Connect with us

Published

on

The UK and US have hailed a “fantastic, historic day” after striking a landmark trade deal.

In President Donald Trump’s own words, this has been years in the making “but it got there with this prime minister”.

But while Sir Keir Starmer will be no doubt celebrating, the devil is in the detail.

Politics latest: Trump says UK-US trade deal is ‘great honour’

President Trump pictured alongside the UK ambassador to the US, Lord Mandelson, in the Oval Office. Pic: AP
Image:
President Trump pictured alongside the UK ambassador to the US, Lord Mandelson, in the Oval Office. Pic: AP

Here, Sky News looks at what has been announced.

Not a full trade deal

The first thing to note is that this isn’t a free trade deal in the conventional sense, but one that focuses on specific sectors – notably cars, steel and agriculture.

It has led to the reduction in some, but not all, of the tariffs Mr Trump imposed on the UK as part of a sweeping package of global measures last month. This included a 10% levy on all UK exports and a higher charge on steel, aluminium and cars.

Tariff exemptions on cars and steel

As a result of Thursday’s deal, car export tariffs will be reduced from 27.5% to 10%, to match Mr Trump’s baseline levy.

The lower car rate applies to the first 100,000 vehicles exported from the UK to the US each year, which Downing Street said is almost the total the UK exported last year.

British carmakers were intensely worried about the impact of tariffs on their industry, so it is hoped the reduction will save thousands of jobs.

Separately, the UK steel industry – on the brink of collapse just a few weeks ago – now won’t face any tariffs after the US agreed to scrap the 25% rate for the UK.

A 10% levy remains on all other goods coming to the US from the UK, which will be the focus of the next stage of discussions, it is understood.

At respective news conferences on Thursday, Sir Keir said the deal has resulted in “jobs saved, jobs won but not job done”, while Mr Trump said the deal was “comprehensive” but he’d like to see it “go further”.

The prime minister said the new measures will save thousands of jobs in the car and steel industries, which were threatened by Mr Trump’s tariffs.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer admits ‘we would like to go further in relation to tariffs’.

New deal on beef – but no drop in standards

The UK has had to make concessions on agriculture in exchange for the tariff exemptions, with the deal including new reciprocal market access to beef.

This means US farmers will have access to the UK for the first time, and UK farmers will have access to the US, at a tariff-free quota of 13,000 metric tonnes.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said this is a fraction of the 35,000 tonnes agreed as part of the Tories’ trade deal with Australia, which rises to 110,000 metric tonnes over time and which farmers said undercut them.

Crucially, the US deal has not involved a weakening of UK food standards on imports, which has previously been a red line in negotiations.

That means hormone-injected beef (and chlorinated chicken) still won’t be allowed on UK shelves, a move that has been welcomed by farming groups.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Ethanol

The UK has also agreed to remove the tariff on ethanol – which is used to produce beer – coming into the UK from the US, down to zero.

US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said that together with the beef deal, this would create five billion dollars in “opportunity for American exports”.

Aerospace

Mr Lutnick also said the US has agreed to drop tariffs on Rolls-Royce engines and other plane parts from the UK.

In return, he said there was “going to be an announcement” by an airline company in the UK that they are “buying ten billion worth of Boeing planes later today”.

A government source said that was a “commercial deal” but “we have a commitment from the US that when it comes to the aerospace industry, UK exporters would face a 0% tariff”.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

What wasn’t in the deal?

Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News in February that while the NHS is “not up for grabs”, NHS patients could take part in US clinical trials as part of a deal in life sciences and medical research.

He also told BBC Radio Four that in return for being in the “driving seat for that groundbreaking research”, we should expect British patients “are at the front of the queue for those new treatments and technologies”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Health sec: ‘NHS not on table’ in US talks

There was no mention of this in Thursday’s announcement.

However Sir Keir said that as part of the deal, the UK has secured “preferential treatment whatever happens in the future” when it comes to pharmaceuticals, as Mr Trump considers import taxes on drugs and medicines.

Read More:
Starmer’s gamble on Trump appears to have paid off

Film tariffs

Mr Trump has also touted the possibility of film tariffs, though like pharmaceuticals, no details have been announced.

Sir Keir said film tariffs weren’t included in Thursday’s deal as they aren’t currently in place but “of course we’re discussing it with the president’s team”.

Tech

Previous speculation had suggested the UK would revise the digital services tax as part of a deal, with the levy mainly applying to US tech companies.

However, this remains unchanged.

Instead, the two sides have agreed to work on a digital trade deal “that will strip back paperwork for British firms trying to export to the US – opening the UK up to a huge market that will put rocket boosters on the UK economy”, Downing Street said.

