LINCOLN, Neb. — Scott Frost has not won enough games at Nebraska. He knows that. Athletic director Trev Alberts knows that. Everybody in Nebraska knows that.
While a 15-27 record in four years would be enough to get a coach fired at nearly any big-time program in America, Nebraska prides itself on not being like everyone else.
That much was clear again last Saturday, as the Cornhuskers prepared to play their fourth top-10 team this season. In the hours before the game, one fan after the next expressed their desire to see Frost return for a fifth season despite the losing record.
“He’s a national championship quarterback, he’s a Nebraska guy, just like Jim Harbaugh over there at Michigan,” said Darron Mapes, wearing an “In Frost We Trust” hat as he stood near the Tom Osborne statue just outside Memorial Stadium. “It just takes time to get the people in there, and the right culture, and the players. I just don’t know who else would be Nebraska. Frost is Nebraska.”
Inside the stadium, Jay Lamontagne brought his 4-year-old son, Cayden, to his first Nebraska game. They sat just behind the end zone, with Cayden holding up a sign that read, “Win this one for FROST.”
“He needs more time,” Jay Lamontagne said. “You give him another couple years and he’s going to figure it out. He’s figured it out everywhere else he’s gone his entire life. It’s not going to change now.”
On the field, Nebraska did enough to raise hopes against Ohio State, the way the Huskers have done in every game this season. But several of the same issues came up again — special teams mistakes, questionable playcalling and an inability to get any rhythm on offense — and the result was the same.
Another close loss.
Nebraska has lost all seven of its games by single digits, worst in FBS, and there are two ways to look at those results. Either look at it the way Frost does — he reiterated postgame that Nebraska was close, the way that he has in nearly every other heartbreaking loss.
“I hate losing more than anybody in that locker room,” Frost said. “Man, I love being the coach here. I love these kids. They’ve battled through a lot. This is going to pop at Nebraska. It just is. We’re doing too many good things right.”
“Man, I love being the coach here. I love these kids. They’ve battled through a lot. This is going to pop at Nebraska. It just is. We’re doing too many good things right.”
Scott Frost
Or look at it the way some frustrated Nebraska fans do: Frost has had four years with little to show for it. Zero bowl appearances. The same mistakes over and over. Why expect anything different as long as he is in charge?
Alberts noted in his statement Monday he has seen “incremental progress,” one contributing factor to the decision to bring Frost back. The truth is, it has been apparent since the Nebraska job opened in 2017 that Frost would be given what he needed to get the program competing for championships again.
His success at UCF, going 13-0 in 2017, only put the cherry on top of what made him the best choice — a Nebraska native, a Nebraska graduate, a Nebraska national champion, a disciple of Osborne. Frost knew at some point during that UCF season he would get a phone call from Osborne. He knew how difficult it would be to win at Nebraska — far more difficult than when he played there thanks to a shifting collegiate landscape and conference realignment to boot.
He also knew there was no way he could turn it down.
Nebraska has invested in Frost, but more than that, it is emotionally tied to doing everything possible to make this hire work. While those inside the administration and fan base had grown weary of firing coaches every three years, only to start over again in a deeper financial hole because of large buyouts, this hire would be the ultimate litmus test for its faltering program.
Because if the perfect fit to take over Nebraska failed, what would that mean for the Nebraska program itself?
Frost knew the team he inherited needed major work, and he knew it would take some time to build a consistent winner. But he also learned tough lessons along the way, lessons that he must apply into Year 5. The offense he ran at UCF is simply not going to work in the Big Ten.
Though there has been a shift in offensive philosophy recently, more must be done to get Nebraska playing at a level it needs to in a division that is dominated by teams that have a proven way to win. It goes without saying that firing four offensive assistants Monday — including offensive coordinator Matt Lubick — was expected as part of a long-needed overhaul.
That is something Alberts mentioned in a sit-down interview with ESPN last month.
“Scott has evolved,” Alberts said. “There’s things that he’s doing today that are more reflective of the reality in the Big Ten. It doesn’t take long to go through the Big Ten and say, ‘The way Iowa plays, they limit the possessions, they shorten the game.’ I think he has adapted, I think that’s part of what makes the Big Ten strong. It holds you accountable toward success because there’s a certain formula that’s inherent in Big Ten success.
“The hardest part about the Big Ten is because everybody has resources, everybody’s committed — Indiana, Purdue, Northwestern — the problem, which has made our mistakes so glaring, is that the margins are so narrow that turnovers, field position, hidden yardage get exacerbated. I’m at practice all the time. There’s an intense focus on those areas with Scott and his staff and we’re making progress, but perhaps that wasn’t necessarily the culture that came from UCF because it’s different there. It’s wide open, we’re scoring every fourth play. These are some of the best college football coaches in America right here in the Big Ten. That’s who Scott and his staff are dealing with.”
Frost ran the spread offense at Oregon and then at UCF, but there are option principles that allow the run game to function at a high level. Nebraska does not need to go all in on the triple option, but it needs to find a way to build a dominant offensive line with a dual-threat quarterback who can be more effective than current starter Adrian Martinez.
In many ways, Frost’s fortunes have been tied to Martinez. Frost put everything into making Martinez into a success. Martinez has played through multiple injuries this season — including a broken jaw — and his grit and toughness will never be questioned. But his continuous mistakes have only compounded Nebraska’s misfortunes.
The defense under coordinator Erik Chinander has grown into a tough unit worthy of the Blackshirts name. That group has given the Cornhuskers a chance to win every single game this season. An offense to match would give Nebraska a better-than-average shot at getting over the hump and turning close losses into wins.
Is that doable with the pressure on next year? Frost does not have much of a choice. With the guarantee of at least one more year, he can recruit the next month with the assurances he needs. He has to, in order to bolster his class. Expect the transfer portal to be a part of his plans, too.
As Alberts pointed out in his statement Monday, the Nebraska players have not quit. “The young men in our program have remained unified and shown great resiliency, which is an important reflection of the leadership of Coach Frost and his staff.”
In a quiet moment after the Ohio State game, Frost told ESPN he remained as confident as ever he would get the job done. He had a determination in his eye, as if the adversity of the past four years was going to push him to work that much harder to get Nebraska back where those in Big Red Nation deserve it belongs.
Frost is the same guy who led UCF to an undefeated season. But the expectations are different at Nebraska. The competition is different. The pressure is different. Everything he does is scrutinized and questioned. But that is bound to happen as the perceived conquering hero, expected to bring championships back to a place that demands them.
Free agent utility man Enrique Hernandez had left elbow surgery Friday for an injury he played through during the Los Angeles Dodgers‘ World Series-winning run.
Hernandez posted about the surgery on Instagram, saying he had played through the injury since May and that it would keep him from playing for Puerto Rico in the World Baseball Classic next year.
He missed more than a month on the injured list during the season due to his elbow but returned in August.
Hernandez, 34, batted .203 with 10 home runs and 35 RBIs in 92 games during the regular season before posting a .250 average with one home run and seven RBIs in the playoffs as the Dodgers won a second straight title.
Members of Congress sent a letter to Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred on Friday, expressing concern over a “new integrity crisis” facing American sports and asking for answers about the alleged betting scheme that led to the recent indictments of two Cleveland Guardians pitchers.
Members of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, which oversees professional sports, called the allegations against Guardians pitchers Emmanuel Clase and Luis Ortiz “markedly more serious” than other recent betting incidents in baseball. Federal prosecutors on Sunday indicted Clase and Ortiz and accused them of rigging individual pitches over multiple games so gambling associates could profit on wagers.
Sens. Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell, who lead the committee, questioned why Clase’s alleged actions, which began in May 2023, were not discovered for two years. They contrasted the case with that of former major leaguer Tucupita Marcano, who was banned in 2024 for betting on baseball.
“How did MLB catch Marcano and ban him for life but failed to notice Clase allegedly rigging pitches for two years?” the letter states. “The integrity of the game is paramount. MLB has every interest in ensuring baseball is free from influence and manipulation. … But in light of these recent developments, MLB must clearly demonstrate how it is meeting its responsibility to safeguard America’s pastime.”
The committee members asked when and how MLB was made aware of the alleged activity by Clase and Ortiz and for documentation detailing the league’s betting policies and details of any other betting-related investigations since Jan. 1, 2020. The committee requested the information and documentation by Dec. 5.
ESPN has reached out to MLB for comment. On Monday, MLB announced that its sportsbook partners had agreed to place a $200 limit on all bets involving individual pitches and prohibit such wagers from being included in parlays. The measures were taken to reduce the amount that could be won from pitch-level bets and therefore decrease the incentive of manipulation.
The same committee sent a letter to the NBA in October, asking for information related to that league’s handling of the alleged betting scandal that led to the indictments of Portland Trail Blazers coach Chauncey Billups, former player and coach Damon Jones and Miami Heat veteran guard Terry Rozier.
“An isolated incident of game rigging might be dismissed as an aberration, but the emergence of manipulation across multiple leagues suggests a deeper, systemic vulnerability,” the committee wrote. “These developments warrant thorough scrutiny by Congress before misconduct issues become more widespread.”
Michael Rothstein, based in Atlanta, is a reporter on ESPN’s investigative and enterprise team. You can follow him via Twitter @MikeRothstein.
Testimony in the wrongful death lawsuit against the Los Angeles Angels underscores the difficulties team attorneys face convincing the jury they were unaware of addiction concerns before employee Eric Kay provided a fentanyl-laced pill that killed pitcher Tyler Skaggs in 2019.
The court case, now entering its sixth week, continues to focus on the team’s handling of Kay’s drug addiction treatment and whether officials did enough to protect Skaggs as Kay’s behavior became increasingly strange, causing Kay’s wife and some Angels employees to raise questions of drug abuse.
Kay was present in Skaggs’ hotel room the night he overdosed on alcohol and opioids, less than a month after Kay returned to work from a drug addiction treatment program. In Kay’s 2022 criminal trial, witnesses testified that Kay distributed pills to other players.
The team doctor testified last week that he prescribed more than 600 opioid pills to Kay over several years before learning how addictive the pills could be.
Contradictory testimony by current and former Angels representatives has sharpened scrutiny about what the Angels knew — and whether officials relayed concerns about Kay to Major League Baseball. Among the trial’s key elements in the past two weeks:
Deborah Johnston, the Angels vice president of human resources, testified Monday that the team worked with MLB to address Kay’s addiction, despite her own deposition and previous testimony by other Angels officials saying they had no knowledge of any such coordination.
MLB sent a statement to ESPN denying any knowledge of or involvement in Kay’s treatment. In front of the judge after jurors left the courtroom on Wednesday, the Skaggs family attorneys accused Johnston of committing perjury, a serious allegation. Angels attorneys immediately denied the perjury accusation.
Angels officials testified they believed Kay’s problems came from prescribed medication to address mental health issues, while clubhouse employees testified they either witnessed or believed Kay had a problem with drugs.
Angels officials testified they believed Kay suffered from bipolar disorder even though Kay’s medical records when he entered rehabilitation in April 2019 showed no record of medication to treat bipolar disorder. Kay’s ex-wife, Camela, testified she was not aware of a bipolar diagnosis.
The team doctor, Craig Milhouse, testified that he prescribed Kay 600 pills of the opioids Norco and Vicodin over a 44-month period between 2009 and 2013.
The crux of the case is whether the Angels knew Kay was abusing drugs and providing them to players, including Skaggs while working in his official capacity. Kay is serving 22 years in federal prison for providing the drug that killed Skaggs in a Texas hotel room on July 1, 2019. The team contends he and Skaggs were acting privately in their off time when the overdose occurred.
The plaintiffs claim the Angels put Skaggs in harm’s way by continuing to employ Kay when his behavior showed warning signs of drug abuse. Angels officials say they are not responsible for Skaggs’ death, were not aware of his drug use and that it was Skaggs’ reckless decision to mix alcohol with illicit drugs that killed him. Officials also testified they were not aware Kay was providing drugs to players when Skaggs died.
The Skaggs family is seeking $118 million in estimated lost wages, in addition to potential punitive damages.
Johnston testified last week that the franchise had worked with MLB to get Kay help for his drug addiction. It’s the first time an Angels official suggested MLB was informed of Kay’s problem — a major bone of contention on the question of team responsibility.
Johnston said that when the Angels investigate potential use of illegal substances on team property, one option is immediate termination, depending on the findings. “Another option is to work with MLB, as we did in this case, and with our physician, Dr. [Erik] Abell,” she stated. Abell was the team’s liaison with MLB for such issues.
Johnston also testified that Kay was drug-tested under MLB’s policies, not those of the Angels.
In a text-messaged statement to ESPN about the perjury accusation, Angels’ attorney Todd Theodora wrote: “The accusation that Ms. Johnston committed perjury is completely false and defamatory. Her testimony was truthful based on several text messages she was recently shown demonstrating that Dr. Abell was treating Eric Kay.”
He added that Johnston “did not make any statements about whether Dr. Abell reported this further to MLB.”
An MLB spokesperson denied the league knew of Kay’s drug use or was involved with Kay’s treatment.
In separate weekend comments to ESPN, Theodora and lead plaintiffs attorney Rusty Hardin argued about the perjury issue, with Theodora characterizing the absence of a ruling by the judge on the accusation as a win for his side, while Hardin insisted that no ruling means the issue remains alive — including plaintiffs’ efforts to get MLB testimony.
California-based civil attorney Geoffrey Hickey told ESPN that perjury can only be proven if Johnston “willingly and knowingly” made a false statement under oath. Hickey said Hardin has a “good-faith argument,” but he doesn’t think Johnston’s statements rise to the level of perjury.
Johnston testified in a September pretrial deposition that no one had reported Kay’s drug use to MLB. She explained Monday she “learned additional information” about the Angels’ communications with MLB after giving her deposition. She said she couldn’t remember the exact document where she learned the information.
Kay’s immediate superior, Tim Mead, and the Angels’ traveling secretary, Tom Taylor, testified earlier in the trial that Abell worked with Kay but made no mention of reporting his case to MLB.
Team doctor Milhouse testified that he believed Abell, the team’s sports psychologist, was the liaison to MLB for such an issue. MLB documents state that player drug issues were subject to investigation and disciplinary follow-up by the office of the MLB commissioner.
While Angels officials testified they never saw Kay take illicit drugs, former clubhouse attendant Kris Constanti testified that Kay told him he was taking Norco. Another ex-clubhouse attendant, Vince Willet, testified he saw Kay crush and then snort a pill in the Angels’ clubhouse kitchen during spring training.
Former clubhouse manager Keith Tarter testified that he suspected Kay was using drugs and that Kay told him in 2019 he was concerned because his supply of Suboxone, a drug to treat opioid dependence, was running out. Tarter said he never saw Kay actually use drugs.
Milhouse testified he didn’t learn about the true addictive nature of opioids until 2014 or 2015. He stopped prescribing them for Kay in 2013.
Camela Kay testified that after her ex-husband had a breakdown at Yankees Stadium the same year, he stated in front of Taylor and Mead he was taking five Vicodin a day. Taylor denied it, and Mead said he didn’t recall the conversation. Milhouse also said that during 2009-2013, he typically only prescribed opioids on a short-term basis and that he had put other patients on similar treatment regimens and quantities as Kay. Milhouse testified that he considered the use of opioids five times a day to be an addiction.
The trial continues in Orange County Superior Court this week, with the witness schedule including Skaggs’ widow, Carli, and mother, Debbie Hetman.
Two jurors have already been excused — leaving two alternates for the remainder of the case, which is slated to go to the jury in mid-December.