News broke Wednesday that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had disclosed the sale of between $1.5 million and $3 million worth of shares in Googles parent company, Alphabet, just a few weeks before the Department of Justice announced an antitrust lawsuit against the tech giant.
Nancy and her husband Paul, who is often the person actually making the trades, have been accused multiple times in the past of using her position in the federal government to make advantageous moves in the stock market. The couple sold their Nvidia stock, albeit at a loss, right before the U.S. government announced new restrictions on the sale of computer chips to China and Russia, while Paul bought $6 million in tech options as Congress debated antitrust measures against Big Tech companies.
Coincidentally, the day before the news broke about the Pelosis stock trades, Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley reintroduced The Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act, otherwise known as the PELOSI Act. The bill, first introduced in 2022, would prohibit members of Congress or their family members from holding or trading individual stocks. Any existing investments would have to be divested or placed in a blind trust for the duration of the lawmakers tenure in office.
A majority of congresspeople are millionaires, and while most were already wealthy before entering Congress, they also tend to have success on the stock market while in office. Although there have been many efforts to rein in congressional stock trading, Hawleys newest push has brought the issue back into the spotlight.
Many congresspeople were already wealthy and held considerable assets before they entered politics. Members of Congress tend to come from professional fields that are relatively lucrative think doctors and lawyers. Some are extremely successful business owners who made the jump over to politics.
For example, Republican California Rep. Darrell Issa is currently the richest person in Congress, with an estimated net worth of $460 million as of September 2022. Before entering the House, Issa made a fortune in the car alarm business in the 1990s. Similarly, the top three richest senators, Rick Scott (R-FL), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Mitt Romney (R-UT) were all successful in private business before attaining public office.
But that doesnt mean lawmakers dont expand their wealth while in office. In fact, some have seen massive gains thanks to fortuitous moves on the stock market.
In 2021, members of Congress and their family members purchased $267 million in assets while sales amounted to $364 million.
On average in 2021, Congress beat the market, according to an analysis by Unusual Whales. SPY, the exchange traded fund that owns all of the stocks on the S&P 500 and one of the most important market measures for investors, saw a return of 13.6%. Meanwhile, both House Democrats and Republicans saw an average return of 14.7% and Senate Democrats saw a return of 15.4%. Only Senate Republicans failed to beat the SPY, with a 13% average return. One congressman saw a return of almost 800%.
Members of Congress have not only been fortunate in picking winning stocks, but they have also had a lot of luck in selling stocks note the Pelosi example above just in the nick of time to avoid massive losses. This level of success has attracted allegations of insider trading, i.e. using knowledge gained from their work in the federal government that is unavailable to normal Americans to make advantageous trades.
Four senators were accused of such malfeasance in the early days of the COVID pandemic. Former Republican Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina and Kelly Loeffler of Georgia sold millions worth of stock after a closed-door briefing on the possible impacts of the coronavirus. Sens. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), David Perdue (R-GA), and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) also dumped stock in the early weeks of the pandemic.
The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission launched investigations into possible insider trading by the five lawmakers. All of the inquiries were dropped by January 2021. An Insider investigation found that many other Congress members bought or sold stock in vaccine manufacturers Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson during the pandemic.
Between 2019 and 2021, 97 members of Congress almost 20% of all lawmakers in the Legislative Branch reported that they made stock trades in companies that were influenced by their committees, according to an analysis by The New York Times.
There are already laws on the books to prevent insider trading, most notably the STOCK Act passed in 2012. A critical part of the law requires members of Congress to promptly disclose any stock trades made by them or close family members. According to an Insider report from early January, 78 members of Congress have recently failed to comply with the law and properly disclose stock trades, according to an Insider report from early January.
Congresspeople who violate the law face a fine, but it is usually only $200 and the penalty has been waived altogether several times by the House Ethics Committee. Two current members of the eight-person Ethics Committee were identified in the Times analysis as having traded stocks in companies influenced by their committees and were among the 78 lawmakers who failed to comply with the STOCK Act.
For too long, politicians in Washington have taken advantage of the economic system they write the rules for, turning profits for themselves at the expense of the American people, Hawley said of the PELOSI Act in a news release. Lawmakers who violate the proposed act would be forced to forfeit any profits from the investments to the American people and lose the ability to write off any losses on their taxes.
The first iteration of Hawleys bill, which lacked the acronymic jab at the former House Speaker, stalled in the Democrat-controlled House in 2022. Democrats also scrapped another proposal to regulate lawmakers stock trades just a few days before the 2022 midterms elections, with then-House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer claiming that there wasnt enough time for representatives to study the proposal.
Almost simultaneously with Hawley, Reps. Chip Roy (R-TX) and Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) introduced a bill banning members of Congress from trading individual stocks for the third time. They previously introduced the bill in 2020 and 2021.
Given the poor track record of bills regulating congressional stock trading, both in getting passed and actually being enforced, chance of meaningful reform is dim. And in the meantime, members of Congress will most likely continue to beat the market.
