Carbon capture is expected to play a pivotal role in the race to net zero emissions. But not everyone agrees

Published

4 years ago

July 20, 2021

admin

A detail of the pilot carbon dioxide (CO2) capture plant is pictured at Amager Bakke waste incinerator in Copenhagen on June 24, 2021.

IDA GULDBAEK ARENTSEN | AFP | Getty Images

LONDON — Carbon capture technology is often held up as a source of hope in reducing global greenhouse gas emissions, featuring prominently in countries’ climate plans as well as the net-zero strategies of some of the world’s largest oil and gas companies.

The topic is divisive, however, with climate researchers, campaigners and environmental advocacy groups arguing that carbon capture technology is not a solution.

The world is confronting a climate emergency, and policymakers and chief executives are under intensifying pressure to deliver on promises made as part of the landmark Paris Agreement. The accord, ratified by nearly 200 countries in 2015, is seen as critically important in averting the worst effects of climate change.

Carbon capture, utilization and storage — often shortened to carbon capture technology or CCUS — refers to a suite of technologies designed to capture carbon dioxide from high-emitting activities such as power generation or industrial facilities, that use either fossil fuels or biomass for fuel.

The captured carbon dioxide, which can also be captured directly from the atmosphere, is then compressed and transported via pipeline, ship, rail or truck to be used in a range of applications or permanently stored underground.

There are a number of reasons why carbon capture is a false climate solution. The first and most fundamental of those reasons is that it is not necessary.

Carroll Muffett

Chief executive at the Center for International Environmental Law

Proponents of these technologies believe they can play an important and diverse role in meeting global energy and climate goals.

Carroll Muffett, chief executive at the non-profit Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), is not one of them. “There are a number of reasons why carbon capture is a false climate solution. The first and most fundamental of those reasons is that it is not necessary,” he told CNBC via telephone.

“If you look at the history of carbon capture and storage, what you see is nearly two decades of a solution in search of a cure.”

‘Unproven scalability’

Some CCS and CCUS facilities have been operating since the 1970s and 1980s when natural gas processing plants in south Texas began capturing carbon dioxide and supplying the emissions to local oil producers for enhanced oil recovery operations. The first one was set up in 1972.

It wasn’t until several years later that carbon capture technology would be studied for climate mitigation purposes. Now, there are 21 large-scale CCUS commercial projects in operation worldwide and plans for at least 40 new commercial facilities have been announced in recent years.

A report published by CIEL earlier this month concluded that these technologies are not only “ineffective, uneconomic and unsafe,” but they also prolong reliance on the fossil fuel industry and distract from a much-needed pivot to renewable alternatives.

Employees near the CO2 compressor site at the Hawiyah Natural Gas Liquids Recovery Plant, operated by Saudi Aramco, in Hawiyah, Saudi Arabia, on Monday, June 28, 2021. The Hawiyah Natural Gas Liquids Recovery Plant is designed to process 4.0 billion standard cubic feet per day of sweet gas as pilot project for Carbon Capture Technology (CCUS) to prove the possibility of capturing C02 and lowering emissions from such facilities.

Maya Siddiqui | Bloomberg | Getty Images

“The unproven scalability of CCS technologies and their prohibitive costs mean they cannot play any significant role in the rapid reduction of global emissions necessary to limit warming to 1.5°C,” the CIEL said, referring to a key aim of the Paris Agreement to limit a rise in the earth’s temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

“Despite the existence of the technology for decades and billions of dollars in government subsidies to date, deployment of CCS at scale still faces insurmountable challenges of feasibility, effectiveness, and expense,” the CIEL added.

Earlier this year, campaigners at Global Witness and Friends of the Earth Scotland commissioned climate scientists at the Tyndall Centre in Manchester, U.K. to assess the role fossil fuel-related CCS plays in the energy system.

The peer-reviewed study found that carbon capture and storage technologies still face numerous barriers to short-term deployment and, even if these could be overcome, the technology “would only start to deliver too late.” Researchers also found that it was incapable of operating with zero emissions, constituted a distraction from the rapid growth of renewable energy “and has a history of over-promising and under-delivering.”

In short, the study said reliance on CCS is “not a solution” to confronting the world’s climate challenge.

Carbon capture is ‘a rarity’ in Washington

Not everyone is convinced by these arguments, however. The International Energy Agency, an influential intergovernmental group, says that while carbon capture technology has not yet lived up to its promise, it can still offer “significant strategic value” in the transition to net zero.

“CCUS is a really important part of this portfolio of technologies that we consider,” Samantha McCulloch, head of CCUS technology at the IEA, told CNBC via video call.

The IEA has identified four key strategic roles for the technologies: Addressing emissions from energy infrastructure, tackling hard-to-abate emissions from heavy industry (cement, steel and chemicals, among others), natural gas-based hydrogen production and carbon removal.

