Connect with us

Published

on

We are just over two weeks into the NHL season. Frozen Frenzy is in the books, and in the distance is the triumphant return of best-on-best international hockey at the 4 Nations Face-off.

There’s a lot of season left, but there is enough of a sample size to identify the biggest surprise of the season for all 32 teams, presented here along with an updated set of Power Rankings.

How we rank: A panel of ESPN hockey commentators, analysts, reporters and editors sends in a 1-32 poll based on the games through Wednesday, which generates our master list here.

Note: Previous ranking for each team refers to the previous edition, published Oct. 19. Points percentages are through Thursday’s games.

Previous ranking: 2
Points percentage: 78.57%

Biggest surprise: Alexis is (still) on fire. The french word for brakes is “freins”, but it’s been all gas and no “freins” for Alexis Lafreniere, who continues to build off of his 14 points in 16 playoff games. It’s not easy being a No. 1 overall pick, where many demand you be great now. It’s been a marathon not a sprint for the Quebec native, and the improvements are tangible. You have to wonder how much Team Canada consideration he will get for February’s 4 Nations Face-off.

Next seven days: vs. ANA (Oct. 26), @ WSH (Oct. 29)


Previous ranking: 6
Points percentage: 100.00%

Biggest surprise: A perfect start. The Jets have been absolutely perfect: 7-0-0, with a plus-18 goal differential, and six players on or above a point-per-game rate out of the gates. This is the kind of dream start you remember if you fall into a slump later in the season and are still top of your division. The Central looked like a top-heavy slugfest with surprise potential before the season started, and the biggest positive surprise thus far has been Winnipeg.

Next seven days: @ CGY (Oct. 26), vs. TOR (Oct. 28), @ DET (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 1
Points percentage: 75.00%

Biggest surprise: Logan Stankoven‘s carry-over rookie campaign. The threshold for an NHL player to remain at “rookie” status is 25 games. Logan Stankoven played 24 last season for Dallas, which means he’s still eligible to win the Calder Trophy this season. Stankoven impressed in those 24 regular-season and 19 postseason appearances, where he averaged just over 16 minutes of ice time per game. Now, he kicked off his official rookie season with seven assists through seven games. His energetic, fearless style has earned him top-line minutes.

Next seven days: vs. CHI (Oct. 26)


Previous ranking: 12
Points percentage: 85.71%

Biggest surprise: A 5-0-2 start. The Wild are kicking off Marc-Andre Fleury‘s final NHL season off properly, as one of four teams without a regulation loss in the early going. Kirill Kaprizov has 13 points through seven games, and Mats Zuccarello has four goals. Maybe the Wild and Preds traded preseason projection vibes?

Next seven days: @ PHI (Oct. 26), @ PIT (Oct. 29)


Previous ranking: 14
Points percentage: 78.57%

Biggest surprise: Being in first place after seven games. The Flames weren’t projected to be a playoff contending team this season, but they are off to a scorching start. They torched Edmonton in the Battle of Alberta debut. Defenseman Rasmus Andersson leads the team with eight points, while Andersson, Jonathan Huberdeau and Nazem Kadri each have three goals.

Next seven days: vs. WPG (Oct. 26), @ VGK (Oct. 28), @ UTA (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 9
Points percentage: 57.14%

Biggest surprise: Guentzel picks up where Stamkos left off. Look, nobody is going to replace Steven Stamkos and his legacy with the Lightning and the city of Tampa. That guy is going straight to the Hall of Fame, having his number retired at Amalie Arena and getting a statue outside. We all know that. But looking at the first few games of this season, Bolts fans can’t help but get excited seeing Jake Guentzel fit right in with Brayden Point and Nikita Kucherov, scoring seven points in six games.

Next seven days: vs. WSH (Oct. 26), vs. NSH (Oct. 28), @ COL (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 3
Points percentage: 57.14%

Biggest surprise: Aside from a couple blips, the goaltending looks … good? Leafs fans have long desired a long-term solution as the No. 1 goalie to help lead the Leafs to the promised land. After the departure of Ilya Samsonov, Joseph Woll was thought to be the guy to get that chance — he looked terrific in the postseason when healthy. And there’s the rub: he has a history of injuries.

