Yes, it’s actually National E-bike Day. Here’s how an electric bike can benefit you
I know it feels like there’s a National Anything Day just about every day. And believe it or not, it’s National E-bike Day today. As we celebrate this fun new holiday, it’s important to remember the impact our daily choices has on the environment. One of the most significant ways to reduce our carbon footprint is to reevaluate our means of transportation. In recent years, electric bicycles have emerged as an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional cars and personal vehicles.
First of all, why is it National E-bike Day? Apparently the never-resting team over at Lectric E-bikes was able to make it official. As they explained:
To celebrate the 4-year anniversary of Lectric eBikes, our company has officially registered May 30th as National E-Bike Day! Yep, you heard that right. Look it up if you don’t believe us! The goal for this holiday is to encourage riders everywhere to celebrate the many benefits of eBiking and opt into electric transportation.
That makes today as good a time as any to take a deeper look into the many benefits of electric bikes, some of which may even surprise you.
Electric bikes help reduce carbon emissions
One of the most compelling reasons to switch to e-bikes is the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), transportation accounts for 29% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Most of these emissions come from personal vehicles like cars and light trucks.
E-bikes produce significantly lower emissions than traditional cars. They run on electricity, which can come from renewable sources like solar or wind power, which is now overtaking fossil fuel-powered electric generation in many areas. You can even charge an e-bike on solar energy that you generate at home, off the grid.
As more countries transition to renewable energy sources, the carbon footprint of e-bikes will decrease further. When used for short trips and commuting, e-bikes can effectively replace cars, resulting in a substantial reduction in emissions.
Electric bikes are much more energy efficient
E-bikes are much more energy-efficient than conventional cars, using a fraction of the energy to travel the same distance. An average e-bike uses about 0.025 kWh per mile, whereas a traditional car consumes around 0.34 kWh per mile. This means that e-bikes are over 10 times more energy-efficient than cars.
By switching to e-bikes, we can drastically reduce energy consumption and dependence on fossil fuels, promoting sustainability.
Electric bikes help reduce traffic congestion (for everyone)
As urban populations continue to grow, traffic congestion has become a significant issue in many cities worldwide. By replacing cars with e-bikes, we can alleviate this problem.
E-bikes are smaller and more maneuverable than cars, allowing for more efficient use of road space. Additionally, e-bikes can often utilize bike lanes and paths, further reducing traffic congestion. By switching more car drivers to e-bikes, we can create more livable, less congested cities. Even if you don’t personally swap your car for an e-bike, everyone who does so helps to reduce traffic for everyone!
So many health benefits
Cycling, even on an electric bicycle, provides numerous health benefits.
Riding an e-bike can help improve cardiovascular fitness, muscle strength, flexibility, and overall well-being.
Even riding a throttle-controlled e-bike without pedaling provides a marginal upper body workout and helps improve balance, not to mention engaging more areas of the brain associated with fine motor controls.
By incorporating e-bikes into our daily routines, we can not only reduce our environmental impact but also improve our health and quality of life.
E-bikes can save you some serious money!
E-bikes are more cost-effective than cars when considering purchase price, maintenance, fuel expenses, parking, and basically every single other associated cost.
Electric bicycles generally cost less to purchase than cars and have lower operating costs because they require so many fewer resources to manufacture. An electric car battery, which is the most expensive part of most electric vehicles, has enough battery cells to produce 100 or more e-bike batteries.
With no need for gasoline, e-bikes eliminate fuel expenses, and their simpler design requires less maintenance. Moreover, electricity is often cheaper than gasoline, making e-bikes a more affordable option for daily commuting and transportation.
Many quality e-bikes are now available for under $1,500, with many good models now reaching the under $1,000 category. We have an entire list of the best e-bikes for every budget here.
E-bikes increase accessibility and inclusivity
E-bikes offer an accessible and inclusive mode of transportation for people of various ages and physical abilities.
The electric assistance provided by e-bikes enables riders to travel longer distances and tackle more challenging terrain without excessive physical exertion. This makes e-bikes an excellent option for older individuals, people with mobility issues, and those who are new to cycling.
By making cycling more accessible, e-bikes can encourage a broader range of people to adopt this sustainable mode of transportation.
Supporting local economies
Switching to e-bikes can also have a positive impact on local economies. By reducing our reliance on cars, we can decrease the demand for imported oil and support local businesses that provide e-bikes and related services.
Furthermore, as more people adopt e-bikes, there is potential for growth in the e-bike industry, creating new job opportunities and stimulating economic development.
E-bike specific bike shops have begun springing up in many areas, focusing on specialties such as hub motor lacing, battery repair, and other new e-bike related maintenance jobs, creating more employment in local communities.
Urban planning and livable cities
The rise of e-bikes presents an opportunity for urban planners to rethink the design of our cities.
By prioritizing cycling infrastructure, such as bike lanes and bike parking, cities can become more sustainable, livable, and people-centric. This shift in urban design can also encourage more people to adopt e-bikes and other sustainable modes of transportation, further reducing our collective environmental impact.
While cycling always offered this benefit, the huge increase in two-wheeled commuters created by the influx of easy-to-ride e-bikes has jumpstarted this effect in US cities.
Environmental justice
The benefits of e-bikes extend beyond individual users and can contribute to broader environmental justice.
Communities that disproportionately suffer from the negative impacts of air pollution, often lower-income and minority neighborhoods, stand to gain from a reduction in vehicle emissions.
By promoting e-bikes and improving cycling infrastructure, we can work toward more equitable and healthy urban environments for all.
As we celebrate National E-bike Day and consider the future of our planet, the case for switching to electric bicycles becomes increasingly clear. E-bikes offer a sustainable, cost-effective, and inclusive alternative to traditional cars and personal vehicles, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, alleviating traffic congestion, and promoting public health. By embracing e-bikes, we can create more livable cities, support local economies, and advance environmental justice.
The transition to electric bicycles is not only an individual choice but also a collective responsibility. By advocating for better cycling infrastructure and supporting policies that promote e-bike adoption, we can accelerate the transition to a greener, more sustainable future. On National E-bike Day and beyond, let’s commit to making e-bikes a central part of our journey toward a cleaner, healthier, and more equitable world.
They may not be for everybody, but they are for many. And each person who replaces car miles with e-bike miles is having a positive effect on our cities, our society, and our world.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Tesla is refusing to do the right thing about ‘Full Self-Driving’ package transfers and instead holds its own incapacity to deliver the package over the head of its owners.
I just had a conversation with Tesla about doing the right thing about FSD transfer. I got an answer: a “categoric no”.
Tesla is literally using its own incapacity to deliver a feature it promised and sold to people, unsupervised self-driving, as a demand trigger to get people to order new cars.
The Context
For those who are not aware, Tesla has been selling since 2016 something called “Full Self-Driving package”, FSD for short, that includes advanced driver assist features, and the automaker has been promising that it will eventually result in unsupervised self-driving capability through over-the-air software updates.
At first, Tesla claimed that all cars produced since 2016 would be able to achieve that. However, Tesla quickly found out that it was wrong and introduced a new computer called HW3 in 2019 and retrofited vehicles with it.
In 2023, Tesla introduced again a new computer, HW4, but the automaker claimed that it would just add more computing power to improve capacity in the future, and it was still confident that it could deliver on its self-driving promises with HW3 cars.
In fact, Tesla CEO Elon Musk even claimed that software updates on HW4 cars would lag 6 months behind updates on HW3 cars as Tesla focuses on delivering on its self-driving promises on the older vehicles.
That lasted less than a year. Since last year, Tesla has been focusing updates on HW4 as it is reaching the compute limits of HW3. As we previously reported, Tesla is now using both nodes on the HW3 computer – meaning that it doesn’t even have any compute redundancy, which is required for level 4-5 autonomy.
Late last year, Tesla finally signaled that it might be reaching the limits of HW3 and said that it would provide computer retrofits if needed, but there’s no retrofit in sight despite HW3 falling now months behind HW4 cars.
With the questionable hardware situation and the even more questionable data pointing to Tesla being way behind schedule on its self-driving ambition, Tesla FSD owners are asking for a simple thing from the automaker, and it can’t even do that.
The Problem
With the situation looking dire for HW3, Tesla owners have been asking the automaker for years to link the FSD software package to the owner rather than the car – meaning that if you upgrade your car to a new Tesla, you can transfer your FSD software package, which you paid up to $15,000 for and Tesla never fully delivered, to the new car.
Doesn’t this sound fair? Tesla sold you a product they never delivered, and you are only giving them another shot on the newer hardware with a new car, which has a higher chance of success.
It doesn’t cost Tesla anything since it’s just a software package that it transfers to hardware that is standard on all cars.
Yet, Tesla has refused to do the right thing here. Musk was asked several times by Tesla owners about doing that and refused. Instead, he devised a plan to use Tesla’s own inability to deliver self-driving capability as a demand trigger.
In the summer of 2023, Musk finally agreed to allow FSD transfers, but not because it was the right thing to do. Instead, he said it would be a “one-time amnesty” for a single quarter. Tesla used this to boost sales in the quarter.
Tesla ended up bringing back the incentive four more times when it needed to boost orders, making Musk a liar for saying it would only be for a quarter. By claiming it’s only for this one time, Tesla is creating urgency in trying to get people to upgrade – instead of doing the right thing and offering everyone who bought FSD the ability to transfer until Tesla actually delivers on its promise.
Currently, Tesla is not offering it because it doesn’t need to. There are plenty of other factors boosting demand right now including the new Model Y, the fear of losing the tax credit in the US, and in Canada, Tesla just announced a price increase coming next month – pushing people to take delivery this month.
I reached out to Tesla about transferring my FSD on a new car this week, and I was told “the FSD transfer window is closed right now”. After explaining all this above to the salesperson and highlighting that it’s the right thing to do not to charge me $11,000 for a software package that I already bought and they never delivered, they agreed to run it up the chain.
The next day, I was told that upper management responded: “a categoric no.”
Electrek’s Take
It’s such a simple thing to do. It’s not only the right thing to do, but it’s also smart for Tesla as it reduces the obvious liability of having HW3 cars that paid for FSD.
At this point, it’s clear that Tesla will never be able to deliver on its promised unsupervised Full Self-Driving capabilities on HW3 cars. Should we really be surprised? Tesla was wrong before and had to upgrade cars from HW2.5 to HW3, which is now 6 years old.
Tesla didn’t know what hardware it needed to deliver self-driving then, and there’s a good chance it doesn’t know now. But even then, would anyone seriously believe that Tesla would deliver unsupervised self-driving capability on 6-year-old hardware? I think not.
Therefore, every HW3 vehicle Tesla sold with a FSD package is a liability. It makes for them to remove the packages from those cars and move them to more recent vehicles with a higher chance of ever delivering on their promise – even though there’s plenty of room for doubt with those cars too.
Regardless, It’s about doing the right thing for your customers instead of using your own inability to deliver a product you promised as a demand lever for more orders. It’s worse than the tactics used by car dealerships that Tesla despises so much.
As usual, I want to highlight that I think FSD is an incredible product, and if it was developed without Elon Musk claiming that it would achieve unsupervised self-driving by the end of every year for the last 5 years and Tesla selling the product to customers before it is ready, I think it would be much more celebrated.
But instead, Tesla and Musk are doing those things, and many people see it as a fraudulent and dangerous product. It doesn’t help when the CEO grossly misrepresents data about the program.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
The New South Wales Rural Fire Service is putting the new, 600 km Volvo FM Electric semi truck through its paces as they work to decarbonize their emergency vehicle fleet and keep Australia safe from the devastating effects of wildfires.
The Volvo FM Electric is on loan to the NSW RFS for an extended test drive as part of a broader effort to understand how low- and zero-emissions vehicles can be integrated into the agency’s emergency services fleets in the future — and the early results are positive!
In an impressive display of capability, the electric semi truck tackled the 550 kilometer route (340 miles) from the services’ Glendenning NSW logistics headquarters to the border city of Albury with a loaded up RFS water tanker in tow. The truck and trailer arrived just in time to be displayed at the NSW RFS Championships in the suburb of Thurgoona.
The truck was operated by a two-man driving team consisting of Inspector Brendan Doyle, RFS Logistics Manager, and RFS Logistics & Transport Supervisor Peter Duff, who shared driving duties over the route to asses the performance Volvo FM Electric, as well as the heavy vehicle charging experience at each side of the trip.
“This drive presented a great opportunity for us to touch, feel and experience an electric prime mover on public roads,” explained Doyle. “It also allows us to consider where a vehicle like this could fill roles within our logistics fleet in the future.”
Doyle’s partner on the ride concurs. “The driving experience was sensational,” added Duff, “One of the key takeaways for me was that you could take anyone familiar with an existing Volvo truck and they’d be able to drive this without additional training at all.”
The truck averaged 88.7 km/h on the trip, with an energy consumption of 1.24 kWh/km — a figure comparable to the Tesla Semi, which Tesla CEO Elon Musk claims uses 2 kWh of energy per mile. The big Volvo required less than 2 total hours’ charging to complete the 6 hour and 15 minute trip with stops at Goulburn and Tarcutta.
Electrek’s Take
It’s great to see electric semi trucks being used in real-world heavy haul applications, as opposed to the easy-to-criticize potato chip hauling performances we’ve seen other brands put up in the recent past. As Volvo’s deployed electric truck fleet knocks on the door of 100 million miles driven, it’s hard to believe Tesla will be able to catch up.
That said, it’s happened before — who among us though the Model Y would be the best selling car in the world back in 2014? If you did, scroll on down to the comments and let us know.
SOURCE | IMAGES: Volvo Trucks.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Last week’s inauguration of President Trump stole the headlines, but it wasn’t the only big election news — a supermajority of workers at BlueOval SK voted to file a petition last week with the National Labor Relations Board to unite with the UAW.
The supermajority vote by workers at BlueOval SK occurred after attending a town hall-style meeting in Elizabethtown, Kentucky with UAW members from Ultium Cells in Lordstown, Ohio last month. The Lordstown Ultium plant makes battery cells for GM and Honda electric vehicles and, like the BlueOval SK (BOSK) project, is a joint venture between one of the Detroit 3 and a Korean battery brand (in the case of Ultium, GM and LG; in the case of BlueOval SK, Ford and SK On).
The similarities were apparently enough to convince the majority of BOSK workers of the UAW team’s credibility in the traditionally union-opposing south. The move is expected to yield immediate improvements in working conditions at the Kentucky plant.
“We’re forming our union so we can have a say in our safety and our working conditions,” explained Halee Hadfield, a quality operator at BOSK. “The chemicals we’re working with can be extremely dangerous. If something goes wrong, a massive explosion can occur. With our union, we can speak up if we see there’s a problem and make sure we’re keeping ourselves and the whole community safe,”
Those safety concerns were echoed by other BlueOval SK employees who voted to join the UAW. “I have worked both union and nonunion jobs and have seen the power of a union firsthand,” said Andrew McLean, a logistics worker in formation at BOSK. “Right now, we don’t have a say at BOSK. With a union, we’ll be on a level playing field with management. That’s so important when you’re getting a new plant off the ground. The union allows us to give honest feedback without fear of retaliation.”
Ford paid its shareholders more than $3 billion in dividends, on a gross profit of over $24.7 billion for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024. That $3 billion would be enough to pay each of Ford’s 177,000 global employees a one-time bonus of $16,950. According to Ford’s 2024 proxy statement, Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford Motor Company, earned a total compensation of $26,470,033 in 2023 — a nearly $6 million raise from 2022.
The growing unionization movement among nonunion battery workers across the country, and especially in the South, builds off the success of the UAW Stand Up Strike at the Big Three, as well as the victory by Volkswagen workers in Chattanooga, who became the first Southern autoworkers employed outside the Big Three to join the UAW last April.
SOURCE | IMAGES: UAW.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports10 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway