Connect with us

Published

on

Many materials can stop bullets, but they are not all created equal some are best for armor and some are best for cover. There are alsosomethat have yet to be truly tested.

Beloware examples of intermediate barriers that can deflect bullets from their intended trajectory and impede their performance by forcing them to shed velocity and deform or even break into pieces. Your car the body, doors, engine block and windows offer very different results

Testing by firearm instructors suggests that auto glass may change the trajectory of a bullet, BUT it won’t stop it and neither will the dashboard or steering wheel.

The body of your vehicle, like the door, might stop bullets depending on the type of bullet and the angle of fire.

Engine blocks have always been accepted as a good cover and arguably the only part of a vehicle you can consistently rely on to stop bullets, according to Jacob Paulsen, founder and president of ConcealedCarry.com. Filing cabinets full of paper

There has actually been a lot of research on file cabinets due to their general availability for cover in a workplace under active shooter situation.

Research conducted by ConcealedCarry.com suggested that an empty file cabinet will not stop most handgun rounds, but a filing cabinet full of paper is likely to be effective. Sandbags

When filled with sand or dirt and placed in strategic positions, sandbags can provide protection from small arms fire and shrapnel.

The dense layers of sand or soil rapidly deplete projectiles of energy until they come to rest harmlessly inside the sandbag. At worst, bullets penetrate them only after having lost much of their velocity.

You can also use sandbags to reinforce or fortify common structures. Some sandbags can be piled in front of a window or door during times of trouble to provide protection from bullets or to prop up plywood coverings to prevent entry.

Even a basic U- or V-shaped barrier of sandbags can prove to be an excellent defense in times of civil unrest. Masonry brick, concrete, stone

Brick, concrete and genuine stone are conventional, durable and long-lasting exterior and indoor construction materials that typically exhibit excellent bullet-resistant properties, and will usually stop small-caliber handgun rounds entirely.

The only downside to these materials is that they degrade comparatively quickly with each bullet hit and the fractures that radiate out from each impact can lessen the resistance of the nearby material. Steel/aluminum plates

Often regarded as one of the better bullet-resistant materials available for reinforcing or building a wall, steel is used for purpose-made armor in both vehicular and individual applications because it typically endures multiple-bullet hits quite well with very little degradation.

The downside is that steel plates are also extremely heavy and difficult to fabricate or modify on a work site.

And like most other metallic armors, steel is highly vulnerable to high-velocity projectiles and extremely vulnerable to high-velocity armor-piercing projectiles. One must also be cautious of spalling (the breaking away of a concrete surface), which occurs on a major hit or near-penetration. Tiny fragments of the steel de-laminate and break off with lethal velocity on the back side of the plate, potentially injuring or even killing people struck by them.

Aluminum is best used as a component in composite armor solutions. Polycarbonate

Due to its exceptional strength, impact resistance and toughness, bullet-resistant polycarbonate is a unique and valuable material.

Polycarbonate has the advantages of being optically transparent, lightweight and shatterproof. Additionally, it has strong dielectric strength, low moisture absorption and excellent UV protection.

These characteristics make polycarbonate sheet one of the best materials for resisting both physical assaults and multiple-shot ballistic assaults. Kevlar

Made of tightly woven synthetic fibers that can endure incredible amounts of punishment, kevlar is the lightest material for stopping bullets and used all around the world by both militaries and civilians for ballistic protection. As far as armors go, the plates are also lightweight, versatile, durable and heat resistant. (Related: NYC residents are buying body armor in record numbers as lawless Democrats defund police and protect violent criminals.) Polyethylene

Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene is a highly durable, water-resistant material that won’t degrade as fast as ceramic or kevlar.

In overall performance, polyethylene is the best material to stop a bullet. Polyethylene can take multiple hits where a plate of ceramic or kevlar would shatter or crack.

While it isn’t as light as kevlar, its strength-to-weight ratio is about 15 times that of kevlar. The material is used to make plates similar to steel plates, only a lot lighter. Non-Newtonian fluids

Researchers in Poland have developed a liquid that’s super-light and flexible. Upon impact,its specially designed shear-thickening fluid, or STF, turns into a solid that is more comfortable than kevlar.

Created by the Moratex Institute of Security Technologies, the liquid is known as non-Newtonian fluid which only changes its structure according to temperature or pressure fluctuations.

In other words, they can quickly change from liquid to rock-hard solid when they’re hit with something forceful,such as a stray bullet.

Visit SelfDefense.newsfor more related stories.

Watch this video to learn about a simple trick to bulletproof your home for SHTF.

This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. More related stories:

New York bans most civilians from wearing bulletproof vests.

More and more Americans are bulletproofing their cars as crime and lawlessness worsen.

Home security: 3 Ways to protect your homestead.

Looking to improve your home security? Here are 25 things you can do right now.

Sources include:

SurvivalJunkies.com

ConcealedCarry.com

ModernSurvivalOnline.com

ScienceAlert.com

Brighteon.com
Submit a correction >>

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Friends creators reveal final episode scripts were leaked by an insider in 2004

Published

on

By

Friends creators reveal final episode scripts were leaked by an insider in 2004

The creators of Friends have revealed that parts of the script for the final episode were leaked by an insider ahead of the show airing.

Simply titled The Last One, millions tuned in as the episode brought the hit comedy to a close 20 years ago, on 6 May 2004, finally resolving the decade-long “will they, won’t they?” romance between Ross and Rachel.

It was the end of an era for its stars – Jennifer Aniston, Courteney Cox, Lisa Kudrow, Matt LeBlanc, Matthew Perry and David Schwimmer – and fans around the world.

Friends: The Reunion sees the cast back together on screen for the first time in 17 years. Pic: Sky/ Warner Media/ HBO
Image:
The six Friends stars got together on screen for the first time in 17 years for a reunion in 2021. Pic: Sky/Warner Media/HBO

Looking back at the final shows in an interview with NBC’s Today show in the US, Friends creators Marta Kauffman and David Crane revealed details of the leak.

“Oh my god, we tried so hard to keep it a secret!” Kauffman said. “We were desperate to keep it a secret and it got out. And it was an inside job.”

Scripts sent out ahead of the premiere of the final episode were numbered, Crane explained.

“We knew how many people knew what it was going to be,” he said. “So it did, through an element of… it became a behind-the-scenes detective show.

“It was frustrating, but at the end of the day, what are you gonna do?”

FILE - Matthew Perry arrives at the premiere of "The Invention of Lying" in Los Angeles on Monday, Sept. 21, 2009. Perry, who starred as Chandler Bing in the hit series ...Friends,... has died. He was 54. The Emmy-nominated actor was found dead of an apparent drowning at his Los Angeles home on Saturday, according to the Los Angeles Times and celebrity website TMZ, which was the first to report the news. Both outlets cited unnamed sources confirming Perry...s death. His publicists and other representatives did not immediately return messages seeking comment. (AP Photo/Matt Sayles, File)
Image:
Matthew Perry, who died in 2023, was given the final line of the series. Pic: AP

Part of the script that leaked included the details of Ross and Rachel finally getting back together, Kauffman said.

But when asked if the mystery of who released the information was solved, she replied with a smile: “Ish.”

“Ish,” Crane repeated.

After 10 series and 236 episodes, as well as Ross and Rachel’s reunion, the final instalment saw Monica and Chandler leaving their famous Manhattan apartment and moving to the suburbs as new parents to adopted twins.

Perry, who died last year, aged 54, wrote about the finale in his 2022 memoir, Friends, Lovers, And The Big Terrible Thing.

Read more from Sky News:
Matthew Perry obituary: The one who made everyone laugh
The Friends reunion: The one where they got back together

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

“Before that final episode, I’d taken Marta Kauffman to one side,” he wrote. “‘Nobody else will care about this except me’, I said. ‘So may I please have the last line?'”

His character Chandler did indeed have the last line. As the Friends decide to go for one last coffee before the move, he simply asks, “Where?”, in a trademark sarcastic but poignant joke about the fact that so much of their time on screen has been spent in the Central Perk coffee shop.

“It’s incredibly poignant. It’s a legacy for him, one of his many legacies,” Kauffman said.

Friends has found a new generation of fans in recent years after being picked up by streaming sites.

Earlier this year, two scripts for The One With Ross’s Wedding, season four’s famous two-part finale filmed in London, sold at auction for £22,000 after being found in a bin.

Continue Reading

Business

P&O Ferries chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite says he couldn’t live on £4.87-per-hour staff pay

Published

on

By

P&O Ferries chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite says he couldn't live on £4.87-per-hour staff pay

The boss of P&O Ferries – known for its fire-and-rehire of nearly 800 workers – has said he could not live on the less than £5-per-hour some of his staff are paid.

The ferry company is paying employees an average of £5.20 an hour, two years after making 786 people redundant, and rehiring cheaper workers, P&O Ferries chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite told the Commons’ Business and Trade Committee.

Money latest: Britons prioritising Netflix over restaurants

Some earn as little as £4.87 an hour, Mr Hebblethwaite added, as MPs on the committee presented him with evidence that some staff were paid as low as £2.90 an hour for their first eight hours of work.

P&O CEO Peter Hebblethwaite appears before a committee in Westminster
Image:
P&O chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite

During exchanges, committee chair Liam Byrne asked Mr Hebblethwaite: “Do you think you could live on £4.87 an hour?”

Mr Hebblethwaite replied: “No, I couldn’t,” before admitting he earned £508,000, including a bonus of £183,000 last year.

While he said he could not live on such pay, the CEO said the rates were “considerably ahead of international minimum standards”.

More on P&o

“These are international seafarers who we are, or our crewing agent is, recruiting from an international field, and we pay substantially ahead of the international seafaring minimum wage,” he added.

The UK national minimum wage is £11.44 since last month for people aged 21 and over.

But P&O Ferries uses maritime workers employed by an overseas agency, who work on ships which are foreign-registered in international waters, so the rates do not apply.

When he last appeared before the committee in March 2022, Mr Hebblethwaite said P&O Ferries workers would receive at least £5.15 every hour.

“People who could work anywhere in the world on any ship choose to come over to us and make a choice to come back,” he said on Tuesday.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

P&O chose to break the law by not consulting before sacking 800 staff because it knew

Fire-and-rehire fallout

Despite the move to get rid of the nearly 800 staff in March 2022, Mr Hebblethwaite said P&O Ferries has always complied with national and international law.

That decision is still under investigation by the government.

While a criminal investigation conducted by the insolvency service concluded in August 2022 that it would not commence criminal proceedings, a civil investigation by the government body is ongoing.

“I confirmed that this decision was legal,” Mr Hepplethwaite added. “That is not to say I don’t regret it, I regret it. I am deeply sorry for the impact it had on 786 seafarers and their families. I wish we’d never had to have made that decision.

“We will never make that decision again.”

Read more
Carpetright to axe over 25% of head office staff

Had it not been made, Mr Hebblethwaite said the operation of P&O Ferries would have been at risk.

“Without that difficult decision I would not be here today and we would not have been able to preserve the 2,000 jobs that we have been able to preserve.”

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Workers rights

Despite the widespread condemnation and political lens that zeroed in on the company, a seafarers’ rights charter has not yet been signed by P&O Ferries.

Mr Hebblethwaite couldn’t say whether workers were allowed to leave the ship during a 17-week working period and will write to the committee with an answer.

“I believe they are, but I believe there are some technicalities,” he answered.

Responding to the evidence, the head of the TUC (Trade Union Congress) Paul Nowak said: “It beggars belief that P&O Ferries has faced no sanctions for its misdeeds and that its parent company DP World has continued to be awarded government contracts.

“For too long, parts of our labour market have resembled the Wild West – with many seafarers particularly exposed to hyper-exploitation and a lack of enforceable rights.

“It’s time to drag our outdated employment laws into the 21st century. Without this, another P&O Ferries scandal is on the cards.”

Continue Reading

World

Vladimir Putin thanks soldiers ‘fighting for motherland’ as he is inaugurated for fifth time

Published

on

By

Vladimir Putin thanks soldiers 'fighting for motherland' as he is inaugurated for fifth time

Vladimir Putin has thanked soldiers “fighting for our motherland” in Ukraine – as he was sworn in as Russian president for a fifth time.

At a ceremony in the gilded Grand Kremlin Palace, Mr Putin placed his hand on the Russian constitution and vowed to defend it as a crowd of hand-picked dignitaries looked on.

An artillery salute marked the end of the official presidential inauguration, and as he left the palace to the sound of the Russian national anthem, a round of applause erupted from those in the audience.

Ukraine-Russia war latest: Putin claims he could work with West

Pic: Kremlin.ru/Reuters

Russian President Vladimir Putin places his hand on the Constitution as he takes the oath during an inauguration ceremony at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia May 7, 2024, in this still image taken from live broadcast video. Kremlin.ru/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT.
Image:
Mr Putin places his hand on the constitution. Pic: Kremlin.ru/Reuters

Tuesday’s inauguration marks the start of another six years at the top for Mr Putin, 71.

He is already the Kremlin’s longest-serving leader since Joseph Stalin, having been in power for nearly two-and-a-half decades – 20 years as president, four as prime minister.

By the end of this term, only Catherine the Great will be ahead of him – she ruled Russia way back in the 18th century.

His new term does not expire until 2030, when he will be constitutionally eligible to run again.

When he succeeded Boris Yeltsin in 1999, Russia was emerging from economic collapse.

Under his leadership, most notably since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the country has become a pariah state that threatens global security, reliant on regimes like China, Iran and North Korea for support.

Russia’s enormous advantage in resources has gradually turned the tide in Ukraine in Moscow’s favour, but both sides have been suffering heavy casualties.

Following his widely-anticipated re-election in March, Mr Putin suggested a confrontation between NATO and Russia was possible, and he declared he wanted to carve out a buffer zone in Ukraine to protect his country from cross-border attacks.

Vladimir Putin
Image:
The ceremony took place at the gilded Grand Kremlin Palace

With major changes at home and abroad over the past two years, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the circumstances do not make it more important to give the public the right to speak out.

“It needs tougher measures to ensure the victory, to ensure that we reach our goals,” he told Sky News, when asked if Russians should not have more say during a war.

He insisted that is a democratic stance in “the same circumstances Western media exists in Europe and the US” and denied Mr Putin has made the country a dictatorship.

“This is not the case absolutely, absolutely, it’s just propaganda, it’s rough propaganda, nothing else,” he added.

“So, we are living in our country, in our own environment and it’s purely democratic. We choose our power. We elect our power. We elect our president.”

Pic: Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin walks before an inauguration ceremony at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia May 7, 2024. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov/Pool
Image:
Pic: Reuters

As the country’s economy remains on a war footing, analysts say that, with another term in office secured, the Kremlin could take the unpopular steps of raising taxes to fund the war and pressure more men to join the military.

The repression that has characterised Mr Putin’s time in office continued when his greatest political foe, opposition leader Alexei Navalny, died in an Arctic penal colony in February.

Mr Peskov told Sky News opposition remains in the country, but added “of course the conditions are much more tough around here because we are in war conditions”.

Other prominent critics have either been imprisoned or have fled the country, and even some of his opponents abroad fear for their security.

Defiant and determined – Russia’s leader is in it for the long haul

The speech was vintage Vladimir – talking up Russia’s greatness, blaming the West for Moscow’s isolation and doubling down on his current path.

If there was any hope of him mellowing in this next term of office, President Putin dispelled that right at the beginning, referring to the security of the Russian people as a matter “above all”.

Translation – we’re in the confrontation with the West for the long haul.

But whose fault is it? Not ours, he said. All part of the Kremlin’s narrative to portray Russia as the victim.

What might concern western officials, is the tone of the speech, especially the last line: “We will realise everything we have planned, together we will win.”

With things going his way at home and on the battlefield, the Russian president appears increasingly confident, and increasingly defiant.

Laws have been promising long prison terms for anyone who discredits the military.

The Kremlin also targets independent media, rights groups, LGBTQ+ activists and others who do not adhere to what Mr Putin has emphasised as Russia’s “traditional family values”.

Read more:
Another inauguration – and more of the same for Russia

US soldier ‘detained in Russia’
Cameron defends Ukraine’s use of UK weapons

Sky News’ international affairs editor Dominic Waghorn said Mr Putin “has taken a country that was emerging from communism and economic collapse towards reform and reintegration into the international community, and he’s turned it in a pariah state threatening global security while he and his kleptocracy have stolen billions”.

He added: “In his inauguration speech, Putin said Russia stands united [but] an estimated 900,000 Russians have voted with their feet and left the country since his invasion of Ukraine.”

Continue Reading

Trending