Microsoft’s record takeover bid for video games giant Activision Blizzard has gone before a US federal court.
The Windows and Xbox maker wants to buy the company best known for the Call Of Duty, Warcraft, and Diablo franchises for $69bn (£54.2bn). It would be the largest tech acquisition ever.
But the UK competitions watchdog blocked it in April over concerns it would hurt competition in cloud gaming, and America’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said it would give Microsoft‘s platforms an unfair edge over rival PlayStation as they would secure exclusive access to Activision’s popular games.
Microsoft now has a five-day legal hearing to make its arguments to the FTC – and the case has already brought everything from Indiana Jones to sci-fi role-playing games into the focus of a courtroom.
Here are the key moments from day one – and what’s to come later.
Call Of Duty ‘could have skipped Xbox’
Call Of Duty, the long-running military shooter franchise, is one of the biggest prizes at stake for Microsoft if the acquisition goes through. The most recent entry in the series raked in $1bn in just 10 days.
But Microsoft’s Sarah Bond told the hearing on Thusday that the latest Xboxes risked missing out on the series, as Activision wanted a fresh deal that gave it a greater share of revenue earned by Xbox versions of the games.
She said: “It was clear Call Of Duty would be on PS5. That would not have been good if it was not also on Xbox.”
Advertisement
Microsoft vows that under its ownership, Call Of Duty would remain on PlayStation, where the series sells most, but Sony claims its platform would eventually lose out.
Image: Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II is the latest instalment in the popular franchise
Microsoft thinks new consoles are five years away
Gamersface a long wait for the next generation of consoles, if Microsoft’s prediction is correct.
In court documents, the company says it doesn’t expect the next Xbox or PS6 until 2028. This came up because Microsoft says it has offered Sony a 10-year deal for Call Of Duty, meaning it would appear on its next console.
A 2028 release would mean eight years after the launch of the current systems, the PS5 and Xbox Series X and S, which both released during the pandemic in late 2020.
Supply chain issues meant they have been hard to find until relatively recently, and demand remains strong.
Image: Xbox Series X and S released in November 2020
Indiana Jones and the exclusivity deal
Never mind his new film, Indiana Jones is now making headlines thanks to video game deal-making.
An Indy game has been in the works at developer MachineGames for several years now. The team is part of the Bethesda Softworks company, which was bought by Microsoft for $7.5bn in 2020.
Speaking on Thursday, Bethesda’s Pete Hines revealed the game is Xbox and PC exclusive, even though the initial agreement with franchise owner Disney (before Microsoft’s acquisition) would have seen it release elsewhere.
But Hines also spoke to the benefits of being able to concentrate on fewer consoles, saying Bethesda’s upcoming science-fiction epic Starfield, one of the most anticipated of 2023, would not be releasing as soon as September if a PS5 version had also been made.
Image: Starfield releases on Xbox and PC in September 2020. Pic: Microsoft/Bethesda
PlayStation and Xbox bosses up next
Friday will see PlayStation chief Jim Ryan and his Xbox counterpart Phil Spencer go head-to-head (no, not in a Zuckerberg vs Musk-style cage fight).
Spencer will be giving evidence live at the hearing, while Ryan will appear in a pre-recorded video.
It means he won’t face potentially awkward questions about an email revealed at Thursday’s hearing, in which he seemed to contradict his public stance by saying he’s “pretty sure” Call Of Duty will remain on PlayStation.
Still to come between now and the trial’s final day next week are the likes of Activision Blizzard and Microsoft chiefs Bobby Kotick and Satya Nadella.
Donald Trump briefly threatened to escalate his trade war with Canada by doubling his planned tariffs on its steel and aluminium from 25% to 50%.
The US president stepped back from his order after the provincial government of Ontario rowed back on a plan to charge 25% more for electricity it supplies to over 1.5 million American homes and businesses.
Canada’s most populous province provides electricity to Minnesota, New York and Michigan.
As a result, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said Mr Trump would not double steel and aluminium tariffs – but the federal government still plans to place a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminium imports from Wednesday.
Image: Donald Trump with Elon Musk in a Tesla after he promised to buy one of the electric cars. Pic: Reuters
Ontario’s response
In his initial response to Mr Trump’s threat, Ontario’s premier Doug Ford said he would not back down until the US leader’s tariffs on Canadian imports were “gone for good”.
But he later suspended the change temporarily, saying “cooler heads need to prevail” and he was confident the US president would also stand down on his plans.
Meanwhile, Canada’s incoming prime minister Mark Carney said he will keep other tariffs in place until Americans “show respect” and commit to free trade.
Mr Carney called the new tariffs threatened by Mr Trump an “attack” on Canadian workers, families and businesses.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:54
‘Canada will win’, country’s next prime minister says
Why is Trump threatening tariffs?
A worldwide 25% tariff on steel and aluminium is due to come into effect on Wednesday as a way to kickstart US domestic production.
Separate tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada covered by a previous trade agreement (the US Mexico Canada, or USMCA deal) were delayed by a month to 2 April.
President Trump seems to bear a particular grudge against Canada because of what he sees as rampant fentanyl smuggling and high Canadian taxes on dairy imports, which penalise US farmers.
He has called for Canada to become part of the United States as its “cherished 51st state” as a solution, which has angered Canadian leaders.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:22
What’s the impact of US tariffs?
Economic impact
Mr Trump’s turnaround comes after markets fell in response to his threat of doubling tariffs.
The stock market has fallen over the last two weeks and Harvard University economist Larry Summers put the odds of a recession at 50-50.
“All the emphasis on tariffs and all the ambiguity and uncertainty has both chilled demand and caused prices to go up,” the former treasury secretary for the Clinton administration posted on X on Monday.
“We are getting the worst of both worlds – concerns about inflation and an economic downturn and more uncertainty about the future and that slows everything.”
