. 17 Georgia Tech and No. 18 Miami? Not even a head-to-head win against the No. 10-ranked Fighting Irish was enough to keep the Canes within playoff range after their loss at SMU.
It’s far from over, as teams still have ample opportunities to build — or bust — their résumés. Separation, though, is starting to occur, and the Bubble Watch is tracking it for you. Teams with Would be in status below are in this week’s bracket based on the committee ranking. For each Power 4 conference, we’ve also listed Last team in and First team out. These are the true bubble teams hovering around inclusion. Teams labeled Still in the mix haven’t been eliminated but have work to do. A team that is Out will have to wait until next year.
The conferences below are listed in order of the number of bids they’d receive, ranked from the most to least, based on the selection committee’s first ranking on Tuesday night.
Jump to a conference:
ACC | Big 12 | Big Ten
SEC | Independent | Group of 5
Bracket

SEC
Would be in: Alabama, Georgia, Ole Miss, Texas A&M
![]()
Last team in: Ole Miss. The Rebels are currently in a safe spot, but they’re not a lock if they don’t run the table. With remaining games against The Citadel, Florida and at rival Mississippi State, there’s no possibility of a “good loss” remaining, and historically, losing in November has been far more damaging to playoff hopes than losing early. Ole Miss shouldn’t lose; it’s favored in each of its remaining games by at least 72% and has the seventh-best chance in the country (55.4%) to win out. If an upset occurred, though, the Rebels would join the two-loss club and might not win a debate with other two-loss teams that had more statement wins — and didn’t lose to an unranked opponent. The Rebels’ remaining schedule strength is No. 56 in the country. With a second loss, Ole Miss would be banking on wins against Oklahoma, Tulane and LSU to impress the committee enough for an at-large bid.
![]()
First team out: Texas. The Longhorns got a significant boost this week in part because three teams above them fell out — Vanderbilt, Georgia Tech and Miami — but also because they earned another CFP top 25 win against the Commodores. The head-to-head win against Oklahoma could also help them in the committee meeting room. If Texas is ranked No. 11 or No. 12 by the committee, though, and the ACC and Group of 5 champions are outside of the committee’s top 12, then the Longhorns would be elbowed out during the seeding process to make room for the fourth- and fifth-highest ranked conference champions, which are guaranteed spots in the playoff.
Still in the mix: Missouri, Oklahoma, Vanderbilt. The Sooners earned a huge résumé boost with their win at No. 25 Tennessee and have a CFP top 25 win against Michigan. For two-loss Vandy, a close road loss to Texas isn’t an eliminator. Missouri’s lone losses were to Alabama and Vanderbilt, but the Tigers don’t have anything yet to compensate for it. That could change on Saturday with a win against Texas A&M.
Out: Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi State, South Carolina, Tennessee
Big Ten
Would be in: Indiana, Ohio State, Oregon
![]()
Last team in: Oregon. The one-loss Ducks have a more challenging second half of the season, and the committee is about to learn how good this team truly is. So far, Oregon’s best win was Sept. 13 at Northwestern. The Ducks have been passing the eye test, but their opponents have a winning percentage of 47.2% — ranked No. 116 in the country. The committee will still respect the double-overtime win at Penn State but also recognize the Nittany Lions weren’t playing at an elite level even with James Franklin on the sideline. With road trips to Iowa and Washington — both respectable two-loss teams — and a Nov. 22 home game against USC, Oregon has a chance to further entrench itself in the top 12 or tumble out.
![]()
First team out: USC. The Trojans’ two losses were on the road to respectable teams (Illinois and Notre Dame) by a combined 12 points. Their best win was Oct. 11 against Michigan, but the Trojans could really boost their résumé this month and completely flip the script with Oregon if they can win in Eugene on Nov. 22. According to ESPN Analytics, USC has the fourth-best chance in the Big Ten to reach the playoff (18%), just ahead of Michigan. The only game it’s not favored to win is Nov. 22 at Oregon. If the Trojans can pull off that upset for a 10-2 finish, though, the committee would definitely consider them for an at-large spot.
Still in the mix: Iowa, Michigan, Washington. All three of these teams were ranked by the committee on Tuesday night, but No. 20 Iowa has the shortest climb into the conversation and gets a chance for a marquee win when it hosts No. 9 Oregon on Saturday. Michigan still has a chance to run the table and impress the committee with a win against its No. 1 team, Ohio State, but the head-to-head loss to USC will be a problem in both the Big Ten standings and the CFP ranking. If USC loses again, though, and their records are no longer comparable, it can be overcome. Then there’s a head-to-head loss to Oklahoma. Still, Michigan has a 13.2% chance to reach the playoff, according to the Allstate Playoff Predictor.
Out: Illinois, Maryland, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, Penn State, Purdue, Rutgers, UCLA, Wisconsin
Big 12
Would be in: BYU, Texas Tech
![]()
Last team in: Texas Tech. If Texas Tech loses to BYU on Saturday but still wins the Big 12, it’s a CFP lock. The problem is if the Red Raiders lose a second conference game, then they’re going to need some help to reach the Big 12 championship. So a loss to BYU could be devastating to their conference and CFP hopes. If the Red Raiders beat BYU on Saturday but lose to it in the Big 12 championship game, they would still have a chance at an at-large bid as the Big 12 runner-up. They would be able to claim a win over the eventual Big 12 champs, which would be a much-needed boost to their résumé. It would depend in part on how the game unfolded. The Cougars are the Red Raiders’ only remaining opponent with a winning record, as they end the season against UCF (4-4) and at West Virginia (3-6).
