Connect with us

Published

on

THE HOME TEAM locker room at AT&T Stadium was quiet. At first, no words were spoken, no music played from the speakers. Despite an 11-win season after a 4-8 year, there was no room for celebration. As pads came off USC players’ shoulders for the last time in the 2022-23 season, tears surfaced.

The Trojans had been up by 15 points with less than five minutes left in the Goodyear Cotton Bowl Classic but, with victory well within their grasp, they allowed Tulane to engineer a shocking comeback to win the New Year’s Six bowl, clouding USC’s incredible turnaround season.

“It was heart-wrenching,” nickelback Jaylin Smith said. “To work so hard for an opportunity like this and to come up short. There were a lot of tears in there.”

When coach Lincoln Riley finally entered the room and spoke to the players on hand, he had a simple message.

“Remember this feeling.”

For players like Smith, who recalled Riley’s words from that night, that feeling is vivid. But over the past eight months, the emotion has evolved from being a hollow disappointment to a motivational fuel that USC hopes will define a season with a better ending.

“We tapered off at the end of the season,” said center Justin Dedich, who decided to return to USC for one more season. “The motto this year is the longer it goes, the better we get.”

As USC readies itself for Year 2 of the Riley era, starting Saturday against San Jose State, the task at hand is different from turning around a 4-8 season. After losing to Utah in the Pac-12 championship, missing a shot at the College Football Playoff and having its greatest weakness — an inconsistent defense — on full display, expectations have only grown. USC is ranked sixth in the AP preseason poll — and questions around the Trojans’ defense have only gotten louder.

With a Heisman-winning quarterback in tow, a slew of returning starters and talented transfer additions, there’s plenty of pressure surrounding the team in its last season as part of the Pac-12. A year into their tenure, Riley & Co. head into the 2023 campaign attempting to harness new talent, continuity and improvement into not just a cohesive team but a championship-caliber one that won’t come up short again.

“I think that’s ultimately been everyone’s motivation,” Smith said. “If you were in that locker room after Tulane, you know the feeling, and I think everyone that was in there, they get the feeling, and they are motivated to never feel that way again.”


ALEX GRINCH DID something this offseason that he hadn’t done in his entire coaching career. As he began the process of taking stock of his first season as the Trojans’ defensive coordinator, Grinch realized going back and reviewing game film wasn’t going to be enough. He needed to go back and watch film of USC’s practices, too.

“It provides a little bit of insight maybe why you didn’t do certain things. It again takes some discipline, and you got to rip off some Band-Aids to do some of those things,” Grinch said. “For instance, finishing football. If you can’t put together on Tuesday and Wednesday two hours of practice building and scouting, it’s going to be really hard to put 60 minutes in [on Saturdays].”

Grinch studied the film and then, a few months ago, brought in some of the team’s defensive leaders to review it as well. It proved illuminating, as coaches and players saw how some things the unit was doing at the start of the year dissipated over the course of the season.

“Being able to look back and say, ‘This was helping us,’ or ‘We kind of got away from this, and it started to hurt us,'” linebacker Shane Lee said. “It can definitely be a tool if you use it right.”

Grinch, whose seat warmed after the loss to Tulane, hasn’t shied away from the facts: Last season, USC’s defense was near the bottom of the FBS in nearly every statistical category except for turnovers forced (sixth in the country). It allowed 27 plays of 20 yards or more, 13 plays of 30 yards or more, eight plays of 40 yards or more, and four plays of 50 yards or more — numbers that all ranked in the bottom 30 defenses in the country.

Talk to any player on the USC defense and a stream of honest acknowledgements surface when discussing last year’s performance. There’s little sugarcoating or beating around the bush — they all know it wasn’t good enough.

“We don’t really look at rankings, but the rankings show that we weren’t the best we could be,” Smith said. “It was frustrating.”

According to the junior safety, strength coach Benny Wylie spent the summer emphasizing those rankings to the defense, reminding them during workouts of, for example, how many points USC’s defense gave up in the fourth quarter. The answer was an average of 10.4 points per fourth quarter — 128th in the country.

“We want to be an effort-based defense, a fast defense, playing free and playing with an edge, something we missed last year,” redshirt senior Bryson Shaw said. “There was a certain type of competitive vibe to us that we were missing.”

It wasn’t just the players. Grinch said he spent the offseason balancing out trying to learn from what worked and didn’t work for last year’s team while also reminding himself that it still helped USC win 11 games and, most importantly, that he couldn’t approach this season as if he were trying to coach last season’s unit.

“Everything is obviously on the table moving forward, but the big-picture stuff in terms of who you want to be and what you want to be. Did we succeed in that in Year 1? No, but that piece doesn’t change,” Grinch said. “What you’re looking for is the tangible piece. The fact is we now have to make sure we play more physically, play faster. … All those things have to move the needle.”

If there wasn’t enough pressure heading into Year 1, there certainly is now. And if the early part of this season displays similar struggles, those negatives will linger. Grinch recognizes that, and, as he put it, he can’t fight narratives. Last month, when a reporter asked him how he felt about the perception that he is coaching for his job this season, Grinch didn’t flinch.

“I think 21 years in the business, I mean, I think you’re coaching for your job all the time,” Grinch said. “I think pressure comes with it. I think about whether it’s Missouri or Washington State or Ohio State or Oklahoma, I don’t think I feel any different than I have in any of those years. There’s a lot of pressure.”

Despite the chatter about Grinch’s job being in jeopardy after the Tulane loss, Riley didn’t waver either, instead reaffirming his commitment in Grinch. This year, there’s added depth and experience at nearly every position, which has bred a productive competition across the board, in large part because USC once again dipped deep into the transfer portal to find an edge. Literally.


MARSHAWN LLOYD WAS still wearing the garnet and black colors of the other USC across the country when he was watching Lincoln Riley’s USC wide-eyed and with a tinge of jealousy.

“I watched the Utah game and the Tulane game, and I hadn’t committed,” Lloyd said. “I was just like, ‘Man, I would love to be in that type of offense.'”

Eight months later, Lloyd now wears cardinal and gold, having spoken his wish into reality by transferring from South Carolina to Southern California and landing squarely in the middle of the offense he admired from afar. Lloyd, who rushed for 573 yards and nine touchdowns last season, is one of several talented transfers who entered the portal this offseason and ended up choosing the Trojans.

As offensive fixtures such as Jordan Addison and Travis Dye left for the NFL, the Trojans had no problem reloading on offense. They added the likes of Lloyd, Arizona‘s Dorian Singer — the Pac-12’s second-leading receiver last year — while bolstering their offensive line with four-star offensive lineman Emmanuel Pregnon from Wyoming and three-star offensive lineman Michael Tarquin from Florida.

While last year’s portal run for USC was in large part due to the circumstance of overhauling a roster, this year’s additions seem to be more rooted in USC’s success and in its obvious needs after losing its final two games last year. It’s why most of its biggest targets in the portal ended up being on defense.

After losing its best defensive player, Tuli Tuipulotu, to the NFL draft, USC had to address that aforementioned edge rusher position and its defensive line as a whole. That unit is where USC found the most transfer portal success, adding players such as three-star Kyon Barrs from Arizona in December along with four-star Jack Sullivan from Purdue, four-star Anthony Lucas from Texas A&M, and eventually the biggest get of them all in four-star defensive lineman Bear Alexander from Georgia.

“We have more good players and less bad players,” Riley said matter-of-factly of the difference between this year and this time last year. “The front seven defensively is a huge difference. It feels a lot different, a little more competition across the board.”

The linebackers represent this notion well. Between a veteran and captain like Lee, a dynamic returning transfer in Eric Gentry and transfer additions such as Jamil Muhammad from Georgia State and four-star linebacker Mason Cobb from Oklahoma State, the room is loaded with options, and that’s before even considering true freshman Tackett Curtis, who has earned some reps among the first team in practice and is listed as the starter at Will linebacker on USC’s recently released depth chart.

Cobb, in particular, has been a standout for more than just his play. In a short time, he has become not just a fixture of the USC defense but a leader for the whole team, all of whom wax poetic about the new guy who has transformed into a team captain in record time.

“That guy deserves it,” Shaw said. “He came in right away and I felt like I knew him forever. He’s got a certain vibe to him, and we all gravitate to it. We’re very excited that he’s here.”

When Riley first arrived at USC, he emphasized his preference to build his team through high school recruiting over relying heavily on the portal. That reliance diminished slightly this season, with 15 incoming transfers compared with 20 last year.

“Moving forward, what you don’t do is say, ‘Well, we’re not doing transfer, we’re not doing high school guys,'” Grinch said. “Let’s make the best roster we possibly can.”

While USC keeps jumping up the recruiting rankings and getting commitments from players such as the top quarterback in the 2026 class, Julian Lewis, there is still an unspoken urgency to build a roster this season that can win now, in what will likely be Caleb Williams‘ final college season.


IT IS A prefix that will forever precede his name — Heisman winner — but Williams has already moved past it.

“He achieved the greatest award you can — the Heisman — and he wants more,” Dedich said. “Not many people can actually go out there and do that.”

A glance at Williams’ Instagram feed is enough to perceive the ways he has enjoyed and supercharged his offseason after winning the Heisman. Visiting London. Walking the runway at Paris Fashion Week. Attending an F1 race in Monaco. Throwing the first pitch at a Dodgers game. His teammates, though, have seen him in different contexts: hanging out, planning team activities, throwing at summer workouts.

“Everyone thinks he’s Superman, but he’s still human,” Dedich said.

Williams, for his part, knows that remaining level with the teammates he will have to correct or praise at some point is crucial to his role as a leader. It’s why he knows coasting in practices or workouts isn’t an option. Or why being the one to create chemistry by spending time outside the football field with the rest of the team is crucial to USC’s success.

“Comfort and confidence,” Williams said when asked what is different going into his second season at USC. “Not just for myself but for everybody overall. Confidence in the scheme. When you get a year under your belt, you get a bunch of trials and tribulations, you get successful plays, you get some confidence, and you get to work with it the whole summer. That’s what we’ve been doing.”

Those who have been around Williams can attest to the growth. Some say he has stepped into being as much of a coach as he can be as a player. Others call out his leadership, while those who transferred to USC don’t hesitate when admitting he was a factor in their decision. Arriving on campus and interacting with Williams in person has only bolstered their belief that they made the right choice.

“He organizes workouts and brings us along,” Singer said. “He brought the offensive line to his first pitch at the Dodgers game; he took the team paintballing a couple weeks ago. So it’s things like that that people don’t see that makes him really special.”

Yet nothing brings home that point more than when Williams becomes as anonymous as he can be these days, putting on a helmet before putting on a show.

“He’s a unique talent and a unique person,” Dedich said when asked about the comparison between Williams and Patrick Mahomes. “People are going to compare other kids to Caleb one day.”

Defensive leaps and improvements on offense should boost USC’s chances this season, but every player is conscious of the fact that the Trojans’ chances rely heavily on Williams, whom every teammate seems to be running out of adjectives to describe. It is fitting then, that the rare critique comes from the person who knows him best.

“He’s played a year and a half of college football. There’s 15 more levels he can get to,” Riley said. “He needs to get better at a little bit of everything. I don’t know if you guys believe me when I tell you that actually is the truth. He’s tremendous, but he doesn’t walk on water yet. He’s got a lot of work to do, and he’s the first one to admit that.”

If Williams’ teammates are the chorus of praise Williams has earned, Riley is the realist, the motivator who knows that the task of improving upon last season won’t be easy, even with a roster that’s deeper, better and more committed to winning.

“I do think he’s a better player right now than he was,” Riley said. “But he’s got a whole new set of challenges that are coming up that he’s gonna have to be ready to work with.”

So far the new and improved Williams show has come behind closed doors, in practices where only a handful of people can watch. Come Saturday, the stage will welcome Williams once again. And after the past eight months of work, USC is hoping the team that joins him up there will be a far better version than the one the Trojans have left behind.

Continue Reading

Sports

College football takeaways: Key storylines and performances from Week 12

Published

on

By

College football takeaways: Key storylines and performances from Week 12

What a week it was in college football: Five AP Top 25 teams lost to unranked opponents, and after No. 6 BYU’s defeat to Kansas, the Big 12 appears to be up for grabs after victories by Colorado and Arizona State.

The Buffaloes and Sun Devils have proved football fans wrong this season as Colorado is tied for the top spot in the Big 12 and Arizona State is a game behind. With both teams on a winning streak, what can they credit for their success?

After a rough start to the season, Billy Napier and Florida have turned things around and the Gators are one win from bowl eligibility. With an upset win over No. 22 LSU, is it time to stop questioning Napier?

Our college football experts break down key storylines and takeaways from Week 12.

Losses might be as important as wins in the CFP committee meeting room

With six new committee members, a new committee chair and a new College Football Playoff executive director, there are a lot of new faces at selection central. Each group is different. Ranking the top 25 teams is a subjective system, and this year’s committee appears to be putting an emphasis on losses — maybe more than in years past.

Who teams lose to and how has always mattered, but it might be more of a factor this year with multiple two-loss teams to sort through. It’s also a big reason why Ohio State is No. 2 and Penn State is No. 4 — close losses to highly-ranked teams. It’s never a good time for a bad loss, but it could mean the difference this year between a first-round bye, a first-round home game — or a seat on the couch. — Heather Dinich


Rivalries matter more than ever

Texas has never viewed Arkansas on par with rival Oklahoma, but Arkansas lives to torment Texas. Three years ago, the No. 15 Longhorns came to Fayetteville and were stomped 40-21. Jubilant Arkansas fans stormed the field.

But returning as conference rivals for the first time since the Razorbacks left the Southwest Conference in 1991 seemed to mean something to No. 3 Texas, too, after a tough 20-10 win over the 5-5 Razorbacks. “It was personal for sure,” senior edge rusher Barryn Sorrell said.

Quinn Ewers sealed the win by running for three yards on fourth-and-2 with 2:14 left. Rather than trying to evade linebacker Larry Worth III, Ewers decided to bull his way over him. “I just tried to put a little statement into it, that’s all,” Ewers said with a smile. “Just the history that these two programs have together, it’s going to be tough.”

Texas joining the SEC reconnected old grudge matches with Texas A&M and Arkansas. The 74,929 who showed up Saturday — the 10th-largest crowd in Arkansas history — threw their Horns Down at every opportunity. With an eight-game SEC schedule, there’s only one permanent rivalry guaranteed per school, and for the Longhorns, that will always be Oklahoma. Texas-Arkansas and Texas-Texas A&M could come and go. When college football is becoming more unrecognizable by the day, regional rivalries should be a priority. — Dave Wilson


Congrats to Colorado and Arizona State for proving us all wrong

It’s probably time to admit we were wrong about Deion Sanders’ Colorado and Kenny Dillingham’s Arizona State in 2024.

OK, maybe not all of us. But as both schools improved to 8-2 on Saturday, a preseason poll from CBS Sports resurfaced that ranked Sanders and Dillingham, respectively, as the 15th- and 16th-best coaches among the Big 12’s 16 football programs. And whether you had either coach/program that low in August, there can’t be many of us who expected either school to be here in Week 12: level alongside Iowa State for second in the Big 12 standings and in line to play at least some kind of role in the College Football Playoff picture over the final weeks of the regular season.

Colorado earned its fourth win in a row and Travis Hunter logged another entry to his Heisman Trophy résumé in a 49-24 win over Utah on Saturday, yet Sanders says the Buffaloes still “haven’t even played our best game.” Meanwhile, Arizona State reached its highest win total since 2021 on Saturday night after storming to a 21-0 first-half lead and holding off No. 16 Kansas State after halftime in a 24-14 road win, fueled by the aerial connection between Sam Leavitt (275 passing yards, three touchdowns) and Jordyn Tyson (12 catches, 176 yards, two touchdowns).

The successes at Colorado and Arizona State are a credit to the respective coaching jobs Sanders and Dillingham are executing. They’re also a credit to the concept that there remain many different paths to winning in a seemingly homogenized era of college football dominated by NIL, the transfer portal and the rest. Through 12 weeks, Colorado and Arizona State represent two of the sport’s great surprises this fall, and there are perhaps no two people more acutely aware of the doubters than the coaches leading this pair of impressive turnarounds in 2024.

“We were a three-win team twice,” Dillingham said Saturday night. “We were under NCAA sanctions. Most head coaches, to be brutally honest, you get fired if you take a job under sanctions. You don’t survive. You’re hired to be fired. That’s the nature of the beast. And right now we’re sitting here at 8-2 and couldn’t be prouder.” — Eli Lederman


South Carolina is clearly the nation’s best three-loss team

Shane Beamer’s team is not part of the logjam atop the SEC. The Gamecocks are not in the College Football Playoff mix, essentially eliminated Oct. 12 when they couldn’t hold a fourth-quarter lead at Alabama or tie the score in the closing minute. But since falling to 3-3 in Tuscaloosa, South Carolina has won four straight and continued to be one of the most consistently compelling squads on Saturdays.

After riding Kyle Kennard and the defense to wins over Oklahoma, Texas A&M and Vanderbilt, South Carolina needed the offense to outlast Missouri, going 70 yards in 47 seconds to score the winning touchdown with 15 seconds left. Redshirt freshman LaNorris Sellers is blossoming into one of the nation’s best young quarterbacks, as he set career highs for passing yards (353) and passing touchdowns (five) against Missouri. South Carolina has defeated three straight AP-ranked opponents for the first time in team history.

“We’re on the right track,” Beamer said. “The young players we have in this program right now, the quarterback, Dylan [Stewart]. You talk about the recruits that are here tonight, the ones that are committed to us. The best days of South Carolina football are right in front of us.”

There will be some what-ifs for the Gamecocks, especially in their losses to LSU and Alabama. But after a 5-7 season last fall, Beamer has recaptured his big-game magic and built a program that no opponent should want to face right now. — Adam Rittenberg


A resolute Billy Napier and his Florida team just keep getting back up

When it starts to go bad for a coach in the SEC, especially one who’s in his third season and has yet to manage a winning record, it’s usually like a two-ton truck cresting over an icy slope.

There’s no stopping the slide.

Even with the recent and dreaded vote of confidence for Florida’s Billy Napier, there are no guarantees about his future. But nobody would have predicted he had any future at Florida two months ago after an ugly home loss to Texas A&M, two weeks removed from a 41-17 beatdown by Miami at home. The speculation late that night was that Napier might be out as early as the next morning.

But he had just enough support in key areas to hang on, and most importantly, the players in his locker room still believed in him. And here we are, with two weeks left in the regular season, and the Gators are one win away from bowl eligibility after taking down LSU 27-16 at home Saturday. Another huge opportunity awaits this weekend when No. 11 Ole Miss visits the Swamp.

The Gators (5-5) have been resilient, just like their coach, and responded from a 49-17 blowout loss at Texas to play one of their most complete games of the season at home against LSU. Simply making a bowl game is hardly the standard at Florida, but the way Napier has kept his team together, continued to develop young quarterback DJ Lagway and gone about his business with accountability, humility and a quiet confidence is proof he deserves a fourth season to show he can get this program to that standard.

It’s time to get behind Napier and quit questioning him. It’s clear the Gators have a talented nucleus of younger players and that those players have their coach’s back. — Chris Low


Louisville … what are you doing?

Stanford vs. Louisville was an inconsequential game that should have flown under the radar, regardless of the result. And while the outcome — a Stanford win that ended a six-game losing streak — was a significant upset, it’s the way it happened that deserves some added attention. It might be the most improbable way a team has lost a game all season. Let’s dive in.

After trailing 35-21 in the fourth quarter, Stanford scored touchdowns with 6:37 left and 45 seconds left to cut the deficit to 35-34. At this point, I thought Stanford coach Troy Taylor, a coach who once went an entire high school season without punting, would go for the win with a 2-point conversion try. He did not. Tie score.

On the ensuing kickoff, Louisville opted against taking the ball at the 25-yard line and returned it to the 19. After a spike, a deep shot, a short pass and another deep shot all fail, Stanford took possession at its 45 with 4 seconds left. Overtime felt inevitable. Wrong.

Stanford completed a 1-yard pass only to be gifted 15 yards by an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty by Louisville, giving the Cardinal a chance to win the game on a 57-yard field goal attempt. Improbable, still. So, what does Louisville do: jumps offside to make the kick easier. And Stanford’s Emmet Kenney took advantage, making a 52-yard field goal as time expired.

An all-time collapse. — Kyle Bonagura


Kennesaw State’s Bohannon shows class on way out

Last weekend, Kennesaw State fired coach Brian Bohannon, who helped build the program from scratch nine years ago, then ushered it from the FCS into the FBS this season. That firing didn’t stop the former FCS Coach of the Year from supporting his players before its game Saturday against Sam Houston.

In a video posted by a Kennesaw State football alum, Bohannon showed up to the team’s pregame walk to the stadium and gave the players hugs and high-fives as they walked by.

The Owls ultimately lost in overtime to fall to 1-9 but showed fight against the Bearkats, who remain in contention for the Conference USA title.

Despite being fired, Bohannon should be revered in Kennesaw for taking the Owls to the FCS playoffs four times, for elevating the program to the FBS — and for the way he graciously exited. — Jake Trotter

Continue Reading

Sports

‘There’s not one right way to do it’: Why paying goalies is so complicated in today’s NHL

Published

on

By

'There's not one right way to do it': Why paying goalies is so complicated in today's NHL

As the New York Rangers and Igor Shesterkin‘s camp negotiate for a new contract, the goalie doesn’t want to talk about what’s at stake — though everyone else around the league does. According to sources, Shesterkin declined an eight-year, $88 million offer at the start of the season, which would have made him the highest paid goalie in NHL history.

“He’s special,” Detroit Red Wings coach Derek Lalonde said on Oct. 14, when Shesterkin stopped 31 shots in a 4-1 win. “I can see why he turned down the 88 [million dollars]. Good agent.”

Five nights later, Shesterkin was even better, turning away 34 of 35 shots against the high-powered Toronto Maple Leafs.

“You can see why he’s going to be the highest-paid goalie in the league,” Toronto’s veteran goalie, Anthony Stolarz, said after the game. “Hats off to him.”

Even after Shesterkin allowed four goals through two periods against the rival Washington Capitals on Oct. 29, his opponents were feeling stymied. Said Capitals assistant Scott Allen ahead of the third period: “You see why he’s asking for $13 million, or whatever it is by now.”

The entire league seems to agree that Shesterkin, 28, is among its top goalies and deserves to be paid as such. But how much should a goalie make in today’s NHL? That might be one of the toughest questions to answer in the league.


JEREMY SWAYMAN AND the Boston Bruins ended a summerlong standoff when he signed an eight-year, $66 million contract ($8.25 million in average annual value) ahead of the season opener. Shortly after, the Dallas Stars’ Jake Oettinger signed an identical deal. They both match what the New York Islanders and Ilya Sorokin agreed to in 2023, and are roughly around what the NHL’s current save percentage leader Connor Hellebuyck ($8.5 million AAV) signed for in 2023 on a seven-year deal.

Starting next season, eight goalies will make at least $7 million. By contrast, 107 skaters will be at or above that mark — with 11 making at least $11 million.

“I think we’re in a decent place, [goalies] are now making great money, but it’s also not superstar money,” one starting goaltender said. “It just shows you how the league views our position. GMs don’t want to make goalies the highest-paid players, but I think lots of guys could make a good argument.”

Star forwards play roughly a third of the game. Star defensemen, at best, skate for half. Their performance can vary based on linemates, matchups and a variety of other nuances. A goaltender is in net (practically) the entire 60 minutes, alone in the crease. But even as it is the most isolated position, front office executives say goaltending is the hardest to evaluate — and therefore compensate.

“Agents want to do apples to oranges comparisons when it comes to goaltenders,” one front office executive said. “We have comps for top centers. Comps for top-four defensemen. Comps for goaltenders are way more complicated.”

Carolina GM Eric Tulsky, who comes from an analytics background, explained how slim the margins are.

“A lot of what makes goaltending hard is that a guy who stops 92% of shots is one of the best goalies in the world,” Tulsky said. “A guy who stops 91% is kind of average. And the difference between those is not very big. You watch a guy face 500 or 1,000 shots, and he might stop 91 or 92% by chance. It takes a lot of time to know for sure that this is a guy that is going to stop 91 or 92% day after day.”

The core argument for not giving goalie superstar contracts tend to center around this uncertainty, posed by one front office executive: “How many mega goalie contracts age well?”

Plus, there’s proof of concept that it’s not always necessary to have one goalie on a big contract.

The Florida Panthers just won a Stanley Cup with the league’s highest-paid active goaltender, Sergei Bobrovsky ($10 million cap hit). Florida spends more on goaltending than any other team. Backup Spencer Knight makes $4.5 million while Florida boasts the league’s only “Goaltending Excellence Department” — which includes four coaches/executives dedicated to the position.

But over the past 10 years, there have also been two Stanley Cup winners with starting goaltenders making the league minimum (Jordan Binnington in 2018, Matt Murray in 2016) while the Golden Knights won in 2023 with Adin Hill earning just $2.175 million, which represented less than 3% of their salary cap.

The theme? “There’s not one right way to do it,” Blackhawks GM Kyle Davidson said. “I don’t think there’s a hard and fast way anyone thinks about spending on goaltending. It probably just depends on what you have on your team.”


IN SURVEYING 12 high-ranking team executives about philosophies in paying goaltending, a common theme emerged, summed up by one GM: “The value of a goaltender is based on how your team is built, rather than his talent.”

One front office executive believed that “if you put Andrei Vasilevskiy on 10 different teams, you’d have 10 different save percentages.”

Most executives deferred to team construction. One GM cited Vegas as a team that was strong down the middle and had an excellent defensive core. “They can get away with average goaltending,” he said.

But poor goaltending can derail a team quickly. “Your 5-on-5 game might be good,” Predators GM Barry Trotz said. “But if you have weak goaltending, that doesn’t allow you to go on any streaks.”

The biggest issue for most front offices is projection on goalie development. It’s why a team like Philadelphia, looking for its goaltender of the future, is hedging its bets. The Flyers are carrying three goalies aged 22-27, and drafted another two in 2023.

“I think people have the idea that goalies peak really late,” one GM said. “I’m not sure I believe that. I don’t think it takes time for the goalie to develop; I think it takes time for teams to say, ‘Wait, this goalie is really good.'”

By then, the goalie might be past his physical prime, hence the risks of a long-term deal. One front office executive who just signed a goalie to a max term said he’s confident, based on that goalie’s pedigree and work ethic, that years 1-5 will go great. After that, the team might need security to cover for potential decline.

Those in the goaltending union often claim their position is both misunderstood and scapegoated. Some agents said in conversation with front office executives, they’ve heard phrases such as “goaltending is a crapshoot,” or “I don’t understand goaltending.”

“Confidence in a goalie from management can be fleeting,” one high-profile goalie agent said. “There’s not a ton of patience. If the season isn’t going well, pressure is on the goalie right away.”

Ray Petkau, who represents Hellebuyck and several other goalies, said he believes goaltending can be misunderstood by some in the analytics community. For example, several front office executives cited Goals Saved Above Expected as a go-to stat for evaluation. Petkau said that one doesn’t tell the whole story.

“If a goal is deflected by an opposing player 2 feet in front of the net, it’s assigned X amount of value. But if a shot is deflected off the goalie’s defenseman, that’s not considered the same way by some of the groups providing public analytics information. Some say it averages out over time, but they don’t take into account that some teams have more defensemen who have a habit of blocking off their stick.”

Petkau prefers performance when facing high-danger chances as a stronger stat for evaluation, but that too has variables that can’t be controlled by the goalie. He also said goalies’ strengths should mesh with a team’s needs. For example, if a goalie isn’t great with rush chances, he shouldn’t go to a team that allows a lot.


THE CLIMATE ISN’T going to get any easier for goalies. League average save percentage has dipped in each of the past nine seasons, and we’re trending for the lowest number (.901) since 2005-06. Tulsky sees a trend of offensive creativity, specifically with more East-West movement and an increase in backdoor plays.

“The game’s getting faster, people are getting stronger, and so it all happens that much quicker,” Tulsky said. “When you’re in a position where your job is to react, that makes it much harder.”

Another leaguewide trend: there are now fewer Shesterkins — obvious No. 1 workhorses — and more incidents of goaltending by committee.

From 2010-2019, the league averaged 20.4 goalies per season who started at least 50 games. Over the past three seasons, that number is now 14.3.

Consider the New Jersey Devils, who needed an upgrade in net for this season. GM Tom Fitzgerald determined it was best to get a combination of goaltenders making less than $8 million versus having one make $8 million and another at the league minimum. The Devils’ new tandem is Jacob Markstrom and Jake Allen, both acquired via trade, with their former teams retaining salary.

“Other goalies we looked at, some were going to be free agents,” Fitzgerald said. “You just don’t know what they were going to be priced at with the cap going up.”

Cost certainty is huge in today’s NHL, where everyone knows the salary cap is going up after several stagnant years — but nobody knows exactly by how much and how quickly.

That’s what makes contracts in general difficult right now. Many agents are focused on percentage of the cap. The three highest players this season, Auston Matthews, Nathan MacKinnon and Connor McDavid, are in the 15-16% range. According to sources, the argument by Shesterkin’s camp is that he is the team’s most important player, so he should be the top-paid player on the team. Currently, that’s winger Artemi Panarin at $11.64 million.

The Rangers, in contrast, need to account for future contracts (winger Alexis Lafreniere just resigned at a $7.45 million annual cap hit, and defenseman K’Andre Miller is due). New York can also offer something no other team can: an eighth year. That means if Shesterkin hit the open market, other teams would have to ante up the AAV to match New York’s total value.

Only Vasilevskiy and Bobrovsky have come close to the record $10.5 million AAV Carey Price earned on an eight-year deal, which kicked in during the 2018-19 season, when Price was 31. Price played only two full seasons on the deal. He has been on long-term injured reserve for most of the past three seasons.

Since there are only so many goalie jobs, there are fewer opportunities to reset the market. Hellebuyck could have in 2024, but instead took less to stay in Winnipeg, a place where he felt comfortable and a team he believed could win with.

That’s why the entire league — and specifically the goaltending union — is waiting for resolution on Shesterkin. He could help shape the future of the position — resetting the market for the next generation.

Continue Reading

Sports

Wisconsin fires offensive coordinator after 2 years

Published

on

By

Wisconsin fires offensive coordinator after 2 years

Wisconsin fired offensive coordinator Phil Longo on Sunday, a day after the Badgers’ 16-13 home loss to No. 1 Oregon.

In a statement, Badgers coach Luke Fickell thanked Longo for his two seasons with the program, while adding, “We are not where we need to be and believe this decision is in the best interest of the team.”

Wisconsin ranks 97th nationally in scoring and 102nd in passing while operating an Air Raid-style offense that Longo brought with him from North Carolina and other stops.

The Badgers, who lost starting quarterback Tyler Van Dyke to a season-ending injury Sept. 14, had only three points and 88 yards in the second half against Oregon, which rallied from a 13-6 deficit entering the fourth quarter.

Wisconsin ranked 101st nationally in scoring in Longo’s 23 games as coordinator and failed to eclipse 13 points on its current three-game losing streak. Quarterback Braedyn Locke had only 96 passing yards against the Ducks.

Fickell did not immediately announce an interim coordinator for Wisconsin’s final regular-season games against Nebraska and Minnesota.

Fickell had long targeted Longo for a coordinator role, going back to his time as Cincinnati’s coach. Longo, 56, oversaw productive offenses at Ole Miss, North Carolina, Sam Houston State and other spots but never consistently got traction at a Wisconsin program that had operated dramatically differently on offense before his arrival.

“This team still has a lot in front of us and I am committed to doing everything we can to close out this season with success,” Fickell said in his statement.

Continue Reading

Trending