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Dec. 11, 2025, in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images
The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced on Thursday, with both hitting fresh closing records. The Russell 2000 index also ended the session at a new high, following the U.S. Federal Reserve’s quarter-point cut on Wednesday.
But if investors analyze Thursday’s individual stock movements, they will see not all is well with the AI play yet. Oracle shares plunged nearly 11%, a day after it reported weak quarterly revenue, higher capital expenditure and long-term lease commitments. Oracle’s slide dragged down AI-related names such as Nvidia and Micron.
In extended trading, Broadcom shares fell 4.5%. The chipmaker beat Wall Street’s expectations for earnings and revenue, but CEO Hock Tan appeared to have failed to address worries that their largest customer, Google, might eventually make more of its chips in-house. Rising memory prices would also pressure margins, while the company’s chip deal with OpenAI might not be binding.
That’s why the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 0.26% despite other major U.S. indexes hitting records. Putting the two together, that means investors are rotating out of tech into other parts of the market. The S&P 500 financials sector, for instance, closed at a fresh record, buoyed by jumps in Visa and Mastercard.
Even though the AI theme seems to be under scrutiny, other sectors are performing well on the back of a resilient U.S. economy — as signaled by Fed officials on Wednesday — and buoyed by interest-rate cut. So long as nothing throws a spanner in the works, looks like we’re all set for a happy holiday season.
— CNBC’s Kristina Partsinevelos contributed to this report.
Disney to invest $1 billion in OpenAI. The media giant will also allow Sora, OpenAI’s video generator, to use its copyrighted characters, under a $1 billion licensing agreement. “We think this is a good investment for the company,” Disney CEO Bob Iger told CNBC.
Reddit launches legal challenge in Australia. The county introduced a ban on social media for teens under 16, which came into effect on Wednesday. Reddit argues that the law is “invalid on the basis of the implied freedom of political communication.”
[PRO] Where will Oracle go from here? Analysts are re-looking their price targets for Oracle stock after the firm released a disappointing and confusing earnings report on Wednesday.
And finally…
Gen. David Petraeus, Former CIA Director, Fmr. Central Commander and American commander in Iraq.
White House’s new national security strategy gave Europe a scare last week as it warned the region faced “civilizational erasure” and questioned whether it could remain a geopolitical partner for America.
The strategy was, “in a way, going after the Europeans but, frankly, some of the Europeans needed to be gotten after because I watched as four different presidents tried to exhort the Europeans to do more for their own defense and now that’s actually happening,” David Petraeus, former CIA director and four-star U.S. Army general, told CNBC’s Dan Murphy in Abu Dhabi on Thursday.
Economists polled by the Reuters news agency had predicted that October GDP would grow by 0.1%.
The figures, from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), represent more bad news for the chancellor over the state of the UK economy.
Commentators had warned that consumer spending was likely to be restrained in the run-up to November’s budget, amid concerns about the impact of Rachel Reeves’s potential measures on households and businesses.
UK GDP has also been hit hard by disruption to car production caused by a cyber attack on Jaguar Land Rover.
The ONS said that during October, the UK’s services sector fell by 0.3%, while construction was down 0.6%. However, production grew by 1.1%.
It found that GDP on a rolling three-month basis, to October, also fell by 0.1%.
The ONS’s director of economic statistics, Liz McKeown, said: “Within production, there was continued weakness in car manufacturing, with the industry only making a slight recovery in October from the substantial fall in output seen in the previous month.
“Overall services showed no growth in the latest three months, continuing the recent trend of slowing in this sector. There were falls in wholesale and scientific research, offset by growth in rental and leasing and retail.”
Scott Gardner, from banking giant JP Morgan, said that despite expectations of a return to growth, the economy continued to “battle a period of inconsistent productivity”.
He added: “Speculation about potential budget announcements had a numbing effect on consumers and businesses in the lead up to the chancellor’s speech at the end of November.”
Suren Thiru, from the Institute of Chartered Accountants, said the data increased the likelihood of the Bank of England cutting interest rates next week.
He said: “With these downbeat figures likely to further fuel fears among rate-setters over the health of the UK economy, a December policy loosening looks nailed on, particularly given the likely deflationary impact of the budget.”
Figures ‘extremely concerning’
Barret Kupelian, chief economist at PwC, said that while some of the blame could be attributed to the Jaguar Land Rover cyber attack, “the bigger story is that speculation around the autumn budget kept households and businesses in wait-and-see mode”.
He added: “Given the timing of the budget, November’s GDP print is likely to look similarly subdued before any post-budget effects start to show up.”
Sir Mel Stride, the Tory shadow chancellor, described the figures as “extremely concerning”, claiming they were “a direct result of Labour’s economic mismanagement”.
A Treasury spokesperson said: “We are determined to defy the forecasts on growth and create good jobs, so everyone is better off, while also helping us invest in better public services.”
Left-wing Labour MPs are split on whether they would welcome an Angela Rayner leadership bid, as speculation continues over whether Sir Keir Starmer can survive.
Senior MPs on the left have told Sky News that the former deputy prime minister “only needs to push the button” and she would have the support to take out her old boss.
