Connect with us

Published

on

Tesla has dropped the price of their FSD Computer/Hardware 3.0 upgrade to $1,000, from the previous price point of $1,500. This applies to vehicles that still have Hardware 2.0/2.5 computers and want to try the new Tesla FSD subscription service rolled out this weekend.

The move comes after significant criticism from Tesla forums and from us here at Electrek, who pointed out that Tesla is charging owners to upgrade to hardware they were already told they had.

Our previous story lays out the whole situation, and we won’t completely repeat it here. Click through if you want more details.

Here’s a quick recap: all vehicles Tesla sold from late-2016 to mid-2019 purportedly included the appropriate hardware for Full Self-Driving capabilities. This was not functional yet, but would be utilized as Tesla further developed its Autopilot software. Eventually, Tesla found out they needed a hardware upgraded, and started shipping cars with a more capable Autopilot computer. When owners of cars with the old hardware bought the Full Self-Driving package, they would be upgraded for free to the new computer. Then Tesla introduced a new subscription model, but started charging people with the old hardware $1,500 for the hardware upgrade, even though those owners had bought the car thinking they had the proper hardware for Full Self-Driving.

After seeing the backlash from forums, Electrek, and other publications, Tesla seems to have taken this criticism at least partially to heart, and customers in the same situation who go to upgrade in the Tesla app are now shown a $1,000 upgrade cost, rather than the previous $1,500:

We have also seen reports that anyone who has scheduled an installation in the last few days will receive a refund for the $500 difference.

According to a teardown by EE Times, Tesla’s HW 3.0 system costs about $190 per unit – though, to be honest, this seems a little low to us. Also, this is simply hardware cost, and doesn’t include any service or logistics costs for the retrofit installation.

Electrek’s Take

While this is a step forward, it’s still not zero. Tesla sold these vehicles with the promise that they had the hardware for self-driving capabilities, so it does not seem ethical to charge additional money to owners who bought the vehicle with that promise simply in order to restore a capability that they were told they already have.

Yes, things have changed since then, but a person who bought a Tesla in 2017 did not know that HW3 would be required for Full Self-Driving, as that announcement wasn’t made until 2019.

Tesla did right by those owners previously, by offering free upgrades for those who bought Full Self-Driving, but they’re still not doing right by the owners of late-2016 to mid-2019 cars who subscribe to the new subscription feature.

We don’t know what Tesla’s specific concerns are which led to this decision. It’s possible they thought that if enough people subscribe for one month and then cancel their subscription, the cost of installing hardware in those vehicles would result in a loss for Tesla, and those cars wouldn’t be gaining any functionality from the new hardware anyway. From their current point of view this makes some sense, but remember: they still sold these cars as if they had Full Self-Driving hardware. Upgrades required to get to that point should be Tesla’s responsibility, not the owner’s.

Fred had a suggestion for a compromise that Tesla could implement, which does alleviate this possible concern:

I had been thinking something similar. Tesla could have introduced the subscription service with a minimum contract, or as Fred states, perhaps a credit of several free months in exchange for a lump sum upfront to cover the hardware upgrade. This would have been an easier sell, as customers wouldn’t feel like they’re losing out on any money, even though they should have already had the hardware for FSD.

They likely didn’t do that because they wanted to keep subscriptions easy, but If they had done this from the get-go, they probably could have avoided the anger of customers who feel jilted at having to pay for hardware they thought they already had.

In the end, the most fair solution is just to take it on the chin and install this hardware for free to people who bought a car that was marketed as having Full Self-Driving hardware. Maybe Tesla takes a short financial hit from this, but if they’re proud enough about the system and think its capabilities are worth 199/month, they’ll eventually recoup those upgrade costs and more.

Besides, it was a promise, and for a company that has grown largely due to the loyalty and word of mouth of its early customers, it’s not just the right thing to do, but the smart thing to do. We’re glad they made this change, because it means they recognize they were wrong and are receptive to criticism, but we’d really like to see the price go down to what it should have been all along: zero.


Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Warfare’s Alex Garland: ‘Being anti-war is not the same as saying it should never happen’

Published

on

By

Warfare's Alex Garland: 'Being anti-war is not the same as saying it should never happen'

Alex Garland says while it’s “the most obvious statement about life on this planet” that the world would be a better place without war, it “doesn’t mean it should never happen”, and there are “circumstances in which war is required”.

The Oscar-nominated screenwriter and director told Sky News: “I don’t think it is possible to make a statement about what war is really like without it being implicitly anti-war, inasmuch as it would be better if this thing did not happen.

“But that’s not the same as saying it should never happen. There are circumstances in which war is required.”

Pic: A24
Image:
(L-R) Co-writers and co-directors Alex Garland and Ray Mendoza. Pic: A24

His latest film, Warfare, embeds the audience within a platoon of American Navy SEALs on an Iraqi surveillance mission gone wrong, telling the story solely through the memories of war veterans from a real 2006 mission in Ramadi, Iraq.

Garland says the film is “anti-war in as much as it is better if war does not happen,” adding, “and that is about the most obvious statement about life on this planet that one could make.”

Comparing it to ongoing geopolitical conflict across the world, Garland goes on: “It would be better if Gaza had not been flattened. It would be better if Ukraine was not invaded. It would it better if all people’s problems could be solved via dialogue and not threat or violence…

“To be anti-war to me is a rational position, and most veterans I’ve met are anti-war.”

The screenwriter behind hits including Ex Machina, 28 Days Later and The Beach says this film is “an attempt to recreate something as faithfully and accurately as we could”.

Pic: A24
Image:
The film opens to Swedish dance hit Call On Me. Pic: A24

‘War veterans feel invisible and forgotten’

Almost entirely based on first-person accounts, the 15-rated film opens with soldiers singing along to the video of Swedish dance hit Call On Me – complete with gyrating women in thong leotards.

It’s the only music in the film. The remaining score is made up of explosions, sniper fire and screams of pain.

Garland co-wrote and co-directed the film alongside Hollywood stuntman and gunfight coordinator Ray Mendoza, whom Garland met on his last film, Civil War.

Mendoza, a communications officer on the fateful mission portrayed in the film, says despite the traumatic content, the experience of making the film was “therapeutic”.

Mendoza told Sky News: “It actually mended a lot of relationships… There were some guys I hadn’t spoken to in a very long time. And this allowed us to bury the hatchet, so to speak, on some issues from that day.”

Turning to Hollywood after serving in the Navy for 16 years, Mendoza says past war film he’d seen – even the good ones – were “a little off” because they “don’t get the culture right”.

Mendoza admits: “You feel like no one cares because they didn’t get it right. You feel invisible. You feel forgotten.”

With screenings of Warfare shown to around 1,000 veterans ahead of general release, Mendoza says: “They finally feel heard. They finally feel like somebody got it right.”

As to whether it could be triggering for some veterans, Mendoza says decisively not: “It’s not triggering. I would say it’s the opposite, for a veteran at least.”

Read more from Sky News:
How attack on aid workers unfolded
The gang war engulfing Scottish cities

Pic: A24
Image:
D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai plays communications officer Ray. Pic: A24

‘I’m an actor – I love my hair’

A tense and raw 90-minute story told in real time, the film’s ensemble cast is made up of young buzzy actors, dubbed “all of the internet’s boyfriends” when the casting was first announced.

Mirroring the Navy SEALs they were portraying, the cast initially bonded through a three-week bootcamp ahead of filming, before living together for the 25-day shoot.

Black Mirror’s Will Poulter, who plays Eric, the officer in charge of the operation, says the film’s extended takes and 360-degree sets demanded a special kind of focus.

Poulter said: “It required everyone to practise something that is fundamental to Navy SEAL mentality – you’re a teammate before you’re an individual.

“When a camera’s roaming around like that and could capture anyone at kind of any moment, it requires that everyone to be ‘on’ at all times and for the sake of each other.

“It becomes less about making sure that you’re performing when the camera lands on you, but as much about this idea that you are performing for the sake of the actor opposite you when the camera’s on them.”

Another of the film’s stars, Reservation Dogs’ D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai, plays Mendoza and is the heart of the film.

Woon-A-Tai says the cast drew on tactics used by real soldiers to help with the intense filming schedule: “Laughter is medicine… A lot of times these are long takes, long hours, back-to-back days, so uplifting our spirit was definitely a big part of it.”

He also joked that shaving each other’s heads in a bonding ritual the night before the first day of filming was a daunting task.

“As actors, we love our hair. I mean, I speak personally, I love my hair. You know, I had really long hair. So yeah, it definitely takes a lot of trust. And you know, it wasn’t even at all, but you know it was still fun to do.”

Warfare is in cinemas now.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

UB40 say striking Birmingham bin workers ‘shouldn’t give up’

Published

on

By

UB40 say striking Birmingham bin workers 'shouldn't give up'

Birmingham band UB40 say the city’s striking bin workers and their union should “keep fighting” in their dispute over pay.

It comes as the government and the council urged them to accept a “fair and reasonable offer”.

“We’re fully on their side,” drummer Jimmy Brown told Sky News. “I think they shouldn’t give up, they should still be fighting.