Enter Anthony Stolarz, who has allowed two goals or fewer in each start this season, building his case to be the No. 1 (or at the very least, 1B in a rotation). Dennis Hildeby has also looked sharp when he’s been tapped (aside from the 6-2 trouncing at the hands of the Blue Jackets). With Woll returning from injury, the prospects look good for the Leafs in the nets (though Thursday’s outing against St. Louis wasn’t great for Woll).

Next seven days: @ BOS (Oct. 26), @ WPG (Oct. 28), vs. SEA (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 7
Points percentage: 64.29%

Biggest surprise: Howdy Howden. Brett Howden enters his fourth season as a member of the Golden Knights on a contract year, and started very strong; with three goals through seven games, he’s well on his way to hit double digits for the first time in his career. A two-way player with a physical style, he’s earned top-six minutes on the second line alongside Tomas Hertl and Pavel Dorofeyev, providing another scoring option for a team that lost a few of them to free agency.

Next seven days: vs. OTT (Oct. 25), vs. SJ (Oct. 26), vs. CGY (Oct. 28), @ LA (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 5
Points percentage: 55.00%

Biggest surprise: Casey’s impressive start. Seamus Casey built himself quite a name among Devils fans, scoring three goals in eight games with the club. Head coach Sheldon Keefe has said he’s impressed with the 2022 second-round pick, but it’s important for Casey to round out his game in the AHL. With Luke Hughes and Brett Pesce returning to the lineup on Thursday, the blue line is certainly crowded long term.

Next seven days: vs. NYI (Oct. 25), vs. ANA (Oct. 27), @ VAN (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 23
Points percentage: 83.33%

Biggest surprise: Picking up where they left off. The Caps are 5-1 to start the season. Dylan Strome has nine points. Tom Wilson has five goals. Of course everyone is watching this team to see when Alex Ovechkin eclipses Wayne Gretzky’s career goal-scoring mark, but this team is looking to make it back to the playoffs after last season’s surprise appearance.

Next seven days: @ TB (Oct. 26), vs. NYR (Oct. 29), vs. MTL (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 4
Points percentage: 61.11%

Biggest (non-)surprise: Paul Maurice signs on the dotted line. One of the greatest moments in NHL history was when Paul Maurice, mid-interview with ESPN’s Emily Kaplan, is tapped on the shoulder to receive the Stanley Cup. He looks at it, talks to it, then raises it, with the biggest look of 29 years’ worth of relief you could possibly have. You win the Cup, people tend to want to keep you around, as the Panthers did in inking Maurice to a contract extension this week.

Next seven days: @ NYI (Oct. 26), @ BUF (Oct. 28)


Previous ranking: 11
Points percentage: 66.67%

Biggest surprise: A very visible Ghost Bear. Shayne Gostisbehere returned to the Hurricanes from the Red Wings this offseason, and has contributed early, including a four-game goal streak, three of which came on the power play. The Hurricanes pulled off the only comeback of two or more goals during Frozen Frenzy night, nullifying Connor McDavid‘s two goals to win it in overtime. Gostisbehere had a goal and a helper in the effort.

Next seven days: @ SEA (Oct. 26), @ VAN (Oct. 28), vs. BOS (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 13
Points percentage: 56.25%

Biggest surprise: They’ve been terrific in a season of firsts. You couldn’t write a better script for the opening game; immaculate vibes, first goal in franchise history scored by Dylan Guenther, who just signed a big contract, and the second goal by new captain Clayton Keller. Can the magic last all season and result in a playoff berth?

Next seven days: @ LA (Oct. 26), vs. SJ (Oct. 28), vs. CGY (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 16
Points percentage: 62.50%

Biggest surprise: Brandt Clarke. In last week’s power rankings focusing on fantasy pickups for each team, Clarke was the choice for Los Angeles. The 21-year-old is logging big and important minutes, particularly in Drew Doughty‘s spot on the Kings’ power play. Clarke picked up five assists through his first eight games of the season.

Next seven days: vs. UTA (Oct. 26), @ SJ (Oct. 29), vs. VGK (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 20
Points percentage: 66.67%

Biggest surprise: The power play. The Sens are second in the league, going 40.9% with the man advantage thus far, and tied for the league lead with nine PPG. Jake Sanderson has been dynamite with the man advantage, potting six of his seven points on the PP.

