Connect with us

Published

on

Apparently, even the Colorado Rockies have their limits.

On Sunday, the day after an embarrassing 21-0 loss to the San Diego Padres dropped the team’s record to 6-33, the Rockies finally fired longtime manager Bud Black — despite general manager Bill Schmidt giving Black a vote of confidence prior to Saturday’s game. Colorado is careening toward not just a seventh consecutive losing season, but a season that could be headed in the same direction as the Chicago White Sox in 2024: chasing the modern record for losses in a season.

Yep, here we go again.

Saturday’s loss capped a remarkable seven-game stretch in which the Rockies allowed six, nine, eight, 10, 11, 13 and 21 runs, respectively. They became the first team in MLB history to allow at least eight runs and then increase their runs allowed in each of their next four games. The 21-0 loss was the third-biggest shutout margin in the major leagues since 1901. The Rockies’ pitching line over that seven-game skid: 62 IP, 96 H, 25 BB, 49 SO, 11 HR, .353 batting average and 9.00 ERA.

And the ERA was 9.00 only because 16 of the 78 total runs they allowed were unearned.

That unearned runs total might suggest that the Rockies, contrary to owner Dick Monfort’s claim back in February, will not have one of the best infield defenses in “history.” Instead, the Rockies rank 28th in the majors in defensive runs saved across all positions — and last in runs allowed and second-to-last in runs scored.

Now, this isn’t all Black’s fault, of course. The Rockies have been headed in this direction for years, trying to build mostly from within as they rarely make trades or sign free agents (and when they did, it was for Kris Bryant, who has barely been on the field in four seasons with the team). The belief across the sport is the Rockies remain well behind other organizations in applying analytics and that they’ve made major mistakes, such as not getting enough in return for Nolan Arenado or letting Trevor Story head to free agency without trading him.

The Rockies did rally to win on Sunday in what would be Black’s final game after nine seasons to improve to 7-33, with third-base coach Warren Schaeffer taking over as interim manager for the rest of the season and former Rockies manager Clint Hurdle, recently named the team’s hitting coach, taking over as bench coach.

“While we all share responsibility in how this season has played out, these changes are necessary,” Monfort said in a statement. “We will use the remainder of 2025 to improve where we can on the field and to evaluate all areas of our operation so we can properly turn the page into the next chapter of Rockies Baseball.”

Comparisons to the White Sox are inevitable. The Rockies’ record through 40 games, prior to Monday’s loss to Texas, put them on a pace to finish 28-134 — which would be a remarkable 13 games worse than Chicago’s 41-121 record.

It’s not like the Rockies haven’t earned that win-loss record: They have been outscored by 128 runs, the second-worst run differential through 40 games since 1900, with only the 2023 Oakland Athletics worse at minus-144. Those A’s were 9-31 through 40 games and 12-50 through 62 games — a 31-win pace — but they at least managed to play a little better the rest of the way and finished 50-112.

So, maybe there’s hope for the Rockies.

Indeed, that’s what made the White Sox so amazing last year — it took a lot of consistently awful baseball to lose 121 games. They were 12-28 through 40 games and 14-30 through 44 games before the losing really kicked in:

  • May 17 to June 6: 1-18

  • July 10 to Aug. 5: 0-21

  • Aug. 17 to Sept.13: 3-22

To the White Sox’s credit, they did manage to win five of the final six games, so while they have the most losses since 1900, their .253 winning percentage is not the worst, with the 1916 A’s (.235), 1935 Braves (.248), 1962 Mets (.250) and 1904 Senators (.252) all worse.

But the Rockies are playing from ahead with such a historically bad start. They have a chance at setting a new single season loss record. And here are the three reasons they might catch the White Sox:

1. The starting pitching is terrible

The Rockies have a 7.09 ERA through 40 games, which is the worst by a National League team since … the 2004 Rockies had a 7.33 ERA. Only two other teams, the Baltimore Orioles and Miami Marlins, have a rotation ERA higher than 4.62 this season. On the other hand, the 2024 White Sox managed to rank 25th in the majors in rotation ERA. They had two excellent starters in Garrett Crochet (6-12, 3.58 ERA, 4.1 WAR) and Erick Fedde (7-4, 3.11 ERA, 4.6 WAR), at least until Fedde was dealt at the trade deadline.

The Rockies, meanwhile, are still relying on Kyle Freeland, German Marquez and Antonio Senzatela — the same trio featured in the rotation when the Rockies made the playoffs in 2017 and 2018. They were worth a combined 13.2 WAR in 2018, but that was seven years ago, and the Rockies’ loyalty in contract extensions to all three hasn’t paid off. Freeland signed a five-year, $64 million extension in 2022 but has a 5.01 ERA and just 3.4 WAR since then. Marquez signed a two-year, $20 million extension coming off Tommy John surgery in 2023, but he has an 8.27 ERA this season. Senzatela has won four games since signing a $50.5 million deal in 2022.

