Connect with us

Published

on

Anytime there’s a bipartisan consensus and a preachy New York Times op-ed, you can assume something you enjoy is about to get regulated out of existence or made worse in quality.

“Giant digital platforms have provided new avenues of proliferation for the sexual abuse and exploitation of children, human trafficking, drug trafficking and bullying and have promoted eating disorders, addictive behaviors and teen suicide,” write Sens. Lindsey Graham (RS.C.) and Elizabeth Warren (DMass.) in today’sNew York Times. “Nobody elected Big Tech executives to govern anything, let alone the entire digital world,” so the senators are introducing a bill to create a new regulatory agency that will fix the problem.

What follows is a litany of untrue statements and gross exaggerations about the way Big Tech operates and the purported harm done by the cluster of websites that millions of Americans willingly use on a daily basis.

“Platforms are protected from legal liability in many of their decisions, so they operate without accountability,” Warren and Graham claim. This refers to Section 230, sometimes called the internet’s First Amendment, which was adopted in 1996 as a means of protecting platforms from being held liable for the content their users post (and without which platforms might choose not to host much speech at all). It also “ensured online platforms’ ability to regulate posts that violate their terms of service,” per First Amendment lawyer Robert Corn-Revere. Warren and Graham seem to think that somehow politicians and regulators would be better at determining which speech is permissible on different platforms.

“Google uses its search engine togive preference to its own products, like Google Hotels and Google Flights, giving it an unfair leg up on competitors,” they continue. “Amazon sucks up information from small businesses that offer products for sale on its platform, then uses that information to run its own competing businesses.”

“Appleforces entrepreneurs (and thereby consumers) to pay crushing commissions to use its App Store,” even.

But they fail to argue for how consumers are made worse off by these purportedly destructive tactics. Google Flights makes travel planning far easier than the days before search. No person is prevented from going directly to an individual airline’s website to book their flight if they prefer. Amazon has increasingly started developing Basics, its generic brand of commonly purchased household goods (just as Target has Target Brand products on offer); if someone needs a phone charger, they can get it more cheaply and quickly than ever before. As for Apple, of course other app developers must pay to place their products in the company’s digital storefront; how nice that customers have access to products made by developers other than those at Apple!

“A few Big Tech companies stifle all competition before it poses any serious threat,” the senators claim, ignoring that we’re in an era where previously indomitable companies are crumbling before our eyes: Meta’s Facebook is shedding daily active users (TikToka competitorhas long been on the rise) and Mark Zuckerberg’s Metaverse augmented reality pet project has struggled to get off the ground; Twitter’s U.S. ad sales are plummeting and traffic has declined each month since January (some users may be migrating to Meta-run competitor Threads, others to censorship-resistant protocols like Nostr). Hulu and YouTube are seeing drop-offs in weekly users (and some industry watchers are even noting a broader decline in the amount of time Americans spend on screens, post-pandemic).

But Big Tech companies are predatory, sucking up our data, claim Warren and Graham. Never mind the fact that we’re not forced to use them, and that it’s unclear what harm is actually done by them accessing our data. Most people, for example, aren’t privacy hawks interested in setting up two-factor authentification, using only encrypted messaging, opting out of any governmental use of their biometric information, and the like, and just express vague concerns about data and algorithms, without any specific complaint as to how their life is made worse because of Meta knowing their birthdate.

Warren and Graham go on to announce they’re introducing legislation to create an “independent, bipartisan regulator charged with licensing and policing the nation’s biggest tech companies” which will be “nimble” and “adaptable” (just like all those other government agencies). The regulator will “prevent online harm” (by waving a magic wand and ensuring no bad actors ever go online); “promote free speech and competition” (by scrapping Section 230 and cracking down on mergers instead of trusting the existing process through which companies have cycled in and out of dominance); “guard Americans’ privacy” (because government agencies do a great job at cybersecurity!); all while “protect[ing] national security” (it is unclear how banning Google Hotels will safeguard the homeland).

