Connect with us

Published

on

ACT Expo, the largest advanced fleet expo, is happening this week, and the question on everyone’s lips is: how can we electrify our fleet quickly?

Range Energy thinks it has the best answer, and it doesn’t require any retrofitting of tractors or engines, just a new trailer.

Range figured that so many people have thought about electrifying the semi-truck tractor, but nobody has really focused on the trailer. This makes sense considering the trailer is just dead weight on most trucks, so why would people think about changing the motive power of something without motive power?

But with EV tech, Range thinks it can change that and add more safety and fuel efficiency. And it can do this much more quickly than it takes to build and validate new electric trucks.

The idea is to add electric motors and a battery directly onto the trailer itself. This gives the trailer the ability to provide some of its own torque to help lighten the load on the diesel tractor, effectively reducing the amount of mass it needs to pull around on its own.

This just makes any load easier to carry. It should enhance the performance of the truck, making it easier to turn onto arterial roads, get up to speed on the highway, or perform passing maneuvers.

Range told us that when it drove down to ACT Expo, from Northern to Southern California, going over the famous Grapevine (Tioga Pass) was a cinch. The pass is famously difficult, featuring a 5-mile stretch of 6% grade, with shoulders dotted with frequent water stops for overheating engines. Range said it easily passed other trucks on the way up – and on the way down, it didn’t have to worry about brake fade since it used regenerative braking in the trailer to charge the battery.

And it doesn’t even take any additional communication between the tractor and the trailer. All of this is done through Range’s “smart kingpin.” This is just the standard interface on any truck trailer, but Range has put sensors in it to detect lateral loads from acceleration and braking. The sensors detect how much force the tractor is asking for, and Range spins up the motor in proportion.

Range showed us a demo of how this works on a shrunk-down prototype of its trailer, with a handle attached to a version of its smart kingpin:

Range’s small-scale demo prototype. It really felt like I was moving nothing at all.

Range says that its system can reduce diesel emissions by 41% and fits directly into a fleet without any changes to tractors or usage patterns. It can even be used in “mild-hybrid” mode if charging isn’t available, effectively turning a diesel truck into a hybrid without having to retrofit the engine itself.

Not every scenario will get that 41% reduction, but Range says even in the worst-case scenario, this impromptu hybrid system should improve efficiency by about 10%. (I question how this is possible at a steady speed on a flat road, but in normal operation that includes any amount of braking, the number seems reasonable.)

Of course, you’ll want to keep these batteries charged when possible because as long as you’ve got 200 kWh of batteries, you might as well use them. So you’d be wise to add charging to your yard, and the trailer accepts either 19 kW AC or DC up to 350 kW. Range hasn’t finalized a single charging solution yet, but spoke of the potential of adding various plugs, overhead charging systems, or even a contact interface at the rear of the trailer, which would automatically start charging whenever the trailer is in a loading bay.

This system enables zero-emission operation in many situations in which that might be desirable, like in yard operation, while idling, or in ports or other emissions-control areas. In these cases, the trailer could be used to push the tractor, and the tractor could be used just for steering. While this sounds unwieldy, Range reminded us that articulated buses often work in a “pusher” configuration, with the rear car of the bus providing motive power, so there shouldn’t be any difficulty there.

Adding batteries and motors to the trailer unlocks a lot of options and applications that a typical “dumb” trailer doesn’t have. It’s easier to add a powered liftgate or powered landing gear for one since you’ve already got power onboard.

Having energy onboard means being able to use the trailer for temporary installations that need power – think disaster response, where electric vehicles have proven capable. Or you could continue powering a refrigerated trailer even while the truck is parked – or when the tractor isn’t even connected.

And the trailer has bidirectional charging, so it could be used to power offboard equipment or to help balance the grid (and make money through energy arbitrage if your trailer spends a lot of time parked and plugged in).

Beyond these efficiency, utility, and performance gains, Range sees safety benefits with the system. By adding control to the rear axle, a truck can gain all sorts of modern safety features like stability control or jackknife protection. And the aforementioned regenerative braking protects against brake fade on long grades and makes obnoxious Jake brakes redundant – and those giant runaway truck ramps should see a lot less use.

It’s not all upsides, though – Range’s unit weighs about 4,000 lbs, which eats into your payload. Semi-trucks are limited to 80,000 lbs gross vehicle weight, and the more the truck and trailer themselves weigh, the less payload you can fit into them and stay under that 80k limit. Because electric trucks are heavier, they are given an additional 2,000 lbs of wiggle room, for a total of 82k lbs.