In 2025, they’re a combined 2-17 with a 6.79 ERA while allowing a .349 average. Chase Dollander was the team’s top prospect entering the season but has 6.88 ERA through seven career starts and poor Bradley Blalock was left in to allow 12 runs on Saturday. And it’s not just that they’re pitching at Coors Field, either. Certainly, injuries have played a role with Marquez and Senzatela, but Freeland has been mostly healthy … and has a 4.51 ERA on the road since 2022.

In other words, while the White Sox’s rotation at least kept them in games at times, the Rockies are often out of it before they can get to their bullpen.

2. The offense might be worse

The White Sox hit .221/.278/.340 while scoring just 507 runs in 2024 — a remarkable 97 fewer than the next lowest team. The Rockies are hitting .219/.286/.360 through their first 40 games and are on pace for 539 runs. They have marginally better raw stats, but that doesn’t factor in Coors Field. They’re hitting .189 in 20 road games.

The 2024 White Sox were a historically bad offense. The only player with regular playing time to finish with an above-average OPS+ was Tommy Pham, who posted a 103 OPS+ in 297 plate appearances. Their top three players in plate appearances were Andrew Vaughn (98 OPS+), Andrew Benintendi (94) and Gavin Sheets (89). The down-roster players were even worse than that with the likes of Miguel Vargas (.104 average in 135 at-bats), Martin Maldonado (.119 average in 135 at-bats) and Dominic Fletcher (.206 average, one home run in 223 at-bats).

The Rockies do have two players with an above-average OPS+ in catcher/DH Hunter Goodman (127) and outfielder Jordan Beck (131). While I’m skeptical whether either player can keep that going, they do have other hitters who might improve, including Ezequiel Tovar, Brenton Doyle and Michael Toglia, who each ran an OPS+ above 100 last season (although, just barely).

Chicago finished with a wRC+ (weighted runs created plus) of 75. That figure adjusts for home park and era, and it is tied for 13th worst since 1947 and ranks third worst since 2000. Meanwhile, Colorado currently has a wRC+ of 66. That would be the worst since 1947 — worse than the 1963 Mets, who hit .219/.285/.315 on their way to a wRC+ of 69.

Still, the Rockies had the second-worst wRC+ last season ahead of only the White Sox — and brought back almost entirely the same group of players. Like the White Sox, the Rockies also aren’t particularly young. The average age of Chicago in 2024, adjusted for playing time, was 27.8, right at the MLB average of 27.9; Colorado is at 28.0 years old, just a notch below the MLB average of 28.2.

Is there help on the way? Infield prospect Adael Amador is up in the majors now and hitting .173 through his first 20 games. Former first-round pick Zac Veen was up for a spell and hit .118 in 34 at-bats. Outfielder Yanquiel Fernandez is one of the team’s top prospects and is hitting .208 in Triple-A. And the rest of their hitting prospects are further away. They will get a boost when Tovar returns from the injured list, but any improvement is going to have come from players already on the roster.

3. They have a tougher schedule

While the AL Central saw three teams make the playoffs and four teams finish above .500 in 2024 — beating up on the White Sox helped in that regard — the 2025 NL West looks like a much tougher division. Some numbers:

  • In 2024, the four other AL Central teams were 226-213 outside the division (.522).

  • So far in 2025, the four other NL West teams are 80-58 outside the division (.579).

The catch here is the Rockies have played only 13 games so far within their division — and have gone 2-11. They still have 39 of their 52 division games left to play. It doesn’t help that with the Rockies playing their worst baseball right now, they’re in the midst of a difficult stretch: Their only series between now and June 12 against teams with losing records are the current series against Texas (the Rangers entered the series 20-21) and one against the Marlins June 2-4.

So, can the Rockies lose 122 games?

They weren’t forecasted to be this bad. In fact, FanGraphs projects them playing close to .400 ball the rest of the way and finishing 55-107.

The biggest difference between the 2025 Rockies and the 2024 White Sox is the bullpen. Chicago had a bad bullpen that went 15-49 with a 4.73 ERA and was particularly bad in close games, finishing with minus-11.22 win probability added, the worst total for any bullpen since 2000.