Next seven days: @ VGK (Oct. 25), @ COL (Oct. 27), vs. STL (Oct. 29)


Previous ranking: 19
Points percentage: 66.67%

Biggest surprise: Elias Pettersson‘s slow start. Pettersson has exceeded 30 goals in the last three seasons, tallying 102 points two seasons ago. So having just three assists through six games doesn’t look very good, especially when he signed a massive deal just months ago. Is he ready to turn the corner?

Next seven days: vs. PIT (Oct. 26), vs. CAR (Oct. 28), vs. NJ (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 8
Points percentage: 43.75%

Biggest surprise: Bench boss bellows at Brad. In the third period of Boston’s 2-1 defeat against Utah on October 19, Bruins coach Jim Montgomery was seen yelling at captain Brad Marchand on the bench following an offensive zone turnover, and also shoved the captain. Montgomery enters his third season coaching the B’s, with both postseasons resulting in losses to the Panthers, and some wonder if he’s on the hot seat.

For what it’s worth, Marchand downplayed the incident to reporters on Thursday: “It’s unfortunate how coaches are scrutinized over things like that. There’s a lack of accountability nowadays because people can’t handle the heat. You make a mistake like that, you deserve to hear about it.”

Next seven days: vs. TOR (Oct. 26), vs. PHI (Oct. 29), @ CAR (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 22
Points percentage: 56.25%

Biggest surprise: An offensive surge. In Seattle’s inaugural season, the team finished bottom five in goals (213). In its second, the Kraken scored a lot more, netting out in the top five (289), jumped 40 points in the standings and made the playoffs. Last season, they were back in the bottom five (214) and well outside the postseason mix. So far this season, they sit right around the middle, 13th, with 23 goals through seven games. Top-liners Jared McCann and Jordan Eberle have a combined nine of those tallies, as the team pushes to get back in the playoffs.

Next seven days: vs. CAR (Oct. 26), @ MTL (Oct. 29), @ TOR (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 17
Points percentage: 50.00%

Biggest surprise: The goaltending. The Avs started the season 0-4, and in all four of those games, their opponents scored five or more goals. They’ve won three straight since, averaging two goals against per game. Through five games, Alexandar Georgiev has a .810 save percentage and a 1-3 record. Justus Annunen is 2-1 with a .900 save percentage. Kaapo Kahkonen is on a conditioning assignment in the AHL, having been claimed off waivers. This team has the talent to outscore their problems on many nights (Cale Makar is on pace for 114 points), but stability between the pipes is essential if they want to be a serious contender.

Next seven days: vs. OTT (Oct. 27), vs. CHI (Oct. 28), vs. TB (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 24
Points percentage: 62.50%

Biggest surprise: Resilience. The Blues spoiled Macklin Celebrini’s NHL debut; the Sharks were up 4-1 going into the third before the Blues scored three unanswered goals to send it to overtime where captain Brayden Schenn called game. Every game but two so far have been one-goal games, and St. Louis has won more than they’ve lost.

Next seven days: @ MTL (Oct. 26), @ OTT (Oct. 29), @ PHI (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 10
Points percentage: 35.71%

Biggest surprise: The Mirror. Mirror, mirror on the wall … who’s the most underachieving team of all? So far this season it’s Edmonton, who are loathing the mention of deja vu as much as Connor McDavid despises ketchup. Time for Edmonton to [ahem] dig in and collect some wins because this team, once again, is in Cup-or-bust mode.

Next seven days: vs. PIT (Oct. 25), @ DET (Oct. 27), @ CBJ (Oct. 28), @ NSH (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 18
Points percentage: 50.00%

Biggest surprise: Shutout losses. Through six games, the Islanders have been shut out three times — and two of those games were 1-0 losses. The Isles have outshot opponents (in particular the Red Wings, where the shot total was 30-11) outchanced them, and Ilya Sorokin has been great in goal. The team just isn’t scoring. Anthony Duclair is injured, and nobody has more than two goals this season (Mathew Barzal has just one).

Next seven days: @ NJ (Oct. 25), vs. FLA (Oct. 26), vs. ANA (Oct. 29), @ CBJ (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 15
Points percentage: 43.75%

Biggest surprise: How much we love nostalgia. Years ago I went to a Bon Jovi concert. After playing a couple songs from their latest album, Jon Bon Jovi bellowed, “now we’ll play your favorites … the hits, only hits and nothing but the hits!” That sent the crowd into a frenzy. Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin aren’t on a retirement tour, but they sure are hitting lofty milestones (with Sid recently crossing 1,600 points and Geno 500 goals), and it feels as nostalgic to hockey fans as “Livin’ On A Prayer.”

Next seven days: @ EDM (Oct. 25), @ VAN (Oct. 26), vs. MIN (Oct. 29), vs. ANA (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 26
Points percentage: 43.75%

Biggest surprise: Ryan McLeod. Since joining the swords in the offseason from Edmonton, McLeod has seemed to fit right in, tied for second in goals on a team that is seventh in the league in scoring. Not the best start for the team in general — including two losses overseas to begin the campaign — but the young core absolutely exists here for a playoff push. McLeod provides quality depth in the middle.

Next seven days: vs. DET (Oct. 26), vs. FLA (Oct. 28)


Previous ranking: 29
Points percentage: 58.33%

Biggest surprise: Shots for everybody! Maybe this shouldn’t be a major surprise, because this has been a trend for the Ducks for the last few seasons. They topped the league two years ago at 35.8 shots allowed per game, and this season they sit behind only Montreal with 34.2. Despite that onslaught, Lukas Dostal has been solid in John Gibson‘s absence, going 2-1-1 with a .930 save percentage.

Next seven days: @ NYR (Oct. 26), @ NJ (Oct. 27), @ NYI (Oct. 29), @ PIT (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 27
Points percentage: 57.14%

Biggest surprise: Winning a game with 11 shots on goal. Okay, this one has a little recency bias as I’m writing this less than 24 hours after Frozen Frenzy, but it will always be bonkers to me when a team logs 11 shots and wins a game. That’s tied for fifth fewest shots in a win in NHL history. Two teams (the Sharks in 1998, Maple Leafs in 1999) needed only nine shots to get the W. Alex Lyon could have also been a pick here, because he’s on a great stretch (two goals against facing 84 shots in his last three games).

Next seven days: @ BUF (Oct. 26), vs. EDM (Oct. 27), vs. WPG (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 30
Points percentage: 50.00

Biggest surprise: Scoring despite injuries. Columbus is 10th in the league in scoring, with 24 goals in a 3-3-0 start. The thing is, their usual offensive contributors are injured: captain Boone Jenner could miss six months due to shoulder surgery, Dmitri Voronkov was placed on IR after a preseason game and Kent Johnston is also sidelined. But the Blue Jackets keep finding ways to score, including a 6-2 thumping of Toronto. Sean Monahan, Mathieu Olivier, Kirill Marchenko and Tegor Chinakov all have three goals through six games.

Next seven days: @ NSH (Oct. 26), vs. EDM (Oct. 28), vs. NYI (Oct. 30)


Previous ranking: 21
Points percentage: 16.67%

Biggest surprise: Cold start after hot summer of spending. The Preds have been surprising since the offseason started. They signed Steven Stamkos and Jonathan Marchessault among others, making them the second oldest team in the NHL, with an average age of 30.2. But they haven’t been scoring, which has led to struggles; they started 0-5 before breaking out in a 4-0 win over the Bruins this week.

Next seven days: @ CHI (Oct. 25), vs. CBJ (Oct. 26), @ TB (Oct. 28), vs. EDM (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 31
Points percentage: 35.71%

Biggest surprise: Turbo boost. Welcome back, Teuvo Teravainen. The 30-year-old began his NHL career as a Blackhawk before spending eight seasons with Carolina and now returning to Chicago. He’s tied with Seth Jones and Connor Bedard atop the Hawks’ scoring leaderboard, and is tied with captain Nick Foligno with three goals. The Teravainen-Bedard tandem has clicked early; this looks to be a great fit through the early going.

