Connect with us

Published

on

I finally got a chance to test out Tesla Full Self-Driving (supervised) v12.5 myself, and my first impression is that the system drives more naturally, but it is still dangerous.

Vigilance is paramount.

Yesterday, I finally received a software update on my Tesla Model 3 that read ‘v12.5’ (12.5.2.1, to be exact).

I had been waiting for it for a while. You see, call me naive, but when Tesla CEO Elon Musk said last year that FSD updates on HW4 (newer Tesla vehicles) would lag about 6 months behind HW3 (older Tesla vehicles), I believed him:

It made sense. He promised unsupervised self-driving on millions of HW3 vehicles for years. It makes sense that Tesla focuses on delivering on the promise for these older vehicles with less computing power before starting to utilize the higher computing power on newer HW4 vehicles.

However, that didn’t happen.

Earlier this year, Musk promised significant improvements to FSD rolling every two weeks:

But I got FSD v12.3.6 on HW3 Tesla Model 3 at the time and didn’t receive any more FSD update for 6 months.

Instead, Musk admitted that Tesla now needs to optimize its FSD code to work on older HW3 vehicles, and HW4 vehicles are getting more updates sooner – signaling Tesla is reaching the limits of the hardware on older vehicles despite promises made.

While this situation has greatly reduce my hopes of Tesla ever delivering on its promise of achieving self-driving on millions of vehicles sold since 2016, I was still excited to see this in the release notes on my car after an update this week:

Yesterday, I had to drive from Shawinigan to Trois-Rivieres (25 miles) and back. It was a good opportunity to test out the system on both surface streets and highways.

My first impression is that there are significant improvements in driving comfort. It drives way more naturally; the auto speed mode feature helps a lot. It drives at a speed that makes sense for the road rather than sticking to the speed limits plus or minus what you tell it.

The new driver monitoring system, which is vision-based rather than sending alerts asking you to tug on the wheels even though you are holding it, also helps make the system feel more natural.

Now, if you don’t look ahead to the road for a few seconds, you get an alert on the screen to pay attention to the road, which goes away if you bring your attention back to it or give inputs to the steering wheel.

These were the main changes. I didn’t see a significant improvement in performance, but the system is at least more enjoyable to use now. It makes using Tesla FSD less like a job and more like a feature, which is a welcomed change after more than two years of “FSD Beta” and now “Supervised FSD”.

I had to disengage the system as I was approaching my destination because the car insisted on going into the right lane when I needed to be on the left to stop. This was a minor annoyance, but a disengagement nonetheless.

On the way back, the car slowed down from my set speed on the highway for seemingly no reason. It is a common problem with Tesla FSD that I had in almost every iteration of the system. it can be dangerous on highways, but this time, it only slowed down by about 5-8 km/h and went back to the set speed in a few seconds without having to disengage.

However, shortly after, I had a more significant issue that resulted in a critical disengagement.

I had to make a left turn here:

A car was coming from the left, but it was pretty far and not coming fast. I would have done the turn without hesitation, but I wasn’t sure if FSD, which is often on the cautious side in those turns, would or if it would wait for the car to pass.

It decided to go, but it was almost as if it changed its mind a third of the way into the turn as it stopped, or at the least decelerated greatly into the turn; it’s hard to tell cause I had to react fast.

The front of the car was already in the way, so I had to take over and complete the turn faster to make sure the upcoming car didn’t crash into me.

Up until that point, I was pretty impressed by FSD v12.5. It’s a good reminder that as the tech improves and feels better, especially more natural like this update, it is super important to remain hyper-vigilant. The smoothness of this update can induce overconfidence, but it is still prone to errors, as I was quickly reminded.

Electrek’s Take

While I am impressed and I think it is an important step as FSD is now starting to feel like an actual feature rather than just homework for Tesla customers to train a system that Tesla sold to us years ago, I still find it hard to see a path from this to unsupervised self-driving, especially on HW3 cars.

Obviously, this was just my first drive, and I need to spend a bit more time with the system for a full review, but I had two disengagements, including a critical one, in about 50 miles. We are still very far from unsupervised.

My main fear is that as the system feels better, like with this update, more people will start getting complacent with it, which could lead to more accidents. I am hoping that Tesla’s new driver monitoring system will counter that potential complacency.