Colorado ranks 19th in bullpen ERA at 4.07, and its high-leverage relievers have been solid, with the Rockies also ranking 19th in the majors with a bullpen WPA of 0.57 — though they’re 0-3 in extra-inning games (the White Sox went 4-10 in extra-inning games). Jake Bird and Seth Halvorsen have been effective while Zach Agnos has a couple saves and only one earned run allowed in 10 ⅓ innings, although he has struck out only four batters. If the Rockies can hold the leads they do get, they should be able to avoid the fate of the White Sox.

They’ll have to get those leads to begin with, though. Eleven of the Rockies’ 34 losses are considered “blowout” losses — five or more runs. That’s around 32%. The 2024 White Sox had a 31% blowout loss rate. The 1962 Mets were also at 31%. That tells us that the Rockies have a chance to chase down last year’s historic White Sox club.

It’s an astonishingly bad start to a season. But here’s maybe the most astonishing number of all: The Rockies drew 38,423 fans for that 21-run loss on Saturday.

Give the Rockies’ marketing people a raise.

Continue Reading

Sports

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, ‘Shoeless’ Joe Jackson

Published

on

By

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson

Pete Rose, Joe Jackson, seven other members of the 1919 Chicago “Black Sox”, six other former players, one coach and one former owner are now eligible to be voted on for the Hall of Fame after commissioner Rob Manfred removed them from Major League Baseball’s permanently ineligible list.

Hall of Fame chairwoman Jane Forbes Clark said in a statement: “The National Baseball Hall of Fame has always maintained that anyone removed from Baseball’s permanently ineligible list will become eligible for Hall of Fame consideration. Major League Baseball’s decision to remove deceased individuals from the permanently ineligible list will allow for the Hall of Fame candidacy of such individuals to now be considered.”

Due to Hall of Fame voting procedures, Rose and Jackson won’t be eligible to be voted on until the Classic Era Baseball committee, which votes on individuals who made their biggest impact prior to 1980, meets in December of 2027.

Let’s dig into what all this means.


Why were these players banned?

All individuals on the banned list who were reinstated had been permanently ineligible due to accusations related to gambling related to baseball — either throwing games, accepting bribes, or like Rose, betting on baseball games.

Most of the banned players, including Jackson and his seven Chicago White Sox teammates who threw the 1919 World Series, played in the 1910s, when gambling in baseball was widespread. As historian Bill James once wrote, “Few simplifications of memory are as bizarre as the notion that the Black Sox scandal hit baseball out of the blue. … In fact, of course, the Black Sox scandal was merely the largest wart of a disease that had infested baseball at least a dozen years earlier and had grown, unchecked, to ravage the features of a generation.”

The most famous player, of course, was Jackson, one of baseball’s biggest stars alongside Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker in the 1910s. While many have tried to exonerate Jackson through the years, pointing out that he hit .375 in the 1919 World Series, baseball historians agree that Jackson was a willing participant in throwing the World Series and accepted money from the gambling ring that paid off the White Sox players.

While the White Sox players were acquitted in a criminal trial in 1921, commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis banned the eight players in a statement that began with the words “Regardless of the verdict of juries …”

If there was an innocent member in the group, it was third baseman Buck Weaver, not Jackson. Weaver had participated in meetings where the fixing of the World Series was discussed, and Landis banned him for life for guilty knowledge.

As for Rose, he was banned in 1989 by commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti for betting on games while he was manager of the Cincinnati Reds, including those involving his own team. While Rose denied the accusations for years, he eventually confessed. He died last September at age 83.


Who else is impacted?

Phillies owner William Cox was banned in 1943 and forced to sell the team for betting on games. Cox had just purchased the team earlier that season. None of the other non-White Sox players are of major significance, although Benny Kauff was the big star of the Federal League in 1914-15, winning the batting title both seasons. The Federal League was a breakoff league that attempted to challenge the National and American leagues.


When is the soonest Rose and Jackson could go into the Hall of Fame?

The Hall of Fame voting process for players not considered by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America — such as Rose and Jackson, who never appeared on the ballot due to their banned status — includes two eras: the Contemporary Baseball Era (1980 to present) and the Classic Baseball Era (pre-1980). The voting periods are already set:

December 2025: Player ballot for the Contemporary Era.

December 2026: Contemporary Era ballot for managers, executives and umpires.

December 2027: Classic Era ballot for players, managers, executives and umpires.

Each committee has an initial screening to place eight candidates on the ballot, so Rose and Jackson will first have to make the ballot. While it’s unclear how a future screening committee will proceed, it’s possible that both will make the ballot. While comparisons to players with PED allegations aren’t exactly apples to apples — since they were never placed on the ineligible list — it’s worth noting that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Rafael Palmeiro were included on the eight-player Contemporary Era ballot in 2023.

