Connect with us

Published

on

Philadelphia Phillies president Dave Dombrowski on Friday said “it’s clear” that first baseman Rhys Hoskins has a torn left ACL and is expected to be out for the season, but that the slugger will seek a second opinion.

“He will need to have surgery,” Dombrowski told reporters. “I would be shocked if he doesn’t. And that will put him out … for the season. That’s what we’re planning.”

Dombrowski estimated a rehabilitation period of more than seven months.

Hoskins, who hit 30 home runs and had 79 RBIs last season, suffered the injury while fielding a grounder in a spring training game Thursday.

He was backing up to play a chopper on Thursday when the ball popped out of his glove. Soon after, he fell to the ground and clutched his left knee. Teammates gathered around him before he was taken off the field.

Dombrowski on Friday said that Darick Hall would be called upon to fill the void at first base as a result of Hoskins’ injury.

“I do feel comfortable to say that we like Darick Hall a lot,” Dombrowski said. “We feel that he’ll get the majority of the playing time at first base. … We think he’s ready to step up and be a big league player.”

The 27-year-old Hall, who played in 41 major league games last season, has 5 home runs and 11 RBIs in spring training to go along with a .319 batting average entering Friday’s games. He hit .250 with 9 home runs and 16 RBIs in 41 games for the Phillies last season.

“He’s a good solid first baseman,” Dombrowski said. “He’s a big guy. He catches the ball. He has a good arm. He’s always had power. We felt comfortable even last year that he could play at the big league level.”

Hoskins’ injury was another blow for the Phillies, who will be without top pitching prospect Andrew Painter for another few weeks because of a sprained ligament in his right elbow. Slugger Bryce Harper also isn’t expected back until around the All-Star break after undergoing Tommy John surgery in November.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Sports

College football FPI release: Team projections for the 2025 season

Published

on

By

College football FPI release: Team projections for the 2025 season

There’s no going back now. The College Football Playoff’s expanded 12-team format made its debut last season, reshaping the postseason as we knew it and showing just how brutal the path to a national championship can be. Add in a flurry of conference realignments (with the grueling travel schedules they created), the ever-increasing influence of the transfer portal and what might be the dawn of an entirely new financial model underpinning the sport, and college football could be changing faster — and more dramatically — than at any point in its history.

As part of our efforts to keep track of these seismic changes, we are relaunching our Football Power Index (FPI) ratings and projections for the 2025 season this week. Just to refresh our memories, the FPI is a predictive rating system that estimates each FBS team’s strength (in points per game relative to the national average) on offense, defense and special teams, making adjustments for starters lost, recruiting talent and other personnel changes. Those numbers are then plugged into the schedule, and everything is simulated 20,000 times to track each team’s odds of winning its conference, making the playoff and advancing through to the national title.

The preseason forecast features plenty of familiar teams at the top, but also plenty of candidates to crash the playoff party.

Let’s begin our tour of the data by looking at the teams most likely to win the 2025 championship.

The top of the list is dominated by SEC teams — 11 of the top 19 hail from the conference, including the two most likely champions in Texas and Georgia (and three of the top four, if you include Alabama).

A year after Ohio State and the Big Ten won the first 12-team playoff title — with only three SEC squads making the field — the FPI model expects a nation-high 4.6 playoff teams to hail from the SEC (nearly twice as many from any other) with a 61% chance that the conference produces the eventual champion.

MORE: Which CFB teams are undervalued, overrated in FPI?


SEC and Big Ten remain on top

If not an SEC team, then the championship will probably go to another familiar power conference program, with a trio of Big Ten teams — Ohio State, Penn State and Oregon — checking in next on the odds list, a year after each went to the CFP quarterfinals (or beyond). A high share of returning production could also have coach Dabo Swinney and Clemson representing the ACC in the playoff again — perhaps making it past the first round this time.

And if we’re looking for somewhat refreshed entries after down seasons, Auburn, Michigan and Oklahoma are all among the 17 most likely champions after each finished outside the top 25 in the FPI last season. All three made major moves in the offseason to spark their surges: Auburn brought in a top-10 transfer class headlined by former Sooners quarterback Jackson Arnold; Michigan brought in a big recruiting class and a few top transfers; and Oklahoma revamped its offensive core, with prized quarterback John Mateer at the helm — plus its returning production otherwise — helping vault the Sooners back into the national picture.


Playoff odds for the Group of 5

The Group of 5 is also an important part of the playoff puzzle, in no small part because of its guaranteed spot in the bracket (reserved for the fifth-highest ranked conference champion). Here are the non-power conference teams with the highest chance to make the playoff in the FPI model.

Even after losing record-setting running back Ashton Jeanty, the Broncos remain the most likely Group of 5 team to make the playoff — though Tulane (despite losing quarterback Darian Mensah and running back Makhi Hughes) and UNLV (coming off an 11-win season, but quarterback Hajj-Malik Williams has moved on) aren’t far behind. With several contenders bunched together and no clear juggernaut, the G5 race for a playoff spot is something to keep a close eye on — including its ripple effects on the rest of the bracket.


Next, let’s look at the projected top units on each side of the ball in 2025, according to the FPI.

If we want another illustration of how dominant the best teams are, the top four projected offensive teams by the FPI — Texas, Georgia, Alabama and Ohio State — are also the top four projected defensive teams, with Alabama and Texas rising 10 spots apiece from 2024 on the offensive side.

That kind of balance on both sides of the ball is what separates this year’s top contenders from the pack, especially in a postseason format that requires versatility over three or four high-stakes playoff games. The rest of the top 20 on both sides also contain some of the biggest offseason movers in those unit rankings — such as Oregon (up 11 spots on defense), Florida (up 27 spots on offense), Clemson (up 14 spots on defense), South Carolina (up 24 spots on offense) and Texas A&M and Auburn (who are up double-digit spots on both sides).


Biggest risers and fallers

Speaking of those offseason changes, let’s look at the programs that have gained (or lost) the most ground overall in the FPI entering 2025.

FAU is projected to improve by at least 25 ranking slots on offense, defense and special teams after adding quite a few transfers — including ex-Western Kentucky quarterback Caden Veltkamp — ahead of coach Zach Kittley’s first season in Boca Raton. Among power-conference teams, Florida State is looking to bounce back from last season’s nightmare with the help of a great offseason in the portal, headlined by the addition of former USC wide receiver Duce Robinson, while ACC rival, Stanford, has the nation’s 13th-highest share of production returning for 2025.

At the other end, Army has lost roughly half of its production from last season’s impressive 12-2 team, including top rusher Kanye Udoh and sack leader Elo Modozie; the FPI predicts regression will hit the Knights hard.

And in terms of power teams that had competitive FPI ratings a year ago, Louisville is projected to drop from No. 12 to 41 after bidding farewell to quarterback Tyler Shough, wide receiver Ja’Corey Brooks, starting offensive tackle Monroe Mills, sack leader Ashton Gillotte and each of its three leading defensive backs in interceptions. Similarly, Colorado sustained heavy offseason losses, and regression might also come for Indiana and Iowa State after a pair of outstanding 11-win seasons.

(Where did the top transfer portal teams land on the most improved list? In addition to FSU and Auburn, Nebraska is up 13 spots to No. 25, Texas Tech rose nine spots to No. 35 and Texas A&M was up seven slots to No. 8. But keep an eye on Ole Miss, which was among the more active portal teams but fell eight spots in the FPI rankings anyway without quarterback Jaxson Dart.)


Best matchups in 2025?

Finally, let’s close by circling the biggest matchups of the 2025 season on our college football calendars. According to the FPI’s projected ratings for both teams, these are the most anticipated games of the season — matchups in which each squad ranks highly, helping to create a high combined matchup quality on ESPN Analytics’ 0-100 scale:

We’ll get one of the best games of the season practically right away, with Week 1 providing Texas-Ohio State — a battle of top-four preseason FPI teams — on Saturday, Aug. 30. That same day, we’ll also get LSU-Clemson, and the next day, we’ll watch Notre Dame travel to Miami to face the Hurricanes in a top-10 FPI matchup.

That sets the tone for a regular season that will feature at least one matchup rated 90 or higher in the FPI matchup quality metric almost every week. But the best week by that metric — with three games rated 90 or higher and five rated 85 or higher — is Week 14, with Ohio State-Michigan, Auburn-Alabama and all of the other usual late-season rivalry games. In addition, three other weeks — Week 5, Week 7 and Week 10 — will carry five games each with a matchup rating of 85 or higher.

That’s a loaded calendar, and it reflects how the meaning of each college football Saturday is changing. Under the old system, one bad week could doom a contender. Now, teams can afford a stumble … but the trade-off is that they also need to prove themselves over more games against top-tier teams.

Regular-season showdowns still matter, too — especially for seeding, byes and home-field advantage. But there’s also more room for redemption, which we saw embodied by both championship game combatant’s last season. And through it all, the FPI gives us a road map to help navigate what’s shaping up to be another wild and transformative season of college football.

Continue Reading

Sports

Who has won the Belmont Stakes? All-time winners list

Published

on

By

Who has won the Belmont Stakes? All-time winners list

Since its inception in 1867, the Belmont Stakes has become one of the most prestigious horse races in the world. The Belmont Stakes takes place five weeks after the Kentucky Derby and three weeks after the Preakness Stakes each year.

Dornoch won the 2024 Belmont Stakes. The 2025 race will take place at the Saratoga Race Course on Saturday. The traditional Belmont Park venue in Elmont, New York, is undergoing a large-scale renovation.

Check out all-time winning horses and jockeys in Belmont Stakes history below.

  • 2024: Dornoch, Luis Saez

  • 2023: Arcangelo, Javier Castellano

  • 2022: Mo Donegal, Irad Ortiz, Jr.

  • 2021: Essential Quality, Luis Saez

  • 2020: Tiz the Law, Manuel Franco

  • 2019: Sir Winston, Joel Rosario

  • 2018: Justify, Mike Smith

  • 2017: Tapwrit, Jose L. Ortiz

  • 2016: Creator, Irad Ortiz, Jr.

  • 2015: American Pharoah, Victor Espinoza

  • 2014: Tonalist, Joel Rosario

  • 2013: Palace Malice, Mike Smith

  • 2012: Union Rags, John Velazquez

  • 2011: Ruler On Ice, Jose Valdivia, Jr

  • 2010: Drosselmeyer, Mike Smith

  • 2009: Summer Bird, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2008: Da’Tara, Alan Garcia

  • 2007: Rags to Riches, John Velazquez

  • 2006: Jazil, Fernando Jara

  • 2005: Afleet Alex, Jeremy Rose

  • 2004: Birdstone, Edgar Prado

  • 2003: Empire Maker, Jerry Bailey

  • 2002: Sarava, Edgar Prado

  • 2001: Point Given, Gary Stevens

  • 2000: Commendable, Pat Day

  • 1999: Lemon Drop Kid, Jose Santos

  • 1998: Victory Gallop, Gary Stevens

  • 1997: Touch Gold, Chris McCarron

  • 1996: Editor’s Note, Rene Douglas

  • 1995: Thunder Gulch, Gary Stevens

  • 1994: Tabasco Cat, Pat Day

  • 1993: Colonial Affair, Julie Krone

  • 1992: A.P. Indy, Eddie Delahoussaye

  • 1991: Hansel, Jerry Bailey

  • 1990: Go And Go, Michael J. Kinane

  • 1989: Easy Goer, Pat Day

  • 1988: Risen Star, Eddie Delahoussaye

  • 1987: Bet Twice, Craig Perret

  • 1986: Danzig Connection, Chris McCarron

  • 1985: Creme Fraiche, Eddie Maple

  • 1984: Swale, Laffit Pincay Jr.

  • 1983: Caveat, Laffit Pincay Jr.

  • 1982: Conquistador Cielo, Laffit Pincay Jr.

  • 1981: Summing, George Martens

  • 1980: Temperence Hill, Eddie Maple

  • 1979: Coastal, Ruben Hernandez

  • 1978: Affirmed, Steve Cauthen

  • 1977: Seattle Slew, Jean Cruguet

  • 1976: Bold Forbes, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1975: Avatar, William Shoemaker