What do you think? Let us know in the comment section below.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

ZEEKR unveils new 001 design refresh with 900V architecture, 7-minute charging, and a ‘starry’ interior

Published

on

By

ZEEKR unveils new 001 design refresh with 900V architecture, 7-minute charging, and a 'starry' interior

Chinese EV brand ZEEKR has announced a new design refresh to its flagship 001 EV model – the second in as many years. This latest upgrade to the 001 features ZEEKR’s 900V architecture, enabling better performance and some of the fastest charging speeds we’ve seen. The interior also appears quite cozy, allowing for a starry night setting on the panoramic roof.

If you know anything about the EV brand ZEEKR, you’ve probably heard of the 001 shooting brake EV. The flagship EV initially debuted in April 2021 and found early success in China before expanding its availability to new markets in Europe.

By 2023, the 001 has contributed to 64% of Zeekr’s annual global sales, including a high-performance quad motor variant called the 001 FR that was introduced in 2023. However, ZEEKR began selling a new model called the 007 in January 2024, which immediately overtook the 001 in popularity.

As a result, ZEEKR introduced a 001 refresh in February 2024, which offered customers new, lower-priced trims, plus improved performance. Even after the refresh, ZEEKR’s other models, like the 007 GT (which features newer tech at a lower price), continue to outsell the 001. So, ZEEKR has gone back to its design lab and introduced yet another 001 refresh for 2025, a much bigger overhaul.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

  • ZEEKR-001-refresh-

ZEEKR 001 refresh will hit the market on October 11

Although most of China is currently on holiday to celebrate the Mid-Autumn Festival, ZEEKR’s marketing team was hard at work, sharing numerous images, videos, and performance specs of the new 001 refresh on social media channels like Weibo and WeChat.

According to the company, the 2025 001 refresh EVs are already making their way to ZEEKR showrooms around China before the official launch and start of deliveries on October 11. Those pre-order holders will be some of the first to experience the new 001 upgrades, which are centered around ZEEKR’s new E-Powertrain technology – a full-stack 900V architecture.

This is a significant upgrade from the 001’s previous 800V system. The result is significantly faster 12C charging, enabling 10-80% SOC in just seven minutes. Variants include an AWD version that offers 925 hp (680kW), accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h (0 to 62 mph) in 2.83 seconds to a top speed of 280 km/h (174 mph).

ZEEKR is also selling a RWD variant powered by CATL’s Qilin battery technology, offering notable (CLTC) range improvement of up to 810 km (503 miles). This version was equipped with a larger pack (113 kWh) compared to the 100 kWh in the 2024 model, which achieved a CLTC range of 750 km (466 miles).

ZEEKR-001-refresh-
Source: ZEEKR/Weibo

The 2025 ZEEKR 001 refresh also features plenty of upgrades to the interior. As showcased by the automaker in a video on Weibo, a new interior design theme called “Starry Sky Concert Hall” features premium textiles and an immersive display that can be activated across the EV’s interior roof. As you can see in the video here, stars and constellations twinkle amidst the glow of the moon, while shooting stars occasionally fly across the ceiling.

Other upgrades in the 001 refresh include a new chassis and “CCD Electromagnetic Damping System,” inclusion of ZEEKR’s G-AES (General Obstacle Avoidance) emergency active safety technology, which enables automatic avoidance at speeds up to 130 km/h (81 mph), and all-scenario tire blowout protection which can keep the shooting brake stable at speeds up to 120 km/h (75 mph) after a tire fails.

As mentioned above, the ZEEKR 001 refresh is expected to reach customers in China this weekend; however, there is no word yet on whether or when it will become available in other markets, such as Europe.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla is in hot water for mishandling insurance claims

Published

on

By

Tesla is in hot water for mishandling insurance claims

California is taking significant enforcement action against Tesla Insurance, alleging the company has been systematically failing to handle claims properly and harming its customers in the state. The California Department of Insurance announced the action, threatening to revoke Tesla’s license to operate in the state and impose significant fines.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen Tesla’s insurance arm in hot water, but this action from a major market like California represents a serious escalation.

According to the press release, the California Department of Insurance has issued “Accusations” and “Notices of Orders to Show Cause” against Tesla Insurance Services, Inc., Tesla Insurance Company, and their partner, State National Insurance Company. The Department alleges that these companies have repeatedly failed to comply with California’s claims handling laws, leading to significant harm for policyholders – most of whom are Tesla drivers.

The Department of Insurance laid out some of the core allegations:

Advertisement – scroll for more content

  • Egregious delays in responding to policyholder claims in all steps of the claims handling process, causing financial harm, out-of-pocket expenses, potential third-party liability exposure, and distress to policyholders.
  • Unreasonable denials and delays in fully paying valid claims to consumers. Failure to conduct thorough, fair, and objective investigations of claims, thus denying consumers the insurance benefits they expect.
  • Failure to advise policyholders of their rights to have their claims denials reviewed by the Department – a major consumer protection in California to make sure insurers are held accountable by their regulator.

The state claims that despite numerous warnings and meetings where Tesla and its partners promised to improve, “the number of justified consumer complaints and violations continued to mount.”

The companies now face potential penalties of up to $5,000 for each unlawful, unfair, or deceptive act, or up to $10,000 for each act determined to be willful. Given the Department alleges “hundreds” of mishandled claims, the fines could quickly add up into the millions.

The companies have 15 days to respond to the allegations. If the issues are not resolved, the case will go before an administrative law judge to determine if Tesla can continue to sell insurance in California.

Electrek’s Take

That does sound like Tesla, especially the part where they are ignoring the notices.

This might be more important than it sounds, as insurance is critical to Tesla’s future, particularly if it is to be an autonomous one.

Tesla first started its insurance arm to lower cost to customers and “better account for how its autonomous driver assistance features improve safety.”

However, ultimately, Tesla drivers would find it hard to insure vehicles with level 3-5 autonomous driving technology, and Tesla planned to offer those services whenever it actually achieves these levels of autonomy.

Based on these statements by the California Department of Insurance, it doesn’t sound like Tesla is ready to take on that responsibility.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla teases stripped-down Model Y expected to be unveiled on Tuesday

Published

on

By

Tesla teases stripped-down Model Y expected to be unveiled on Tuesday

Tesla appears to be teasing its upcoming stripped-down Model Y, which is now expected to be unveiled on Tuesday, October 7th.

Yesterday, Tesla teased a product unveiling planned for October 7th with a cryptic image of what appears to be a wheel, or wheel cover, or a fan spinning.

Now, Tesla has released a second teaser and this time, it features headlights:

Our main guess with the first teaser was the new stripped-down Model Y, and this second teaser pretty much confirms it, as it features the same headlights as the prototypes already spotted in public and leaked on the website.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The vehicle is based on the refreshed Model Y launched earlier this year, but Tesla removed many standard features to reduce the price.

One of the features removed is the front light bar, with now just the narrow headlights remaining.

Tesla has been teasing the release of “more affordable models” since last year, but there’s been confusion around what Tesla plans to release.

As we have reported for almost a year, CEO Elon Musk canceled Tesla’s planned “$25,000 EV” in favor of stripped-down versions of its Model 3 and Model Y.

Due to Tesla still referring to them as “new, more affordable models”, many people believed that Tesla would still bring to market new, cheaper models.

In fact, the automaker initially stated that it would arrive in the “first half of 2025.”

The first half of 2025 came and went without new, cheaper models. Instead, Tesla claimed that the “first build” of the new model was produced in June, and it will launch later this year.

In July, Musk finally confirmed that the first “new affordable model” is in fact simply a Model Y.

The new stripped-down Model Y is codenamed E41 and is expected to feature cheaper materials and fewer features than the normal Model Y, which starts at $45,000 in the US.

It is expected to be equipped with more affordable materials, such as a textile interior, and to lose the Model Y’s glass roof, as well as features like the rear screen and more.

Electrek’s Take

The problem with this program is that, rather than launching a brand-new model, it will mostly cannibalize Tesla’s existing Model Y sales.

At best, it will boost Model Y demand by ~10-15% when Tesla’s production capacity is operating at ~60%.

And to achieve that, I think the variant needs to be closer to $35,000 than the $40,000 we have seen in leaks earlier.

If that’s the case, I think it will do the same thing at the Cybertruck RWD that only lasted a few months because people felt they lost too many features for the $10,000 price difference.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending