Connect with us

Published

on

After a multiyear investigation into Hunter Biden, prosecutors could be close to sharing any possible results with the public and whether the president’s son will face any criminal charges. 

The Washington Post reported Wednesday that people familiar with the matter said prosecutors are close to a decision on whether to charge Biden with possible tax-related and gun-related legal violations.

The news came after his legal team reportedly met with the Justice Department (DOJ) to discuss possible charges that Biden might be facing. 

Biden first announced in December 2020 that the U.S. attorney’s office in Delaware was investigating his tax affairs after being a regular target of attacks from former President Trump during the 2020 presidential election campaign. 

Trump primarily targeted the now-president’s son over his membership on a board for a Ukrainian energy company while Joe Biden was serving as vice president during the Obama administration. 

Hunter Biden has acknowledged that he had “poor judgment” in taking the role because it put his father in a position to be attacked, but he emphasized that he did not commit any wrongdoing. 

Trump and his allies have called for Hunter Biden to face charges and accused the president of being involved in his son’s business affairs but have not presented evidence of that. 

Trump’s push for the older and younger Biden to face charges led him to make a phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in 2019, in which he threatened to cut off aid if Ukrainian authorities did not launch an investigation. Trump was impeached by the House over the call but acquitted by the Senate. 

Multiple reports indicate that Biden has been under investigation for his foreign business dealings, specifically income he received from the Ukrainian company and operations in China. 

The Post reported in October that prosecutors believed they had enough evidence to charge Biden with tax crimes. They also reportedly had evidence of him falsifying paperwork for a gun purchase that he made in 2018. 

David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware and a Trump appointee, would ultimately make the decision about whether to file charges. 

President Biden said in response to the reports that enough evidence existed for Hunter to face charges that he has “great confidence in my son.”  

“I love him, and he’s on the straight and narrow, and he has been for a couple years now. And I’m just so proud of him,” he said.  

Biden has vowed to allow the DOJ to conduct its investigation without any outside interference, and the White House has repeatedly referred questions about the investigation to the DOJ. 

But the Biden administration was accused of mishandling the investigation in recent weeks. An attorney for a possible whistleblower who is a supervisor for the Internal Revenue Service sent Congress a letter late last month that they have evidence contradicting sworn statements that a top appointee gave to Congress. 

It alleges that the administration has allowed clear conflicts of interest to affect the investigation and notes instances of politics impacting decisions in the case.  Clarence Thomas’s problems multiply at Supreme Court Conservatives criticize liberal Supreme Court justices for ethics issues

The White House reiterated in response that the investigation would be handled independently by the DOJ and noted that Weiss was appointed by Trump. 

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) subpoenaed the FBI on Wednesday for a document that he says details an unspecified “alleged criminal scheme” involving Joe Biden when he was vice president. Comer and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who jointly sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, do not directly accuse Biden of participating in the scheme and describe it only in broad terms. 

The White House rejected the idea, saying that congressional Republicans have for five years “been lobbing unfounded, unproven, politically-motivated attacks against the President and his family without offering evidence for their claims or evidence of decisions influenced by anything other than U.S. interests.”

Continue Reading

Business

Millions face council tax rise of more than 5% after government gives green light to bigger hikes

Published

on

By

Millions face council tax rise of more than 5% after government gives green light to bigger hikes

Millions of people face council tax hikes over normal thresholds after the government allowed six areas to boost rates above the usual 5%.

More than two million people will be hit by increases of between 5 and 10%.

Windsor and Maidenhead Council wanted to increase council tax by 25% but the plan was blocked – instead it will go up by 9%.

Newham Council will go up by the same amount, while Bradford Council will put up taxes by 10% and Birmingham, Somerset and Trafford councils will all put up rates by 7.5%.

Politics latest: Labour polling slumps behind Reform

Speaking to Sky News’ Kay Burley, health and social care minister Karin Smyth defended the above normal increases – saying “many more councils” asked for permission to hike taxes, but were refused.

She said the ones given the nod “are particularly desperate” and need the money to keep “basic services running”.

The Labour MP was quick to blame the Conservatives, saying local government was left in a “really, really dark state” by the previous government.

How do councils increase tax?

In order to keep up with demands, councils are allowed to raise council tax usually by up to 5%, broken down into 3% core spending with an additional 2% for social care.

At the moment, a principle exists which prevents more than a 5% increase to council tax without a referendum, mostly to protect taxpayers from excessive increases.

But if a council is already in conversation with government on exceptional financial support, and if the government agrees to allow the council to raise tax above the cap as part of this, the council doesn’t necessarily have to take that to a local public vote.

Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner – who is also the secretary of state for local government – confirmed the move on Monday.

She said the average council tax increase across the country would not surpass last year’s total of 5.1%.

She also said more than £69bn in central funding would be made available to regional administrators, a rise of 6.8% compared to the 2024-25 period. Close to £4bn has also been put aside to help councils with social care.

Read more on politics:
Reform ahead of Labour in poll
Starmer reacts to Trump’s tariff threat

Builder shortage challenging growth plans

The Conservatives accused Labour of “pushing the burden on to taxpayers after they promised to freeze council tax”.

Shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said: “Their Local Government Finance Settlement will mean that councils will have to raise council tax to accommodate Labour’s jobs tax.

“This means that local people will pay more for less when it comes to local services, especially in rural areas which are losing the Rural Services Delivery Grant that Labour have abolished.

“The Labour Party have made false promises to local people, promising to freeze council tax while many councils will now have to raise it due to Labour’s political choice to raise council tax.”

👉Listen to Politics At Jack And Sam’s on your podcast app👈

The County Councils Network, which represents 37 administrations, said they are facing pressure from the government’s decisions to increase national insurance contributions for employers, and increases to minimum wage.

Barry Lewis, the network’s finance spokesperson said: “More than four in five CCN members say they are in a worse position than before the autumn budget and this finance settlement, and one-third say their service reductions next year will now be severe.

“Considering there is very little fat left to cut from many of these services already, a further reduction will have a material impact on our residents.”

Ms Rayner confirmed allocations worth £502m to assist councils with the impact of increases to employer national insurance contributions.

Continue Reading

Business

China hits back after new US tariffs take effect – as those against Mexico and Canada are paused

Published

on

By

China hits back after new US tariffs take effect - as those against Mexico and Canada are paused

China has retaliated after the US imposed 10% tariffs on its goods.

Not long after the US taxes began at 5am British time, China said it was imposing 10% tariffs on American crude oil, agricultural machinery, large-displacement cars and pickup trucks.

There will also be 15% tariffs on coal and liquefied natural gas, as well as an investigation into Google.

China also said it is imposing export controls on rare earth metals such as tungsten, tellurium, ruthenium, molybdenum and ruthenium-related items – the country controls much of the world’s supply of such metals, which are critical for the transition to clean energy.

They will not come into effect until Monday 10 February, however.

President Trump said his actions were in response to what he described as Beijing’s failure to stop the flow of fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, into the US.

Mr Trump added that the tariffs on China could just be the start, though the White House said he was due to talk to President Xi Jinping.

“China hopefully is going to stop sending us fentanyl, and if they’re not, the tariffs are going to go substantially higher,” Mr Trump said.

China has described fentanyl as America’s problem and said it would challenge the tariffs at the World Trade Organisation, as well as taking other countermeasures.

But it also left the door open for talks.

The issue of fentanyl is only one part of Mr Trump’s issue with China. He has long railed against the trade imbalance between the first and second-largest economies in the world.

Tariffs paused

Earlier, the imposition of 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada was paused after agreements were reached on border security.

Mexico was first to make a deal with the White House. Its president, Claudia Sheinbaum, said she was sending 10,000 National Guard troops to the US border immediately in return for a tariff delay.

Mr Trump said the Mexican soldiers would be “specifically designated” to stop the flow of fentanyl into the US, as well as illegal migrants. Further negotiations will now be carried out, he added.

Ms Sheinbaum said she had a “good conversation” with him lasting at least 30 minutes just hours before the tariffs were due to begin.

She also extracted a concession from Mr Trump – after explaining the “seriousness” of high-powered weapons coming over the border from the US and getting into the hands of criminal groups.

“It gives them firepower,” she said. “We asked that the US also help our country by helping stop this arms trafficking… he agreed.”

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Canada made similar moves. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said almost 10,000 frontline personnel “are and will be working on protecting the border”.

He added on X that his country was appointing a “fentanyl czar”, drug cartels would be listed as terrorists, and there would be “24/7 eyes on the border”.

There will also be a Canada-US joint strike force to “combat organised crime, fentanyl and money laundering”, Mr Trudeau announced.

Both Mr Trudeau and Mr Trump will view the deal as a win – Mr Trump for seemingly forcing the US’s northern neighbour to act, and Mr Trudeau for heading off sanctions with measures that for the most part (with the exception of the fentanyl czar) had already been announced in December.

Mr Trump said he was “very pleased with this initial outcome” and work will begin to see how a “Final Economic Deal” with Canada can be structured.

Tariffs are designed to show China’s mettle

Nicole Johnston

Asia correspondent

@nicole_reporter

China has made it clear it’s not taking Donald Trump’s 10% tariff lying down.

Despite the country still being on its New Year’s spring break, China has announced retaliatory measures.

Its tariffs of 10-15% hit exports of US coal, liquified natural gas (LNG), agricultural machinery and pick-up trucks to China.

However, these tariffs would not take effect until 10 February, giving Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping time to possibly hammer out a deal.

Canada and Mexico have been given a 30-day reprieve from the threatened 25% US tariffs.

China may be hoping it can also avert the start of a trade war by engaging in direct talks.

It’s believed Mr Trump and Mr Xi will speak on the phone in the coming days.

Chinese countermeasures extend beyond just tariffs though.

They have also restricted a handful of critical minerals like tungsten, launched an antitrust investigation into Google and sanctioned two US companies.

The Chinese government is strengthening its language against the US and its tariffs.

It is still open to negotiation in the spirit of the phase one US-China trade deal during Mr Trump’s first term, but it has a domestic audience to consider.

Beijing insists it is a peer competitor to the US and its rival on the world stage. These tariffs are designed to show China’s mettle.

What is the UK situation on tariffs?

President Trump hates trade deficits, and does not want to import more goods from another country than are sent there in return, says Sky’s economics and data editor, Ed Conway.

But Britain has bigger trade deficits than the US, Conway adds, and is one of the few countries in the world to import more goods from America than America imports from it.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘PM walking tightrope between Trump and EU’

Read more:
Trump threatens to cut off South Africa funding
Breaking economies could be just first step

In addition, because the UK is no longer part of the European Union, any tariffs imposed on Brussels will not affect London.

When asked about the UK, Mr Trump said: “I think that one can be worked out.”

Sir Keir Starmer said it was “early days”.

Analysis: Has it all just been theatre?

First Mexico, now Canada. In another whirlwind day, both of America’s closest neighbours appear to have capitulated to President Trump.
The 25% tariffs on all goods from both countries were due to come into effect at midnight US Eastern time. But after calls between all three leaders, suddenly the tariffs were paused.

So what’s going on? Is this a clear signal of the power Trump wields? His blunt tool of using the threat of tariffs as a negotiating tool has paid off? Bullying tactics work? Well, maybe. At least that’s how Mr Trump wants everyone to think. Dance to my tune, or else.

And it’s absolutely the case that Mexico and Canada were in panic mode this weekend. But surely Donald Trump was panicking a little too when he saw the stock markets on Monday. He claimed this afternoon not to be taking any notice of their sharp falls. But we know he cares deeply about market reactions.

Here’s what’s interesting: the statement from Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau sounded at first glance like it was announcing something new.
“Canada is implementing our $1.3bn border plan… nearly 10,000 frontline personnel are and will be working on protecting the border…”

But it’s not a new announcement. Look at the language – “are and will be”. In other words, “we’re doing this already Mr President, but if you want me to reiterate it to placate you, then I will…” All that Justin Trudeau has done today is reiterate a border plan he announced last December.

Mexico too has been doing an increasing amount in the fight against fentanyl though it could and probably now will do more.

So has it all been theatre this past 24 hours?

A show of brinkmanship from Donald Trump, which could have had a cliff-edge ending, but instead ended with him looking strong (and freaking out much of the developed world in the process) and his closest neighbours forced to reiterate their existing plans.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump tariffs: How the UK finds itself in a strong position on US trade

Published

on

By

Trump tariffs: How the UK finds itself in a strong position on US trade

What if Britain has, almost entirely by accident, navigated itself into about the best possible position it could be in, as Donald Trump embarks on a trade war with nearly all his economic partners?

I realise this might, at first, sound a little odd. After all, when the world is facing economically-destructive measures (blanket tariffs are invariably value-destructive, in the short run at least) it’s hard to see much in the way of victories. Moreover, when it comes to Donald Trump, no one, including his own cabinet and staff, can quite predict what will happen next. Consider the roller-coaster over tariffs in the past few days alone.

Even so, the fact remains that of all the countries and regions in the world, Britain seems much less likely than most to face the kind of peremptory tariffs the president is so keen on.

Trade war latest: Trump pauses Mexico tariffs for a month

To see why, it helps to remember that the one thing Mr Trump hates above all else is trade deficits – when you import more goods (and it seems to be goods he mostly cares about) from another country than you send there in return.

America has an enormous trade deficit with China and with Mexico too, not to mention a smaller but not insubstantial deficit with Canada. When the president talks about the reasons for his tariffs he sometimes mentions illegal fentanyl imports, but, even more often, he references the size of the trade deficits. He wants America to make more stuff domestically and suck in less stuff from overseas.

We could have a long conversation (and I suspect we probably will have a long conversation in the coming months) about the extent to which deficits are, per se, a bad thing. But in the short run let’s focus on the UK and its strengths in this game.

More on Donald Trump

First, since the UK is no longer part of the European Union, it will not automatically face the same trade terms as its neighbours on the continent. If the US imposes tariffs on the EU, Britain will not necessarily face them.

Second, if there is one country in the world with even bigger trade deficits than the US, it’s Britain. This country has deindustrialised even quicker than America, with the upshot that unlike the EU or Canada or Mexico, Britain is one of the few countries in the world to import more goods from America than America imports from it.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How will Trump’s tariffs affect Brits?

Footnote: that last point actually depends on whose numbers you’re looking at. Look at America’s figures and it has a trade surplus with the UK. Look at Britain’s figures and America has a trade deficit with us. But either way, both are very small. The numbers are essentially balanced.

Third, in recent months, the new Labour government has begun to improve its relationship with China. Chancellor Rachel Reeves went on a financial diplomacy mission to Beijing last month. And unlike nearly every other industrialised country in the developed world, Britain has not imposed tariffs on imports of Chinese electric vehicles.

Many diplomats have raised their eyebrows about this, but in the event that America wanted to do a deal with Britain, this is precisely the kind of thing the government could quickly reverse: “Oh alright then – in return for this trade deal, we’re willing to impose those tariffs on China – the ones everyone else has already introduced.”

Read more:
Trump says Canada should be ‘cherished 51st state’

Why has Trump targeted Mexico and Canada?
How Trump’s tariffs could impact consumers

The funny thing about these three strengths is that, first off, up until recently many would have seen each of them – Brexit, our deindustrialisation and our cosying up to China – as weaknesses rather than strengths. They certainly weren’t part of any grand strategic plan.

Even so, the UK nonetheless finds itself in an unexpectedly propitious position when it comes to negotiating with the US. It has a better chance than most nations to act as a diplomatic bridge between America and Europe. Its chances of sealing that much-vaunted trade deal with the US have improved rather than deteriorated. Indeed, I’m told that leading members of the administration believe a trade deal with the UK could be sealed in a matter of months.

Whether that actually eventuates remains to be seen. After all, if there’s one thing you can’t predict when it comes to Donald Trump it’s, well, anything.

Continue Reading

Trending