Same old Maple Leafs? Why this playoff run will be different
More Videos
Published
2 years agoon
By
adminThe Toronto Maple Leafs have ironic taste in goal songs.
When a Leaf lights the lamp at home, it’s celebrated to the dulcet tones of 1980s duo Hall & Oates crooning their classic “You Make My Dreams (Come True).”
Never mind that the tune was recorded before anyone on the roster was born. It also plays like a sarcastic nod to the fact that not since 1967 have the Maple Leafs fulfilled their fans’ long-held hopes of another Stanley Cup victory.
It’s a history Toronto is painfully, acutely aware of because — like another ’80s classic by Naked Eyes can attest — there’s always something (or someone) there to remind the Leafs of all the franchise hasn’t achieved since its true glory days.
That sting of unmet expectations has only heightened in recent years.
Is there reason to believe this time will be any different? Or is it the same old situation for Toronto?
A QUICK REFRESHER: The Maple Leafs organization has won 13 Cups since the Toronto Arenas hoisted the first one in 1917-18, and the Leafs picked up their most recent four titles over a seven-year span in the 1960s.
This was all before the NHL expanded past its Original Six era. That came the season after Toronto won its last Cup; the league added six teams and the Leafs embarked on what has become the NHL’s longest active streak without a championship (55 years — and counting).
Fast-forward to 2016. Toronto was supposed to start turning a corner. The Leafs drafted Auston Matthews after a bottom-dwelling 2015-16 campaign, Mitchell Marner and William Nylander were ready to join the NHL ranks, and beliefs were high once again that Toronto could regain contender status.
And they did, sort of. The Leafs have frequently finished high in the league standings and have made the playoffs every year with that core. But Toronto hasn’t won a single postseason round, not in five straight best-of-seven series. (They even lost in that best-of-five play-in opportunity during the COVID-19 bubble experience.)
The Leafs have tinkered. They’ve adjusted. They’ve said all the right things and never made good on them when it mattered. So, every spring the same mantra returns: This is the year they’ll get it right.
Right?
Here they are again to find out. Toronto is taking on the Tampa Bay Lightning in the first round for a second consecutive season. The Lightning eliminated the Leafs in seven games last time. Both teams are different now, though. Plenty can change in a calendar year.
Such was the optimism in Leaf Land, right up until the puck dropped Tuesday night in Game 1. Toronto fell behind just 1:19 into the first period and eventually lost 7-3. The Internet expectedly exploded with a landslide of takes on how the Leafs are already cooked, doomed to repeat their pattern forevermore.
Will that be the case? Won’t any of that regular-season success Toronto experienced (finishing fourth overall in points with 111) carry over — and potentially guide them through — to a series win?
The Leafs can’t afford any lesser result. General manager Kyle Dubas, a key architect in creating this team, is on an expiring contract that may not be renewed if Toronto can’t show that their postseason shelf life is longer than the average quart of milk.
Here are four reasons to believe:
Under pressure
Toronto hasn’t lacked chances in the past.
The Leafs held a series lead in four of their last five best-of-seven appearances (the lone exception was in 2017-18 against the Boston Bruins). It’s not putting an opponent on the ropes that’s been their problem; it’s failing to land the knockout punch.
The inability to finish in Game 6 and 7 has traditionally been an eyesore. Toronto’s record in Games 1-5 of those full playoff rounds (not including Tuesday’s result) is 13-12, with 3.08 goals per game and a strong 20.3% success rate on the power play.
In Games 6-7? 1-8 record. 2.00 goals per game. And a whopping 4.8% power-play percentage.
That’s not what you want. But perhaps Toronto can learn a lesson about how not only to start, but finish, a series with urgency. Take last season, for instance. Toronto shut out Tampa Bay 5-0 in Game 1, and still would up losing in seven. This year, an opposite scenario could be in the Leafs’ cards.
Toronto was a resilient group in the regular season. The Leafs lost consecutive games in regulation only twice (and not since January) while recording the fourth-most come-from-behind wins (17) in the NHL. That’s testament to how they handled adversity over a long stretch and found ways to win with the odds stacked against them.