![]()
First team out: Utah. The No. 13 Utes are in a tricky spot because their two losses are to the Big 12’s best teams — BYU and Texas Tech. Utah still has the third-best chance to reach the Big 12 title game (22.2%) but will need some help to get there. Utah’s best wins are against Arizona State and Cincinnati, but it might have a hard time earning an at-large bid without being able to beat at least one of the best teams in its league. If there is some movement above the Utes, though, they could quickly earn a promotion given their place on the bubble after the first ranking.
Still in the mix: Cincinnati. They’re included here because they still have an 18% chance to reach the Big 12 title game, according to ESPN Analytics. The unranked Bearcats have only one league loss, which gives them some slim hope. Their other loss was in the season opener to Nebraska.
Out: Arizona, Arizona State, Baylor, Colorado, Houston, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma State, TCU, UCF, West Virginia
ACC
Would be in: Virginia
![]()
Last team in: Virginia. Like Georgia Tech, Virginia has a road loss to NC State as its lone blemish, but it was an early four-point loss compared with the Yellow Jackets’ double-digit defeat. Virginia also has a head-to-head win against Louisville. That’s the Hoos’ best win of the season and their only one against a CFP top 25 opponent. Virginia would still be in, though, if it wins the ACC even if it’s ranked outside the committee’s top 12 — just like three-loss Clemson was last year.
![]()
First team out: Louisville. The Cardinals lost at home in overtime to Virginia on Oct. 4 but earned a statement win Oct. 17 at Miami. Louisville will probably have only one win this season against a CFP top 25 team, which will make earning an at-large bid difficult. Louisville’s best shot would be to run the table, have teams above it lose, and win the ACC. Louisville has a 10.6% chance of winning the ACC, fourth best behind Georgia Tech, Miami and Virginia.
Still in the mix: Duke, Georgia Tech, Miami, SMU. The odds of earning an at-large bid dropped significantly on Tuesday, but any team that has a chance to win its league will have a chance to lock up a playoff spot, and these teams are all still technically in contention to play for the ACC title. Virginia has the best chance to reach the ACC championship game (66.6%), followed by Georgia Tech (41.3%) and Louisville (33.8%), according to ESPN Analytics. Miami has only a 2.7% chance to reach the championship game — also behind Duke and SMU.
Out: Boston College, Cal, Clemson, Florida State, North Carolina, NC State, Pitt, Stanford, Syracuse, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest
Independent
![]()
Would be in: Notre Dame. The playoff stars aligned for Notre Dame in Week 10, when Vanderbilt, Georgia Tech and Miami all lost, opening the door for the 6-2 Irish to move back into the top 10 after beating Boston College. The selection committee’s decision to render the head-to-head loss to Miami moot was critical for both teams. The group rewarded Notre Dame for its eye test and recent surge during a six-game winning streak. Notre Dame has the best chance of any team in the country to run the table (64.3%), but the Nov. 15 trip to Pitt will be difficult. The Panthers are playing well, have won five straight and have a bye week to prepare for the Irish. Notre Dame’s playoff position will remain tenuous until the clock runs out at Stanford and the Irish are 10-2.
Group of 5
![]()
Would be in: Memphis. As the projected winner of the American this week, Memphis would earn a playoff spot as the committee’s fifth-highest ranked conference champion. Memphis wasn’t ranked in the committee’s top 25, but the group continues to rank teams until a Group of 5 team is included and then publicizes which one it is without revealing the full ranking and which teams might have been ahead. The Oct. 25 win against South Florida was critical in the league race, but the loss to 3-5 UAB is an ink stain on the Tigers’ résumé that can be overcome with a conference title. Memphis has at least a 57% chance to win each of its remaining games, according to ESPN Analytics.
Still in the mix: USF, North Texas, James Madison, San Diego State. The committee would consider USF’s head-to-head wins against Boise State and North Texas.

Bracket
Based on the first committee ranking, the seeding would be:
First-round byes
No. 1 Ohio State (Big Ten champ)
No. 2 Indiana
No. 3 Texas A&M (SEC champ)
No. 4 Alabama
First-round games
On campus, Dec. 19 and 20
No. 12 Memphis (American champ) at No. 5 Georgia
No. 11 Virginia (ACC champ) at No. 6 Ole Miss
No. 10 Notre Dame at No. 7 BYU (Big 12 champ)
No. 9 Oregon at No. 8 Texas Tech
Quarterfinal games
At the Goodyear Cotton Bowl, Capital One Orange Bowl, Rose Bowl presented by Prudential and Allstate Sugar Bowl on Dec. 31 and Jan. 1.
No. 12 Memphis/No. 5 Georgia winner vs. No. 4 Alabama
No. 11 Virginia/No. 6 Ole Miss winner vs. No. 3 Texas A&M
No. 10 Notre Dame/No. 7 BYU winner vs. No. 2 Indiana
No. 9 Oregon/No. 8 Texas Tech winner vs. No. 1 Ohio State
Trending
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024