But Range’s system doesn’t qualify for that exception. It’s working on this issue with regulators, trying to get its unit qualified so that trucks with its trailer can access that additional 2k lbs, but it hasn’t received that allowance yet.

Range is moving quickly to try to get those allowances and also to get to market. Since almost all regulation is on the tractor and not the trailer (in fact, a recent court decision said that the EPA and CARB can’t regulate trailers because they aren’t “self-propelled”), this means that Range can get its trailers to market much quicker than other manufacturers that are still going through regulatory processes to bring truck tractors to market. And then Range can get those trailers onto trucks more quickly since further modification of the tractor isn’t needed.

And as a startup staffed by many people who have worked in fast-moving EV startups before (the CEO, Ali Javidian, worked at Tesla from 2008-2012), Range is moving quickly. It plans to have trailers for sale next year, though we’ll have to see how that works out, especially when it comes to battery supply, which has been difficult lately.

Range argues that its solution is necessary and helpful because we need action now on climate change, and these trailers can be deployed more quickly and with less capital than converting a whole fleet.

That said, California’s huge new truck rule has some pretty aggressive timelines, including an end to new diesel purchases for drayage trucks at the end of this year. So Range may find its market disappearing over time as everyone converts to fully electric operation.

The company still thinks that it will have a niche since its trailers could even give electric trucks the additional safety benefits mentioned above or could be used as range boosters for EV trucks as well. If, say, someone needs a 400-mile truck but can only find a 300-mile truck that fits their other specifications, adding a Range trailer could give them the boost they need.

It’s still early days for Range, and though it is moving quickly, there’s a lot of distance from here to there. We don’t know pricing or availability yet, though Range says it’ll be in the market next year. And while the company is promising a lot, most of these promises seem fairly realistic, and nobody else is doing anything like this (that we know of). We’re certainly excited to see more from Range as it moves forward.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Customers could end up paying for data centers’ energy costs in the absence of reform: Experts

Published

on

By

Customers could end up paying for data centers' energy costs in the absence of reform: Experts

A visitor observes a computer bay at the PA10 data center, operated by Equinix Inc., in Paris, France, on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

In some advanced economies, electricity infrastructure and cost of utilities are undergoing structural changes because of artificial intelligence-driven demand for data centers.

In the process, U.S consumers could be paying higher utility bills because of the sector shifting costs to consumers, warned a latest paper by the Harvard Electricity Law Initiative.

Meanwhile in the U.K, residents may experience higher wholesale prices in light of a proposed reform to the electricity market that would favor data centers which harness renewable energy.

As pricing concerns emerge, regulation and energy grid reform will take center stage in managing energy prices and meeting changing energy needs.

‘Complex’ special contracts

Special contracts between utilities and data center companies are one of the ways higher costs associated with data centers may transfer onto everyday consumers, identified a report by the Harvard Electricity Law Initiative in March.

Such contracts “allow an individual consumer to take service under conditions and terms not otherwise available to anyone else.” In other words, they can be used to shift costs from data centers to consumers because of the subjectivity and complexity in those contracts’ accounting practices, the report stated.

Moreover, special contracts are approved by the Public Utilities Commission but tend to undergo “opaque regulatory processes” that make it difficult to assess if costs have been shifted from data centers onto the consumer.

To remedy this, the report recommended regulators tighten oversight over special contracts or completely do away with them and opt for existing tariff practices.

“Unlike a one-off special contract that provides each data center with unique terms and conditions, a tariff ensures that all data centers pay under the same terms and that the impact of new customers is addressed by considering the full picture of the utility’s costs and revenue,” according to the report.

Jonathan Koomey, a researcher in energy and information technology, concurs with the need for data centers to pay according to their usage of the energy grid.

“The key point, in my view, is that highly profitable companies who impose costs on the grid with big new loads should pay the costs created by those new loads,” Koomey told CNBC.

Beyond utility companies and regulators, “intervenors in the utility regulatory process also play a critical role,” Koomey said.

Intervenors can include a specific group of constituents or a large commercial or industrial customer who partake in proceedings. They may raise issues pertaining to customer service and affordability and ultimately allow for commissions to hear from a broad group of stakeholders.