Sir Keir also confirmed that there is “nothing in the deal that impinges” on free speech, after US vice president JD Vance criticised the UK and other European governments for their approach.

Continue Reading

UK

Police appeal after woman raped in ‘racially aggravated attack’ in West Midlands

Published

on

By

Police appeal after woman raped in 'racially aggravated attack' in West Midlands

Police have said they are investigating a “racially aggravated” rape in the West Midlands.

Officers were called just before 8.30am on Tuesday after a Sikh woman in her 20s reported being attacked by two white men in the area around Tame Road in Oldbury.

The Sikh Federation (UK) said the perpetrators allegedly told the woman during the attack: “You don’t belong in this country, get out.”

One of the men is described as having a shaved head, of heavy build, and was reported to be wearing a dark coloured sweatshirt and gloves.

The second man was reportedly wearing a grey top with a silver zip.

West Midland Police said it is being treated as a “racially aggravated attack” and has appealed for anyone in the area who may have seen the men to contact the force.

Chief Superintendent Kim Madill said: “We are working really hard to identify those responsible, with CCTV, forensic and other enquiries well under way.

“We fully understand the anger and worry that this has caused, and I am speaking to people in the community today to reassure them that we are doing everything we can to identify and arrest those responsible.

“Incidents like this are incredibly rare, but people can expect to see extra patrols in the area.”

Dabinderjit Singh, the lead executive for political engagement at the Sikh Federation (UK), said: “The current racist political environment is driven by popularism and created by politicians playing the anti-immigration card who are unashamedly exploiting those with right-wing and racist views.

“More than 48 hours later we await the public condemnation by politicians on all sides of this brutal racist and sexual attack where a young Sikh woman has been viciously beaten and raped.”

Gurinder Singh Josan, Labour MP for Smethwick, wrote on X: “This is a truly horrific attack and my thoughts are with the victim.”

He added: “The incidence is being treated as a hate crime.

“The police are working extremely sympathetically with the victim at her pace who has been traumatised by the attack.

“We are grateful for all the CCTV and information that has already been forthcoming from the community.”

Continue Reading

UK

Asylum seekers come face-to-face with migrant hotel critics

Published

on

By

Asylum seekers come face-to-face with migrant hotel critics

“It makes me sad. We left when our country had the troubles so we should have in this world… the humanity”.

We’re sitting in a cafe in Tamworth and Noor, 19, is explaining how it feels to know there are people in the town who don’t want him here.

Noor is from Afghanistan and came to the UK on a small boat.

The cafe is close to the asylum hotel where he’s staying.

The group met in a cafe in Tamworth
Image:
The group met in a cafe in Tamworth

He’s agreed to come along with four other men from the hotel to speak to locals about the concern in the town over the Staffordshire hotel being used to house asylum seekers.

There was a peaceful demonstration outside the hotel last month. But last year, a protest here turned ugly. Windows were smashed, petrol bombs thrown, and part of the hotel was set alight.

Among the locals in the cafe is Tom, 25, who reveals he was at both protests.

More on Asylum

Tom (left) has attended anti-migration protests in Tamworth
Image:
Tom (left) has attended anti-migration protests in Tamworth

He says he was persuaded to go by friends and explains to the group why they decided to go.

“They were annoyed, angry, fuming that the government had let them [asylum seekers] live in a hotel,” he says.

Noor, who speaks the best English of the asylum seekers in the group, replies: “What did we do wrong?”

Noor says he is upset by people who do not want him in the UK
Image:
Noor says he is upset by people who do not want him in the UK

“Your government accepts us as asylum seekers,” he continues.

Tom thinks. “I’m more annoyed with the government than you guys,” he tells them.

‘A place to get the golden ticket’

Noor explains to the group how he ended up in the UK. He left Afghanistan four years ago with his family but they were separated on the journey. He doesn’t know where they are.

Heather, a 29-year-old local accountant, speaks up.

Heather says protests outside hotels makes asylum seekers fearful
Image:
Heather says protests outside hotels makes asylum seekers fearful

“When people protest, I’m like, why don’t you protest near the government?” she asks. “Why don’t you take your issue to them rather than being outside the hotel?”

“Those asylum seekers aren’t going to change the policy at all,” she adds. “It’s just going to make them fearful.”

Each of the locals in the cafe has their own take on why some don’t like the asylum seekers living in their town.

“I think they feel like they’re living better than the British people, some of them, and it’s almost like they feel offended,” says Andrew, 47.

“Some people in the UK see how the asylum seekers are coming over to Britain because they see it as a place to get the golden ticket,” he adds.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK’s unprecedented immigration figures

Heather agrees. She says the NHS is a draw and the UK also has “different border control regulations that might be seen as weaker than in some other countries”.

