Connect with us

Published

on

A parliamentary inquiry has concluded that Boris Johnson knowingly misled parliament multiple times with his statements about parties in Downing Street that breached COVID rules.

The privileges committee of MPs found Mr Johnson’s breaches serious enough to recommend a suspension of 90 days if he were still an MP – far exceeding the period needed to trigger a recall petition and possible by-election.

In the highly anticipated report, published this morning, the committee found that Mr Johnson:

• Misled the house on multiple occasions

• Committed further contempt in his conduct last week by impugning the committee, thereby undermining the democratic process of the House

• Was complicit in the campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation of the committee

The committee also recommended that now Mr Johnson has resigned as an MP, he should not be granted a former member’s pass to parliament.

More on Boris Johnson

Johnson ‘deliberately misled the House’ and ‘was complicit in attempted intimidation of committee’ – politics latest

In a scathing 30,000 word assessment, the committee said that in “deliberately misleading the House Mr Johnson committed a serious contempt”.

“The contempt was all the more serious because it was committed by the prime minister, the most senior member of the government.

“There is no precedent for a prime minister having been found to have deliberately misled the House.”

‘A dreadful day for democracy’

The former prime minister immediately hit back by branding the committee’s report a “charade”, adding: “I was wrong to believe in the committee or its good faith.

“The terrible truth is that it is not I who has twisted the truth to suit my purposes. It is Harriet Harman and her committee.

“This is a dreadful day for MPs and for democracy.

“This decision means that no MP is free from vendetta, or expulsion on trumped up charges by a tiny minority who want to see him or her gone from the Commons.

“I do not have the slightest contempt for parliament, or for the important work that should be done by the Privileges committee.

“But for the privileges committee to use its prerogatives in this anti-democratic way, to bring about what is intended to be the final knife-thrust in a protracted political assassination – that is beneath contempt.”

The former prime minister has been under investigation by the Commons privileges committee since last June, after an investigation by police and then senior civil servant Sue Gray confirmed a series of gatherings had taken place in Downing Street during lockdowns.

The cross-party committee, led by Labour MP Harriet Harman, has been assessing whether Mr Johnson misled parliament – either recklessly or deliberately – with his statements claiming all COVID rules and guidance were followed by Number 10.

Johnson had ‘personal knowledge’ of gatherings

In coming to its conclusion, the MPs did not find Mr Johnson’s defence that no one had advised him the gatherings were against the rules as credible.

He also challenged the committee over the fact that the evidence it received “contains not a single document that indicates that I received any warning or advice that any event broke or may have broken the rules or guidance”.

But the committee said it believed “Mr Johnson’s personal knowledge of the gatherings, in particular what he saw while he was present at them, means that he would not have needed to be reliant on advice to satisfactorily assess their nature.

“We also note that Mr Johnson made repeated statements to the House and the public highlighting the responsibility of everyone in the UK to understand and follow the COVID measures in place.”

The former prime minister has repeatedly asserted that he believed one Number 10 leaving do – where he was seen toasting colleagues to mark the departure of communications chief Lee Cain – was “absolutely essential for work purposes”.

But the committee again found against him, saying it did not believe that “severe staff morale pressures during the COVID pandemic … in itself provided a licence for Mr Johnson’s conveniently flexible interpretation of the rules on gatherings, or the guidance on social distancing.”

They added: “A workplace ‘thank you’, leaving drink, birthday celebration or motivational event is obviously neither essential or reasonably necessary.

Read more:
Who are the privileges committee investigating whether Boris Johnson misled parliament over partygate?
Boris Johnson: What the former PM told the privileges committee about partygate

“Mr Johnson is adamant that he believed all of the events which he attended and of which he had direct knowledge were essential.

“That belief, which he continues to assert, has no reasonable basis in the rules or on the facts. A reasonable person looking at the events and the rules would not have the belief that Mr Johnson has professed. That is plain from the fact that around the UK during the period of pandemic restrictions these events did not take place.”

The publication of the report comes after Mr Johnson dramatically quit as an MP on Friday after receiving its draft findings.

In a last-ditch attempt to disparage the Tory-majority panel on the eve of publication, he called for its most senior Conservative member to resign.

He accused Sir Bernard Jenkin of “monstrous hypocrisy” after the Guido Fawkes website reported the MP had gone to a drinks party in Parliament held by Commons Deputy Speaker Dame Eleanor while COVID restrictions were in place in 2020.

But Mr Johnson was accused of attempting to distract from the report’s findings by opposition MPs, while a source close to the committee reportedly dismissed the intervention as “desperate stuff”.

Continue Reading

UK

MP Mike Amesbury admits punching man – and will remain suspended from Labour Party

Published

on

By

MP Mike Amesbury admits punching man - and will remain suspended from Labour Party

MP Mike Amesbury has pleaded guilty to assault by beating for punching a man in Cheshire.

The Runcorn and Helsby MP appeared at Chester Magistrates’ Court on Thursday morning where he admitted attacking 45-year-old Paul Fellows in Main Street, Frodsham, Cheshire, in October.

Speaking outside the court, he said the incident was “highly regrettable” and he was “sincerely sorry” to Mr Fellows and his family.

Politics latest: Russian drones strike Kyiv during Starmer visit

CCTV footage showed Amesbury, who has been an MP since 2017, punching Mr Fellows on the ground.

Other previously released videos from another angle show Amesbury punching Mr Fellows repeatedly after knocking him to the floor as members of the public intervened.

It was reported to police at 2.48pm on Saturday 26 October.

The court heard how Amesbury told Mr Fellows “you won’t threaten your MP again” after punching him in the head with enough force to knock him to the ground.

The 55-year-old politician is currently an independent MP after he was suspended by Labour at the end of October when the CCTV footage emerged.

He will continue to be suspended so remains as an independent.

Pic: Richard Townshend/UK Parliament/PA
Image:
Pic: Richard Townshend/UK Parliament/PA

The court heard Mr Fellows recognised Amesbury in the taxi rank in Frodsham town centre at about 2am on 26 October last year.

Both were alone and had been drinking.

Alison Storey, prosecuting, said Mr Fellows approached the MP to remonstrate about a bridge closure in the town and CCTV then shows they spoke for several minutes but there was no aggression or raised voices.

Mr Fellows then started to walk away but Amesbury re-engaged and was heard saying “what” a few times before shouting it.

The victim then put his hands in his pockets and turned towards the taxi queue and when he turned back Amesbury punched him in the head, knocking him to the ground.

He then punched Mr Fellows again, at least five times, Ms Storey said.

She told the court he was then heard saying “you won’t threaten your MP again will you”.

Read more:
Starmer makes surprise visit to Kyiv to sign 100-year deal

PM rules out emergency budget as he defends his chancellor

Amesbury was voluntarily interviewed under caution by Cheshire Police in October and was charged with common assault on 7 November.

At the time, Amesbury said what happened was “deeply regrettable” and he was co-operating with police.

A Labour Party spokesman said: “It is right that Mike Amesbury has taken responsibility for his unacceptable actions.

“He was rightly suspended by the Labour Party following the announcement of the police investigation.

“We cannot comment further whilst legal proceedings are still ongoing.”

Amesbury is set to be sentenced next month. If he is sent to prison or given a suspended sentence he could lose his seat.

A sentence of less than a year, even if it is suspended, would leave him liable to the recall process, which would trigger a by-election if 10% of registered voters in his seat sign a petition calling for it.

A jail term of more than a year would mean he automatically loses his seat.

Continue Reading

UK

‘I have nightmares of dead bodies’: Patients dying and undiscovered for hours in hospital corridors

Published

on

By

'I have nightmares of dead bodies': Patients dying and undiscovered for hours in hospital corridors

Patients are dying in corridors and going undiscovered for hours while the sick are left to soil themselves, nurses have said, revealing the scale of the corridor crisis inside the UK’s hospitals.

In a “harrowing” report built from the experiences of more than 5,000 NHS nursing staff, the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) found almost seven in 10 (66.81%) say they are delivering care in overcrowded or unsuitable places, including converted cupboards, corridors and even car parks, on a daily basis.

Demoralised staff are looking after as many as 40 patients in a single corridor, unable to access oxygen, cardiac monitors, suction and other lifesaving equipment.

Women are miscarrying in corridors, while some nurses report being unable to carry out adequate CPR on patients having heart attacks.

Sara (not her real name) said she was on shift when a doctor told her there was a dying patient who had been waiting in the hospital’s corridor for six hours.

“It took a further two hours to get her into an adequate care space to make her clean and comfortable,” she told Sky News.

“That’s a human being, someone in the last hours of their life in the middle of a corridor with a detoxing patient vomiting and being abusive behind them and a very poorly patient in front of them, who was confused, screaming in pain. It was awful on the family, and it was awful on the patient.”

More on Nhs

Dead patients ‘not found for hours’

A nurse working in the southeast of England quit her job after witnessing an elderly lady in “animal-like conditions”.

She told the RCN: “A 90-year-old lady with dementia was scared, crying and urinating in the bed after asking several times for help to the toilet. Seeing that lady, frightened and subjected to animal-like conditions is what broke me.

“At the end of that shift, I handed in my notice with no job to go to. I will not work where this is a normal day-to-day occurrence.”

Another nurse in the South East said a patient died in a corridor and “wasn’t discovered for hours”.

Sara told Sky another woman needed resuscitating after the oxygen underneath her trolley ran out. Sara was one of just two nurses caring for more than 30 patients on that corridor.

“I have had nightmares – I have a nightmare that I walk out in the corridor and there are dead bodies in body bags on the trolleys,” she said, growing visibly emotional.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

No electricity to plug in computers

One nurse, who spoke to Sky News, said the conditions were “undignified” and “inhumane”.

“It’s not just corridors – we utilise chairs, cupboards, whatever space is available in the hospital to be repurposed into a care space, in the loosest sense of that term. These spaces are unsafe.”

Some spaces, she said, don’t even have basic electricity for nurses to plug in their computers.

The nurse, who spoke to Sky on the condition of anonymity, said she has experienced burnout multiple times over the state of her workplace.

“I have come to the conclusion this week I don’t think I can continue working in the NHS or as a nurse,” she said.

“It breaks my soul; I love what I do when I am able to do it in the right way. I like caring for people, I like making people better, I also like providing a dignified death.”

She added: “I want to look after the institution I was born into, but for the sake of my family and my mental health, I don’t know how much more I can give.”

With 32,000 nursing vacancies in England alone, data also shows around one in eight nurses leave the profession within five years of qualifying.

Nurses are being forced to provide care in hospital corridors and car parks. Pic: PA
Image:
Nurses are being forced to provide care in hospital corridors and car parks. Pic: PA

Staff ‘not proud of the care they are giving’

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) says the testimony, which runs to over 400 pages, must mark a “moment in time”. In May 2024, the RCN declared a “national emergency” over corridor care in NHS services.

Professor Nicola Ranger, RCN general secretary and chief executive, said: “At the moment, [nursing staff] are not proud of the care they are giving.”

“We hear stories of escalation areas and temporary beds that have been open for two years,” she added. “That is no longer escalation, it’s understaffed and underfunded capacity that is pretty shocking care for patients. We have to get a grip on that.”

Read more: Hospital advertises for corridor nurse amid NHS winter crisis

She called the situation “a disgrace”, citing abuse of staff as another reason for people leaving the profession in droves.

Last week, a nurse was left with “life-changing injuries” after being stabbed by a man while at work.

“The NHS used to be the envy of the world and we need to take a long hard look at ourselves and say ‘what needs to change?’

“The biggest concern for us is that the public Is starting to lose a little faith in their care, and that has to stop. We absolutely have to sort this out.”

Commenting on the RCN’s report, Duncan Burton, chief nursing officer for England, said the NHS had experienced one of the “toughest winters” in recent months, and the report “should never be considered the standard to which the NHS aspires”.

“Despite the challenges the NHS faces, we are seeing extraordinary efforts from staff who are doing everything they can to provide safe, compassionate care every day,” he added. “As a nurse, I know how distressing it can be when you are unable to provide the very best standards of care for patients.”

Have you experienced corridor care in an NHS hospital? Get in touch on NHSstories@sky.uk

Continue Reading

UK

British woman dies in French Alps after crashing into another skier

Published

on

By

British woman dies in French Alps after crashing into another skier

A 62-year-old British woman has died in the French Alps after colliding with another skier, according to local reports.

The English woman was skiing on the Aiguille Rouge mountain of Savoie at around 10.30am on Tuesday when she hit a 35-year-old man who was stationary on the same track, local news outlet Le Dauphine reported.

It added that emergency services and rescue teams rushed to the scene but couldn’t resuscitate the woman, who died following the “traumatic shock”.

The man she collided with was also said to be a British national.

Read more:
Death of two-year-old boy at nursery investigated by police
British-born former child star dies aged 32 in LA wildfires

Local reports said the pair were skiing on black slopes, a term used to describe the most challenging ski runs with particularly steep inclines.

A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office told Sky News: “We are supporting the family of a British woman who died in France and are in touch with the local authorities.”

Continue Reading

Trending