Liverpool fans who made personal injury claims over the chaos at the 2022 Champions League final in Paris have reached a compensation agreement.
UEFA confirmed a “full and final settlement” had been agreed with supporters represented by two law firms, although the terms will remain confidential.
An independent report published last year found Europe’s football governing body bore “primary responsibility” for the security failures which almost led to a “mass fatality catastrophe”.
Thousands of Liverpool fans were penned in against perimeter fences outside the Stade de France by police, with the kick-off delayed by more than half an hour.
Some had already been targeted by local youths trying to steal their tickets, while others were robbed after leaving the stadium following Real Madrid‘s 1-0 win.
“UEFA has already taken a number of steps following the 2022 final, including implementing recommendations from the independent review and establishing a special refund scheme,” UEFA said in a statement.
“Today, it has gone further by ensuring that Liverpool fans represented by Pogust Goodhead and Bingham Long receive a sum by way of compensation in relation to the difficulties and challenges that they were confronted with.
More on Football
Related Topics:
“The parties have agreed the terms of this statement but that the terms of the settlement will otherwise remain confidential.
“The settlement agreement has been made without any admission of liability. UEFA is pleased to have reached a common position which it is hoped provides closure for the fans.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:16
What actually happened to fans at Champions League final?
The failed security operation saw tens of thousands of fans held in poorly organised queues ahead of the final at the 75,000-capacity stadium, which is a key venue for the Paris Olympics.
Authorities initially tried to deflect the blame towards ticketless Liverpool fans arriving late for the game, drawing comparisons with the 1989 Hillsborough tragedy, where 97 people were killed in a crush.
Following the publication of the review last year, Liverpool fan Daniel Nicolson described “a complete breakdown of any authority”, telling Sky News: “I just can’t believe they got it wrong.”
He said: “This cannot happen again. I was so relieved when the report came out and it vindicated us as fans.”
Michael Burke and Paul Hudson, members of the claimants’ legal team at Pogust Goodhead, said: “We are delighted that fellow supporters of Liverpool Football Club will soon be in receipt of compensation for the difficulties and challenges they faced at the 2022 Champions League Final.
“This was an exceptionally important case and to have played a part in it was a privilege.”
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Gerard Long, managing director of Bingham Long, added: “As a local firm, it was important for us to be able to report back to [fans] that we had resolved the matter without lengthy legal proceedings, and they will receive some compensation.
“I would like to make clear that no deduction will be taken from my clients’ damages and that they will therefore receive 100 per cent of the compensation received as part of this settlement.”
Vladimir Putin has thanked soldiers “fighting for our motherland” in Ukraine – as he was sworn in as Russian president for a fifth time.
At a ceremony in the gilded Grand Kremlin Palace, Mr Putin placed his hand on the Russian constitution and vowed to defend it as a crowd of hand-picked dignitaries looked on.
An artillery salute marked the end of the official presidential inauguration, and as he left the palace to the sound of the Russian national anthem, a round of applause erupted from those in the audience.
Tuesday’s inauguration marks the start of another six years at the top for Mr Putin, 71.
He is already the Kremlin’s longest-serving leader since Joseph Stalin, having been in power for nearly two-and-a-half decades – 20 years as president, four as prime minister.
By the end of this term, only Catherine the Great will be ahead of him – she ruled Russia way back in the 18th century.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
His new term does not expire until 2030, when he will be constitutionally eligible to run again.
When he succeeded Boris Yeltsin in 1999, Russia was emerging from economic collapse.
Advertisement
Under his leadership, most notably since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the country has become a pariah state that threatens global security, reliant on regimes like China, Iran and North Korea for support.
Russia’s enormous advantage in resources has gradually turned the tide in Ukraine in Moscow’s favour, but both sides have been suffering heavy casualties.
Following his widely-anticipated re-election in March, Mr Putin suggested a confrontation between NATO and Russia was possible, and he declared he wanted to carve out a buffer zone in Ukraine to protect his country from cross-border attacks.