The Leafs also tied for the fifth-most one-goal victories (21), another possible indication Toronto is better suited for more tightly contested battles ahead — and closing them out — than in seasons past.
The core of the core
Marner is just one piece of the puzzle. But he’s a big one.
Generally, Marner gets lumped in with Matthews and Nylander under the “Leafs’ young core of perennial playoff underachievers” banner. It’s not entirely inaccurate, either.
Matthews leads the league in goals (299) since he arrived in 2016-17, but entered this postseason 41st in playoff markers (17, through 39 games) over that same stretch.
Marner is 10th overall in points (554) in the same regular-season span. During the postseason, he ranks 59th (33) and has failed to score a single goal in any of Toronto’s elimination games.
And Nylander? He averaged 0.84 points per game in the regular season, dropping to 0.77 come playoffs.
The numbers haven’t added up to postseason success for Toronto. Marner could lead the charge in changing that. He’s already showing why.
Marner paced the Leafs with three assists in Tuesday’s loss, while logging a team-high 23:06 time on ice. Toronto had few positives to take from that demoralizing defeat, but Marner’s performance is worth referencing as a positive.
That’s unsurprising, given the resplendent regular season Toronto’s top-line winger put together. His 69 assists (tied for fourth most in the league) and 99-point effort left Marner one shy of being the fourth Leaf ever to ever 100. The 25-year-old never let up, going without a point in consecutive games only twice all season.
What Marner highlighted most was all the ways he can exploit the competition, not only from a playmaking and scoring perspective but by being a difference-maker in every phase of the game. Marner has blossomed defensively, he’s tenacious on pucks (leading the NHL in regular-season takeaways with 104) and can drive any line — and most teammates — to prosperity.
Leafs coach Sheldon Keefe will be counting on that ability again come Game 2. Michael Bunting usually skates alongside Matthews and Marner, but he’s been suspended three games for an illegal check to the head of Lightning defenseman Erik Cernak in Game 1. So it’ll be Calle Jarnkrok back in a top-line spot looking for some of that Marner magic to rub off on his game.
There’s so much Marner can do with and without the puck. All that creativity, elusiveness and overall consistency must eventually translate regularly to the postseason, and it’s never felt like Marner was more primed to execute at the most critical time of year than he is now.
A goalie to believe in
The Leafs found a true No. 1 goaltender in Ilya Samsonov. And he had a spectacular regular season. That wasn’t how Toronto drew it up necessarily. It’s also what made Samsonov’s performance in Game 1 so perplexing.
Behind a lackluster Leafs defense, Samsonov was shellacked for six goals on 29 shots for a .793 SV%. That was through only 40 minutes; rookie Joseph Woll replaced Samsonov in the third period.
Keefe is riding with Samsonov for Game 2, though. His total body of work demands it.
When Dubas overhauled the Leafs’ goaltending last summer, it was two-time Cup champion Matt Murray — acquired from the Ottawa Senators with two years remaining on his contract — projecting as the Leafs’ next starter. Samsonov was a free agent signee accepting a one-year deal to bet on himself.
It didn’t take long for Samsonov to steal the show.
Murray has been plagued by injury issues throughout his career and this season was no exception, as hip, ankle and concussion problems held him to only 26 appearances. That would have been a nightmare scenario for Toronto had Samsonov not stepped up.
In 42 regular-season showings, Samsonov went 27-10-5, with a .919 SV% and 2.33 GAA. Those rank in the top 10 among NHL goalies with at least 15 starts this season and are career highs for Samsonov.
Even if Murray were healthy going into the postseason — which he was not — Samsonov earned the right to be Toronto’s go-to guy.
Toronto has been run aground in previous postseasons by unexpectedly poor goaltending. Last year, starter Jack Campbell went from shutting out Tampa Bay in Game 1 to being pulled in Game 4 after allowing five goals, then produced a below-.900 SV% with a chance to eliminate the Lightning in Game 5. Again, it’s not about how Toronto’s goaltender has been early on in a series; it’s how he’ll perform when the stakes are highest that counts.
Samsonov can write a new narrative. Granted, the 26-year-old has only one playoff win to date (he was 1-4-3 through two postseason series with Washington in 2021 and 2022) but he’s also never performed better — or more consistently — than this season.
There’s a laid-back attitude to Samsonov perfectly matched for a city obsessed with getting over the first-round hump. The pressure that might have derailed other goalies doesn’t seem to affect Samsonov the same way. If Samsonov can rebound from Game 1 and be as good — or even better — in this postseason than he was the last eight months, Toronto will have one less (critically important) thing to worry about.
Enviable depth
Toronto has tried for years to add impactful depth pieces in the summer and more specifically at the trade deadline. This is when to show they’ve succeeded at doing both.
-
Dubas spied Zach Aston-Reese in the offseason and offered him a professional tryout. Aston-Reese turned that into a one-year contract and became an integral part of the Leafs’ bottom-six forward group.
-
Jarnkrok was an under-the-radar free agent signing who quickly morphed into a versatile top-nine piece for Keefe to shuffle throughout the lineup with good success everywhere.
Toronto didn’t waste time during deadline season, either.
-
Dubas scooped up Ryan O’Reilly and Noel Acciari from St. Louis, and both have been valuable. O’Reilly carries Cup-winning and Conn Smythe credentials, and slides around the top nine to give Toronto a variety of looks.
-
Acciari has been a resounding success in the bottom six. He’s got scoring touch, grit and finishes checks in a way that practically earns a standing ovation on a per-shift basis in Toronto.
-
Sam Lafferty — brought in with defenseman Jake McCabe from Chicago — has added underrated speed in a bottom-six spot.
-
And speaking of blueliners, the Leafs have had almost too many bodies to choose from there. Dubas acquired Luke Schenn (the league’s regular-season hits leader, with 318) from Vancouver, and he and McCabe have worked their way into a steadier, more reliable rotation than Toronto has wielded in years (the Leafs ranked seventh in both goals against and shots against this season, a testament to how their blended back end came together).
Game 1 hardly represented that group at their best. Mark Giordano was credited with three giveaways, T.J. Brodie with two. The Leafs could barely manage to clear their own zone — let alone factor into more positive plays up the ice — and hung Samsonov out to dry repeatedly.
It was an uncharacteristically putrid performance. Toronto should improve defensively from here. The Leafs have depth to tap into. Toronto’s newcomers add girth where previously the Leafs had been lean. An infusion of different types of players to the lineup this season made the Leafs more dangerous than the team Tampa Bay saw 12 months ago. While Toronto’s core of talented stars will need to steal the spotlight, they have a robust supporting cast to help avoid bowing out early. Again.
THERE’S ANOTHER IRONIC LINE for the Leafs in that Hall & Oates classic:
“What I want — you got.”
The Lightning are recent two-time Cup champions. They’ve planted flags on the mountain. Toronto has been stuck at base camp, barely able to climb.
Pundits have predicted before that the Leafs would be different. Better. More ready to win a series and go on from there. Toronto has lost before in heart-breaking, borderline-humiliating ways. It could happen again (especially if Game 1 is any indication). But it doesn’t have to.
Toronto has done the work. The Leafs have all the tools. Those years of hardship can finally amount to something positive. The payoff will be that much greater. It’s not too late.
And maybe one day those “plan the parade” jokes will be followed by an actual celebration.
You may like
Sports
College football takeaways: Key storylines and performances from Week 12
Published
8 hours agoon
November 18, 2024By
adminWhat a week it was in college football: Five AP Top 25 teams lost to unranked opponents, and after No. 6 BYU’s defeat to Kansas, the Big 12 appears to be up for grabs after victories by Colorado and Arizona State.
The Buffaloes and Sun Devils have proved football fans wrong this season as Colorado is tied for the top spot in the Big 12 and Arizona State is a game behind. With both teams on a winning streak, what can they credit for their success?
After a rough start to the season, Billy Napier and Florida have turned things around and the Gators are one win from bowl eligibility. With an upset win over No. 22 LSU, is it time to stop questioning Napier?