But others said it “won’t wash with the public”, given it was only a few months ago that she resigned in scandal over her tax affairs. She has also been accused of not doing enough for the left while she was in government.
Sir Keir has insisted he would face down any threat to his leadership, while Ms Rayner’s allies say she has no plan to oust him.
But many MPs have said privately – if not publicly – that a challenge to his position appears increasingly inevitable given the state of the polls.
One MP in the socialist campaign group (SCG) said “all Angela needs to do is push the button” and MPs would get behind her – citing her popularity with the Labour membership.
Another MP said: “I think she would have a healthy number of people who would back her.”
More on Angela Rayner
Related Topics:
Ms Rayner, a former trade union rep, was elected by members to be deputy Labour leader in 2020. She was a longstanding member of Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet and is revered by many of her colleagueson the left for her rise from a working-class background to the top of British politics, having left school at 16, pregnant, and with no qualifications.
However one MP said while they personally “rate her a lot” she “could have done more” for the left while in government.
“Ange was the deputy leader for a long time. I have to say she went to ground for a long time and didn’t speak up. Whether she has the support of MPs or the country I don’t know.”
This view was echoed by another colleague, who said she is “complicit” in the government’s failures.
This MP, in a traditional red wall seat, said the “visceral dislike of Starmer is baked in” and they have never experienced anything like the anti-Labour sentiment they are hearing on the doorstep.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:46
Is Andy Burnham coming for Starmer?
They said any change of leader would have to be an outsider with a radical vision “like 1945”. “It would have to be Andy”, they said, referring to the Greater Manchester metro mayor Andy Burnham.
‘Burnham is a no-brainer’
Many MPs on both the left and the so-called “soft-left” told Sky News he would be their preferred candidate, given he is not associated with the current government, he has a different vision for the country and is popular with the public.
Mr Burnham is not currently an MP but he has not ruled out standing if a seat became available.
“In a hypothetical universe where all the barriers are overcome then Burnham is a no-brainer,” said one MP from the 2024 intake.
Another MP supportive of a Burnham takeover said a Rayner return “won’t wash with the public” given she had to resign from the second most senior position in government for underpaying stamp duty in September. They said it also wouldn’t be credible for her to “suddenly” start criticising the direction of the Starmer government given she was so closely tied to it.
As another MP put it: “I’d be backing a candidate from the left of the party. Angela Rayner is not from the left of the party.”
Other runners and riders
Any challenger would need the public backing of 80 colleagues to trigger a leadership contest. May is seen as crunch date if the local elections go as badly as predicted.
Image: Wes Streeting. Pic: PA
Other names that have come up include Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood. Mr Streeting is seen as a charismatic communicator who could take on Nigel Farage and Zack Polanski, while MPs within the “blue Labour” caucus are impressed with Ms Mahmood’s hard line on immigration.
But MPs on the left feel this would only offer a temporary boost in the polls as the pair are both seen as being on the centre-right, and a change of leader would be pointless without a change of direction.
Another name that has come up is the former Labour leader Ed Miliband, but while he is more to the left he has been rejected by the public once – having lost the 2015 election.
‘No active plot’
The MPs who spoke to Sky News stressed there was no active plot, but rather a general consensus that it is looking increasingly likely Sir Keir won’t be able to turn things around.
MPs who disagree with the prime minister’s politics said they are surprised at how personally disliked he is on the doorstep as he is ultimately a “nice man”.
They fear he has lost the trust of the public by saying one thing and doing another, with the winter fuel fiasco still coming up in areas where Reform UK is making gains.
As one MP put it: “We want him [Sir Keir] to do well and do better… but you can’t go on forever if things look terrible in the opinion polls.”
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
MPs have recently revived the soft-left tribune group with the aim of influencing the government to take more of a progressive direction.
Ms Rayner addressed this group on Tuesday night, along with new deputy leader Lucy Powell and cabinet ministers Mr Miliband and Lisa Nandy.
One MP who spoke to Ms Rayner said she has “absolutely no plans” to launch a leadership bid “unless she is keeping it quiet”. They added that the subject of a leadership challenge didn’t come up in any of the speeches and there was an “upbeat atmosphere” following the lifting of the two-child benefit cap.
“The budget has landed well with the party,” they said. “[The meeting] felt like a sea change.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
Streeting: ‘We need Rayner back’
As deputy prime minister and housing secretary, Ms Rayner introduced the Employment Rights Bill within 100 days and pushed through reforms to renters rights, the leasehold system and further devolution. She is also said to have played a crucial role in persuading Sir Keir to water down welfare cuts in the face of a major backbench rebellion.
A source close to her defended her record, saying she is “not interested in pacts and plots” and wants the government to succeed. They said she is not finished in politics but “she’s no one’s pawn, she’s her own person”.
Ms Rayner resigned after an ethics investigation found she acted in good faith, but broke the ministerial code by failing to get the correct tax advice after purchasing a flat in Brighton. She referred herself to HMRC and an investigation is ongoing.