Connect with us

Published

on

STARKVILLE, Miss. — The advice Mike Leach shared with Zach Arnett during quiet moments and late-night phone calls was invaluable. Granted, Arnett couldn’t always tell where a conversation with his boss was heading — his degree in history and minor in political science came in handy sometimes — but there was often a nugget of wisdom to be found in there somewhere if he stuck with Leach long enough.

Which got Arnett thinking one afternoon last month. The Mississippi State head coach popped up from a seat in his office and walked over to his desk. He pulled open the top right drawer, clutched a handout Leach gave the staff and waved it around.

Once or twice a year, he said, they’d read through Leach’s curated thoughts on coaching. There’s a bit about coaches failing players rather than players failing coaches. “What I really like about them,” Arnett said, “is they force you as a coach to flip the mirror onto yourself.”

When he first read the handout, shortly after being hired as Leach’s defensive coordinator in 2020, it was as if he’d been struck by lightning. Coaches are notorious for buying up volumes of books on leadership, Arnett said, and Leach found a way to boil it down to four pages of bullet points.

Arnett turned it over in his hands and smiled knowingly. He didn’t want to give away specific quotations; he thinks the insights inside are so valuable. “It’s a lifetime of common sense wisdom,” he said.

And it’s guiding him on this new, unexpected journey, as the 36-year-old balances honoring a football legend and one-of-a-kind character with forging his own identity.

The flowers are long gone, but other remembrances of Leach remain in Starkville. The pirate flags that wave on front porches. The different twists on the Jolly Roger, some with swords instead of crossbones. It turns out you can put an eye patch on pretty much anything; it’s become another way of saying, “In loving memory.”

When players leave a morning weight-lifting session last month, they do so wearing black workout shirts with “Swing your sword” emblazoned across the front.

A favorite phrase of Leach’s rings in Arnett’s ears: “Never take counsel of your fears. Emphasize your strengths.”

Some coaches might fear replacing a legend. Some, especially first-time coaches like Arnett, might feel compelled to keep everything exactly the same.

“Who’s going to duplicate Mike Leach?” he asked. “There’s no chance in hell.”


ARNETT ACKNOWLEDGED THE irony. A first-time head coach taking over for an icon, and that icon, who he spent the past three years working for as his defensive coordinator, didn’t actually want him as his first choice.

No, Leach had his sights set on a lesser-known football innovator he’d admired from afar: Rocky Long, the 73-year-old former head coach who created the 3-3-5 stack defense. The only reason Arnett got the job, he says, is because “Coach Long decided this wasn’t for him.”

That, and Arnett was the next best thing. He played linebacker for Long at New Mexico, racking up 200 career tackles and earning a spot on the academic all-conference team four times. He then got his start in coaching as a graduate assistant on Long’s staff, working his way up to defensive coordinator. He’d actually just left San Diego State to take the DC job at Syracuse when Leach called.

It was unexpected and awkward packing up after only a few weeks in New York, but the opportunity was too perfect to turn down. Not only could he learn from Leach when he was around, he could learn from the times when he wasn’t. Because Leach was too busy calling plays and running quarterback meetings to fuss over the defense, managing that side of the ball was left almost entirely to him.

Arnett was a nominee for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant each of his first two seasons at State. His defenses gave up the fourth fewest yards in the SEC from 2020 to 2022. He was also a member of the AFCA 35 Under 35 Coaches Leadership Institute.

“There was a tremendous amount of freedom,” Arnett said of working under Leach. “But it was very educational from the way he sees the game, his ability to simplify the game. I think coaches are notorious for our ability to overcomplicate stuff. You turn football into a calculus problem for your players, and usually that shows up on film. You got a bunch of guys not just reacting and playing fast. You can see the wheels spinning, and he’s the exact opposite of that.”

Arnett sums up the beauty of the Air Raid.

“Simply put: Run where they ain’t, look for open space,” he said, laughing. “That’s pretty damned ingenious.”

What Arnett admired most about Leach and Long — aside from their ability to simplify their respective schemes — was their willingness to defy convention.

Some coaches say you shouldn’t spread the field with four receivers and throw the ball 70 times a game. It’s not balanced. Well, Leach dared to ask what was balanced about not getting everyone the football? He wound up convincing a generation of coaches like Lincoln Riley and Sonny Dykes to see it his way.