Our college football experts break down key storylines and takeaways from Week 12.
Losses might be as important as wins in the CFP committee meeting room
With six new committee members, a new committee chair and a new College Football Playoff executive director, there are a lot of new faces at selection central. Each group is different. Ranking the top 25 teams is a subjective system, and this year’s committee appears to be putting an emphasis on losses — maybe more than in years past.
Who teams lose to and how has always mattered, but it might be more of a factor this year with multiple two-loss teams to sort through. It’s also a big reason why Ohio State is No. 2 and Penn State is No. 4 — close losses to highly-ranked teams. It’s never a good time for a bad loss, but it could mean the difference this year between a first-round bye, a first-round home game — or a seat on the couch. — Heather Dinich
Rivalries matter more than ever
Texas has never viewed Arkansas on par with rival Oklahoma, but Arkansas lives to torment Texas. Three years ago, the No. 15 Longhorns came to Fayetteville and were stomped 40-21. Jubilant Arkansas fans stormed the field.
But returning as conference rivals for the first time since the Razorbacks left the Southwest Conference in 1991 seemed to mean something to No. 3 Texas, too, after a tough 20-10 win over the 5-5 Razorbacks. “It was personal for sure,” senior edge rusher Barryn Sorrell said.
Quinn Ewers sealed the win by running for three yards on fourth-and-2 with 2:14 left. Rather than trying to evade linebacker Larry Worth III, Ewers decided to bull his way over him. “I just tried to put a little statement into it, that’s all,” Ewers said with a smile. “Just the history that these two programs have together, it’s going to be tough.”
Texas joining the SEC reconnected old grudge matches with Texas A&M and Arkansas. The 74,929 who showed up Saturday — the 10th-largest crowd in Arkansas history — threw their Horns Down at every opportunity. With an eight-game SEC schedule, there’s only one permanent rivalry guaranteed per school, and for the Longhorns, that will always be Oklahoma. Texas-Arkansas and Texas-Texas A&M could come and go. When college football is becoming more unrecognizable by the day, regional rivalries should be a priority. — Dave Wilson
Congrats to Colorado and Arizona State for proving us all wrong
It’s probably time to admit we were wrong about Deion Sanders’ Colorado and Kenny Dillingham’s Arizona State in 2024.
OK, maybe not all of us. But as both schools improved to 8-2 on Saturday, a preseason poll from CBS Sports resurfaced that ranked Sanders and Dillingham, respectively, as the 15th- and 16th-best coaches among the Big 12’s 16 football programs. And whether you had either coach/program that low in August, there can’t be many of us who expected either school to be here in Week 12: level alongside Iowa State for second in the Big 12 standings and in line to play at least some kind of role in the College Football Playoff picture over the final weeks of the regular season.
Colorado earned its fourth win in a row and Travis Hunter logged another entry to his Heisman Trophy résumé in a 49-24 win over Utah on Saturday, yet Sanders says the Buffaloes still “haven’t even played our best game.” Meanwhile, Arizona State reached its highest win total since 2021 on Saturday night after storming to a 21-0 first-half lead and holding off No. 16 Kansas State after halftime in a 24-14 road win, fueled by the aerial connection between Sam Leavitt (275 passing yards, three touchdowns) and Jordyn Tyson (12 catches, 176 yards, two touchdowns).
The successes at Colorado and Arizona State are a credit to the respective coaching jobs Sanders and Dillingham are executing. They’re also a credit to the concept that there remain many different paths to winning in a seemingly homogenized era of college football dominated by NIL, the transfer portal and the rest. Through 12 weeks, Colorado and Arizona State represent two of the sport’s great surprises this fall, and there are perhaps no two people more acutely aware of the doubters than the coaches leading this pair of impressive turnarounds in 2024.
“We were a three-win team twice,” Dillingham said Saturday night. “We were under NCAA sanctions. Most head coaches, to be brutally honest, you get fired if you take a job under sanctions. You don’t survive. You’re hired to be fired. That’s the nature of the beast. And right now we’re sitting here at 8-2 and couldn’t be prouder.” — Eli Lederman
South Carolina is clearly the nation’s best three-loss team
Shane Beamer’s team is not part of the logjam atop the SEC. The Gamecocks are not in the College Football Playoff mix, essentially eliminated Oct. 12 when they couldn’t hold a fourth-quarter lead at Alabama or tie the score in the closing minute. But since falling to 3-3 in Tuscaloosa, South Carolina has won four straight and continued to be one of the most consistently compelling squads on Saturdays.
After riding Kyle Kennard and the defense to wins over Oklahoma, Texas A&M and Vanderbilt, South Carolina needed the offense to outlast Missouri, going 70 yards in 47 seconds to score the winning touchdown with 15 seconds left. Redshirt freshman LaNorris Sellers is blossoming into one of the nation’s best young quarterbacks, as he set career highs for passing yards (353) and passing touchdowns (five) against Missouri. South Carolina has defeated three straight AP-ranked opponents for the first time in team history.
“We’re on the right track,” Beamer said. “The young players we have in this program right now, the quarterback, Dylan [Stewart]. You talk about the recruits that are here tonight, the ones that are committed to us. The best days of South Carolina football are right in front of us.”
There will be some what-ifs for the Gamecocks, especially in their losses to LSU and Alabama. But after a 5-7 season last fall, Beamer has recaptured his big-game magic and built a program that no opponent should want to face right now. — Adam Rittenberg
A resolute Billy Napier and his Florida team just keep getting back up
When it starts to go bad for a coach in the SEC, especially one who’s in his third season and has yet to manage a winning record, it’s usually like a two-ton truck cresting over an icy slope.
There’s no stopping the slide.
Even with the recent and dreaded vote of confidence for Florida’s Billy Napier, there are no guarantees about his future. But nobody would have predicted he had any future at Florida two months ago after an ugly home loss to Texas A&M, two weeks removed from a 41-17 beatdown by Miami at home. The speculation late that night was that Napier might be out as early as the next morning.
But he had just enough support in key areas to hang on, and most importantly, the players in his locker room still believed in him. And here we are, with two weeks left in the regular season, and the Gators are one win away from bowl eligibility after taking down LSU 27-16 at home Saturday. Another huge opportunity awaits this weekend when No. 11 Ole Miss visits the Swamp.
The Gators (5-5) have been resilient, just like their coach, and responded from a 49-17 blowout loss at Texas to play one of their most complete games of the season at home against LSU. Simply making a bowl game is hardly the standard at Florida, but the way Napier has kept his team together, continued to develop young quarterback DJ Lagway and gone about his business with accountability, humility and a quiet confidence is proof he deserves a fourth season to show he can get this program to that standard.
It’s time to get behind Napier and quit questioning him. It’s clear the Gators have a talented nucleus of younger players and that those players have their coach’s back. — Chris Low
Louisville … what are you doing?
Stanford vs. Louisville was an inconsequential game that should have flown under the radar, regardless of the result. And while the outcome — a Stanford win that ended a six-game losing streak — was a significant upset, it’s the way it happened that deserves some added attention. It might be the most improbable way a team has lost a game all season. Let’s dive in.
After trailing 35-21 in the fourth quarter, Stanford scored touchdowns with 6:37 left and 45 seconds left to cut the deficit to 35-34. At this point, I thought Stanford coach Troy Taylor, a coach who once went an entire high school season without punting, would go for the win with a 2-point conversion try. He did not. Tie score.
On the ensuing kickoff, Louisville opted against taking the ball at the 25-yard line and returned it to the 19. After a spike, a deep shot, a short pass and another deep shot all fail, Stanford took possession at its 45 with 4 seconds left. Overtime felt inevitable. Wrong.
Stanford completed a 1-yard pass only to be gifted 15 yards by an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty by Louisville, giving the Cardinal a chance to win the game on a 57-yard field goal attempt. Improbable, still. So, what does Louisville do: jumps offside to make the kick easier. And Stanford’s Emmet Kenney took advantage, making a 52-yard field goal as time expired.
An all-time collapse. — Kyle Bonagura
Kennesaw State’s Bohannon shows class on way out
Last weekend, Kennesaw State fired coach Brian Bohannon, who helped build the program from scratch nine years ago, then ushered it from the FCS into the FBS this season. That firing didn’t stop the former FCS Coach of the Year from supporting his players before its game Saturday against Sam Houston.
In a video posted by a Kennesaw State football alum, Bohannon showed up to the team’s pregame walk to the stadium and gave the players hugs and high-fives as they walked by.
The Owls ultimately lost in overtime to fall to 1-9 but showed fight against the Bearkats, who remain in contention for the Conference USA title.
Despite being fired, Bohannon should be revered in Kennesaw for taking the Owls to the FCS playoffs four times, for elevating the program to the FBS — and for the way he graciously exited. — Jake Trotter
Sports
‘There’s not one right way to do it’: Why paying goalies is so complicated in today’s NHL
Published
9 hours agoon
November 18, 2024By
admin-
Emily Kaplan, ESPNNov 18, 2024, 08:25 AM ET
Close- Emily Kaplan is ESPN’s national NHL reporter.
As the New York Rangers and Igor Shesterkin‘s camp negotiate for a new contract, the goalie doesn’t want to talk about what’s at stake — though everyone else around the league does. According to sources, Shesterkin declined an eight-year, $88 million offer at the start of the season, which would have made him the highest paid goalie in NHL history.
“He’s special,” Detroit Red Wings coach Derek Lalonde said on Oct. 14, when Shesterkin stopped 31 shots in a 4-1 win. “I can see why he turned down the 88 [million dollars]. Good agent.”
Five nights later, Shesterkin was even better, turning away 34 of 35 shots against the high-powered Toronto Maple Leafs.
“You can see why he’s going to be the highest-paid goalie in the league,” Toronto’s veteran goalie, Anthony Stolarz, said after the game. “Hats off to him.”
Even after Shesterkin allowed four goals through two periods against the rival Washington Capitals on Oct. 29, his opponents were feeling stymied. Said Capitals assistant Scott Allen ahead of the third period: “You see why he’s asking for $13 million, or whatever it is by now.”
The entire league seems to agree that Shesterkin, 28, is among its top goalies and deserves to be paid as such. But how much should a goalie make in today’s NHL? That might be one of the toughest questions to answer in the league.
JEREMY SWAYMAN AND the Boston Bruins ended a summerlong standoff when he signed an eight-year, $66 million contract ($8.25 million in average annual value) ahead of the season opener. Shortly after, the Dallas Stars’ Jake Oettinger signed an identical deal. They both match what the New York Islanders and Ilya Sorokin agreed to in 2023, and are roughly around what the NHL’s current save percentage leader Connor Hellebuyck ($8.5 million AAV) signed for in 2023 on a seven-year deal.
Starting next season, eight goalies will make at least $7 million. By contrast, 107 skaters will be at or above that mark — with 11 making at least $11 million.
“I think we’re in a decent place, [goalies] are now making great money, but it’s also not superstar money,” one starting goaltender said. “It just shows you how the league views our position. GMs don’t want to make goalies the highest-paid players, but I think lots of guys could make a good argument.”
Star forwards play roughly a third of the game. Star defensemen, at best, skate for half. Their performance can vary based on linemates, matchups and a variety of other nuances. A goaltender is in net (practically) the entire 60 minutes, alone in the crease. But even as it is the most isolated position, front office executives say goaltending is the hardest to evaluate — and therefore compensate.
“Agents want to do apples to oranges comparisons when it comes to goaltenders,” one front office executive said. “We have comps for top centers. Comps for top-four defensemen. Comps for goaltenders are way more complicated.”
Carolina GM Eric Tulsky, who comes from an analytics background, explained how slim the margins are.
“A lot of what makes goaltending hard is that a guy who stops 92% of shots is one of the best goalies in the world,” Tulsky said. “A guy who stops 91% is kind of average. And the difference between those is not very big. You watch a guy face 500 or 1,000 shots, and he might stop 91 or 92% by chance. It takes a lot of time to know for sure that this is a guy that is going to stop 91 or 92% day after day.”
The core argument for not giving goalie superstar contracts tend to center around this uncertainty, posed by one front office executive: “How many mega goalie contracts age well?”
Plus, there’s proof of concept that it’s not always necessary to have one goalie on a big contract.
The Florida Panthers just won a Stanley Cup with the league’s highest-paid active goaltender, Sergei Bobrovsky ($10 million cap hit). Florida spends more on goaltending than any other team. Backup Spencer Knight makes $4.5 million while Florida boasts the league’s only “Goaltending Excellence Department” — which includes four coaches/executives dedicated to the position.
But over the past 10 years, there have also been two Stanley Cup winners with starting goaltenders making the league minimum (Jordan Binnington in 2018, Matt Murray in 2016) while the Golden Knights won in 2023 with Adin Hill earning just $2.175 million, which represented less than 3% of their salary cap.
The theme? “There’s not one right way to do it,” Blackhawks GM Kyle Davidson said. “I don’t think there’s a hard and fast way anyone thinks about spending on goaltending. It probably just depends on what you have on your team.”
IN SURVEYING 12 high-ranking team executives about philosophies in paying goaltending, a common theme emerged, summed up by one GM: “The value of a goaltender is based on how your team is built, rather than his talent.”
One front office executive believed that “if you put Andrei Vasilevskiy on 10 different teams, you’d have 10 different save percentages.”
Most executives deferred to team construction. One GM cited Vegas as a team that was strong down the middle and had an excellent defensive core. “They can get away with average goaltending,” he said.
But poor goaltending can derail a team quickly. “Your 5-on-5 game might be good,” Predators GM Barry Trotz said. “But if you have weak goaltending, that doesn’t allow you to go on any streaks.”
The biggest issue for most front offices is projection on goalie development. It’s why a team like Philadelphia, looking for its goaltender of the future, is hedging its bets. The Flyers are carrying three goalies aged 22-27, and drafted another two in 2023.
“I think people have the idea that goalies peak really late,” one GM said. “I’m not sure I believe that. I don’t think it takes time for the goalie to develop; I think it takes time for teams to say, ‘Wait, this goalie is really good.'”
By then, the goalie might be past his physical prime, hence the risks of a long-term deal. One front office executive who just signed a goalie to a max term said he’s confident, based on that goalie’s pedigree and work ethic, that years 1-5 will go great. After that, the team might need security to cover for potential decline.
Those in the goaltending union often claim their position is both misunderstood and scapegoated. Some agents said in conversation with front office executives, they’ve heard phrases such as “goaltending is a crapshoot,” or “I don’t understand goaltending.”
“Confidence in a goalie from management can be fleeting,” one high-profile goalie agent said. “There’s not a ton of patience. If the season isn’t going well, pressure is on the goalie right away.”
Ray Petkau, who represents Hellebuyck and several other goalies, said he believes goaltending can be misunderstood by some in the analytics community. For example, several front office executives cited Goals Saved Above Expected as a go-to stat for evaluation. Petkau said that one doesn’t tell the whole story.
“If a goal is deflected by an opposing player 2 feet in front of the net, it’s assigned X amount of value. But if a shot is deflected off the goalie’s defenseman, that’s not considered the same way by some of the groups providing public analytics information. Some say it averages out over time, but they don’t take into account that some teams have more defensemen who have a habit of blocking off their stick.”
Petkau prefers performance when facing high-danger chances as a stronger stat for evaluation, but that too has variables that can’t be controlled by the goalie. He also said goalies’ strengths should mesh with a team’s needs. For example, if a goalie isn’t great with rush chances, he shouldn’t go to a team that allows a lot.
THE CLIMATE ISN’T going to get any easier for goalies. League average save percentage has dipped in each of the past nine seasons, and we’re trending for the lowest number (.901) since 2005-06. Tulsky sees a trend of offensive creativity, specifically with more East-West movement and an increase in backdoor plays.