Once the ballot is determined — a 16-person committee consisting of Hall of Fame players, longtime executives and media members or historians — convenes and votes. A candidate must receive 12 votes to get selected. In the most recent election in December, Dave Parker and Dick Allen were on the Classic Era ballot.


Which players have the best HOF cases?

Obviously, Rose would have been a slam-dunk Hall of Famer had he never bet on baseball and had he appeared on the BBWAA ballot after his career ended. The all-time MLB leader with 4,256 hits, Rose won three batting titles and was the 1973 NL MVP. And while he’s overrated in a sense — his 79.6 career WAR is more in line with the likes of Jeff Bagwell, Brooks Robinson and Robin Yount than all-time elite superstars — and hung on well past his prime to break Ty Cobb’s hits record, his popularity and fame would have made him an inner-circle Hall of Famer.

Whether he’ll get support now is complicated. Bonds and Clemens both received fewer than four votes in 2023. The committee usually consists of eight former players, and they may not support Rose given the one hard and fast rule that every player knows: You can’t bet on the game.

Jackson, meanwhile, was a star of the deadball era, hitting .408 in 1911 and .356 in his career, an average that ranks fourth all time behind only Cobb, Negro Leagues star Oscar Charleston and Rogers Hornsby. He finished with 62.2 WAR and 1,772 hits in a career that ended at age 32 due to the ban. Those figures would be low for a Hall of Fame selection, although the era committees did recently elect Allen and Tony Oliva, both of whom finished with fewer than 2,000 hits. And again, it is hard to say how the committee will view Jackson’s connection to gambling on the sport.

The only other reinstated player with a semblance of a chance to get on a ballot is pitcher Eddie Cicotte, who won 209 games and finished with 59.7 WAR. While his final season came at 36, the knuckleballer was still going strong, having won 29 games for the White Sox in 1919 and 21 in 1920 before Landis banned him.

For what it’s worth, the top position players in career WAR who made their mark prior to 1980 and aren’t in the Hall of Fame are Rose, Bill Dahlen (75.3), Bobby Grich (71.0), Graig Nettles (67.6), Reggie Smith (64.6), Ken Boyer (62.8), Jackson and Sal Bando (61.5).

Pitching candidates would include Luis Tiant (65.7), Tommy John (61.6) and Wes Ferrell (60.1). John was on the recent ballot and received seven votes. Others on that ballot included Steve Garvey, Boyer, Negro Leagues pitcher John Donaldson, Negro Leagues manager Vic Harris and Tiant.

Other potential pre-1980 candidates could include Thurman Munson, Bert Campaneris, Dave Concepcion and Stan Hack.

Continue Reading

Sports

Who has won the Preakness Stakes? All-time winners list

Published

on

By

Who has won the Preakness Stakes? All-time winners list

Since its inception in 1873, the Preakness Stakes has become one of the most prestigious horse races in the world. Following the Kentucky Derby and preceding the Belmont Stakes each year, the Preakness Stakes take place on the third Saturday in May at Pimlico Race Course in Baltimore, Maryland.

Check out the all-time winning horses and jockeys in Preakness Stakes history.

  • 2024: Seize The Grey, Jaime Torres

  • 2023: National Treasure, John Velazquez

  • 2022: Early Voting, Jose Ortiz

  • 2021: Rombauer, Flavien Prat

  • 2020: Swiss Skydiver, Robby Albarado

  • 2019: War of Will, Tyler Gaffalione

  • 2018: Justify, Mike Smith

  • 2017: Cloud Computing, Javier Castellano

  • 2016: Exaggerator, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2015: American Pharoah, Victor Espinoza

  • 2014: California Chrome, Victor Espinoza

  • 2013: Oxbow, Gary Stevens

  • 2012: I’ll Have Another, Mario Gutierrez

  • 2011: Shackleford, Jesus Castenon

  • 2010: Lookin at Lucky, Martin Garcia

  • 2009: Rachel Alexandra, Calvin Borel

  • 2008: Big Brown, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2007: Curlin, Robby Albarado

  • 2006: Bernadini, Tom Albertrani

  • 2005: Afleet Alex, Jeremy Rose

  • 2004: Smarty Jones, Stewart Elliott

  • 2003: Funny Cide, José Santos

  • 2002: War Emblem, Victor Espinoza

  • 2001: Point Given, Gary Stevens

  • 2000: Red Bullet, Jerry Bailey

  • 1999: Charismatic, Chris Antley

  • 1998: Real Quiet, Kent Desormeaux

  • 1997: Silver Charm, Gary Stevens

  • 1996: Louis Quatorze, Pat Day

  • 1995: Timber Country, Pat Day

  • 1994: Tabasco Cat, Pat Day

  • 1993: Prairie Bayou, Matt Smith

  • 1992: Pine Bluff, Chris McCarron

  • 1991: Hansel, Jerry Bailey

  • 1990: Summer Squall, Pat Day

  • 1989: Sunday Silence, Pat Valenzuela

  • 1988: Risen Star, Eddie Delahoussaye

  • 1987: Alysheba, Chris McCarron

  • 1986: Snow Chief, Alex Solis

  • 1985: Tank’s Prospect, Pat Day

  • 1984: Gate Dancer, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1983: Deputed Testamony, Donald Miller Jr.

  • 1982: Aloma’s Ruler, Jack Kaenel

  • 1981: Pleasant Colony, Jorge Velásquez

  • 1980: Codex, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1979: Spectacular Bid, Ron Franklin

  • 1978: Affirmed, Steve Cauthen

  • 1977: Seattle Slew, Jean Cruguet

  • 1976: Elocutionist, John Lively

  • 1975: Master Derby, Darrell McHargue

  • 1974: Little Current, Miguel Rivera

  • 1973: Secretariat, Ron Turcotte

  • 1972: Bee Bee Bee, Eldon Nelson

  • 1971: Canonero II, Gustavo Avila

  • 1970: Personality, Eddie Belmonte

  • 1969: Majestic Prince, Bill Hartack

  • 1968: Forward Pass, Ismael Valenzuela

  • 1967: Damascus, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1966: Kauai King, Don Brumfield

  • 1965: Tom Rolfe, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1964: Northern Dancer, Bill Hartack

  • 1963: Candy Spots, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1962: Greek Money, John Rotz

  • 1961: Carry Back, John Sellers

  • 1960: Bally Ache, Bob Ussery

  • 1959: Royal Orbit, William Harmatz

  • 1958: Tim Tam, Ismael Valenzuela

  • 1957: Bold Ruler, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1956: Fabius, Bill Hartack

  • 1955: Nashua, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1954: Hasty Road, John Adams

  • 1953: Native Dancer, Eric Guerin

  • 1952: Blue Man, Conn McCreary

  • 1951: Bold, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1950: Hill Prince, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1949: Capot, Ted Atkinson

  • 1948: Citation, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1947: Faultless, Doug Dodson

  • 1946: Assault, Warren Mehrtens

  • 1945: Polynesian, W.D. Wright

  • 1944: Pensive, Conn McCreary

  • 1943: Count Fleet, Johnny Longden

  • 1942: Alsab, Basil James

  • 1941: Whirlaway, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1940: Bimelech, F.A. Smith