With major changes at home and abroad over the past two years, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the circumstances do not make it more important to give the public the right to speak out.
“It needs tougher measures to ensure the victory, to ensure that we reach our goals,” he told Sky News, when asked if Russians should not have more say during a war.
He insisted that is a democratic stance in “the same circumstances Western media exists in Europe and the US” and denied Mr Putin has made the country a dictatorship.
“This is not the case absolutely, absolutely, it’s just propaganda, it’s rough propaganda, nothing else,” he added.
“So, we are living in our country, in our own environment and it’s purely democratic. We choose our power. We elect our power. We elect our president.”
As the country’s economy remains on a war footing, analysts say that, with another term in office secured, the Kremlin could take the unpopular steps of raising taxes to fund the war and pressure more men to join the military.
The repression that has characterised Mr Putin’s time in office continued when his greatest political foe, opposition leader Alexei Navalny, died in an Arctic penal colony in February.
Mr Peskov told Sky News opposition remains in the country, but added “of course the conditions are much more tough around here because we are in war conditions”.
Other prominent critics have either been imprisoned or have fled the country, and even some of his opponents abroad fear for their security.
Defiant and determined – Russia’s leader is in it for the long haul
The speech was vintage Vladimir – talking up Russia’s greatness, blaming the West for Moscow’s isolation and doubling down on his current path.
If there was any hope of him mellowing in this next term of office, President Putin dispelled that right at the beginning, referring to the security of the Russian people as a matter “above all”.
Translation – we’re in the confrontation with the West for the long haul.
But whose fault is it? Not ours, he said. All part of the Kremlin’s narrative to portray Russia as the victim.
What might concern western officials, is the tone of the speech, especially the last line: “We will realise everything we have planned, together we will win.”
With things going his way at home and on the battlefield, the Russian president appears increasingly confident, and increasingly defiant.
Laws have been promising long prison terms for anyone who discredits the military.
The Kremlin also targets independent media, rights groups, LGBTQ+ activists and others who do not adhere to what Mr Putin has emphasised as Russia’s “traditional family values”.
Sky News’ international affairs editor Dominic Waghorn said Mr Putin “has taken a country that was emerging from communism and economic collapse towards reform and reintegration into the international community, and he’s turned it in a pariah state threatening global security while he and his kleptocracy have stolen billions”.
He added: “In his inauguration speech, Putin said Russia stands united [but] an estimated 900,000 Russians have voted with their feet and left the country since his invasion of Ukraine.”
Rishi Sunak has said Beijing is “acting in a way that is more authoritarian and assertive abroad” after Sky News revealed China hacked the Ministry of Defence
The prime minister made his first comments about the massive data breach on Tuesday lunchtime after Sky News revealed on Monday evening that China is responsible for hacking the armed forces’ third-party payroll system.
He refused to name China but said a “malign actor has compromised the armed forces payment network”.
“I set out a very robust policy towards China, which means that we need to take the powers which we have done to protect ourselves against the risk that China and other countries pose to us,” he added.
“They are a country with fundamentally different values to ours that are acting in a way that is more authoritarian and assertive abroad.”
Mr Sunak said he wanted to reassure people the MoD has already removed the network, taken it offline and is “making sure the people affected are supported in the right way”.
Names and bank details of current army, Royal Navy and RAF personnel and some veterans were exposed by the hack.
China said the accusations were “completely fabricated and malicious slanders”.
Advertisement
A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in London denied the country had anything to do with an MoD hack and said it had made “relevant responses” to accusations on the 25 and 27 March.
He accused the UK of politicising cyber security and claimed there was no factual evidence of China hacking the MoD.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:20
China: Hacking allegations ‘absurd’
‘China has no need to meddle in internal affairs of UK’
The spokesman said: “I will hereby reiterate that the so-called cyber attacks by China against the UK are completely fabricated and malicious slanders.
“We strongly oppose such accusations. China has always firmly fought all forms of cyber attacks according to law. China does not encourage, support or condone cyber attacks.
“At the same time, we oppose the politicisation of cyber security issues and the baseless denigration of other countries without factual evidence.
“China has neither the interest nor the need to meddle in the internal affairs of the UK.”
The attack was focused on a contractor system that is not connected to the main MoD computer systems. It has now been taken down and a review launched.
All salaries will be paid this month and the MoD hopes serving personnel will not be concerned about their safety, with staff to be provided with advice and support.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps is due to make a statement on the issue to the Commons this afternoon.
Tobias Ellwood, a Conservative MP and former soldier, told Sky News China “was probably looking at the financially vulnerable with a view that they may be coerced in exchange for cash”.
Tory MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith, who has been sanctioned by China, told Sky News: “China is behind this.
“And the reluctance, I think, comes from this panic that somehow if we upset China, China will kill the business.”
Labour’s shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said the hack was “deeply concerning” and the government “has got questions to answer”.
Luke de Pulford, executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said Beijing has carried out many cyber attacks on Britain but the UK has only retaliated once in the form of sanctioning the companies carrying out the attack rather than the Chinese government.
He added that FBI director Christopher Wray “put it pretty starkly” when he said Beijing’s cyber espionage programme is so vast it is bigger than all its major competitors combined.
Not China’s first cyber attack on UK
The hack could raise questions about whether other countries with challenging relationships with China will want to share sensitive intelligence with the UK.
The attack comes less than two months after “state-affiliated actors”, alleged to be working on behalf of China, were blamed by the government for two “malicious” cyber attack campaigns in the UK.
There are many in Israel who don’t believe Benjamin Netanyahu wants a new hostage deal, and they’re not just the families of those still being held in Gaza.
Such is the scepticism with which Israel’s prime minister is now regarded, a growing number of Israelis are starting to think their embattled leader wants to string out the fighting as long as possible as a means to remain in office.
Having spent much of Monday blaming Hamas for collapsing ceasefire talks, the group’s dramatic acceptance of a ceasefire proposal last night certainly threw the Israeli government.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
There are parties to these negotiations who will know if that is true or not: The CIA Director Bill Burns has spent much time in the Middle East over recent months and has been criss-crossing between Cairo, Doha and Tel Aviv over the past few days.
More on Benjamin Netanyahu
Related Topics:
He will be fully across each word of any proposal and how the language has shifted; he will know who is acting in good faith, and if either side isn’t.
The fact the Israeli war cabinet has agreed to send a negotiating team to Cairo today, something they didn’t do last week, shows they are taking this seriously, but the parallel move to send IDF troops into Rafah complicates matters.
Advertisement
There are two opposing schools of thought here; one says that Netanyahu’s decision to keep fighting and attack Rafah shows he doesn’t want to halt the war, knowing that a ceasefire could very likely spell the end of his government if its right-wing allies resign in protest.
The other view is that Netanyahu has upped the military pressure on Hamas to achieve a hostage deal, just at the moment negotiations are reaching a decisive point.
To suggest Netanyahu is deliberately blocking a new deal “is like Hitler indicting Churchill” a source close to the prime minister texted me on Monday night.
When I asked if Hamas was “playing the PM”, I got laughter emojis back.
But an invasion of Rafah would be a final roll of the dice.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:18
Displaced people react to IDF’s evacuation warning
Sure, it remains the final unexplored bastion of Hamas in Gaza, but is it really the location of [Hamas leaders] Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Deif and the remaining hostages and would a full-scale operation in Rafah finally achieve Israel’s outstanding objectives?
It’s a gamble, and if it doesn’t succeed, Netanyahu will be left with few places to turn.
This might be the best deal Netanyahu is going to get then, and he is now under pressure to decide.
If the US, Qatar, Egypt and Hamas all agree it’s a good deal, how can Bibi reject it without being seen as the one preventing the hostages from returning home?