“The game’s getting faster, people are getting stronger, and so it all happens that much quicker,” Tulsky said. “When you’re in a position where your job is to react, that makes it much harder.”
Another leaguewide trend: there are now fewer Shesterkins — obvious No. 1 workhorses — and more incidents of goaltending by committee.
From 2010-2019, the league averaged 20.4 goalies per season who started at least 50 games. Over the past three seasons, that number is now 14.3.
Consider the New Jersey Devils, who needed an upgrade in net for this season. GM Tom Fitzgerald determined it was best to get a combination of goaltenders making less than $8 million versus having one make $8 million and another at the league minimum. The Devils’ new tandem is Jacob Markstrom and Jake Allen, both acquired via trade, with their former teams retaining salary.
“Other goalies we looked at, some were going to be free agents,” Fitzgerald said. “You just don’t know what they were going to be priced at with the cap going up.”
Cost certainty is huge in today’s NHL, where everyone knows the salary cap is going up after several stagnant years — but nobody knows exactly by how much and how quickly.
That’s what makes contracts in general difficult right now. Many agents are focused on percentage of the cap. The three highest players this season, Auston Matthews, Nathan MacKinnon and Connor McDavid, are in the 15-16% range. According to sources, the argument by Shesterkin’s camp is that he is the team’s most important player, so he should be the top-paid player on the team. Currently, that’s winger Artemi Panarin at $11.64 million.
The Rangers, in contrast, need to account for future contracts (winger Alexis Lafreniere just resigned at a $7.45 million annual cap hit, and defenseman K’Andre Miller is due). New York can also offer something no other team can: an eighth year. That means if Shesterkin hit the open market, other teams would have to ante up the AAV to match New York’s total value.
Only Vasilevskiy and Bobrovsky have come close to the record $10.5 million AAV Carey Price earned on an eight-year deal, which kicked in during the 2018-19 season, when Price was 31. Price played only two full seasons on the deal. He has been on long-term injured reserve for most of the past three seasons.
Since there are only so many goalie jobs, there are fewer opportunities to reset the market. Hellebuyck could have in 2024, but instead took less to stay in Winnipeg, a place where he felt comfortable and a team he believed could win with.
That’s why the entire league — and specifically the goaltending union — is waiting for resolution on Shesterkin. He could help shape the future of the position — resetting the market for the next generation.
Sports
Wisconsin fires offensive coordinator after 2 years
Published
19 hours agoon
November 18, 2024By
admin-
Adam Rittenberg, ESPN Senior WriterNov 17, 2024, 06:28 PM ET
Close- College football reporter; joined ESPN in 2008. Graduate of Northwestern University.
Wisconsin fired offensive coordinator Phil Longo on Sunday, a day after the Badgers’ 16-13 home loss to No. 1 Oregon.
In a statement, Badgers coach Luke Fickell thanked Longo for his two seasons with the program, while adding, “We are not where we need to be and believe this decision is in the best interest of the team.”
Wisconsin ranks 97th nationally in scoring and 102nd in passing while operating an Air Raid-style offense that Longo brought with him from North Carolina and other stops.
The Badgers, who lost starting quarterback Tyler Van Dyke to a season-ending injury Sept. 14, had only three points and 88 yards in the second half against Oregon, which rallied from a 13-6 deficit entering the fourth quarter.
Wisconsin ranked 101st nationally in scoring in Longo’s 23 games as coordinator and failed to eclipse 13 points on its current three-game losing streak. Quarterback Braedyn Locke had only 96 passing yards against the Ducks.
Fickell did not immediately announce an interim coordinator for Wisconsin’s final regular-season games against Nebraska and Minnesota.
Fickell had long targeted Longo for a coordinator role, going back to his time as Cincinnati’s coach. Longo, 56, oversaw productive offenses at Ole Miss, North Carolina, Sam Houston State and other spots but never consistently got traction at a Wisconsin program that had operated dramatically differently on offense before his arrival.
“This team still has a lot in front of us and I am committed to doing everything we can to close out this season with success,” Fickell said in his statement.
Trending
-
Sports2 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports8 months ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports1 year ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Environment1 year ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway