A government aid package aimed at securing the long-term future of steelmaking in South Wales could be a “missed opportunity”, a senior Labour MP has told Sky News.
Stephen Kinnock, whose Aberavon constituency includes Port Talbot, home of the steelworks owned by Tata, also said the deal could be counterproductive.
While it does include the building of electric arc furnaces (EAFs) – which are greener than traditional blast furnaces – it does not focus enough on transitioning to a decarbonised economy, Mr Kinnock said.
“Nobody’s really talking about hydrogen (to produce steel), carbon capture and storage,” he said.
Dr Jonathan Aylen, a steel industry expert at the University of Manchester, has similar concerns, describing the potential agreement as a “bit of a stop-gap solution”.
Getting rid of blast furnaces, which use coke derived from coal, would be an important step, however.
While they are a “great way to make steel” they are also a “great producer of carbon”, Dr Aylen told Sky News.
“For every tonne of steel you make you get two tonnes of carbon dioxide going into the atmosphere.”
But he, too, mentioned the use of hydrogen and carbon capture and said ministers need to take a “long, careful, hard look at what needs to be done to decarbonise steel and stop becoming, so to speak, being taken for a sucker by every company that wants a handout”.
Advertisement
For the unions, there are concerns about job cuts, because EAFs use less labour-intensive processes to produce steel than blast furnaces.
The government is “choosing to follow a jobs cuts agenda”, the Unite union has claimed.
Community, the steelworkers’ union, said unions had “not agreed any decarbonisation strategy for Port Talbot”.
Image: A molten steel ladle
There are questions, too, about whether it is worth spending taxpayers’ money to support the steel industry.
Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said it accounts for a “fraction of a percent” of the UK economy.
UK steel has been through “multiple insolvencies” and this latest rescue plan could be seen as the government “throwing good money after bad”, Mr Mould added.
But Mr Kinnock said that failing properly to support the British steel industry could mean becoming reliant on metal from China which is produced in an “incredibly dirty, heavily polluting” manner.
The potential agreement, uncovered by Sky News, could see ministers handing over a £500m aid package, with Whitehall officials and Tata Steel getting close to agreeing a deal that would commit more than £1bn to the future of the firm’s South Wales plant.
Mr Kinnock said he had “real concern” that the “focus seems to be very much on electric arc furnaces”.
He added: “Nobody’s really talking about hydrogen, direct reduced iron, carbon capture and storage, which are all vitally important routes to decarbonising the steel-making processes.
“If we don’t have all those different routes we won’t be able to make all the grades and quantities of steel that we need to retain our customer base.
“And if we don’t do that there will be more job losses than are necessary, and it will be a missed opportunity by the government and by Tata Steel.”
Mr Kinnock is calling for a “full spectrum approach” as the UK pursues rapid decarbonisation, and said it is “vital” the unions and the workforce are fully consulted about the agreement.
Asked if the steel industry has a future, Mr Kinnock said: “Imagine the cost of doing nothing. There are 4,000 very well paid, high-skilled jobs in the Port Talbot steelworks.
“If we’re going to transition to a decarbonised economy are we going to do that by importing steel from China?
“We’re also living in a dangerous and turbulent world. Do we really think it’s a good idea to be relying on other governments – sometimes hostile to the UK – to supply our steel?”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:59
What’s the cost of Tata Steel going green?
Sharon Graham, the general secretary of Unite, said: “This government could make us the green steel capital of Europe – instead they are choosing to follow a jobs cuts agenda. Unite will leave no stone unturned in the fight for jobs.”
Community, the steelworkers’ union, said: “We remain in discussions with the company and the unions have not agreed any decarbonisation strategy for Port Talbot.
“We continue to support a solution that will maintain blast furnace production and safeguard the future for all the UK plants.
“We are ready to use all means at our disposal to protect jobs and our vital strategic industry.”
The chancellor has confirmed she is considering “changes” to ISAs – and said there has been too much focus on “risk” in members of the public investing.
In her second annual Mansion House speech to the financial sector, Rachel Reeves said she recognised “differing views” over the popular tax-free savings accounts, in which savers can currently put up to £20,000 a year.
She was reportedly considering reducing the threshold to as low as £4,000 a year, in a bid to encourage people to put money into stocks and shares instead and boost the economy.
However the chancellor has shelved any immediate planned changes after fierce backlash from building societies and consumer groups.
In her speech to key industry figures on Tuesday evening, Ms Reeves said: “I will continue to consider further changes to ISAs, engaging widely over the coming months and recognising that despite the differing views on the right approach, we are united in wanting better outcomes for both savers and for the UK economy.”
She added: “For too long, we have presented investment in too negative a light, quick to warn people of the risks, without giving proper weight to the benefits.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:36
Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma
Ms Reeves’s speech, the first major one since the welfare bill climbdown two weeks ago, appeared to encourage regulators to focus less on risks and more on the benefits of investing in things like the stock market and government bonds (loans issued by states to raise funds with an interest rate paid in return).
She welcomed action by the financial regulator to review risk warning rules and the campaign to promote retail investment, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is launching next year.
“Our tangled system of financial advice and guidance has meant that people cannot get the right support to make decisions for themselves”, Ms Reeves told the event in London.
Last year, Ms Reeves said post-financial crash regulation had “gone too far” and set a course for cutting red tape.
On Tuesday, she said she would announce a package of City changes, including a new competitive framework for a part of the insurance industry and a regulatory regime for asset management.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:21
Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job
In response to Ms Reeves’s address, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: “Rachel Reeves should have used her speech this evening to rule out massive tax rises on businesses and working people. The fact that she didn’t should send a shiver down the spine of taxpayers across the country.”
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
The governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, also spoke at the Mansion House event and said Donald Trump’s taxes on US imports would slow the economy and trade imbalances should be addressed.
“Increasing tariffs creates the risk of fragmenting the world economy, and thereby reducing activity”, he said.
The taxpayer is to help drive the switch to non-polluting vehicles through a new grant of up to £3,750, but some of the cheapest electric cars are to be excluded.
The Department for Transport (DfT) said a £650m fund was being made available for the Electric Car Grant, which is due to get into gear from Wednesday.
Users of the scheme – the first of its kind since the last Conservative government scrapped grants for new electric vehicles three years ago – will be able to secure discounts based on the “sustainability” of the car.
It will apply only to vehicles with a list price of £37,000 or below – with only the greenest models eligible for the highest grant.
Buyers of so-called ‘Band two’ vehicles can receive up to £1,500.
The qualification criteria includes a recognition of a vehicle’s carbon footprint from manufacture to showroom so UK-produced EVs, costing less than £37,000, would be expected to qualify for the top grant.
More from Money
It is understood that Chinese-produced EVs – often the cheapest in the market – would not.
Image: BYD electric vehicles before being loaded onto a ship in Lianyungang, China. Pic: Reuters
DfT said 33 new electric car models were currently available for less than £30,000.
The government has been encouraged to act as sales of new electric vehicles are struggling to keep pace with what is needed to meet emissions targets.
Challenges include the high prices for electric cars when compared to conventionally powered models.
At the same time, consumer and business budgets have been squeezed since the 2022 cost of living crisis – and households and businesses are continuing to feel the pinch to this day.
Another key concern is the state of the public charging network.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:29
The Chinese electric car rivalling Tesla
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: “This EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money – it’ll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century.
“And with over 82,000 public charge points now available across the UK, we’ve built the infrastructure families need to make the switch with confidence.”
The Government has pledged to ban the sale of new fully petrol or diesel cars and vans from 2030 but has allowed non-plug in hybrid sales to continue until 2025.
It is hoped the grants will enable the industry to meet and even exceed the current zero emission vehicle mandate.
Under the rules, at least 28% of new cars sold by each manufacturer in the UK this year must be zero emission.
The figure stood at 21.6% during the first half of the year.
The car industry has long complained that it has had to foot a multi-billion pound bill to woo buyers for electric cars through “unsustainable” discounting.
Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said the grants sent a “clear signal to consumers that now is the time to switch”.
He went on: “Rapid deployment and availability of this grant over the next few years will help provide the momentum that is essential to take the EV market from just one in four today, to four in five by the end of the decade.”
But the Conservatives questioned whether taxpayers should be footing the bill.
Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said: “Last week, the Office for Budget Responsibility made clear the transition to EVs comes at a cost, and this scheme only adds to it.
“Make no mistake: more tax rises are coming in the autumn.”
A leading financier and Conservative Party donor is among the contenders vying to chair Channel 4, the state-owned broadcaster.
Sky News has learnt from Whitehall sources that Wol Kolade has been shortlisted to replace Sir Ian Cheshire at the helm of the company.
Mr Kolade, who has donated hundreds of thousands of pounds to Tory coffers, is said by Whitehall insiders to be one of a handful of remaining candidates for the role.
A recommendation from Ofcom, the media regulator, to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy about its recommendation for the Channel 4 chairmanship is understood to be imminent.
Mr Kolade, who heads the private equity firm Livingbridge, has held non-executive roles including a seat on the board of NHS Improvement.
He declined to comment when contacted by Sky News on Monday.
His candidacy pits him against rivals including Justin King, the former J Sainsbury chief executive, who last week stepped down as chairman of Ovo Energy.
Debbie Wosskow, an existing Channel 4 non-executive director who has applied for the chair role, is also said by government sources to have made it to the shortlist.
Sir Ian stepped down earlier this year after just one term, having presided over a successful attempt to thwart privatisation by the last Tory government.
The Channel 4 chairmanship is currently held on an interim basis by Dawn Airey, the media industry executive who has occupied top jobs at companies including ITV, Channel 5, and Yahoo!.
The race to lead the state-owned broadcaster’s board has acquired additional importance since the resignation of Alex Mahon, its long-serving chief executive.
It has since been reported that Alex Burford, another Channel 4 non-executive director and the boss of Warner Records UK, was interested in replacing Ms Mahon.
Ms Mahon, who was a vocal opponent of Channel 4’s privatisation, is leaving to join Superstruct, a private equity-owned live entertainment company.
The appointment of a new chair is expected to take place by the autumn, with the chosen candidate expected to lead the recruitment of Ms Mahon’s successor.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport declined to comment on the recruitment process.