“You get to stay in a hotel,” she tells the asylum seekers. “You get the free health care. And so I think that’s why they’re a little bit annoyed.”

Noor replies: “One thing I should tell you is that when we cross the English Channel, it means we don’t care about our life. It’s very dangerous.”

Read more:
Protesters on why they oppose asylum hotels
The key numbers driving the immigration debate

Noor and four other asylum seekers joined the meeting
Image:
Noor and four other asylum seekers joined the meeting

Links to the UK

I’m keen to know why they chose to come to Britain. Noor tells the group it’s because he has a relative here and speaks the language.

Azim, 22, who is also from Afghanistan, says he came here because people in the UK “have respect to Islam”.

He also has a family member here.

Azim says people in the UK are respectful of Islam
Image:
Azim says people in the UK are respectful of Islam

I ask them if they could have claimed asylum in France, but Noor says his “only hope was England”.

He says it’s “better for education” here. All the men agree it’s seen as the better place to come.

The conversation moves to the protests this summer which began in Epping, Essex, after an asylum seeker there was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl – an offence he has now been convicted of.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

In full: The Immigration Debate

Noor believes British people have a right to be angry about that. He tells the group he believes that asylum seekers who commit crimes “should get back to their country”.

“We also [do] not support them,” he says.

Over the course of the meeting, the mood becomes more relaxed. People with different views find some common ground.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Immigration Debate audience have their say

Noor tells the group that if things improve in Afghanistan he would like to go back there one day.

If not, he hopes he’ll stay in the UK and earn enough to repay in taxes the bill for the hotel he’s staying in now.

It has been a frank exchange. Some in this town will never want asylum seekers here and people like Noor and Azim know it.

But they were placed here by the Home Office and can only wait until their asylum claims are processed.

Continue Reading

UK

‘They’re in conditions you can’t even imagine’: Son of UK couple held in Iran renews plea for their release

Published

on

By

'They're in conditions you can't even imagine': Son of UK couple held in Iran renews plea for their release

“Mum is teaching yoga and English to her cellmates in Iranian prison.”

It’s now over eight months since British couple Lindsay and Craig Foreman were detained in Iran.

Last week, during a long-awaited visit from British ambassador Hugo Shorter, it was confirmed that the pair continue to endure tough conditions with no indication of how – or when – the legal process will proceed.

“They’re both coping, making the best of a bad situation. They’re in conditions you can’t even imagine.”

Lindsay Foreman with son Joe Bennett. Pic: Family handout
Image:
Lindsay Foreman with son Joe Bennett. Pic: Family handout

Speaking to Sky News, their son Joe Bennett explained how the couple have been crammed into cells with more than 50 other prisoners, while suffering constant back pain caused by metal bunk beds.

“The beds are stacked three high. It’s unsanitary. It’s hot. There are often power outages and they’re in 50-degree heat.”

Craig and Lindsay Foreman. Pic: Family handout
Image:
Craig and Lindsay Foreman. Pic: Family handout

Lindsay and Craig, both 52, were arrested in early January in Iran, as they crossed the country on motorbikes as part of an around-the-world adventure. The couple had left Spain just a few weeks earlier and were aiming to drive all the way to Australia.

They were charged with espionage and have been transferred to various prisons around Iran, with little information provided to British diplomatic staff about their whereabouts.

Joe and the rest of the family have only managed to speak to their parents once on the phone. “In a brief conversation that I had with my mum, we managed to share a laugh and a lot of tears as well. But it’s a test of time, how long they can keep this up for.”

Pic: Family handout
Image:
Pic: Family handout

The UK ambassador’s meeting with Craig was the first in over four months, and despite suffering from untreated dental pain, he quipped about becoming a “reluctant Arsenal supporter” while watching football on television with other prisoners.

The couple were previously held together in a facility in the Iranian city of Kerman but have been moved to separate prisons in the capital, Tehran. Family members are calling on the Iranians to move Lindsay into the same facility where Craig is being detained.

Pic: Family handout
Image:
Pic: Family handout

Their son acknowledged in his interview with Sky News that he was frustrated with his parents when they were arrested in January. Family members had urged them not to travel through the country.

“I had that natural reaction that some of the public do – why did they go? It’s idiotic, you’re going against the advice, and it serves them right. That’s fair enough when you don’t know them [but] just picture your parents having a bit of a sense of adventure… it’s a different story.”

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office says it is “deeply concerned” about the couple, adding, “we continue to raise this case directly with the Iranian authorities”.

Members of the Foreman family are urging the British government and the new foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper, to take direct action to improve harsh prison conditions and urgently organise for Lindsay and Craig’s release.

“I need them home, you know, and I need them home as soon as possible. We need them, the family miss them dearly – so we’re going to do everything we can to make that possible.”

Continue Reading

Trending