Contra Warren and Graham’s implications, it’s not easy to predict which new companies will emerge from the ashes of our discards. It’s not clear that the existing landscape is detrimental to consumers (again, who use these products willingly) or immune from competition. Will Threads be successful? Will Elon Musk drive Twitter into the ground? Will the future be Substack? Patreon? X? More group messaging and less interest in expansive social networks? Are people losing interest in streaming, in favor of shorter-form content like Reels? Will Amazon’s grocery delivery business succeed? Will its movie studios? Maybe neither, and it will actually be a health care industry disruptor, offering cheaper pharmaceuticals than ever before. And why is it that Microsoftthe still-massive company under investigation right now in the E.U., and the target of much 1990s antitrust ireis so infrequently mentioned today?

Warren and Graham have indeed reached a bipartisan consensus: They sell short the good done by these large companies, exaggerate the harms, and display the type of extraordinary hubris that commonly emanates from government officials.

Continue Reading

World

Orebro attack: Victim of Sweden shooting rang fiancee one last time to tell her he loved her

Published

on

By

Orebro attack: Victim of Sweden shooting rang fiancee one last time to tell her he loved her

One of the victims of the attack on an adult education centre in Sweden rang his fiancee one last time after being shot to tell her he loved her.

Salim Iskef, 29, is thought to be one of the 10 people killed in Orebro on Tuesday.

Local media has named Rickard Andersson as the perpetrator behind the attack, which the Swedish prime minister described as the worst mass shooting in the country’s history.

After being shot, Mr Iskef, a newly engaged nursing assistant, managed to call his fiancee one final time.

“He said he loved me so much”, Kareen Elia, his fiancee, told Sky News’ Swedish partner TV4.

“You have no words. I can’t describe the feelings. We were supposed to get married on July 25,” she said.

She added that, after he called her lying on the floor, she could not understand what she was seeing on FaceTime and was in shock.

Then he said: “Take care of my mother, yourself,” Ms Elia told the Swedish outlet. She added: “He said he had been shot. That they had shot us. I asked where. He hung up. I called again and again but he didn’t answer.”

Ms Elia was critical of the police’s handling of the situation, saying officers could have saved him if they had acted faster.

She also said she was still waiting for confirmation of her fiancee’s death. “We haven’t seen him yet,” she added.

‘We heard him walking around’

It comes as one of the survivors told Sky News correspondent Ashna Hurynag how, as she hid fearing for her life, she heard the footsteps of Andersson close by.

Meracil Kallkvist said: “I was really shaking. It was scary. I was thinking, I was going to panic.

“I wanted to run to save my life because I was thinking I don’t want to get… [hurt] here sitting down and hiding.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sweden shooting survivor recounts ordeal

She recounted how she panicked as the first shots rang out, fearing something might have exploded, while some of the other students went to investigate the noises.

Ms Kallkvist said: “They wanted to know, then after like two seconds because [of the] other shots, one person ran back, someone was shooting, so I ran.”

While looking for somewhere to hide, she described how she met her teacher and, unable to lock the door of the room they were in, they pushed tables and chairs against it to try to block it.

It was then they heard Andersson walking around.

Read more from Sky News:
Germany’s race to be ready for war
Hottest January on record shocks scientists
British woman, 24, dies in Sri Lanka

Ms Kallkvist added: “After, we heard him walking around. Yes… it was really scary, if he’d just turned to the room where we were hiding…

“He [was] just walking around and talking and after we heard banging on the doors, I think it was the other room, then suddenly shots again.”

Police previously said they were yet to establish a motive and that the gunman was believed to have shot himself dead.

Continue Reading

World

Sri Lanka: British woman Ebony McIntosh, 24, dies after hostel fumigated for bed bugs, police say

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka: British woman Ebony McIntosh, 24, dies after hostel fumigated for bed bugs, police say

A British woman has died on holiday in Sri Lanka after a room in her hostel was fumigated for bed bugs, local police said.

Ebony McIntosh, 24, from Derby, was taken to hospital in the capital Colombo on Saturday after becoming ill.

She had reportedly suffered vomiting, nausea and breathing difficulties – but died there hours later.

Another woman Nadie Raguse, 26, from Germany, who was also staying at the Miracle Colombo City Hostel died, Sri Lanka police said.

The force’s spokesperson Buddhika Manatunga said a room in the hostel had been fumigated for bed bugs before the women fell ill – and that they are investigating the possibility of poisoning by noxious pesticides.

The hostel is closed until further notice.

The digital marketing and social media manager’s family has set up a GoFundMe page to help with the cost of returning her body to the UK.

‘Absolutely heartbroken’

A statement on the page read: “We are absolutely heartbroken to share that our beautiful baby girl and big sister Ebony has passed away unexpectedly on Saturday 1st February 2025, thousands of miles away from home.

“Words cannot begin to express how broken we are, it’s been like a nightmare since we found out on Sunday morning, we have prayed and prayed that this can’t be true. It couldn’t possibly happen to our lovely Ebs.”

The statement added: “We cannot even begin to imagine how scared she must have felt at the time and it hurts us so badly to think of the pain she was in. We need to be with her and bring her home safely.

“She passed away with someone from the hostel beside her. We are endlessly grateful to this man for staying with her during her last moments.”

The family said Ms McIntosh had started her holiday on 28 January when she flew from Heathrow to “follow her dreams of travelling all over South Asia, starting in Sri Lanka”.

They said she was “full of excitement for her adventures ahead, in typical Ebony style she had spent months researching and planning and drawing up schedules for the coming months”.

“Her trip was cruelly cut short on Saturday 1st February, when she [was taken] very ill in the hostel she was staying in.”

Read more from Sky News:
Decision to demolish Grenfell criticised
Steve Coogan avoids driving ban
Emaciated dog and tarantulas abandoned

A cause of death has not been established – and a post-mortem examination cannot take place until the family arrives on 10 February, the police said.

A Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) spokesperson confirmed: “We are supporting the family of a British woman who died in Sri Lanka, and are in contact with the local authorities.”

Continue Reading

World

‘Dangerous climate breakdown’ warning as hottest January on record shocks scientists

Published

on

By

'Dangerous climate breakdown' warning as hottest January on record shocks scientists

Last month was the warmest January on record, according to new data.

The finding has baffled scientists, who had expected changes in ocean currents in the Pacific to take the edge off rising global temperatures.

Figures released by the European Copernicus climate service show average temperatures around the world in January were 1.75C warmer than before greenhouse gas emissions started to rise significantly in the industrial revolution around 150 years ago.

That’s 0.1C above the record set last January. And it comes after a year in which temperatures topped 1.5C, the target for climate negotiations, for the first time.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

2024 was the warmest year on record

Dr Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London, warned that the rising pace of climate change would increase the risk of extreme weather and its consequences.

“This January is the hottest on record because countries are still burning huge amounts of oil, gas and coal,” she said.

“The Los Angeles wildfires were a stark reminder that we have already reached an incredibly dangerous level of warming. We’ll see many more unprecedented extreme weather events in 2025.”

Read more:
Role climate change did – and did not – play in California wildfires

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is new COP deal a good one?

January had been expected to be slightly cooler than last year because of a natural shift in weather patterns and ocean currents in the Pacific, called La Nina.

But that hasn’t been enough to slow the upward trend in temperatures.

‘Frankly terrifying’

Bill McGuire, emeritus professor of geophysical & climate hazards at UCL, said: “The fact that the latest robust Copernicus data reveals the January just gone was the hottest on record – despite an emerging La Nina, which typically has a cooling effect – is both astonishing and, frankly terrifying.

“Having crashed through the 1.5C limit in 2024, the climate is showing no signs of wanting to dip under it again, reflected by the fact that this is the 18th of the last 19 months to see the global temperature rise since pre-industrial times top 1.5C.

“On the basis of the Valencia floods and apocalyptic LA wildfires, I don’t think there can be any doubt that dangerous, all-pervasive, climate breakdown has arrived.”

Read more from Sky News:
Lab-grown meat for dogs goes on sale
‘Self-healing roads’ could help fix pothole problem

The consequences of a warming atmosphere are also being directly felt in the UK, with more intense rainfall increasing the risk of surface flooding.

The Environment Agency released figures in December showing 4.6 million properties in England are at risk from flooding as drainage systems are overwhelmed by rainfall. That’s a 43% increase on previous estimates.

But adapting to a climate change is hugely expensive.

The government on Wednesday announced it would spend £2.65bn over two years to shore up existing flood defences and protect an extra 52,000 homes and businesses – a tiny fraction of the number at risk.

Continue Reading

Trending