Next seven days: vs. NSH (Oct. 25), @ DAL (Oct. 26), @ COL (Oct. 28), @ SJ (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 28
Points percentage: 35.71%

Biggest surprise: Lane Hutson. The Habs might not be a playoff team this season, but boy are they fun to watch. It seems like every game there is a jump-out-of-your-seat kind of moment being produced by one of their dazzling young players. It may not be as much of a surprise coming from a Cole Caulfield or Nick Suzuki, but Lane Hutson has provided many of those. The analytics aren’t kind to him, but coach Martin St. Louis doesn’t seem fazed thus far. He is on the way to being a long-term defensive superstar for the Habs.

Next seven days: vs. STL (Oct. 26), @ PHI (Oct. 27), vs. SEA (Oct. 29), @ WSH (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 25
Points percentage: 21.43%

Biggest surprise: Matvei-ry good. Matvei Michkov has arrived, and Flyers fans are loving it — especially his team-leading seven points through seven games. He has incredible puck handling, vision and shooting, and is playing top-line minutes. All of his three goals thus far have been on the power play; imagine what he will be once he unlocks his game at 5-on-5.

Next seven days: vs. MIN (Oct. 26), vs. MTL (Oct. 27), @ BOS (Oct. 29), vs. STL (Oct. 31)


Previous ranking: 32
Points percentage: 12.50%

Biggest surprise: Penalties. The Sharks are the last winless team in the NHL — and Macklin Celebrini is out of the lineup due to injury — but one glaring stat is that the Sharks have given up six power-play opportunities in three of their last four games; Cody Ceci mentioned it after the Sharks 3-1 loss to the Ducks on Tuesday: “Maybe stay off the refs a little bit too. Maybe they’ll start to call a little more in our favor.” Taking fewer trips to the sin bin may not be a cure-all, but it’s a start.

Next seven days: @ VGK (Oct. 26), @ UTA (Oct. 28), vs. LA (Oct. 29), vs. CHI (Oct. 31)

Continue Reading

Sports

What are FBS college football conference tiebreaker rules?

Published

on

By

What are FBS college football conference tiebreaker rules?

In the new 12-team College Football Playoff format, there is an added emphasis on conference championships. The four highest-ranked conference champions receive a first-round bye and a fifth conference champion is guaranteed a spot in the field. Those champions will be determined by conference title games held Dec. 6-7.

But in a college football landscape that has mostly done away with divisions and with some conferences expanding to as many as 18 teams, it can be difficult to figure out who is in line to reach those conference title games.

We’re here to help out. Below are the list of tiebreakers for each league to help determine conference championship game participants.

Atlantic Coast Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams)

4. Combined win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by the ACC commissioner

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams.

1. Combined head-to-head win percentage among the tied teams (if all tied teams are common opponents)

2. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

2a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, and no tied team defeated each of the other tied teams, but a tied team lost to each of the other tied teams, that team is eliminated

3. Win percentage against common opponents

4. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings

5. Combined win percentage of conference opponents

6. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

7. Draw administered by the ACC commissioner

Big 12 Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against the next-highest common opponent in the conference standings; in case of tied teams in standings, use each team’s win percentage against all of those teams

4. Combined win percentage in conference games of conference opponents (strength of conference schedule)

5. Total wins over the 12-game season (only one win against teams from FCS or lower division will be counted)

6. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

7. Coin toss

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams. When reduced to two tied teams, the two-team tiebreakers will be used.

1. Combined head-to-head among tied teams (if all tied teams are common opponents)

1a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

1b. If all tied teams are not common opponents, and no tied team defeated each of the other tied teams, but a tied team lost to each of the other tied teams, that team is eliminated

2. Win percentage against all common opponents

3. Record against next-highest common opponent in conference standings; in case of tied teams in standings, use each team’s win percentage against all of those teams

4. Combined win percentage in conference games of conference opponents (strength of conference schedule)

5. Total wins over the 12-game season (only one win against teams from FCS or lower division will be counted)

6. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

7. Coin toss

Big Ten Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by the Big Ten commissioner

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams. When reduced to two tied teams, the two-team tiebreakers will be used.

1. Combined head-to-head among tied teams

1a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

2. Win percentage against all common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by the Big Ten commissioner

Southeastern Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams: if a two-team tiebreaker will not break a tie, combined records against tied common opponents will be used)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher relative total scoring margin against all conference opponents (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Random draw

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams.

1. Combined head-to-head among tied teams (if all tied teams are common opponents)

1a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

1b. If all tied teams are not common opponents, and no tied team defeated each of the other tied teams, but a tied team lost to each of the other tied teams, that team is eliminated

2. Record against all common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams; if a two-team tiebreaker will not break a tie, combined records against tied common opponents will be used)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher relative total scoring margin against all conference opponents (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Random draw

American Athletic Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. If one team is ranked in the latest CFP rankings (and didn’t lose in the final weekend of the regular season)

2a. If one team is ranked in the latest CFP rankings and lost in the final weekend of the regular season, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

2b. If both teams are ranked, the higher-ranked team that didn’t lose in the final weekend of the regular season (if both lose, a composite average of metrics)

2c. If neither team is ranked in the latest CFP rankings, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

3. Win percentage against common conference opponents

4. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) excluding exempt games

5. Coin toss

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams.

1. Combined head-to-head (if all teams played each other)

1a. If one tied team defeated all other tied teams

2. If the highest-ranked team in the latest CFP rankings that didn’t lose in the final weekend of the regular season

2a. If the highest-ranked team loses in final weekend of regular season, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

2b. If multiple ranked teams in the CFP rankings, the highest ranked team(s) that wins in the final weekend of the regular season

2c. If all ranked teams lose on the final weekend, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

2d. If no teams are ranked in the final CFP rankings, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

3. Win percentage against common conference opponents

4. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) excluding exempt games

5. Coin toss

Conference USA

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie and three-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Highest CFP rankings going into the final weekend (if team wins in the final weekend)

3. Highest average ranking of four computer rankings (Connelly SP+, SportSource, ESPN SOR, KPI Rankings)

4. Highest average ranking of two computer rankings (SportSource, KPI Rankings)

5. Highest most recently published multiyear football Academic Progress Rate (if same, most recent year)

6. Draw administered by commissioner’s designee

Mid-American Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents based on MAC finish (breaking ties) from top-to-bottom of conference

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by Team Rating Score metric (SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by MAC commissioner

Three-team tie:

1. Combined head-to-head (if all teams played each other)

2. If one tied team defeated all other tied teams

3. Win percentage against all common opponents

4. Win percentage against all common opponents based on finish (with ties broken)

5. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

6. Higher ranking by Team Rating Score metric (SportSource Analytics)

7. Draw administered by MAC commissioner

Mountain West Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Highest CFP ranking (if team wins in the final weekend)

2a. If only or both CFP ranked teams loses in the final weekend (or if there is no ranked teams), an average of metrics will be used

3. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference)

4. Record against the next-highest team in the conference standings (tied teams will be lumped together if tied teams played all those teams)

5. Win percentage against common conference opponents

6. Coin toss conducted virtually by the commissioner

Three-plus team tie:

1. Combined head-to-head (if all teams played each other)

2. If one tied team defeated all other tied teams

3. Highest CFP ranking among teams to win in the final weekend

4. Average of selected metrics (if ranked team loses or if no teams ranked)

5. Overall win percentage against all opponents (conference and nonconference); maximum one win against FCS or lower-division team

6. Record against the next-highest team in the conference standings (tied teams will be lumped together if tied teams played all those teams)

7. Win percentage against common conference opponents

8. Drawing conducted virtually by the commissioner

Sun Belt Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie

1. Head-to-head

2. Overall win percentage

3. Win percentage against the next-highest team in the division standings (lumping together tied teams)

4. Win percentage against all common nondivisional conference opponents

5. Higher-ranked teams in the CFP rankings (if it wins in the final regular season week); if the highest-ranked team loses, an average of selected computer rankings (Anderson & Hester, Massey, Colley and Wolfe)

6. If no team is ranked in the CFP rankings, an average of selected computer rankings (Anderson & Hester, Massey, Colley and Wolfe)

7. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) against FBS teams

8. Coin toss

Three-plus team tie: (Teams will not revert to two-team tiebreaker once three-plus team tiebreaker is trimmed to two.)

1. Combined head-to-head

2. Divisional win percentage

3. Win percentage against the next-highest team in the division standings (lumping together tied teams)

4. Highest-ranked team in the CFP rankings (if they win in the final weekend of regular season); if that team loses, an average of selected computer rankings

5. If no team is ranked in the CFP rankings, an average of selected computer rankings (Anderson & Hester, Massey, Colley and Wolfe)

6. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) against FBS teams

7. Draw lots (conducted by commissioner)

Check out the ESPN college football hub page for the latest news, analysis, schedules, rankings and more.

Continue Reading

Sports

Soto will take time in free agency, Boras says

Published

on

By

Soto will take time in free agency, Boras says

SAN ANTONIO — Juan Soto will take his time surveying the free agent market before signing with a team, according to his agent Scott Boras.

Speaking at the general manager’s meetings Wednesday, Boras indicated that Soto desires a “thorough” vetting before making a decision.

“Due to the volume of interest and Juan’s desire to hear [from teams], I can’t put a timeframe on it, but it’s going to be a very thorough process for him,” Boras said. “He wants to meet people personally. He wants to talk with them. He wants to hear from them.”

That includes ownership, even for the New York Yankees, for whom he played in 2024 and hit 41 home runs with a league-leading 128 runs scored. Soto helped New York to a World Series appearance, but that doesn’t necessarily give the Yankees a leg up on the competition to sign him.

“He wants ownership that’s going to support that they are going win annually,” Boras said. “Owners want to meet with Juan and sit down and talk with him about what they’re going to provide for their franchise short term and long term.”

Soto’s overall deal is likely to be at least the second largest in MLB history behind Shohei Ohtani‘s 10-year, $700 million contract with the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Boras refused to compare the two players, but stressed Soto’s age (26) as a distinctive factor in teams’ pursuit of his client. Ohtani was 29 when he hit free agency.

“I don’t think Ohtani has much to do with Juan Soto at all,” Boras said. “It’s not something we discuss or consider. … He’s in an age category that separates him.”

Both New York teams have spoken to Boras already, though there are a handful of other big-market franchises that could be in play for his services, including the San Francisco Giants and Toronto Blue Jays.

Boras was asked how the competitive balance tax on payrolls could impact Soto’s free agency.

“I don’t think tax considerations are the focal point when you’re talking about a business opportunity where you can make literally billions of dollars by acquiring somebody like this,” Boras said.

Boras and Soto are only at the beginning stages of what could be a drawn-out process. One thing going for the player, in Boras’ estimation, is that Soto is “pretty well known” considering he has already been on three teams and played in 43 playoff games, including twice in the World Series.

In his agent’s eyes, every winning team should be interested.

“They’re [team executives] called upon to be championship magicians,” Boras said. “Behind every great magician is the magic Juan.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Sources: Angels add ex-Cubs RHP Hendricks

Published

on

By

Sources: Angels add ex-Cubs RHP Hendricks

SAN ANTONIO — Free agent pitcher Kyle Hendricks has agreed to a one year, $2.5 million contract with the Los Angeles Angels, sources familiar with the situation told ESPN.

Hendricks, 34, posted a 5.92 ERA for the Chicago Cubs last season but was better in the second half after a stint in the bullpen. His ERA was 4.41 from mid-July to the end of the regular season. He threw 7⅓ shutout innings in his last start as a Cub in late September after spending the first 11 years of his career with Chicago.

The Angels are hoping Hendricks finds more consistency in 2025, similar to what he displayed at times late in 2024. They also have a young pitching staff that needs mentoring. Hendricks can help in that department as well.

Hendricks won the ERA title in 2016, helping the Cubs to a World Series title. He was the last member of that team still playing for the Cubs until he became a free agent after the 2024 season. Overall, he’s 97-81 with a 3.68 ERA.

Hendricks is from the Los Angeles area, having gone to Capistrano Valley High School in Mission Viejo, California. He was originally drafted by the Angels in the 39th round in 2008 before attending Dartmouth. Additionally, his dad worked in the Angels’ ticket office for six years when Hendricks was a teenager.

Continue Reading

Trending