For these four reasons, McCulloch said it would be fair to describe CCUS as a climate solution.

At present, CCUS facilities around the world have the capacity to capture more than 40 million metric tons of carbon dioxide each year. The IEA believes plans to build many more facilities could double the level of CO2 captured globally.

“It is contributing but not to a scale that we envisage will be needed in terms of a net-zero pathway,” McCulloch said. “The encouraging news, I think, is that there has been very significant momentum behind the technology in recent years and this is really reflecting that without CCUS it will be very difficult — if not impossible — to meet net-zero goals.”

Electricity pylons are seen in front of the cooling towers of the coal-fired power station of German energy giant RWE in Weisweiler, western Germany, on January 26, 2021.

INA FASSBENDER | AFP | Getty Images

Meanwhile, the American Petroleum Institute, the largest U.S. oil and gas trade lobby group, believes the future looks bright for carbon capture and utilization storage.

The group noted in a blog post on July 2 that CCUS was a rare example of something that is liked by “just about everyone” in Washington – Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike.

Where do we go from here?

“Frankly, tackling climate change is not the same as trying to bring the fossil fuel industry to its knees,” Bob Ward, policy and communications director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change at the London School of Economics, told CNBC via telephone.

“If the fossil fuel companies can help us get to net zero then why wouldn’t we want them to do that? I think too many environmental groups have conflated their dislike of oil and gas companies with the challenge of tackling climate change.”

When asked why carbon capture and storage schemes should be in countries’ climate plans given the criticism they receive, Ward replied: “Because if we are going to get to net zero by 2050, we have to throw every technology at this problem … People who argue that you can start ruling out technologies because you don’t like them are those who, I think, haven’t understood the scale of the challenge we face.”

The CIEL’s Muffett rejected this suggestion, saying proponents of carbon capture technologies are increasingly reliant on this kind of “all of the above” argument. “The answer to it is surprisingly easy: It is that we have a decade to cut global emissions in half and we have just a few decades to eliminate them entirely,” Muffett said.

“If on any reasonable examination of CCS, it costs massive amounts of money but doesn’t actually reduce emissions in any meaningful way, and further entrenches fossil fuel infrastructure, the question is: In what way is that contributing to the solution as opposed to diverting time and energy and resources away from the solutions that will work?”

Environment

Honda is already testing a new electrified Civic: Here’s our first look

Published

3 hours ago

November 5, 2025

admin

Honda is already testing a new electrified Civic: Here's our first look

A new Civic is in the works that’s bringing much more than just a new look to Honda’s best-selling vehicle. Here’s our first look at the next-gen Honda Civic.

Honda previews next-gen Civic with new hybrid system

During an event held for the media on Wednesday, Honda offered a look at some of the advanced new tech it plans to roll out over the next few years.

Although it just launched the current Civic Hybrid last year, Honda is already working on its replacement. Honda didn’t confirm or deny that the Civic was under the camouflage, but it was pretty evident.

The new Civic will ride on Honda’s next-gen hybrid (HEV) platform, designed for mid-size vehicles. Honda’s new hybrid system is nearly 200 lbs (90 kg) lighter and more flexible, which it said provides “excellent fuel economy” while also improving the driving experience.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

According to Car and Driver, which drove the new Civic, the interior is also getting redesigned. Honda covered most of it, but you could still see what appeared to be a larger, at least 15″ infotainment screen at the center.

Honda is keeping most powertrain details a secret for now, but the new Civic appears to have an electrified drive unit similar to those found in the Accord and CR-V.

The company said the direct-drive motor and generator motor are smaller, more efficient, and free from rare-earth materials. Honda also said the battery, located under the rear seat, is all-new. It will be used for upcoming compact and mid-size vehicles, which Honda said will help reduce costs.

Honda-Civic-new-hybrid-platform — (Source: Honda)

As for how it drives, Car and Driver said the new Honda Civic was quick off the line thanks to its direct-drive setup. However, the test track was too smooth to really judge the ride quality.

Like the new Honda Prelude, the Civic will feature S+ Shift, which simulates gear-shifting via paddles on the steering wheel.

The prototype had exhaust pipes, but they likely won’t make it to the production model. Honda plans to launch several next-gen hybrids on the new HEV platform, starting from 2027. The next-gen Honda Accord may even arrive before the Civic, debuting on the hybrid system.

Honda said it’s also developing a next-gen platform for large-size HEVs to meet the growing demand in North America.

Using a next-gen V6 engine with extended fuel-efficient range, Honda said it aims to improve fuel efficiency by 30% compared to its current ICE vehicles. Honda’s larger HEVs will likely go on sale closer to 2028.

Honda also showcased the Super-ONE Prototype during the event, its compact EV set to launch in Japan in 2026, followed by the UK and other global markets.

Add Electrek as a preferred source on Google

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Environment

Will Zero bring its new 60 MPH electric scooter to the US?

Published

4 hours ago

November 5, 2025

admin

Will Zero bring its new 60 MPH electric scooter to the US?

Zero Motorcycles turned heads in Milan at EICMA 2025 with the unveiling of its new LS1 electric scooter, a sleek and practical 60 mph (100 km/h) commuter built for European city streets. With its swappable batteries, off-board charging, and smart safety tech like ABS and traction control, the LS1 is clearly a strong contender in the urban EV space. It also marks a major shift for Zero, expanding beyond full-size electric motorcycles into a more accessible, everyday format.

But will it come to the US market?

At the show I had the chance to speak with James Callahan of Zero, and he confirmed that the LS1 is not coming to the US market, at least not in its current form or in the near future. “The scooter market in the US is still very small,” Callahan explained, “so for now, we’re focused on Europe, where the demand is much higher.”

And while interest from American riders may exist, there’s another hurdle: the LS1 isn’t homologated for the US, meaning it doesn’t meet certain regulatory standards like the NHTSA’s lighting requirements. Its slick continuous LED turn signal bar would need to be redesigned entirely, among other tweaks to the design.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The LS1 comes equipped with two removable batteries that live in the floorboard and can be charged indoors using an 800W charger – or even faster with a 1,500W upgrade. A third battery can be added under the seat for extended range, while that same underseat storage area also hides a cavity large enough for a helmet or groceries.

Add in a low seat height, a short wheelbase, and user-friendly features, and you’ve got a solid commuter platform. But it’s a platform that we’re not likely to see in the US for a long time.

So while the LS1 represents an exciting new chapter for Zero in Europe, fitting with the company’s recent move out of California and into the Netherlands, don’t expect to see it zipping down US streets anytime soon.

Though it’s not all bad news for our American readers. There’s a spark of hope that Zero’s more affordable off-road electric motorcycles launched in the US market this year could be getting street-legal homologation, though not immediately. More on that soon…

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Environment

Toyota’s selling cars faster than it can build them, saying it can ‘barely cover the demand’

Published

5 hours ago

November 5, 2025

admin

Toyota's selling cars faster than it can build them, saying it can 'barely cover the demand'

Toyota is selling cars faster than it can build them. With strong demand for hybrids, the company says it can “barely cover the demand.”

Toyota’s hybrids fuel sales growth in 2025

After reporting its fiscal second-quarter earnings on Wednesday, Toyota raised its sales and earnings forecast for the year.

In the first half of the fiscal year, the company sold a record 5.27 million vehicles, up 105% compared to the same period in 2024. Those numbers include its luxury Lexus brand.

Toyota said “strong demand from customers around the world” led to higher sales, particularly in Japan and North America. Hybrid vehicles primarily drove growth, with higher demand in competitive markets such as North America and China.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The Japanese automaker sold 2.27 million hybrids (HEVs) in the first six months of the fiscal year 2026. Including battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), and fuel-cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), Toyota’s total “electrified” vehicles accounted for 47% of its total sales.

Toyota said the new RAV4, its best-selling vehicle globally, is carrying the growth as the first to adopt its software-defined platform, Arene.

Like most automakers, Toyota took a hit from the US auto tariffs. The company expects the 15% tariff will cost an extra 1.45 trillion yen ($9.4 billion) in the fiscal year.

Toyota-hybrid-sales — Toyota RAV4 PHEV (Source: Toyota)

Toyota expects higher sales, and cost-cutting measures will lessen the blow. It raised operating profit guidance for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, to 3.4 trillion yen ($22 billion). That’s up from its previous guidance of 3.2 trillion yen ($20.8 billion), but still a 28% decrease compared to the previous fiscal year.

Toyota-2026-bZ-prices — 2026 Toyota bZ electric SUV (Source: Toyota)

“In terms of sales, we expect a very healthy situation going forward,” Toyota’s CFO, Kenta Kon, said during a news conference with reporters on Wednesday (via Automotive News).

According to Kon, Toyota is still seeing “strong demand,” so much so that “we can barely cover the demand,” he added.

Electrek’s Take

Although hybrids are carrying the growth, Toyota’s BEV sales are still lagging. In the US, Toyota sold just 61 bZ electric SUVs in September. Through the first nine months of the year, Toyota sold just 12,264 bZs, down from 13,577 in the same period last year.

With the 2026 BZ upgrade rolling out and new EVs arriving soon, including the C-HR and bZ Woodland, Toyota’s BEV sales are expected to gain momentum over the next few months finally.

At the Japan Mobility Show, the company revealed plans for five unique brands under the Toyota Group, which it says will provide a diverse range of vehicles designed for every buyer.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.