  • 1939: Challedon, George Seabo

  • 1938: Dauber, Maurice Peters

  • 1937: War Admiral, Charley Kurtsinger

  • 1936: Bold Venture, George Woolf

  • 1935: Omaha, Willie Saunders

  • 1934: High Quest, Robert Jones

  • 1933: Head Play, Charley Kurtsinger

  • 1932: Burgoo King, Eugene James

  • 1931: Mate, George Ellis

  • 1930: Gallant Fox, Earl Sande

  • 1929: Dr. Freeland, Louis Schaefer

  • 1928: Victorian, Sonny Workman

  • 1927: Bostonian, Whitey Abel

  • 1926: Display, John Maiben

  • 1925: Coventry, Clarence Kummer

  • 1924: Nellie Morse, John Merimee

  • 1923: Vigil, Benny Marinelli

  • 1922: Pillory, L. Morris

  • 1921: Broomspun, Frank Coltiletti

  • 1920: Man o’ War, Clarence Kummer

  • 1919: Sir Barton, Johnny Loftus

  • 1918: Jack Hare Jr., Charles Peak; War Cloud, Johnny Loftus

  • 1917: Kalitan, E. Haynes

  • 1916: Damrosch, Linus McAtee

  • 1915: Rhine Maiden, Douglas Hoffman

  • 1914: Holiday, Andy Shuttinger

  • 1913: Buskin, James Butwell

  • 1912: Colonel Holloway, Clarence Turner

  • 1911: Watervale, Eddie Dugan

  • 1910: Layminster, Roy Estep

  • 1909: Effendi, Willie Doyle

  • 1908: Royal Tourist, Eddie Dugan

  • 1907: Don Enrique, G. Mountain

  • 1906: Whimsical, Walter Miller

  • 1905: Cairngorm, W. Davis

  • 1904: Bryn Mawr, E. Hildebrand

  • 1903: Flocarline, W. Gannon

  • 1902: Old England, L. Jackson

  • 1901: The Parader, F. Landry

  • 1900: Hindus, H. Spencer

  • 1899: Half time, R. Clawson

  • 1898: Sly Fox, Willie Simms

  • 1897: Paul Kauvar, T. Thorpe

  • 1896: Margrave, Henry Griffin

  • 1895: Belmar, Fred Taral

  • 1894: Assignee, Fred Taral

  • 1893: No race

  • 1892: No race

  • 1891: No race

  • 1890: Montague, W. Martin

  • 1889: Buddhist, George B. Anderson

  • 1888: Refund, Fred Littlefield

  • 1887: Dunboyne, William Donohue

  • 1886: The Bard, S. Fisher

  • 1885: Tecumseh, Jim McLaughlin

  • 1884: Knight of Ellerslie, S. Fisher

  • 1883: Jacobus, George Barbee

  • 1882: Vanguard, T. Costello

  • 1881: Saunterer, T. Costello

  • 1880: Grenada, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1879: Harold, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1878: Duke of Magenta, C. Holloway

  • 1877: Cloverbrook, C. Holloway

  • 1876: Shirley, George Barbee

  • 1875: Tom Ochiltree, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1874: Culpepper, William Donohue

  • 1873: Survivor, George Barbee

  • Continue Reading

    Sports

    Rose, ‘Shoeless’ Joe HOF-eligible as MLB lifts ban

    Published

    on

    By

    Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe HOF-eligible as MLB lifts ban

    In a historic, sweeping decision, baseball commissioner Rob Manfred on Tuesday removed Pete Rose, “Shoeless” Joe Jackson and other deceased players from Major League Baseball’s permanently ineligible list.

    The all-time hit king and Jackson — both longtime baseball pariahs stained by gambling, seen by MLB as the game’s mortal sin — are now eligible for election into the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York.

    Manfred ruled that MLB’s punishment of banned individuals ends upon their deaths.

    “Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game,” Manfred wrote in a letter to attorney Jeffrey M. Lenkov, who petitioned for Rose’s removal from the list Jan. 8. “Moreover, it is hard to conceive of a penalty that has more deterrent effect than one that lasts a lifetime with no reprieve.

    “Therefore, I have concluded that permanent ineligibility ends upon the passing of the disciplined individual, and Mr. Rose will be removed from the permanently ineligible list.”

    Manfred’s decision ends the ban that Rose accepted from then-Commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti in August 1989, following an MLB investigation that determined the 17-time All-Star had bet on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds.

    Jackson and seven other Chicago White Sox were banned from playing professional baseball in 1921 by MLB’s first commissioner, Kenesaw Mountain Landis, for fixing the 1919 World Series.

    Based on current rules for players who last played more than 15 years ago, it appears the earliest Rose and Jackson could be enshrined is summer 2028 if they are elected.

    Manfred’s ruling removes a total of 16 deceased players and one deceased owner from MLB’s banned list, a group that includes Jackson’s teammates, ace pitcher Eddie Cicotte and third baseman George “Buck” Weaver. The so-called “Black Sox Scandal” is one of the darkest chapters in baseball history, the subject of books and the 1988 film, “Eight Men Out.”

    In 1991, shortly before Rose’s first year of Hall of Fame eligibility, the Hall’s board decided any player on MLB’s permanently ineligible list would also be ineligible for election. It became known as “the Pete Rose rule.”

    Rose believed his banishment would be lifted after a year or two, but it became a lifetime sentence. For “Shoeless” Joe Jackson, who died in 1951, the ban became an eternal sentence, until Tuesday.

    Jackson was considered for decades by voters, but Pete Rose’s name has never appeared on a Hall of Fame ballot. He died in September at age 83.

    Nearly a decade ago, Lenkov began a campaign to get Rose reinstated. On Dec. 17, Pete Rose’s eldest daughter, Fawn, and Lenkov appealed to Manfred and MLB chief communications officer Pat Courtney during an hourlong meeting at MLB’s midtown Manhattan headquarters.

    “This has been a long journey,” Lenkov said. “On behalf of the family, they are very proud and pleased and know that their father would have been overjoyed at this decision today.”

    Jane Forbes Clark, chairman of the board of the Hall of Fame, said Manfred’s decision will allow Rose, Jackson and others to be considered by the Historical Overview Committee, which will “develop the ballot of eight names for the Classic Baseball Era Committee … to vote on when it meets next in December 2027.”

    Lenkov said he and Rose’s family intend to petition the Hall of Fame for induction as soon as possible.

    “My next step is to respectfully confer with the Hall and discuss … Pete’s induction into the Hall of Fame,” Lenkov said. The attorney said he and Rose’s family will attend Pete Rose Night on Wednesday at Cincinnati’s Great American Ball Park.

