Connect with us

Published

on

Prince Harry has blamed the tabloid press for “inciting hatred and harassment” in his private life, saying he ended up “playing up to a lot of the headlines” when he was cast as a “playboy prince” and a “thicko” as a young royal.

Details of Harry‘s accusations against the publisher of the Mirror newspaper have been released in his witness statement as he begins giving evidence in court.

The Duke of Sussex wrote: “I genuinely feel that in every relationship that I’ve ever had – be that with friends, girlfriends, with family or with the army, there’s always been a third party involved, namely the tabloid press.”

Live updates from court: Harry in the witness box

He said he was bringing the claim “to hold people to account for what they have done, so that they can’t hide behind their own institution or organisation”, and that he was “determined to get to the bottom of it once and for all”.

Members of the Royal Family get “cast into a specific role by the tabloid press”, he said. As “spare” to the “heir” – Prince William – “you’re then either the ‘playboy prince’, the ‘failure’, the ‘drop out’ or, in my case, the ‘thicko’, the ‘cheat’, the ‘underage drinker’, ‘irresponsible drug taker’, the list goes on.

“As a teenager and in my early twenties, I ended up feeling as though I was playing up to a lot of the headlines and stereotypes that they wanted to pin on me mainly because I thought that, if they are printing this rubbish about me and people were believing it, I may as well ‘do the crime’, so to speak.

“It was a downward spiral, whereby the tabloids would constantly try and coax me, a ‘damaged’ young man, into doing something stupid that would make a good story and sell lots of newspapers. Looking back on it now, such behaviour on their part is utterly vile.”

Because of the personality he had been portrayed as, every time he walked into a room he “expected people to be thinking ‘he’s obviously going to fail this test, because he’s a thicko’,” he wrote.

Other key claims from Harry’s witness statement:

• “Intrusion” into his private life caused paranoia around his relationships
• He feels “sick” at the thought of former Mirror editor Piers Morgan and journalists allegedly hacking his mother Diana‘s phone
• He believes both the UK press and government “are at rock bottom”
• Reveals he has never been an account holder or received a bill for a mobile phone – this was dealt with “by the Institution, presumably for security purposes although that now seems rather ironic”
• He also says the Institution could “wipe our devices remotely”

Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex arrives the Rolls Building of the High Court in London, Britain June 6, 2023. REUTERS/Hannah McKay

Harry, 38, is suing the publisher, attempting to prove that reporters for the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People titles were linked to methods including phone hacking, so-called “blagging” or gaining information by deception, and use of private investigators, between 1996 and 2010.

MGN is contesting the claims and has either denied or not admitted each of them. The publisher also argues that some of the claimants have brought their legal action too late.

Relationships before Meghan

 Prince Harry The Duke of Sussex and Meghan Markle The Duchess of Sussex 
Pic:AP
Image:
Pic: AP

In his statement, Harry said he found it hard to trust people and that he suffered “bouts of depression and paranoia”, with friends and girlfriends becoming “instant targets”.

At least one of his girlfriends told him “she was warned off me by her parents saying ‘is it really worth all the aggravation?’,” he wrote.

Writing about his relationship with his ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, he said alleged press intrusion “led her to make the decision that a royal life was not for her, which was incredibly upsetting for me at the time”.

‘My mother wasn’t paranoid’

The Prince and Princess of Wales, and Prince Harry smile to photographers with Prince William (2R), second in line to the throne, at his first day of term at the world famous Eton College September 6.  Prince William and other new boys known as "Tits" will attend their first classes tomorrow in the distinctive school uniform

In his statement, Harry also included details of newspaper reports based on a “rumour” that his biological father was James Hewitt.

Princess Diana did have an affair with Major Hewitt while she was married to the now King Charles.

“Numerous newspapers had reported a rumour that my biological father was James Hewitt, a man my mother had a relationship with after I was born,” Harry wrote.

“At the time of this article and others similar to it, I wasn’t actually aware that my mother hadn’t met Major Hewitt until after I was born.”

The prince went on to say he felt “constantly suspicious” of “everyone” around him, and adds: “I’ve always heard people refer to my mother as paranoid, but she wasn’t. She was fearful of what was actually happening to her and now I know that I was the same.”

