Asylum seekers being moved out of taxpayer-funded hotels are simply being moved to other hotels still paid for by the Home Office, Sky News has learned.
Home Office minister Chris Philip told Sky News the government had already closed 50 hotels to migrants, reducing the number from 398 to 348 – something they had pledged to do by the end of this month with a promise to house them in cheaper types of accommodation like the Bibby Stockholm barge.
But Sky News has seen taxis full of migrants leaving one hotel in Kidderminster, Worcestershire, only to arrive at another hotel 70 miles away in Derbyshire.
One asylum seeker from Afghanistan, who we’re calling Khan, 19, arrived on a small boat in early June 2022. He will now be unable to continue attending college, where he was studying English and GCSE Maths, as his new hotel is too far away.
He states he had no choice but to move. “The hotel tell us that if you cancel this process you must sleep on the road like a homeless [person],” he says.
Image: Migrants being moved from now-closed hotel in Bewdley
Khan came to the UK because his family worked for the Afghan government so he no longer felt safe after the Taliban takeover of the country in 2021.
Due to the length of time he’s been waiting for a decision his asylum claim is part of the “legacy” backlog that Rishi Sunak pledged to “abolish” by the end of 2022.
More from UK
The Home Office said the pledge had been “delivered”, having processed more than 112,000 asylum claims overall in 2023.
It means Khan had expected by now to not still be living in taxpayer-funded accommodation.
Advertisement
“I am also not happy to stay in hotel accommodation because I want to work. I want to start a new life and I cannot do something right now… just sleep and eat,” he says.
He currently has a solicitor chasing the Home Office for a decision on his claim.
“Up to now no-one gave me a response, up to December when I emailed them they told us wait up to the end of the year – now the new year start and when we email them, no-one responds.”
Image: Khan came to the UK because he no longer felt safe after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan
A group of residents who offer support to people seeking asylum has been tracking the movements of these hotel closures over recent months.
Sarah Frost, lead co-ordinator from Wyre Forest Supports Asylum Seekers, told Sky News: “We’ve got four from here who got moved from a hotel that was closing just before Christmas.
“They got moved here, and now they’re moving on to another hotel. So some people have been in five or six hotels in a matter of six months or so.”
She adds: “I suppose [the Home Office is] consolidating hotels but obviously it still costs to feed the person…I can’t see how it’s really saving money because taxi fares from Derbyshire to Worcestershire is going to cost a lot of money.”
Another hotel in Bewdley, Worcestershire, was closed last week, but Sky News has been told the men were sent to three different hotels further north.
Image: Hallo believes the moves are due to the upcoming election
Hallo, not his real name, 31, from Iraq was sent by taxi with eight other men to a hotel in Staffordshire.
“It’s just shifting around, just switching…just wasting money”, he says. “I think it’s just because of the next election so they want to tell the native people we sorted out the hotels, the cases, the backlog cases.”
The closure of hotels has also affected families. Near Bromsgrove in Worcestershire, the curtains are shut and children’s scooters have been abandoned outside a hotel that was recently closed to migrants.
Sky News has been told that children have lost school places because they were moved suddenly to another county.
The Home Office told Sky News it is making significant progress to reduce the cost of £8.2m a day to UK taxpayers.
A spokesperson said: “As we exit more hotels in the coming months, we remain upfront about accommodation being on a no-choice basis. This means that individuals may be moved to other parts of the asylum accommodation estate too, including hotels.”
The UK is facing an “economic inactivity crisis” as employers are losing an estimated £85bn a year in costs linked to sickness and poor workplace health, a landmark report has found.
More than one in five working-age people are now out of work and not looking for work – more than comparator countries – which is costing the UK £212bn a year, the Mayfield review said.
Its author, former John Lewis boss Sir Charlie Mayfield, says poor health “has become one of the biggest brakes on growth and opportunity,” but says it is not inevitable.
The report, published on Wednesday, says there are now 800,000 more people out of work now than in 2019 due to health problems, and without “decisive action” to address this, another 600,000 people will be added by 2030.
Sir Charlie found that a 22-year-old who is not in work for health reasons could be more than £1 million worse off over their lifetime, while employers are losing an average of £120 per day in profit from absences.
The cost to the state is also vast – it is costing 7% of GDP, or almost 70% of the income tax we pay, through “lost output, increased welfare payments and additional burdens on the NHS”, which is “unsustainable”.
More on Benefits
Related Topics:
The additional burden in welfare payments and NHS demand is around £47bn annually, the report says.
Among the reasons for these absences continuing to mount is a “culture of fear” felt by both employers and employees, that “creates distance” and “discourages safe and early disclosure, constructive conversations and support,” Sir Charlie found.
Why millions of Britons are off work long-term sick
“Who the f*** am I?” asks Roni Jones, from Cornwall, four years after the Easter weekend that ended her career.
The former NHS manager, charity chief executive and self-confessed workaholic once dismissed those off work with long-term sickness as “malingerers”, “the worried well” or suffering from “yuppie flu”.
But after she collapsed in her garden in 2021, she was diagnosed with a debilitating neurological condition, adding her name to the growing list of 2.8 million people off work due to long-term sickness.
“There’s always been this negative thing about people who don’t work. And I would have been part of that. Until it happened to me,” says Jones, 63, who lives with multisystem dysautonomia, a condition that causes her “bone-crushing” pain and fatigue.
“I can’t even conceive of being able on a regular basis to get up, get showered and get out of the house – never mind go and do a day’s work.”
He wrote that there is a “a lack of an effective or consistent support system for employers and their employees in managing health and tackling barriers faced by disabled people” that are “structural”.
But he says “these problems are not inevitable,” adding: “What is missing is coordination, focus, and a coherent framework for change.”
Google among 60 employers interested in new scheme
Sir Charlie’s report is “proposing a fundamental shift from a model where health at work is largely left to the individual and the NHS, to one where it becomes a shared responsibility between employers, employees and health services”.
Employers must “act on prevention, to support rehabilitation, and to remove barriers for disabled people,” he says.
His message to employees is: “Work can be demanding. Setbacks are part of life. Health and work are not always easy partners, but they are mutually reinforcing. Supportive workplaces matter, and so does personal responsibility.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:34
Our political correspondent Tamara Cohen explains how young people are particularly badly affected.
But he also calls on the government to “reset the system – to enable and incentivise employers and employees to act”.
“System issues such as fit note reform, dispute resolution and links with programmes like Pathways to Work will also demand coordination,” he wrote, calling for political leadership across a range of government departments to spearhead change.
The review also calls for the adoption of a workplace health provision, which is described as a non-clinical case management service supporting employees and line managers across a so-called healthy working lifecycle.
It says this approach of offering support and advice and early intervention could be integrated with the NHS App and reduce or replace the need for the current fit note.
The government says more than 60 employers – including the British Beer and Pub Association, Burger King, John Lewis and Google UK – have expressed interest in becoming so-called vanguard employers to pioneer the overall new approach.
This would involve a three-year phase focused on how to address mental health at work, retention of older people in work and improved participation and retention of disabled people in work.
Business Secretary Peter Kyle told broadcasters said the aim of this initial scheme would be to see “what works, what is possible”, and they have agreed to share their findings with the government with the aim of “spread[ing] that learning” to businesses across the country.
Health is ‘essential for economic growth’
Sir Charlie said: “Employers are uniquely placed to make a difference, preventing health issues where possible, supporting people when they arise, and helping them return to work.
“If we keep Britain working, everyone wins – people, employers and the state.
“That’s why the action the government is taking forward from my review is so important. I’m looking forward to working with them and with employers, large and small, to keep people in work, unlock potential and build a healthier, more prosperous Britain.”
Image: Sir Charlie Mayfield, former boss of John Lewis, pictured in 2015. Pic: PA
Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden said Sir Charlie’s message was “crystal clear: keeping people healthy and in work is the right thing to do and is essential for economic growth”.
“Business is our partner in building a productive workforce – because when businesses retain talent and reduce workplace ill-health, everyone wins.
“That’s why we’re acting now to launch employer-led vanguards as part of the Plan for Change, driving economic growth and opportunity across the country.”
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said that while he welcomes the report and its findings, he is worried about the impact of the government’s Employment Rights Bill, that is returning to the Commons this afternoon.
He told Mornings with Ridge and Frost: “I think we need to give employers more opportunity and reasons to hire young people, and that (the Bill)… will put up all sorts of barriers and create incentives for them not to take a chance when they’re giving young people a job.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says Donald Trump’s pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao went through a “thorough review process” before the president signed it off.