  • 1974: Little Current, Miguel Rivera

  • 1973: Secretariat, Ron Turcotte

  • 1972: Riva Ridge, Ron Turcotte

  • 1971: Pass Catcher, Walter Blum

  • 1970: High Echelon, Eddie Belmonte

  • 1969: Arts And Letters, Braulio Baeza

  • 1968: Stage Door Johnny, Heliodoro Gustines

  • 1967: Damascus, William Shoemaker

  • 1966: Amberoid, William Boland

  • 1965: Hail To All, John Sellers

  • 1964: Quadrangle, M. Ycaza

  • 1963: Chateaugay, B. Baeza

  • 1962: Jaipur, W. Shoemaker

  • 1961: Sherluck, B. Baeza

  • 1960: Celtic Ash, W. Hartack

  • 1959: Sword Dancer, W. Shoemaker

  • 1958: Cavan, P. Anderson

  • 1957: Gallant Man, W. Shoemaker

  • 1956: Needles, D. Erb

  • 1955: Nashua, E. Arcaro

  • 1954: High Gun, E. Guerin

  • 1953: Native Dancer, E. Guerin

  • 1952: One Count, E. Arcaro

  • 1951: Counterpoint, D. Gorman

  • 1950: Middleground, W. Boland

  • 1949: Capot, T. Atkinson

  • 1948: Citation, E. Arcaro

  • 1947: Phalanx, R. Donoso

  • 1946: Assault, W. Mehrtens

  • 1945: Pavot, E. Arcaro

  • 1944: Bounding Home, G. L. Smith

  • 1943: Count Fleet, J. Longden

  • 1942: Shut Out, E. Arcaro

  • 1941: Whirlaway, E. Arcaro

  • 1940: Bimelech, F.A. Smith

  • 1939: Johnstown, J. Stout

  • 1938: Pasteurized, J. Stout

  • 1937: War Admiral, C. Kurtsinger

  • 1936: Granville, J. Stout

  • 1935: Omaha, W. Saunders

  • 1934: Peace Chance, W. D. Wright

  • 1933: Hurryoff, M. Garner

  • 1932: Faireno, T. Malley

  • 1931: Twenty Grand, C. Kurtsinger

  • 1930: Gallant Fox, E. Sande

  • 1929: Blue Larkspur, M. Garner

  • 1928: Vito, C. Kummer

  • 1927: Chance Shot, E. Sande

  • 1926: Crusader, A. Johnson

  • 1925: American Flag, A. Johnson

  • 1924: Mad Play, E. Sande

  • 1923: Zev, E. Sande

  • 1922: Pillory, C.H. Miller

  • 1921: Grey Lag, E. Sande

  • 1920: Man o’ War, C. Kummer

  • 1919: Sir Barton, J. Loftus

  • 1918: Johren, F. Robinson

  • 1917: Hourless, J. Butwell

  • 1916: Friar Rock, E. Haynes

  • 1915: The Finn, G. Byrne

  • 1914: Luke McLuke, M. Buxton

  • 1913: Prince Eugene, R. Troxler

  • 1912: Race canceled

  • 1911: Race canceled

  • 1910: Sweep, J. Butwell

  • 1909: Joe Madden, E. Dugan

  • 1908: Colin, J. Notter

  • 1907: Peter Pan, G. Mountain

  • 1906: Burgomaster, L. Lyne

  • 1905: Tanya, E. Hildebrand

  • 1904: Delhi, G. Odom

  • 1903: Africander, J. Bullman

  • 1902: Masterman, J. Bullman

  • 1901: Commando, H. Spencer

  • 1900: Ildrim, N. Turner

  • 1899: Jean Bereaud, R. R. Clawson

  • 1898: Bowling Brook, P. Littlefield

  • 1897: Scottish Chieftain, J. Scherrer

  • 1896: Hastings, H. Griffin

  • 1895: Belmar, F. Taral

  • 1894: Henry of Navarre, W. Simms

  • 1893: Comanche, W. Simms

  • 1892: Patron, W. Hayward

  • 1891: Foxford, E. Garrison

  • 1890: Burlington, S. Barnes

  • 1889: Eric, W. Hayward

  • 1888: Sir Dixon, J. McLaughlin

  • 1887: Hanover, J. McLaughlin

  • 1886: Inspector B, J. McLaughlin

  • 1885: Tyrant, P. Duffy

  • 1884: Panique, J. McLaughlin

  • 1883: George Kinney, J. McLaughlin

  • 1882: Forester, J. McLaughlin

  • 1881: Saunterer, T. Costello

  • 1880: Grenada, L. Hughes

  • 1879: Spendthrift, G. Evans

  • 1878: Duke of Magenta, W. Hughes

  • 1877: Cloverbrook, C. Holloway

  • 1876: Algerine, W. Donahue

  • 1875: Calvin, R. Swim

  • 1874: Saxon, G. Barbee

  • 1873: Springbok, J. Rowe

  • 1872: Joe Daniels, J. Rowe

  • 1871: Harry Bassett, W. Miller

  • 1870: Kingfisher, E. Brown

  • 1869: Fenian, C. Miller

  • 1868: General Duke, R. Swim

  • 1867: Ruthless, J. Gilpatrick

  • Continue Reading

    Sports

    Rolling Rockies: First 3-game sweep since May ’24

    Published

    on

    By

    Rolling Rockies: First 3-game sweep since May '24

    MIAMI — Hunter Goodman tripled and doubled and the Colorado Rockies beat the Miami Marlins 3-2 on Wednesday to complete a sweep in their first series win of the season.

    Rockies starter Kyle Freeland allowed two unearned runs over 6⅓ innings. Freeland (1-8) scattered four hits and struck out four for his first victory since a 4-1 win against the Milwaukee Brewers on Sept. 8, 2024.

    Colorado, which began the series with a major-league-worst 9-50 record, won its third straight for the first time this season. It was the Rockies’ first three-game sweep since they beat the San Diego Padres in May 2024.

    Jake Bird got the last two outs in the seventh, Victor Vodnik pitched the eighth and Tyler Kinley closed for his second save.

    The Rockies struck quickly against Marlins starter Cal Quantrill (3-6) on Goodman’s RBI triple in the first.

    Consecutive doubles from Tyler Freeman and Jordan Beck in the fifth made it 2-0.

    Goodman hit a leadoff double against reliever Janson Junk in the sixth, advanced on a flyout and scored on Brenton Doyle‘s sacrifice fly.

    Goodman finished 7-for-13, with three homers and five RBIs in the series against Miami.

    The Marlins, who lost their fourth straight, got on the board on Heriberto Hernandez‘s run-scoring single and an RBI fielder’s choice by Jesus Sanchez in the seventh.

    Quantrill allowed two runs and five hits over five innings. The right-hander walked one and struck out two.

    Continue Reading

    Trending