More key points from the witness statement

• Harry says he was “only 5%” funded by the UK taxpayer as a royal, but that tabloids felt they “owned him”
• Hits out at medical details such as injuries being published – says he was “singled out” as a “p****” at school and at Sandhurst
• Says he is “shocked and appalled at the sheer volume” of payments made by MGN titles to private investigators
• Admits he would have used the phrase “two-face s***” about “indiscreet” Paul Burrell, his mother’s former butler
• Criticises the “cowardice” of journalists not giving evidence in court
• Details story about poker night with the late Caroline Flack, and says she was “often hounded” by tabloids

‘Harry’s Cocaine Ecstasy and GHB Parties’ and other stories

Harry alleges about 140 articles published between 1996 and 2010 contained information gathered using unlawful methods, and 33 of these have been selected to be considered at the trial.

In his statement, he discusses each of them. Referring to the story above, he said it affected his time at school. “This article, along with the NOTW coverage, had a huge impact on my life. Eton had a zero drugs policy in place, and I was extremely worried I was going to be expelled,” he wrote.

Read more:
Harry v Mirror publisher – the opening statements
‘Devastation’ and ‘discord’: Explosive start to court battle
Which articles have been brought up?

Referring to another story, headlined “Beach Bum Harry”, published in 2003, Harry explained this was about a trip to Noosa, in Australia, and it included a picture of him in the sea. He had been staying in a house with friends after visiting Steve Irwin’s Crocodile Zoo when he was photographed.

“I only learnt recently that the Queen had asked one of her assistant private secretaries to fly out to Noosa and take a house down the road from where I was staying, without me knowing,” he wrote. “She was concerned about the extent of the coverage of my trip and wanted someone I knew to be nearby, in case I needed support.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Analysing Harry’s statement

Charles was ‘sympathetic’ over incident with paparazzi photographer

Harry also described being accused of lashing out at a photographer in a scuffle outside a nightclub in 2004, and how a photograph appeared in the media.

“This was a particularly challenging period of my youth,” he said. “I had just turned 20, and like most 20 year-olds, I wanted to go out and socialise. However, everywhere I went, the paparazzi seemed to turn up…”

He added: “As I reached the car, I could hear taunting. I was being egged on for a reaction, knowing I’d been out and had a few drinks. A camera hit me across my nose as I was opening the door, I turned, grabbed the nearest camera to me and shoved it backwards.”

Harry said he was taken back to Clarence House afterwards and then to see a doctor.

“Everyone in the family, including my father, was sympathetic to the position I was in, there was no respite, never an ‘off’ moment when I was allowed to go out with my friends without the intrusion and harassment.”

He said he was “not sure how the defendant’s journalists could have legitimately obtained” the information they had in their story.

‘I promised Chelsy I wasn’t given a lap dance’

Harry's former girlfriend Chelsea Davy pictured in 2011
Image:
Harry’s former girlfriend Chelsea Davy pictured in 2011

Writing about an article headlined “Chel Shocked”, published by The People in 2006, Harry said he visited a Spearmint Rhino strip club but did not have a lap dance.

The article reported that his then girlfriend Ms Davy had gone “berserk” and slammed the phone down over the night out – however, the duke said in his witness statement: “I don’t think Chelsy did go mad about me going there. We did speak about it over the phone, but I promised her that I hadn’t had a lap dance and stayed with the three other cadets that had girlfriends.”

The duke said he believed journalists had access to one of their phone records.

“The detail about the timing and length of the calls is so specific. With hindsight, it seems likely to me that the Defendant’s journalists had access to one of our phone records and put two and two together to make a story.”

‘I need to make sure this unlawful behaviour is exposed’

In his statement, Harry describes having “a front row seat” to the “huge problem” of those in the media who “have stolen or highjacked the privileges and powers of the press”.

He said he does not want anyone else to experience what he has “on a personal level”, and continued: “But also, on a national level as, at the moment, our country is judged globally by the state of our press and our government – both of which I believe are at rock bottom…

“I may not have a role within the Institution but, as a member of the British Royal family, and as a soldier upholding important values, I feel there’s a responsibility to expose this criminal activity in the name of public interest.”