Investment bank Goldman Sachs revised down its growth forecast for this year from 2.2% to 1.7% and moderately increased its recession probability to 20% “because the White House has the option to pull back policy changes if downside risks begin to look more serious”.
Mr Trump has tried to reassure the American public that his tariffs will cause a bit of a “transition” to the economy as taxes spur more companies to begin the years-long process of relocating factories to the US to avoid tariffs.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Mr Trump did not rule out the possibility of a recession during an interview with Fox News on Sunday, where he said: “I hate to predict things like that.”
On Tuesday, he was asked about a potential recession and said “I don’t see it at all” and claimed the US is “going to boom”.
On Monday, the S&P 500 stock index fell 2.7% and on Tuesday it was around 10% below its record set last month.
A five-year-old boy was “incinerated” when a pressurised oxygen chamber exploded at a medical facility in the US state of Michigan.
Four people have been charged over the child’s death at the Oxford Centre in Detroit, Michigan’s attorney general has said.
Thomas Cooper, from Michigan, was pronounced dead at the scene, while his mother, who was standing next to the chamber, suffered injuries to her arms when it exploded on 31 January.
“A single spark it appears ignited into a fully involved fire that claimed Thomas’s life within seconds,” attorney general Dana Nessel said at a news conference on Tuesday.
“Fires inside a hyperbaric chamber are considered a terminal event. Every such fire is almost certainly fatal and this is why many procedures and essential safety practices have been developed to keep a fire from ever occurring.”
The centre’s founder and chief executive, Tamela Peterson, has been charged with second-degree murder, according to online court records.
Facility manager Gary Marken, 65, safety manager Gary Mosteller, 64, and the hyperbaric chamber’s operator that day, Aleta Moffitt, 60, have also been charged.
Marken and Mosteller are charged with second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter.
Moffitt is charged with involuntary manslaughter and intentionally placing false medical information on a medical records chart.
Raymond Cassar, Marken’s attorney, said the second-degree murder charge comes as “a total shock” to him and his client.
“For fairness, he is presumed innocent,” Mr Cassar said.
“This was a tragic accident and our thoughts and our prayers go out to the family of this little boy.
“I want to remind everyone that this was an accident, not an intentional act. We’re going to have to leave this up to the experts to find out what was the cause of this.”
Sky News’ US partner network NBC News reported that according to the family’s lawyer, the boy had received multiple sessions of hyperbaric therapy for sleep apnea and ADHD.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared hyperbaric chambers to be marketed as safe and effective for a list of 13 disorders, including severe burns, decompression sickness and non-healing wounds.
But the list does not include many of the other disorders advertised by the Oxford Centre – including sleep apnea and ADHD.
The FDA also recommends that consumers only use hyperbaric centres that are inspected and accredited by the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society.
The Oxford Centre does not appear on the society’s February 2025 list of accredited facilities.
The father of a British tourist being held in the US has told Sky News “what was meant to be a life-changing trip has turned into a nightmare”.
Rebecca Burke, 28, from Monmouthshire, was attempting to cross into Canada from the US when she ended up being handcuffed and taken to a detention facility due to an issue with her visa.
Ms Burke, who has been travelling since January, had a tourist visa for her backpacking trip around North America, but her entry into Canada – where she was planning to stay with a host family in exchange for food and accommodation – was rejected.
Canadian officials said she needed a working visa and sent Ms Burke back to the US – where she was then “taken by homeland security in handcuffs to a large detention centre”, her father Paul Burke said.
She has now been held in the Tacoma Northwest facility in Washington state for 14 days.
Image: Rebecca researched for months before jetting off to the US and Canada
“We thought of all the countries in the world, two of the safest for a British tourist to go to would be the USA and Canada,” Mr Burke said during an interview on Sky News Breakfast. “What was meant to be life changing for her has turned into a nightmare.”
Mr Burke and his wife have been able to speak to their daughter daily, as she can make phone calls from a shared iPad.
More from UK
They have become worried about Ms Burke’s health, as her vegan meals consist solely of cold rice and potatoes.
Image: Paul Burke has fears for his daughter’s health
“We spoke to her last night and she said she had to go and see the medic because she’s got digestive problems,” Ms Burke said.
“We’ve got very kind people [in Washington] who have offered to visit her. They’ve said when they visit, she’s behind a glass screen and they have to talk to her on a telephone.
“I can’t believe a British tourist is being kept in these conditions.”
Image: Ms Burke has been able to trade with other women in the centre
Ms Burke – a graphic artist – has been able to trade with other women in the centre to secure fresh fruit, her dad said.
“She’s trading portraits of the other women and the other women’s kids, in return for an orange or some other food,” he said. “In terms of how the other women are treating her, it really is a band of sisters working together. They’re taking care of each other.
“They’re all trying to help each other and support each other, which is one good thing.”
Image: Rebecca Burke has been told it could take another 10 days for her case to be dealt with
It is unclear when Ms Burke’s case will be dealt with by US immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials, who are “overloaded with cases” due to the US government’s blitz on immigration, her father said.
“The detention centres are being filled because of the crackdown,” Mr Burke continued. “Becky told us that her detention centre will be at capacity next week.”
“She was told by the ICE officer, it could still be another 10 days [until her case is dealt with],” he continued. “Why can’t it be tomorrow? We just want her home.”
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “We are supporting a British national detained in the USA and are in contact with the local authorities.”
A spokesperson for ICE said: “Rebecca Burke, 28, a citizen of the United Kingdom is detained by ICE at the Northwest ICE Processing Center related to the violation of the terms and conditions of her admission.
“All aliens in violation of U.S. immigration law may be subject to arrest, detention and if found removable by final order, removal from the United States regardless of nationality.”