The Football Association has defended the new England shirt despite a backlash after Nike changed the colour of the St George’s Cross.
Sky Sports News has been told the governing body has no intention of withdrawing the controversial kit.
A row erupted after the US sportswear giant revealed it had altered the traditional red cross of the England flag and introduced purple and blue stripes.
The company dubbed it “a playful update” to the shirt ahead of Euro 2024, inspired by the training kit worn by England’s 1966 World Cup winners.
Fans are demanding the original flag be reinstated and an online petition has collected thousands of signatures.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:39
‘You wouldn’t change the Welsh dragon to a pussycat’
But a FA spokesperson said: “The new England 2024 Home kit has a number of design elements which were meant as a tribute to the 1966 World Cup winning team.
“The coloured trim on the cuffs is inspired by the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, and the same colours also feature on the design on the back of the collar. It is not the first time that different coloured St George’s cross-inspired designs have been used on England shirts.
Advertisement
“We are very proud of the red and white St George’s cross – the England flag. We understand what it means to our fans, and how it unites and inspires, and it will be displayed prominently at Wembley tomorrow – as it always is – when England play Brazil.”
What are the origins of the St George’s Cross?
The St George’s Cross, featuring a white background with a red cross, is the national flag of England.
The standard hails back to the time of the crusades, with the two colours used to distinguish between English and French troops.
The red cross on a white background subsequently became representative of the religious military campaigns and was used by many nations to show their support for them.
The first record of the standard being associated with St George was in Genoa, which adopted him as patron saint during the 12th century as the personification of the ideals of Christian chivalry.
St George was a soldier in the Roman army, who allegedly slayed a dragon in order to save the Princess of Libya.
When he was rewarded by the King, he gave all the money to the poor and then converted to Christianity.
He died a martyr in 303 because he refused to recant his faith.
England adopted him as its patron saint in 1348.
In 1552, all saints’ flags were abolished in England apart from St George’s in the English Reformation under King Edward VI who also used it as his royal standard.
In 1606, the flag was incorporated into the official design of the Union Jack, which united the four nations as they then existed.
Still widely used today, Church of England churches often fly the St George’s flag.
More recently the English national emblem is flown at sporting events to represent the country.
The flag flies with the Union Flag every St George’s Day, which is celebrated on 23 April.
Mr Sunak said: “Obviously, I prefer the original and my general view is when it comes to our national flags we shouldn’t mess with them because they are a source of pride, identity, who we are and they are perfect as we are.”
Labour’s shadow attorney general Emily Thornberrytold Sky News: “It’s all very peculiar. The England flag is a symbol of unity.
“People, particularly in the last few years when we’ve been having such a difficult time, the England flag at the time has been a symbol of unity… the Lionesses and so on.
“So you wouldn’t expect Nike to go off and have a look at the Welsh flag and decide to change the dragon to a pussycat.
“I mean, you wouldn’t expect the England flag to be changed like this.
“You wouldn’t expect bits of purple in the French tricolour. I mean, why are they doing it? I don’t understand.”
Back in 2014, Ms Thornberry was forced to resign from the shadow cabinet by the then party leader Ed Miliband after being accused of mocking “White Van Man” in a social media post during a visit to Rochester, which pictured a housing block with St George’s flags flying from the window.
Responding to the Nike design, England’s most capped men’s player, Peter Shilton, wrote on X: “Sorry but this is wrong on every level I’m totally against it.”
Former England goalkeeper David Seaman said: “It doesn’t need fixing. What’s next, are they going to change the Three Lions to three cats? Leave it alone. It’s the St George’s Flag. Leave it alone.”
The price of the shirt has also faced criticism since it was launched earlier this week.
An “authentic” version costs £124.99 for adults and £119.99 for children while a “stadium” version is £84.99 and £64.99 for children.
A Nike spokesperson previously said: “The England 2024 home kit disrupts history with a modern take on a classic.
“The trim on the cuffs takes its cues from the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, with a gradient of blues and reds topped with purple.
“The same colours also feature an interpretation of the flag of St George on the back of the collar.”
The UK is facing an “economic inactivity crisis” as employers are losing an estimated £85bn a year in costs linked to sickness and poor workplace health, a landmark report has found.
More than one in five working-age people are now out of work and not looking for work – more than comparator countries – which is costing the UK £212bn a year, the Mayfield review said.
Its author, former John Lewis boss Sir Charlie Mayfield, says poor health “has become one of the biggest brakes on growth and opportunity,” but says it is not inevitable.
The report, published on Wednesday, says there are now 800,000 more people out of work now than in 2019 due to health problems, and without “decisive action” to address this, another 600,000 people will be added by 2030.
Sir Charlie found that a 22-year-old who is not in work for health reasons could be more than £1 million worse off over their lifetime, while employers are losing an average of £120 per day in profit from absences.
The cost to the state is also vast – it is costing 7% of GDP, or almost 70% of the income tax we pay, through “lost output, increased welfare payments and additional burdens on the NHS”, which is “unsustainable”.
More on Benefits
Related Topics:
The additional burden in welfare payments and NHS demand is around £47bn annually, the report says.
Among the reasons for these absences continuing to mount is a “culture of fear” felt by both employers and employees, that “creates distance” and “discourages safe and early disclosure, constructive conversations and support,” Sir Charlie found.
Why millions of Britons are off work long-term sick
“Who the f*** am I?” asks Roni Jones, from Cornwall, four years after the Easter weekend that ended her career.
The former NHS manager, charity chief executive and self-confessed workaholic once dismissed those off work with long-term sickness as “malingerers”, “the worried well” or suffering from “yuppie flu”.
But after she collapsed in her garden in 2021, she was diagnosed with a debilitating neurological condition, adding her name to the growing list of 2.8 million people off work due to long-term sickness.
“There’s always been this negative thing about people who don’t work. And I would have been part of that. Until it happened to me,” says Jones, 63, who lives with multisystem dysautonomia, a condition that causes her “bone-crushing” pain and fatigue.
“I can’t even conceive of being able on a regular basis to get up, get showered and get out of the house – never mind go and do a day’s work.”
He wrote that there is a “a lack of an effective or consistent support system for employers and their employees in managing health and tackling barriers faced by disabled people” that are “structural”.
But he says “these problems are not inevitable,” adding: “What is missing is coordination, focus, and a coherent framework for change.”
Google among 60 employers interested in new scheme
Sir Charlie’s report is “proposing a fundamental shift from a model where health at work is largely left to the individual and the NHS, to one where it becomes a shared responsibility between employers, employees and health services”.
Employers must “act on prevention, to support rehabilitation, and to remove barriers for disabled people,” he says.
His message to employees is: “Work can be demanding. Setbacks are part of life. Health and work are not always easy partners, but they are mutually reinforcing. Supportive workplaces matter, and so does personal responsibility.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:34
Our political correspondent Tamara Cohen explains how young people are particularly badly affected.
But he also calls on the government to “reset the system – to enable and incentivise employers and employees to act”.
“System issues such as fit note reform, dispute resolution and links with programmes like Pathways to Work will also demand coordination,” he wrote, calling for political leadership across a range of government departments to spearhead change.
The review also calls for the adoption of a workplace health provision, which is described as a non-clinical case management service supporting employees and line managers across a so-called healthy working lifecycle.
It says this approach of offering support and advice and early intervention could be integrated with the NHS App and reduce or replace the need for the current fit note.
The government says more than 60 employers – including the British Beer and Pub Association, Burger King, John Lewis and Google UK – have expressed interest in becoming so-called vanguard employers to pioneer the overall new approach.
This would involve a three-year phase focused on how to address mental health at work, retention of older people in work and improved participation and retention of disabled people in work.
Business Secretary Peter Kyle told broadcasters said the aim of this initial scheme would be to see “what works, what is possible”, and they have agreed to share their findings with the government with the aim of “spread[ing] that learning” to businesses across the country.
Health is ‘essential for economic growth’
Sir Charlie said: “Employers are uniquely placed to make a difference, preventing health issues where possible, supporting people when they arise, and helping them return to work.
“If we keep Britain working, everyone wins – people, employers and the state.
“That’s why the action the government is taking forward from my review is so important. I’m looking forward to working with them and with employers, large and small, to keep people in work, unlock potential and build a healthier, more prosperous Britain.”
Image: Sir Charlie Mayfield, former boss of John Lewis, pictured in 2015. Pic: PA
Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden said Sir Charlie’s message was “crystal clear: keeping people healthy and in work is the right thing to do and is essential for economic growth”.
“Business is our partner in building a productive workforce – because when businesses retain talent and reduce workplace ill-health, everyone wins.
“That’s why we’re acting now to launch employer-led vanguards as part of the Plan for Change, driving economic growth and opportunity across the country.”
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said that while he welcomes the report and its findings, he is worried about the impact of the government’s Employment Rights Bill, that is returning to the Commons this afternoon.
He told Mornings with Ridge and Frost: “I think we need to give employers more opportunity and reasons to hire young people, and that (the Bill)… will put up all sorts of barriers and create incentives for them not to take a chance when they’re giving young people a job.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says Donald Trump’s pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao went through a “thorough review process” before the president signed it off.