    “Reds Nation will not only be able to celebrate Pete’s legacy, but now optimistically be able to look forward to the possibility that Pete will join other baseball immortals,” Lenkov said. “Pete Rose would have for sure been overjoyed at the outpouring of support from all.”

    Rose and Jackson’s candidacies presumably will be decided by the Hall’s 16-member Classic Baseball Era Committee, which considers players whose careers ended more than 15 years ago. The committee isn’t scheduled to meet again until December 2027. Rose and Jackson would need 12 of 16 votes to win induction.

    Jackson had a career batting average of .356, the fourth highest in MLB history. After his death, Jackson’s fans, including state legislators in South Carolina, launched numerous public and petition-writing campaigns arguing that Jackson deserved a plaque in the Hall of Fame. Despite accepting $5,000 in gamblers’ cash to throw the 1919 World Series, Jackson batted .375, didn’t make an error and hit the series’ only home run.

    Across the decades and among millions of baseball fans, especially in Cincinnati where Rose was born and played most of his career, the clamor over the pugnacious, stubborn legend’s banishment from baseball and the Hall became louder, angrier and increasingly impatient.

    Few players in baseball history had more remarkable careers than Pete Rose. He was an exuberant competitor who played the game with sharp-elbowed abandon and relentless hustle. Rose, whose lifetime batting average was .303, is Major League Baseball’s career leader in hits (4,256), games played (3,562), at-bats (14,053), singles (3,215) and outs (10,328). He won the World Series three times — twice with the Reds and once with the Philadelphia Phillies.

    Rose often said — and stat experts agree — that he won more regular-season games (1,972) than any major league baseball player or professional athlete in history. He also won three batting titles, two Gold Glove Awards, the Most Valuable Player Award and the Rookie of the Year Award.

    In 2015, shortly after Manfred succeeded Bud Selig as commissioner, Rose applied for reinstatement with MLB. Manfred met with Rose, who first told the commissioner he had stopped gambling but then admitted he still wagered legally on sports, including baseball, in his adopted hometown of Las Vegas.

    Manfred rejected Rose’s bid for reinstatement after concluding he had failed to “reconfigure his life,” a requirement for reinstatement set by Giamatti. Allowing Rose back into baseball was an “unacceptable risk of a future violation … and thus to the integrity of our sport,” Manfred declared on Dec. 14, 2015.

    Rose often complained that the ban prevented him from working with young hitters in minor league ballparks. On Feb. 5, 2020, Rose’s representatives filed another reinstatement petition, arguing that the commissioner’s decision to level no punishment against the World Series champion Houston Astros players for electronic sign stealing was unfair to Rose. “There cannot be one set of rules for Mr. Rose,” the 20-page petition argued, “and another for everyone else.”

    But Manfred, who did not meet again with Rose, chose not to rule on that second appeal prior to Rose’s death on Sept. 30, 2024.

    Earlier this year, President Donald Trump announced he planned to posthumously pardon Rose. “Over the next few weeks I will be signing a complete PARDON of Pete Rose, who shouldn’t have been gambling on baseball, but only bet on HIS TEAM WINNING,” Trump wrote on social media Feb. 28.

    Trump didn’t say what the pardon would cover. Rose served five months in federal prison for submitting falsified tax returns in 1990.

    During an Oval Office meeting on April 16, Trump and Manfred discussed Rose’s posthumous petition for reinstatement, among other topics. Manfred later declined to discuss details of their conversation.

    On Tuesday, Manfred called Trump, who was on a state trip in Saudi Arabia, and Forbes Clark about his ruling, multiple sources told ESPN.

    John Dowd, the former Justice Department attorney who conducted MLB’s Rose investigation, told ESPN in 2020 that he believes Jackson belongs in the Hall but said he would disagree with Manfred on Rose. “There’s no difference with him being dead — it’s about behavior, conduct and reputation,” Dowd said.

    Dowd’s inquiry found Rose had wagered on 52 Reds games and hundreds of other baseball games in 1987 while serving as Cincinnati’s manager. Giamatti then banned Rose from baseball permanently on Aug. 23, 1989.

    When asked at a news conference whether Rose’s punishment should keep him out of the Hall of Fame, Giamatti said he’d leave that decision to the baseball writers who vote every year on players eligible for induction.

    “This episode has been about, in many ways … taking responsibility and taking responsibility for one’s acts,” said Giamatti, a Renaissance scholar and former Yale president. “I know I need not point out to the baseball writers of America that it is their responsibility to decide who goes into the Hall of Fame. It is not mine.”

    In his letter Tuesday, Manfred referred to the Giamatti quote and said he agrees “it is not part of my authority or responsibility to express any view concerning Mr. Rose’s … possible election to the Hall of Fame. I agree with Commissioner Giamatti that responsibility for that decision lies with the Hall of Fame.”

    Giamatti had said Rose’s only path back into the game was to “reconfigure his life,” a not-so-subtle hint that if Rose continued to bet on baseball, he had no shot to return.

    Only eight days after announcing the ban, Giamatti died of a heart attack at 51. His deputy and successor, Fay Vincent, adamantly opposed Rose’s reinstatement — both during his tenure as commissioner (until 1992) and until his death three months ago at age 86.

    Rose was his own worst enemy. For nearly 15 years, he denied having placed a single bet on baseball. In the early 2000s, then-commissioner Bud Selig offered Rose a chance, but with conditions, including an admission that he bet on baseball and a requirement that he stop gambling and making casino appearances.

    Rose declined.

    In January 2004, he admitted in his book, “My Prison Without Bars,” that he had gambled on baseball as the Reds manager. But he insisted he only bet on his team to win. In 2015, ESPN reported that a notebook seized from a Rose associate showed Rose had also wagered on baseball while still a player, something he would not acknowledge.

    Rose’s illegal gambling and prison time aren’t the only stains on a legacy that might be weighed by Hall of Fame voters, a group instructed to consider integrity, sportsmanship and character.

    In 2017, a woman’s sworn statement accused Rose of statutory rape; she said they began having sex when she was 14 or 15 and Rose was in his 30s. Rose said he thought she was 16 — the age of consent in Ohio at the time. Two days later, the Philadelphia Phillies announced the cancellation of Rose’s Wall of Fame induction.

    In January 2020, ESPN reported that for all practical purposes, Manfred viewed baseball’s banned list as punishing players during their lifetime but ending upon their death. However, Hall of Fame representatives have said that a player who dies while still on the banned list remains ineligible for consideration. With his 2020 reinstatement application sitting on Manfred’s desk, Rose was granted permission by MLB to be honored at a celebration of the 1980 Philadelphia Phillies World Series championship on Aug. 7, 2022.

    In the dugout before fans gave Rose a lengthy standing ovation, a newspaper reporter asked him about the 2017 allegation and whether his involvement in that day’s celebration sent a negative message to women.

    “No, I’m not here to talk about that,” Rose replied to her. “Sorry about that. It was 55 years ago, babe.”

    The public backlash to Rose’s remarks was swift and severe. MLB sources said his comments derailed his campaign to get off the ineligible list.

    In the past several years, some fans have become more insistent that Rose should be forgiven by MLB and inducted into the Hall of Fame. One reason is America’s love affair with sports betting. As MLB has embraced legalized gambling through sponsorships and partnerships — like all U.S. professional sports — some fans and commentators complained that Rose deserves a second chance, echoing an argument Rose often made.

    “I thought we lived in a country where you’re given a second chance, but not as far as gambling’s concerned,” Rose said in a 2020 interview with ESPN. He estimated the ban cost him at least $80 million in earnings as an MLB manager.

    Rose, who signed baseballs and jerseys for years in memorabilia stores inside Las Vegas casinos and in Cooperstown on Hall of Fame induction weekends, gambled legally on sports nearly every day for the rest of his life.

    Asked how much money his gambling had cost him, Rose said he didn’t know, though he acknowledged he lost far more than he won. “No one wins at gambling,” said Rose.

    “I’m the one that’s lost 30 years,” he told ESPN in the 2020 documentary “Backstory: Banned for Life*.” “Just to take baseball out of my heart penalized me more than you could imagine. You understand what I’m saying? … I don’t think there’s ever been a player, I could be wrong, I don’t think there’s ever been a player that loved the game like I did. You could tell I loved the game, the way I played the game.

    “So then you take that away from somebody. I’m able to hide it on the outside, but it’s ate me up inside, for all those years. Hell, you’d think I was Al Capone. I’m Pete Rose — played more games than anybody, batted more than anybody … OK? Got more hits than anybody. I am the biggest winner in the history of sports.”

    Last September, in his last interview 10 days before his death, Rose told sportscaster John Condit: “I’ve come to the conclusion — I hope I’m wrong — that I’ll make the Hall of Fame after I die. Which I totally disagree with, because the Hall of Fame is for two reasons: your fans and your family. … And it’s for your family if you’re here. It’s for your fans if you’re here. Not if you’re 10 feet under. You understand what I’m saying?”

    “What good is it going to do me or my fans if they put me in the Hall of Fame a couple years after I pass away?” Rose told Condit. “What’s the point? What’s the point? Because they’ll make money over it?”

    ESPN’s William Weinbaum and John Mastroberardino contributed to this report.

    Continue Reading

    Trending