The opening arguments from lawyers

Lawyer David Sherborne, a member of Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex's legal team, walks outside the Rolls Building of the High Court in London, Britain June 5, 2023. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls
Image:
David Sherborne is representing Harry

On Monday, lawyers for both sides made their opening arguments, with David Sherborne, for Harry, claiming that Mirror journalists listened to voicemail messages from Princess Diana while Piers Morgan was editor of the newspaper.

He also told the court how alleged intrusion caused “mistrust” between Harry and Prince William. There was “no time” in Harry’s life “when he was safe from this activity”, the barrister said, adding: “Nothing was sacrosanct or out of bounds and there was no protection from this unlawful information gathering.”

In his opening statement, MGN’s lawyer, Andrew Green, told the court there was no evidence to support the duke’s claims.

It was “obvious” that security arrangements around Harry “were like very few on Earth”, he said, and that any journalist “would know they would be taking an absolutely enormous risk” in carrying out any unlawful activity around the royal.

He also dismissed the claim that Princess Diana’s voicemails were hacked as “total speculation” and “without any evidential basis whatsoever”.

Harry did not attend Monday’s court session – much to the “surprise” of the judge, Mr Justice Fancourt – as he only flew into the UK from Los Angeles on Sunday night, having celebrated his daughter Lilibet’s second birthday earlier that day, Mr Sherborne said.

Harry in Court – Watch special programme on Sky News tonight at 9pm

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Posh boys’ playing gangsters: Eddie Marsan on TV and film industry’s obsession with upper-class actors

Published

on

By

'Posh boys' playing gangsters: Eddie Marsan on TV and film industry’s obsession with upper-class actors

Over the last two decades, Eddie Marsan has established himself as one of Britain’s most versatile and acclaimed character actors. From major blockbusters like the Sherlock Holmes films and Mission: Impossible III, to his roles on the TV series Ray Donovan, and more recently the sci-fi drama Supacell.

As a performer, he is a skilled observer. And one thing he’s come to notice a lot over the years is how few of his castmates tend to share his working-class roots.

“If you want to be an actor in this country, and you come from a disadvantaged background, you have to be exceptional to have a hope of a career,” he says. “If you come from a privileged background, you can be mediocre.”

Speaking after being named one of the new vice presidents of drama school Mountview, and meeting students at the establishment where he too first trained, Marsan is keen to stress why it’s so necessary to support young actors who can’t fund their careers.

Eddie Marsan at Mountview. Pic: Steve Gregson
Image:
Eddie Marsan at Mountview. Pic: Steve Gregson


“I came here when I was in my 20s… I was a bit lost, to be honest… I was serving an apprenticeship as a printer when Mountview offered me a place,” he says.

“There were no kinds of grants then, so for the first year an East End bookmaker paid my fees, then my mum and him got together and paid the second year, then Mountview gave me a scholarship for the third year, so I owe them everything.

“I didn’t earn a living as an actor for like six, seven yearsyears ago, actors could sign on and basically go on the dole while doing playsnow, in order to become an actor, you have to have the bank of mummy and daddy to bankroll you for those seven or eight years when you’re not going to earn a living.”

Marson and Dame Elaine Paige are both taking on ambassadorial roles to mark Mountview’s 80th anniversary, joining Dame Judi Dench, who has been president of the school since 2006.

“The parties are fantastic,” he jokes. “The two dames, they get so half-cut, honestly, you have to get an Uber to get them home!”

But he’s rather more serious about TV and film’s “fashion for posh boys”.

'If you come from a privileged background you can be mediocre' in the TV and film industry, says Marsan. Pic: Steve Gregson
Image:
‘If you come from a privileged background you can be mediocre’ in the TV and film industry, says Marsan. Pic: Steve Gregson

“When I went to America and I did 21 Grams and Vera Drake. I remember thinking, ‘great I’m going to have a career now,’ but I wasn’t the idea of what Britain was selling of itself.

“Coming back from Hollywood, a publicist said to me ‘when we get to London and do publicity for the film 21 Grams we’re going to come to you’… but no one was interested… I remember coming to Waterloo station and looking up and seeing all these posh actors selling Burberry coats and posters, and they hadn’t done anything compared to what I’d done, and yet they were the image that we were pushing as a country.”

