Tory MPs have launched scathing attacks on the government for U-turning on its decision to remove all EU legislation from UK law by the end of 2023.
Kemi Badenoch, the business and trade secretary, confirmed the move on Wednesday, putting a stop to a key pledge of Rishi Sunak’s leadership campaign last summer.
She said it had been her decision to remove the so-called sunset clause, as it risked “legal uncertainty”, so a new approach was needed.
But staunch Brexiteers within the Conservative ranks have criticised the change, with former business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg accusing Mr Sunak of “behaving like a Borgia”.
A fiery session in the Commons began on Thursday with a telling off for Ms Badenoch for making the announcement via a written statement, rather than coming to the despatch box.
Answering an urgent question on the policy change, she told MPs: “I am very sorry that the sequencing that we chose was not to your satisfaction.”
More on Brexit
Related Topics:
Image: Kemi Badenoch faced scorn from all sides of the House – including from the Speaker’s chair
But Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle met her tone with a tirade, saying her comment was “totally not acceptable”.
“Who do you think you are speaking to?” he added. “I am the defender of this House and these benches on both sides, I am not going to be spoken to by a secretary of state who is absolutely not accepting my ruling.
Advertisement
“Members should hear it first, not a WMS (written ministerial statement) or what you decide.
“These members have been elected by their constituents and they have the right to hear it first and it is time this government recognises we are all elected, we are all members of parliament and use the correct manners.”
Ms Badenoch apologised, saying she was “very sorry she did not meet the standards expected”, before beginning a defence of the change in government policy.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:58
Kemi Badenoch was told off in the House of Commons by the Speaker
She said the move would “provide the legal clarity and certainty” for businesses, while still seeing 600 pieces of EU law revoked by the end of the year.
The minister also said the new approach would allow “the space for longer term and more ambitious reforms”, adding: “We will still fully take back control of our laws and end supremacy and the special status of EU law.”
But a raft of Tory backbenchers stood to criticise her plans.
Barrage of criticism after ‘massive climbdown’
Mark Francois, who chairs the Brexit-backing European Research Group (ERG), asked why the government had “performed a massive climbdown on its own bill despite having such strong support from its own backbenches”, saying to Ms Badenoch: “What on earth are you playing at?”
Sir Desmond Swayne said: “The advantage of a sunset [clause] is it provides a sense of urgency. Now there isn’t one, is there?”
And Michael Fabricant said she had been “tin-eared” by not understanding the upset it would cause.
Ms Badenoch also faced a barrage of criticism from opposition MPs about its handling of the issue.
Labour shadow business minister, Justin Madders, called it “an absolute shambles”.
He added: “It was completely unrealistic, reckless and frankly arrogant to think you could strike 4,000 laws from the statute book in the timescale of the bill.
“It is no use blaming the blob or the anti-growth coalition or the BBC.
“This humiliating U-turn is completely down to government hubris that has found itself crashing up against reality.”
The SNP’s Pete Wishart also criticised the minister’s tone during the debate, saying she was “doing herself no favours at all with her patronising and arrogant manner”.
He added: “Isn’t it just the case that in the haste to create this hard Brexit utopia, the reality has just finally caught up with them?
“Doesn’t it look like the Conservative Party, this fragile Brexit coalition, is now starting to fragment into its constituent parts?”
But a few MPs from her own side offered support, with Tory Sir Bob Neil saying the change in approach was “sensible and pragmatic”, and done in “a very Conservative and pro-business fashion”.
A woman who claimed to be Madeleine McCann has pleaded not guilty to stalking the missing girl’s parents.
Julia Wandel, 23, is accused of making calls, leaving voicemails, and sending a letter and WhatsApp messages to Kate and Gerry McCann.
Wandel, from southwest Poland, is also accused of turning up at their family home on two occasions last year and sending Instagram messages to Sean and Amelie McCann, Madeleine’s brother and sister.
It is alleged she caused serious alarm or distress to the family between June 2022 and February this year when she was arrested at Bristol Airport.
She claimed to be Madeleine on Instagram in 2023, but a DNA test showed she was Polish.
Karen Spragg, 60, who is alleged to have made calls, sent letters and attended the home address of Mr and Mrs McCann, also denied a charge of stalking at Leicester Magistrates’ Court.
Wandel was remanded back into custody while Spragg, from Caerau in Cardiff, was granted conditional bail.
Both women are due to appear at Leicester Crown Court for trial on 2 October.
Image: Karen Spragg arriving at Leicester Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday. Pic: PA
Madeleine’s disappearance has become one of the world’s most mysterious missing child cases.
She was last seen in Portugal’s Algarve in 2007 while on holiday with her family.
Her parents had left her in bed with her twin siblings while they had dinner with friends at a nearby restaurant in Praia da Luz when the then three-year-old disappeared on 3 May.
A league table of foreign criminals and their offences is set to be published for the first time.
The plans, due to be announced on Tuesday, will reportedly focus on those offenders awaiting deportation from the UK.
The latest data shows there were 19,244 foreign offenders awaiting deportation at the end of 2024, a rise from 17,907 when the Conservatives left office in July and 14,640 at the end of 2022.
Despite more offenders being deported since Labour came to power, the number waiting to be removed from the UK has been growing.
Factors are understood to include the early release of inmates due to prison overcrowding, instability and diplomatic problems in some countries and a backlog of legal cases appealing deportation.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the decision to publish the nationalities of foreign criminals showed Labour had “buckled” under pressure from the Conservatives to disclose the data.
The latest government statistics show there were 10,355 foreign nationals held in custody in England and Wales at the end of 2024, representing 12% of the prison population.
More on Crime
Related Topics:
The most common nationalities after British nationals were Albanian (11%), Polish (8%), Romanian (7%), which also represented the top three nationalities who were deported from the UK in 2024, according to Home Office figures.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is understood to have ordered officials to release the details by the end of the year, according to The Daily Telegraph.
The newspaper reported Ms Cooper overruled Home Office officials, who previously claimed it was too difficult to provide quality data on foreign criminals.
A Home Office source said: “Not only are we deporting foreign criminals at a rate never seen when Chris Philp and Robert Jenrick were in charge at the Home Office, but we will also be publishing far more information about that cohort of offenders than the Tories ever did.”
The source added that ministers wanted “to ensure the public is kept better informed about the number of foreign criminals awaiting deportation, where they are from and the crimes they have committed”.
Datawrapper
This content is provided by Datawrapper, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Datawrapper cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Datawrapper cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Datawrapper cookies for this session only.
Foreign nationals sentenced to 12 months or more in prison are subject to automatic deportation, but the home secretary can also remove criminals if their presence in the UK is not considered desirable.
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick welcomed the news, saying: “We will finally see the hard reality that mass migration is fuelling crime across our country… Frankly, the public deserved to know this [detail on foreign criminals] long ago.”
Rachel Reeves will pledge to “stand up for Britain’s national interest” as she heads to Washington DC amid hopes of a UK/US trade deal.
The chancellor will fly to the US capital for her spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the first of which began on Sunday.
During her three-day visit, Ms Reeves is set to hold meetings with G7, G20 and IMF counterparts about the changing global economy and is expected to make the case for open trade.
The chancellor will also hold her first in-person meeting with her US counterpart, treasury secretary Scott Bessent, about striking a new trade agreement, which the UK hopes will take the sting out of Mr Trump’s tariffs.
In addition to the 10% levy on all goods imported to America from the UK, Mr Trump enacted a 25% levy on car imports.
Ms Reeves will also be hoping to encourage fellow European finance ministers to increase their defence spending and discuss the best ways to support Ukraine in its war against Russia.
Speaking ahead of her visit, Ms Reeves said: “The world has changed, and we are in a new era of global trade. I am in no doubt that the imposition of tariffs will have a profound impact on the global economy and the economy at home.
“This changing world is unsettling for families who are worried about the cost of living and businesses concerned about what tariffs will mean for them. But our task as a government is not to be knocked off course or to take rash action which risks undermining people’s security.
“Instead, we must rise to meet the moment and I will always act to defend British interests as part of our plan for change.
“We need a world economy that provides stability and fairness for businesses wanting to invest and trade, more trade and global partnerships between nations with shared interests, and security for working people who want to get on with their lives.”