“Working people shouldn’t have to take a reduction in their incomes, which is what we’re talking about here.

“We’re talking about people being paid less and it seems to me with prices going up, heating, buying food, inflation and rents going up then people need a decent wage to have a half decent life… keep going boys!”

Members of Unite on the picket line in Tyseley, Birmingham, amid an ongoing refuse workers' strike in the city. Birmingham City Council says it is declaring a major incident over the impact of the ongoing bin strike, as it estimates 17,000 tonnes of waste remains uncollected around the city. Picture date: Tuesday April 1, 2025.
Image:
Members of the Unite union in Birmingham earlier this month. Pic: PA

Workers joined picket lines again on Thursday, with some fearing they could be up to £600 a month worse off if they accept the terms.

“We have total utter support for the bin men and all trade unions,” said guitarist Robin Campbell.

“The other side is always going to say they’ve made a reasonable offer – the point is they’re the ones who’ve messed up, they’re the ones who’ve gone bankrupt, they’re the ones now trying to reduce the bin men’s wages.”

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Lead singer Matt Doyle told Sky News: “It’s a shame that what we’re seeing is all the images of rats and rubbish building up, that is going to happen inevitably, but we’ve just got to keep fighting through that.”

About 22,000 tonnes of rubbish accumulated on the city’s streets after a major incident was declared last month by Birmingham City Council.

Rubbish bags in Poplar Road in Birmingham.  
Pic: PA
Image:
Rubbish has blighted the city’s streets for weeks . Pic: PA

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Bin situation ‘pains me’ – council boss

On a visit to the city, local government minister Jim McMahon said the union and local authority should continue to meet in “good faith” and the government felt there was a deal that could be “marshalled around”.

He paid tribute to the “hundreds of workers” who have worked “around the clock” to clear the rubbish.

Read more:
Bin workers urged to accept ‘fair’ offer
Military planners help with bin crisis

“As we stand here today, 85% of that accumulated waste has been cleared and the council have a plan in place now to make sure it doesn’t accumulate going forward,” said Mr McMahon.

Sky News understands talks are not set to resume until next week.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Drummer Zak Starkey speaks out after leaving The Who

Published

on

By

Drummer Zak Starkey speaks out after leaving The Who

Drummer Zak Starkey has said he is “surprised and saddened” after parting ways with The Who following recent charity shows at the Royal Albert Hall.

The musician, who is the son of The Beatles drummer Ringo Starr and his first wife, Maureen Starkey, had been with the band since 1996, when he joined for their Quadrophenia tour.

He was introduced to drumming as a child by “Uncle Keith” – The Who drummer and family friend Keith Moon, who died in 1978.

20 June 2023, Berlin: Zak Starkey, drummer, of the band The Who plays at the concert of The Who with Orchestra - "Hits Back!" at the Waldb'hne in Berlin. Photo by: Carsten Koall/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images
Image:
Pic: Carsten Koall/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images

Earlier this week, the band issued a statement saying a “collective decision” had been made about his departure. It came after their Teenage Cancer Trust shows in March.

A review of one gig, published in the Metro, suggested frontman Roger Daltrey – who launched the annual gig series for the charity in 2000 – was “frustrated” with the drumming during some tracks.

Now, Starkey has issued a statement to Rolling Stone, saying he is “very proud” of his near 30 years with The Who.

“Filling the shoes of my Godfather, ‘Uncle Keith’ has been the biggest honour and I remain their biggest fan,” he said. “They’ve been like family to me.”

More on The Who

In January, Starkey suffered a blood clot in his right leg and a performance with his other band Mantra Of The Cosmos – which also features Shaun Ryder and Bez from Happy Mondays, and Andy Bell of Ride and Oasis – was cancelled.

Referencing this in his statement to Rolling Stone, Starkey said: “I suffered a serious medical emergency with blood clots in my right bass drum calf. This is now completely healed and does not affect my drumming or running.”

He continued: “After playing those songs with the band for so many decades, I’m surprised and saddened anyone would have an issue with my performance that night, but what can you do?”

Starkey said he planned to “take some much needed time off with my family” and focus on the release of Mantra Of The Cosmos single Domino Bones, which features Noel Gallagher, as well as his autobiography.

“Twenty-nine years at any job is a good old run, and I wish them the best,” he added.

Starkey has also previously played with Oasis, Lightning Seeds and Johnny Marr.

While Daltrey starts a solo tour at the weekend, The Who have two shows planned for Italy in July but no full tour. Details of a replacement for Starkey have not been announced.

Continue Reading

Trending