Connect with us

Published

on

Health Secretary Steve Barclay has said it would be “provocative” to hold a pro-Palestinian rally on Armistice Day as he revealed there would be “ongoing discussions” within the Cabinet over the planned protest.

Mr Barclay said while he felt “strongly” about the right to protest, next Saturday (11 November) was the “wrong day” to gather in London to call for a ceasefire in Gaza.

The health secretary was asked for his views about the protest after Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, confirmed it would go ahead because the “legal threshold” to stop it on security grounds “had not been met”.

Sir Mark said people “should be very reassured that we’re going to keep this away from the remembrance and armistice events” but added that legally, there was “no mechanism to ban a gathering, a static protest”.

Politics latest: Labour frontbencher quits over Gaza stance

Asked by Sky’s Kay Burley what he made of Sir Mark’s assessment, the health secretary said: “It is provocative to have protests like this on that day; I think there a lot of other days in the year when protests can happen.”

Rishi Sunak has also branded the planned march as “provocative and disrespectful” and believes it shouldn’t be allowed.

He wrote to Sir Mark and said there was “a clear and present risk” that memorials such as the Cenotaph “could be desecrated”.

Organisers have said the protest will be “well away” from the monument, instead going from Hyde Park to the US embassy, and that it won’t start until after the 11am silence to remember people who died in wars.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will pro-Palestine marches be banned on Armistice Day?

Police chief explains why protest will go ahead

Police can ask the home secretary to approve a ban under the Public Order Act if they believe there will be serious public disorder, serious criminal damage, or serious disruption to the community.

The Met chief admitted concern about “splinter groups” and “troublemakers” but said arrests at previous protests were small considering the tens of thousands attending.

He said the force would do “everything in our power” to ensure the Armistice and Remembrance events in London this weekend will “pass without disruption”.

In a statement released by the force, he said: “Over recent weeks we’ve seen an escalation of violence and criminality by small groups attaching themselves to demonstrations, despite some key organisers working positively with us.

“But at this time, the intelligence surrounding the potential for serious disorder this weekend does not meet the threshold to apply for a ban.

“If over the next few days the intelligence evolves, and we reach a threshold where there is a real threat of serious disorder we will approach the home secretary.”

Read more:
Labour shadow minister resigns over Starmer’s Gaza position
Explained: Can you ban a protest?

Debate on protest not over

Mr Barclay said that while it was “important we have the right to protest”, Remembrance Day was not the correct moment.

He said there would be “ongoing discussions” after the Met gave the go-ahead for a demonstration calling for a ceasefire in Gaza to take place on Armistice Day.

He told Sky News: “I think there’ll be ongoing discussions on this.

“There is a legal threshold and the commissioner is of the view that that legal threshold has not been met.

“Obviously, the Home Office and colleagues will discuss that over the course of the day.”

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Sic AI’s on each other’ to solve artificial intelligence threat: David Brin, author

Published

on

By

‘Sic AI’s on each other’ to solve artificial intelligence threat: David Brin, author

Best-selling sci-fi author David Brin says AIs could be made to police each other under threat of losing blockchain-based registration.

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC doesn’t want Ethereum to transform banking landscape, says Joseph Lubin

Published

on

By

SEC doesn’t want Ethereum to transform banking landscape, says Joseph Lubin

Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin says the SEC is engaging in strategic enforcement action instead of engaging in meaningful discourse with the cryptocurrency industry.

Continue Reading

Politics

Natalie Elphicke apologises for supporting sex offender ex-husband after concerns from Labour MPs

Published

on

By

Natalie Elphicke apologises for supporting sex offender ex-husband after concerns from Labour MPs

The MP who defected from the Tories to Labour yesterday has apologised for comments she made supporting her ex-husband after he was convicted of sexual assault.

After former Tory MP Charlie Elphicke was jailed for two years in 2020 for assaulting two women, Natalie Elphicke told the Sun the fact he was “attractive” and “attracted to women” had made him an “easy target for dirty politics and false allegations”.

She called the trial unfair and said the allegations were “complete nonsense” and called her ex-husband “charming, wealthy, charismatic and successful”.

Several Labour MPs said they were not comfortable having an MP in their party who has defended a sex offender.

Jess Phillips, former shadow domestic violence minister, said Mrs Elphicke should “account for her actions”.

Just over 24 hours after defecting, Mrs Elphicke released a statement apologising for her comments.

She said: “My decision to join the Labour Party is not one I have taken lightly but one I made because I am convinced that this country needs a new government led by Keir Starmer to fix the problems we see from housing to small boats.

More from Politics

“I always knew that this decision would put a spotlight on the prosecution of my ex-husband and I want to address some of the commentary around this head on.

“The period of 2017-2020 was an incredibly stressful and difficult one for me as I learned more about the person I thought I knew. I know it was far harder for the women who had to relive their experiences and give evidence against him.

Read more: Natalie Elphicke defends MP husband after conviction

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Defecting Tory MP crosses floor to Labour

“I have previously, and do, condemn his behaviour towards other women and towards me. It was right that he was prosecuted and I’m sorry for the comments that I made about his victims.

“It is vital that women can have confidence in the criminal justice system and our rates of prosecution and conviction are far too low as a country.

“Keir Starmer’s mission to halve male violence against women and girls is critical and I wanted to take the opportunity to express my explicit support for Labour colleagues working to realise it.”

Mrs Elphicke ended her marriage to Mr Elphicke moments after he was convicted but supported his unsuccessful appeal, which is when she made the “attractive” comments.

She had supported him until he was convicted and was seen entering the court with him most days of his trial.

After he stepped down as an MP she stood in his Dover seat and won with a large majority.

She will not be standing again in the next election.

Continue Reading

Trending