“They often can dig deeper than the overburdened regulators into the projections and technical details and reveal key issues that haven’t yet surfaced in regulatory proceedings,” Koomey added.

Overbuilt infrastructure?

Another factor affecting utility prices is the excessive development of energy infrastructure.

Utilities and pipeline companies in the states of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia are planning a “major buildout of natural gas infrastructure over the next 15 years,” potentially based on an overestimation of data center load forecasts, highlighted a report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis in January.

Proactive decisions on the part of utilities and regulators are needed to prevent ratepayers from being “on the hook” for overbuilt infrastructure, said the IEEFA report.

Policymakers across states have adopted a slew of measures to incentivize, curb and regulate the influx of data center development, from tax breaks to legislative bills, with a focus on ensuring non-data centers consumers do not bear undue costs, according to a report by the Gibson Dunn Data Centers and Digital Infrastructure Practice Group.

Zonal pricing

In the U.K, data centers and consumers face a different pricing challenge amid government plans to transform the country’s electricity market into a decarbonized, cost-effective and secure electricity system.

The zonal pricing scheme that is being explored under the government’s Review of Electricity Markets Arrangements would mark a shift away from uniform pricing to a split electricity market. Under the new framework, consumers in different geographical zones would be subject to different wholesale electricity prices based on the marginal cost of meeting demand at that location.

Modeling from consulting firm Lane Clark and Peacock suggests that Northern Scotland would experience lower wholesale prices owing to their high renewable penetration and relatively low demand.

The rest of the U.K, accounting for 97% of national electricity demand, is poised to see a rise in wholesale prices from the current national pricing model.

The impact on retail prices remains murky as yet.

“It is not clear how this may impact retail prices as wholesale prices are only one part of the overall electricity bill for consumers, and DESNZ still needs to make various decisions,” according to joint comments from Sam Hollister, Head of Energy Economics, Policy, and Investment and Dina Darshini, Head of Commercial and Industrial at Lane Clark Peacock’s energy transition division, LCP Delta.

The DESNZ is the U.K.’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.

Will data centers benefit?

While tech firms appear onboard with the lower costs that zonal pricing stands to offer, based on think tank research supported by Amazon, OpenAI and Anthropic, whether data centers do in fact stand to benefit from zonal pricing would depend on their type of operations, according to Hollister and Darshini.

Those potentially well-suited for zonal pricing include data center facilities that handle workloads that can be shifted in time or location, they said.

AI training for deep learning models is one such example. Such workloads can be scheduled during off-peak hours when electricity prices may be lower and synchronized with periods of surplus wind or solar power, which would reduce costs and alleviate grid congestion.

Similarly, data centers that do not need to be close to major urban centers or end users — such as those supporting hyperscale AI training, cloud and large-scale data storage facilities or scientific computing hubs — could also benefit from cheaper electricity when located in regions with high renewable generation and low local demand, Hollister and Darshini said.

However, “not all AI workloads are flexible — real-time inference tasks, such as those used in chatbots, fraud detection, or autonomous vehicles, require immediate processing and would not benefit from time-shifting,” they added.

Latency-sensitive applications such as financial trading and real-time streaming that require close proximity to users would also find zonal pricing “less viable.”

Boosting grid infrastructure

Proponents of zonal pricing point to the benefits of reducing the need to move energy over long distances.

But with the National Energy System Operator’s plans to increase network capability and connect more offshore wind, focusing on grid infrastructure is important, “and zonal pricing won’t eliminate those requirements,” according to Hollister and Darshini.

“It’s not just data centers that are going to need this additional capacity on the grid, they’re probably the most high profile ones, but EV charging is going to change the grid. National Grid as an organization have been talking about the change in the demand profile from EVs for a very long time,” David Mytton, a researcher in sustainable computing, told CNBC.

The demands on the energy grid posed by the electrification of vehicles is a challenge shared across the U.S. and U.K.

In the U.S., electric vehicles will constitute over half of all new cars sold by 2030 and is set to place a considerable strain on an aging energy grid system.

While the electricity consumption of U.S. data centers is growing at an increasing pace, a report by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory published in December noted that this is playing out against a “much larger electricity demand that is expected to occur over the next few decades from a combination of electric vehicle adoption, onshoring of manufacturing, hydrogen utilization, and the electrification of industry and buildings.”