Read more from Sky News:
Diary collection wins prestigious non-fiction prize
Beckham receives knighthood at Windsor Castle

A 2024 Creative Industries, Policy, and Evidence Centre report found 8% of British actors come from working class backgrounds, compared to 20% in the 70s and 80s.

“Even a gangster movie now, 40 years ago you would have something like The Long Good Friday or Get Carter with people like Michael Caine or Bob Hoskins who were real working-class actors playing those parts, now you have posh boys playing working-class characters.”

Within the last five or six years, he says there has at least been “more of an effort to include people of colour”.

Pic: Steve Gregson
Image:
Pic: Steve Gregson

‘They’re scared of a level-playing field’

“What I find really interesting is, I’ve been an actor for 34 years, and I remember for the first 20 years going on a set and very rarely within the crew and within the cast would you see a black face, very rarely.

“One of the saving graces really are things now like Top Boy and Supacell, where you have members of the black community making dramas about their communities, that can’t be co-opted by the middle classes.”

“People like Laurence Fox complaining that it’s unfair, I never heard them complain when you never saw a black face, never once did they say anything. Now that people are trying to address it, they think it’s unfair…because they’re scared of a level playing field.”

Now, more than ever, Marsan says he feels compelled to point out what needs to change within the industry he works in.

“Look, social media is destroying cultural discourse. It’s making people become very binary… acting and drama is an exercise in empathy and if there’s one thing that we need more of at the moment it’s that.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Joey Barton’s posts ’caused me sleepless nights’, says Jeremy Vine

Published

on

By

Joey Barton's posts 'caused me sleepless nights', says Jeremy Vine

Broadcaster Jeremy Vine has told a jury he felt “wickedly torn down for no reason” by ex-footballer Joey Barton, whose online posts led him to take civil action.

The TV and radio presenter said he intervened to support football commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko after Barton shared an image online of their faces superimposed on to a photograph of notorious serial killers Fred and Rose West.

After a televised FA Cup match between Crystal Palace and Everton in January 2024, the former Manchester City and Newcastle United footballer likened the sports broadcasters to the “Fred and Rose West of commentary”.

Responding to the comment, Vine said on X: “What’s going on with @Joey7Barton? I just glanced at the Rose West thing… genuinely, is it possible we are dealing with a brain injury here?”

Joey Barton arrives at Liverpool Crown Court. Pic: PA
Image:
Joey Barton arrives at Liverpool Crown Court. Pic: PA

‘I was quite shocked’

Giving evidence on Wednesday, Vine said: “I was quite shocked by what Mr Barton had said about two very respected commentators in Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko.

“I thought it was very vicious to impose them on the images of two mass murderers of children, and I was looking for an explanation.

“I said ‘are we dealing with a brain injury here’ as a way of underlining my own feelings that he had crossed the line on that tweet.”

Barton, 43, is currently standing trial at Liverpool Crown Court, accused of posting grossly offensive messages on X aimed at the three broadcasters, allegedly with the intent to cause distress or anxiety.

The court heard that Mr Barton replied to Vine’s tweet with a post referring to him as “you big bike nonce”.

The defendant, who has 2.7 million followers on X, also made references to convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Jeremy Vine. Pic: PA
Image:
Jeremy Vine. Pic: PA

‘This now gets really serious’

Vine told the prosecutor he felt “very alarmed” that Mr Barton was choosing “this word ‘nonce’ to throw around” and that “this was now escalating”.

“This now gets really serious. He is accusing me of being a paedophile,” he said.

“These are disgusting actions. It’s a despicable thing to say.

“It gravely upset me, and I had a sleepless night that night.”

As more posts followed, Vine “began to feel scared”.

Read more from Sky News:
How many prisoners are released by mistake in the UK?
Migrant sent back to France for second time in two months

Vine said: “I realised I had to take some action, but I was not sure what to do. I realised the quickest remedy would be some sort of civil action.”

Civil proceedings were initiated in March 2024. A week later, a post from Mr Barton’s X account stated: “If anyone has any information about Jeremy Vine – pictures, screenshots, videos, or messages that could help us in the case – please send them to me using the hashtag #bikenonce.”

Jurors heard that in June 2024, Barton agreed to pay Mr Vine £75,000 in damages for defamation and harassment, along with his legal expenses, as the two parties reached a settlement in the civil case.

In a separate agreement, Barton also paid Vine an additional £35,000 in damages and legal costs relating to similar issues.

The court was told that Mr Barton issued a public apology on his X account in June 2024, admitting that he had made a “very serious allegation” on social media.

He denies the offences said to have been committed between January and March 2024.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Helen Garner’s ‘unsparing’ diary collection becomes first to win prestigious Baillie Gifford non-fiction prize

Published

on

By

Helen Garner's 'unsparing' diary collection becomes first to win prestigious Baillie Gifford non-fiction prize

A writer, whose “candid” and “unsparing” diaries have become the first to ever win the prestigious Baillie Gifford Prize for Non-Fiction. has told Sky News she is “delighted” to see the literary format recognised rather than dismissed.

Helen Garner, an acclaimed Australian author and diarist whose celebrity fans include singer Dua Lipa and fellow writer David Nicholls, said that diaries, often written by women, tended to be given “short shrift” in the literary industry.

She has now won the Baillie Gifford award for How To End A Story, a collection which charts 20 years of her life, from publishing her debut novel while raising a young daughter in the 1970s to the disintegration of her marriage in the 1990s.

Garner accepted the award via video link from Australia. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize
Image:
Garner accepted the award via video link from Australia. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize

Judges hailed her as a “brilliant observer and listener” and described the diaries as a “recklessly candid, unsparing, occasionally eye-popping account of the implosion of a marriage”.

Speaking to Sky News’ Sophy Ridge and Wilfred Frost on the new Mornings with Ridge and Frost programme, Garner, 82, said: “My main reason to be delighted is that I think diaries have been given short shrift in literature. I think they are literature.

“Because they were often written by women, they used to be dismissed as just sort of verbal sludge that people… sort of lazily wrote down, but in actual fact to keep a decent diary involves as much hard work as writing a full-on book – in my experience, anyway. So I’m really glad that it’s been recognised.”

Garner was named winner of the £50,000 prize at a ceremony in London on Tuesday, and accepted her award via video link from Melbourne, Australia.

Journalist Robbie Millen, who chaired the prize jury, said her “addictive” book was the unanimous choice of the six judges.

“Garner takes the diary form, mixing the intimate, the intellectual, and the everyday, to new heights,” he said, comparing her to Virginia Woolf in the canon of great literary diarists. “There are places it’s toe-curlingly embarrassing. She puts it all out there.”

How To End A Story was the judge's unanimous choice. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize
Image:
How To End A Story was the judge’s unanimous choice. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize

‘The mess my life became is not unique’

Garner, who has published novels, short stories, screenplays and true crime books, told Sky News she has been surprised to hear from so many readers who have related to her words and most intimate thoughts.

“People have said to me, ‘this could be my marriage’,” she said. “I found that rather shocking because it’s quite a painful story of a marriage collapsing, starting off with love, but then developing over the years into something painful and destructive.

“I’ve been glad to find that I’m not unique in that way, that the mess that I made in my life, the mess that my life became, it’s not unique. In fact, it’s archetypal. It’s something that’s happened to gazillions of people in the history of the world.”

Asked by Ridge if the book would have been a “difficult read” for her ex-husband, Garner replied: “I don’t know, I haven’t spoken to him for approximately 25 years. We won’t be speaking to each other again, I imagine. And if you’ve read the diary, you’ll see why.”

The other shortlisted titles

Jason Burke’s The Revolutionists: The Story Of The Extremists Who Hijacked The 1970s

Richard Holmes’s The Boundless Deep: Young Tennyson, Science And The Crisis Of Belief

Justin Marozzi’s Captives And Companions: A History Of Slavery And The Slave Trade In The Islamic World

Adam Weymouth’s Lone Wolf: Walking The Faultlines Of Europe

Frances Wilson’s Electric Spark: The Enigma Of Muriel Spark

How To End A Story is the first set of diaries to win the Baillie Gifford Prize, which was founded in 1999 and recognises English-language books in current affairs, history, politics, science, sport, travel, biography, autobiography and the arts.

It was selected from more than 350 books published between 1 November 2024 and 31 October 2025.

Continue Reading

Trending