It might have been tempting to hire one of Leach’s many former assistants and keep the offense as is, but Arnett wanted to do things differently.

“And I don’t think [Leach] would necessarily have a problem with that,” he said, “because he would want me to run a program that’s in the vision that I see as best fit for its future.”

Mississippi State senior deputy athletic director for compliance Bracky Brett, who was interim AD when Leach died, says he never hesitated handing over the reins to Arnett. When he offered him the job on a permanent basis, he told him, “Total control of the program is on you.”

Brett marveled at how Arnett was able to lead the team through such a difficult time — how he was a stabilizing force, holding the locker room and the roster together.

“I always felt like if we had not made the move that we made, it would’ve cost us probably some kids on signing day and some kids in the portal,” Brett said. “It would’ve set this football program back two years.”

Three weeks after Arnett and Mississippi State agreed to a four-year, $12 million contract, the Bulldogs beat Illinois in the Reliaquest Bowl, coming from behind with 16 unanswered points in the fourth quarter. The scene on the field in Tampa that day was unbelievable, Brett says, an emotional release.

play

0:35

Will Rogers celebrates bowl win by waving flag in memory of Mike Leach

Following Mississippi State’s bowl win, Will Rogers waves the “Mike” flag in memory of late coach Mike Leach.

And, looking back, Brett appreciated how Arnett waited for what came next. After he’d finished what Leach had started and they’d returned home, Arnett went to work building the program his way. He scrapped the traditional Air Raid and overhauled the entire offensive coaching staff. Leach’s offense and Leach’s guys were suddenly gone.

Brett is crystal clear: “Mike will be remembered, loved and revered here a long time. We’re not going to forget him in any shape, form or fashion.”

But, he said, Arnett can’t coach with a ghost looking over his shoulder.

“You’ve got to make the program yours,” Brett says. “If you’re gonna be the head coach and your livelihood and your salary depends on winning, you’ve got to do what you think is best to win. And he’s brought in some people on his staff that I think people may question. But I know one thing: They’re damn good football coaches”


KEVIN BARBAY LEANED forward in his chair overlooking the practice fields and looked down at his hands, searching for the right words.

“You know, it’s not pressure,” he said, “but I do understand the circumstances of coming in and replacing the legend of Mike Leach.”

A few months ago, Barbay was the offensive coordinator at Appalachian State. He had no connection to Leach, to Arnett, to Mississippi State, to the Air Raid. None of it. He got his start as a graduate assistant at Baylor where they ran the cleverly named Bear Raid, and even then Barbay was working on the defensive side of the ball at the time.

Barbay is a former high school coach, a Texas native, who played quarterback for Doug Williams at Grambling State and graduated from Lamar. So to be the person at 40 years old asked to step in and overhaul an offense that’s so synonymous with Leach was, well, something.

“I’d be lying if I didn’t tell you that initially when Coach [Arnett] called me that it wasn’t like, ‘Oh, wow. That’s gonna be a job, replacing Mike Leach,'” Barbay said. “But it does help me a little bit just talking to myself about, ‘You’re replacing a legend, but you are not that legend. And don’t try to be who you’re not.'”

Barbay’s offense will still feature a lot of four-receiver sets and plenty of passing. But it will also feature the running back and play-action and a position that’s been absent the past three seasons: tight end.

Time will tell how effective the offense will be, but it promises to look more diverse than Leach’s Air Raid.

“Really right now it’s about identifying what our guys do well and then just putting those guys in the right situations and in the right formations,” Barbay said. “Right now it’s all discovery.”

Barbay chuckled as he recited the depth chart. It’s like an island of misfit toys, he says. “We have to be patient.”

Take the lack of tight ends — as in zero on the roster he inherited. This spring, they picked a defensive lineman, a receiver and a linebacker to try out at the position. And they went out and signed a pair of transfer tight ends in Geor’quarius Spivey from TCU and Ryland Goede from Georgia, who will arrive in the summer.

The good news is Barbay doesn’t have to wonder who his quarterback will be. Will Rogers returns with 33 career starts under his belt. He’s already the SEC career completions leader (1,159) and holds school records for career passing yards (10,689) and career passing touchdowns (82).

Rogers is going to be asked to throw the ball more downfield and move around the pocket more this coming season. Barbay says he’ll have more options to pull the ball and run as well.

“Will’s biggest attribute is he’s one of the most competitive people,” Barbay said. “In a short amount of time, he has proven to me how competitive he is. He hates losing, he hates incompletions. So, to me, it doesn’t really matter what you ask him to do, he’s gonna perfect it.”

So far, Rogers is happy with the offense, but it’s been an adjustment. The Air Raid is all he’s known since high school. And no one on the team was closer to Leach than him. He was more than a coach. He was a friend.

“I’ve just kinda just put my head down and gone to work,” he said. “I haven’t really thought about it too much, you know? On my own time I’ll think about it every now and then, but I think the competitor in me, I’m always just trying to put this team in the best position to win and just continue to compete and continue to try and get better every single day.”

With his experience and production, he could have left after last season via the transfer portal and had plenty of suitors. There are more than a few Leach disciples out there who could use a quarterback to run the Air Raid.

Rogers, who grew up two hours from Starkville, stayed.

“A lot of people wanna say a lot of different things and start rumors and things like that,” he said. “But for me, I was just wanting to finish it out with some of the guys that we’ve been here with for four years, just kind of finish what we started here at Mississippi State.”


DON’T EXPECT ARNETT to provide a carefully crafted thesis on which Halloween candy is best or what college mascot would win a WWE style Royal Rumble. He may have a few interesting theories on life (local or extraterrestrial), but thus far he’s keeping them to himself.

Mike Leach, Zach Arnett is not. Check back in 25 years from now, but it’s hard to imagine Arnett becoming the quixotic, quotable character that his predecessor was. His personality is more no-nonsense. Included in Mississippi State president Mark Keenum’s statement announcing Arnett’s hire was this telling line: “He brings great drive and intensity to the task.”

Mississippi State is a program that’s going in a different direction, a direction that fits Starkville’s personality as a working class town in rural Mississippi. The university was founded in large part as an agricultural school. Arnett’s house sits on five acres. He has chickens. Horses graze on the property. He cuts his own grass — or he did back when he was a coordinator and had the time.

Brett loves the fact that his head coach owns a zero-turn lawn mower. He summed up his approach in a single phrase: “Blue collar.”

“I want us to look like a tough, hard-nosed football team,” Arnett said, “who still does all the things that good football teams do: You play clean football; you don’t turn the ball over; hopefully, you create takeaways; you create explosive plays on offense; you limit ’em on defense; you win the field position battle on special teams; all that stuff. But just simply, I would hope when you turn on the film you see a team who looks like they play the game with some energy and some excitement.”

Tony Hughes, who has coached at Ole Miss, Southern Miss and Jackson State, said Mississippi State has a reputation for attracting fighters, for having a chip on its shoulder, for playing downright angry.

“Zach is that, but from New Mexico” Hughes said.

Arnett grew up in Albuquerque overlooking the Sandia-Manzano Mountains. In addition to linebacker, he played some fullback back in the day, too. So he’s not afraid of taking or delivering a big hit. “That’s what he believes in and that’s what he likes,” Hughes said. “I want a football team that exemplifies that personality, because that is the only chance you have to win and be successful here.”

Says Rogers: “I think we’re gonna be a really tough team to beat, and just a tough team in general come fall.”

Arnett may not look or sound anything like Leach, but he shares an old-school mentality that’s appreciated here. In fact, Rogers said, he’s a little more diligent about meetings starting on time. And when they do, “It’s all ball from there.”

He may not walk to campus regularly like Leach did, but don’t be surprised if you see Arnett on the side of the road by accident. He recently bought a 1960 Ford F-100, which promptly broke down on him during a visit to campus with his wife and kids.

A good samaritan helped out and gave him a jump. Before he left, the stranger said, “I gotta ask: Are you the head football coach at Mississippi State?”

That won’t be a question for much longer.

Continue Reading

Sports

Cindric docked points, fined for spinning Dillon

Published

on

By

Cindric docked points, fined for spinning Dillon

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Austin Cindric was docked 50 points and fined $50,000 by NASCAR on Wednesday for intentionally spinning Ty Dillon in last weekend’s Cup Series race at Circuit of the Americas.

Dillon moved Cindric up the track early in the race and Cindric quickly retaliated by hooking Dillon in the right rear, spinning Dillon’s car.

NASCAR has made clear they will not tolerate drivers hooking competitors in the right rear to spin them because of the potential hazards. Bubba Wallace and Chase Elliott have both previously been suspended for similar actions.

The penalty drops Cindric of Team Penske from 11th to 35th in the standings heading into this weekend’s race at Phoenix Raceway.

NASCAR fined Carson Hocevar $50,000 and penalized him 25 points for intentionally wrecking Harrison Burton last year. Hocevar hooked Burton in the right rear while under caution at Nashville Superspeedway.

One of the reasons Cindric was not suspended, per a NASCAR official, is because it happened on a road course with lower speeds and tight confines — and the result didn’t draw a caution flag.

Wallace and Elliott both hooked other drivers on ovals with higher speeds that led to cautions.

In additional penalties announced Wednesday, NASCAR said two members of Kyle Larson‘s pit crew had been suspended two races for a tire coming off his car during last weekend’s Cup race at COTA. Brandon Johnson, the jackman, and front tire changer Blaine Anderson were both suspended.

Continue Reading

Sports

Briscoe wins appeal over spoiler at Daytona 500

Published

on

By

Briscoe wins appeal over spoiler at Daytona 500

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Chase Briscoe and Joe Gibbs Racing won their appeal Wednesday when the National Motorsports Appeals Panel said his Toyota did not have an illegally modified spoiler when he won the Daytona 500 pole.

The victory restores the 100 points and 10 playoff points NASCAR had penalized Briscoe for the spoiler violation. The team also gets its 100 points and 10 playoff points back, and crew chief James Small’s four-race suspension was rescinded, as was the $100,000 fine to the team.

Briscoe is now tied for 14th in the season standings with Carson Hocevar headed into Sunday’s race at Phoenix Raceway. They are one point ahead of Kyle Larson, who is 16th in the season standings.

“The panel believes that the elongation of some of the holes on the number 19 Cup car spoiler base is caused by the process of attaching that specific spoiler base to the rear deck and not modification of the single source part,” the panel wrote.

Joe Gibbs said he was appreciative of the process “NASCAR has in place that allowed us the opportunity to present our explanation of what led to the penalty issued to our No. 19 team.

“We are thankful for the consideration and ruling by the National Motorsports Appeals Panel,” the team owner added. “It is obviously great news for our 19 team and everyone at Joe Gibbs Racing. We look forward to focusing on the remainder of our season starting this weekend in Phoenix.”

Briscoe also thanked the panel and NASCAR on social media “for giving us the option to show our evidence.” He also thanked Joe Gibbs Racing for preparing his car for his debut season with the team.

The appeals panel consisted of former motorsports marketing executive Dixon Johnston, former Speed Channel president Hunter Nickell and former South Boston Speedway general manager Cathy Rice.

Continue Reading

Sports

NASCAR countersues in dispute over charters

Published

on

By

NASCAR countersues in dispute over charters

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — NASCAR’s revenue-sharing charter system is under threat of being disbanded according to a Wednesday counterclaim filed by the stock car series against Michael Jordan-owned 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports that singles out Jordan’s longtime business manager.

The contentiousness began after more than two years of negotiations on new charter agreements — NASCAR’s equivalent of a franchise model — and the 30-page filing contends that Jordan business manager Curtis Polk “willfully” violated antitrust laws by orchestrating anticompetitive collective conduct in connection with the most recent charter agreements.

23XI and Front Row were the only two organizations out of 15 that refused to sign the new agreements, which were presented to the teams last September in a take-it-or-leave-it offer a mere 48 hours before the start of NASCAR’s playoffs.

The charters were fought for by the teams ahead of the 2016 season and twice have been extended. The latest extension is for seven years to match the current media rights deal and guarantee 36 of the 40 spots in each week’s field to the teams that hold them, as well as other financial incentives. 23XI and Front Row refused to sign and sued, alleging NASCAR and the France family that owns the stock car series are a monopoly.

NASCAR already has lost one round in court in which the two teams have been recognized as chartered organizations for the 2025 season as the legal dispute winds through the courts.

What is NASCAR counterclaiming?

In the new counterclaim, Polk is repeatedly singled out as the ringleader against the current charter proposals. NASCAR attorney Christopher Yates went so far as to tell The Associated Press that Polk, who in addition to being Jordan’s business manager is a co-owner of 23XI along with three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, does not understand the NASCAR business model.

“Curtis Polk basically orchestrated and threatened a boycott of one of the qualifying races for a major event and others did not go along with him,” Yates said. “He got other teams to boycott a meeting that was required by the charter. When you have a threatened boycott of qualifying races that are covered by media that’s not a good thing for other race teams, not a good thing when you are trying to collectively grow the sport.”

The qualifying race in question was the 2024 pair of 150-mile duels that set the field for the Daytona 500.

“I don’t think Mr. Polk really understands the sport,” Yates told the AP. “I think he came into it and his view is it should be much more like the NBA or other league sports. But it’s not. No motorsport is like that. He’s done a lot of things that might work in the NBA or might be OK in the NBA but just are not appropriate in NASCAR.”

Who is violating the antitrust act?

NASCAR’s complaint alleges “the undisputed reality is that it is 23XI and FRM, led by 23XI’s owner and sports agent Curtis Polk, that willfully violated the antitrust laws by orchestrating anticompetitive collective conduct in connection with the terms of the 2025 Charter Agreements.”

“It is truly ironic that in trying to blow-up the Charter system, 23XI and FRM have sought to weaponize the antitrust laws to achieve their goals,” the counterclaim says, alleging Polk’s threats are “attempting to misuse the legal system as a last resort to secure new terms.”

Bob Jenkins, an entrepreneur, owns Front Row Motorsports and joined 23XI in the lawsuit when he declined to sign the 2025 charter agreement last September.

NASCAR’s counterclaim asks for an injunction eliminating guaranteed starting spots for charter teams. NASCAR wants the four combined charters held by 23XI and Front Row before the lawsuit to be returned to NASCAR, and it wants to dissolve the two charters each team purchased ahead of the 2025 season for their own individual expansion.

“There’s a misperception out there that somehow 23IX and Front Row might achieve something that other teams can take advantage of, and that’s just not right,” Yates told the AP. “This is not going to be a renegotiation. NASCAR has no intent of renegotiating the terms of the charter. Front Row and 23XI are threatening the charter system and its continuation, and NASCAR is fine without the charter system.

“The charter system was created at the request of the teams. That was before 23XI and Curtis Polk’s time, I don’t think they understand that history. But if they succeed with their lawsuit and the charter system goes away, that’s OK.”

What do 23XI and Front Row want?

Yates told the AP he’s asked Jeffrey Kessler, the attorney representing 23XI and Front Row, what is it the two teams want and cannot get a straight answer.

“The mere fact that the lawsuit calls the system into question, I really think 23XI and Front Row are being pretty selfish in terms of what they are trying to do, and I don’t think they are taking into account the 32 teams that have signed the charters and think it is a good deal for them,” Yates said. “Do some of them think they should have gotten more? I’m sure. Does NASCAR think it should have gotten more? Absolutely. But NASCAR does not see the charter system as necessary.”

Jordan has said he’s suing NASCAR on behalf of all the teams so that even the smallest ones can receive equal footing in terms of benefits as a participant in the top motorsports league in the United States.

Among the improvements in the 2025 charters is a more equitable revenue share, but missing is the demand that teams wanted the charters to become permanent. NASCAR at its discretion can claw back charters from underperforming teams or eliminate the system completely. Yates said NASCAR has no intention of renegotiating the charters signed in September by 13 organizations, nor did he see a scenario in which NASCAR settles the lawsuit.

“Polk and 23XI’s other owners openly professed that they wanted to change NASCAR’s economic model by demanding more money for the teams from NASCAR media revenues, instead of teams competing against each other,” Yates said. “However, 23XI and FRM did not merely reject the terms of the 2025 Charters. Rather, those teams embarked on a strategy to threaten, coerce, and extort NASCAR into meeting their demands for better contract and financial terms.”

Continue Reading

Trending