Given this, the infrastructural and regulatory reforms that emerge out of data center management would be helpful for an imminent era of changing electricity demand, said Mytton and fellow researchers.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla’s Cybercab and Semi sourcing disrupted by Trump’s tariffs, report says

Published

on

By

Tesla's Cybercab and Semi sourcing disrupted by Trump's tariffs, report says

A new report claims that President Trump’s tariffs have disrupted Tesla’s plan to source parts for the upcoming Cybercab and Tesla Semi production in China.

The trade war started by President Trump and his constantly changing tariffs has thrown a wrench in the plans of most supply chain managers worldwide.

Tesla is no exception.

For most of its manufacturing programs in the US, the American automaker imports a significant number of parts from China, Mexico, Canada, and Europe.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

This includes its upcoming vehicles: Cybercab and Tesla Semi.

Tesla aims to start production of the vehicles at Gigafactory Texas and a new factory in Nevada later this year and ramp up to volume production in 2026.

Reuters reports that Tesla has suspended plans to source certain parts for the upcoming Cybercab and Tesla Semi from China:

Tesla’s plans to ship components from China for Cybercab and Semi electric trucks in the United States were suspended after President Donald Trump raised tariffs on Chinese goods amid a trade war, said a person with direct knowledge.

According to the report, Tesla was ready to move ahead with the plan when Trump first increased the tariffs on China to 34%, but the automaker is suspending the specific sourcing plans after the most recent increases:

Tesla was ready to absorb the additional costs when Trump imposed the 34% tariff on Chinese goods but could not do so when the tariff went beyond that, leaving shipping plans suspended, said the person, who declined to be named as the matter is private.

Trump raised the tariffs on China to 145% last week, with some expectations announced on Friday — even though Trump later claimed there were no exceptions.

In response to the tariffs the US is imposing on China, the Chinese government reciprocated with its own tariffs on US goods, which resulted in Tesla stopping taking new orders for Model S and Model X vehicles in the country.

Electrek’s Take

I would take the report with a grain of salt since it is based on a single source, but it certainly makes sense.

The phrase “Trump’s tariffs have disrupted” could be followed by the name of virtually every major manufacturing company globally, and Tesla is no exception.

Due to Tesla’s vertical integration, Tesla shareholders have been claiming that the tariffs would be positive for Tesla, or at least not as bad as they would be for other automakers.

Tesla indeed has impressive vertical integration for the auto industry, but that’s in relative terms. Effectively, Tesla still uses a significant number of parts from other countries, especially Mexico, but also from China.

Mexico would be the most problematic for Tesla, as roughly 25% of the parts of all its vehicle programs built in the US originate from there.

The tariffs on auto parts from Canada and Mexico are currently paused for everything in the USMCA agreement, but Trump signaled that this is only temporary.

As for the tariffs on China, they primarily affect Tesla’s energy business, which relies on cheap Chinese battery cells, but Tesla also imports some Chinese parts for its cars and 145% tariffs will change that.

Tesla, like many other companies, has to start looking for alternatives.

Many of the problems come not only from the excessively high tariffs Trump is imposing on countries, but also from the fact that he keeps changing his mind and making exceptions, making it hard for companies to plan.

In this case, Tesla might have suspended plans with Chinese suppliers only to wait and see if Trump will back off the Chinese tariffs, if Musk can lobby for an exception with the President, whom he helped elect with $250 million in political donations, to shop for suppliers from other countries, or maybe, just maybe, do what Trumps claims his tariffs will do and manufacture those parts in the US.

For some reason, I have doubts about it being the last one, but you never know.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Groundbreaking heavy equipment EVs (ha!) steals the show at bauma

Published

on

By

Groundbreaking heavy equipment EVs (ha!) steals the show at bauma

It only happens every three years, but it’s spectacular! I’m speaking of course, about bauma – one of the largest trade shows of any kind where heavy equipment manufacturers serving construction, forestry, mining, and more bring out their latest and greatest new job site innovations, and we’ve got a whole bunch of them here, on this special bauma edition of Quick Charge!

With more than two million square feet indoors and twice that outdoors, bauma hosts more than 600,000 guests from 200 countries to see 3,600 exhibitors’ hardware (and, increasingly, software). We’re only going to cover a sliver, but it’s a really cool sliver, you guys – enjoy!

Prefer listening to your podcasts? Audio-only versions of Quick Charge are now available on Apple PodcastsSpotifyTuneIn, and our RSS feed for Overcast and other podcast players.

New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (and sometimes Sunday). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Got news? Let us know!
Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending