Connect with us

Published

on

During a recent earnings presentation, SoftBank Founder Masayoshi Son (pictured here in 2019) said the company will go into “defense” mode as a result of myriad headwinds that have roiled global markets.

Tomohiro Ohsumi | Getty Images

Softbank’s Vision Fund filed suit against the founders of one of its portfolio companies on Monday, alleging that they artificially inflated user metrics, lied to the fund about performance and bilked the fund for millions.

Buzzy social media startup IRL launched in Apr. 2021 and was seemingly “one of the fastest growing social media apps for Generation Z,” the complaint in San Francisco federal court alleges.

related investing news

The stablecoin market has shrunk this year while bitcoin has rallied — What investors should know

CNBC Pro
Oakmark Funds' Bill Nygren is one of the top value managers with double-digit returns — for decades

CNBC Pro

Softbank was invested in the company thanks to its apparently low cost, “strong” user engagement that left it “well positioned for further viral growth” in the same way that Facebook and Twitter exploded.

In May 2021, a month after the company launched, SoftBank invested $150 million in IRL through the one of the conglomerate’s high-spending Vision Funds, buying $125 million in shares from the company and another $25 million from insiders including CEO Abraham Shafi as well as Noah Shafi and Yassin Aniss, the complaint says.

SoftBank believed that IRL had 12 million monthly active users, or MAUs.

But those numbers were a lie, the complaint alleges. IRL was secretly swarming its own platform with an army of bots, according to the complaint, creating the veneer of a thriving social network which was, in reality, a cover to “defraud investors.”

The plot began to unravel when Securities and Exchange Commission opened an investigation into IRL in late 2022. In Apr. 2023, Abraham Shafi was suspended as CEO, and the company dissolved in June.

The suit raises significant questions about the level of scrutiny that SoftBank applied to its portfolio companies. When a third-party assessment of user numbers came in significantly below IRL’s own sales pitch, SoftBank representatives accepted Abraham Shafi’s explanations that they were “definitely not accurate,” according to the suit.

Past missteps from SoftBank include large positions in allegedly fraudulent crypto exchange FTX and devalued property company WeWork. SoftBank’s Vision Funds have faltered significantly since the market highs of 2021, and the conglomerate posted a full year loss of $32 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023.

Continue Reading

Technology

Chinese tech giant Tencent’s quarterly revenue rises 15%, fueled by AI

Published

on

By

Chinese tech giant Tencent's quarterly revenue rises 15%, fueled by AI

Tencent on Thursday posted 15% year-on-year revenue growth, with AI boosting the Chinese tech giant’s performance in advertising targeting and gaming.

Here’s how Tencent performed in the third quarter of 2025, per earnings released on Thursday: 

  • Revenue: 192.9 billion Chinese yuan ($27.12 billion), surpassing the 189.2 billion Chinese yuan expected analysts, according to data compiled by LSEG. 
  • Operating profit: 63.6 billion yuan, versus 58.01 billion yuan expected by the street.  

Tencent boosted its capital expenditure earlier this year as it ramped up AI and eyed European expansion for its cloud computing services, which would compete against market leaders Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. It has its own AI foundational model in China called Hunyuan, however it also uses DeepSeek in some products.  

Tencent shares are up 56.7% year-to-date. 

This is a breaking news story. Please refresh for updates.

Continue Reading

Technology

CNBC Daily Open: There’s the AI market, and then there’s ‘everything else’

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: There's the AI market, and then there's 'everything else'

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on Nov. 12, 2025 in New York City.

Spencer Platt | Getty Images

The divergence between the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite on Wednesday stateside reinforces the suggestion that there are two markets operating in the U.S.: one of an artificial intelligence and another of “everything else.”

Not only did the Dow rise, it also secured its second consecutive record high and closed above the 48,000 level for the first time.

The index, which comprises 30 blue-chip companies, is typically seen as a marker of the “old economy.” That is to say, it is mostly made up of large, well-established companies driving the U.S. economy, such as banks, healthcare and industrials, before Silicon Valley became a mini sun powering everything.

And it was those stocks — Goldman Sachs, Eli Lilly and Caterpillar — that lifted the Dow on Wednesday.

To be sure, new and flashy names, such as Nvidia and Salesforce, constitute the Dow too. But as the index is price-weighted, meaning that companies with higher share prices influence the Dow more, tech companies don’t exert as much gravity on it.

That’s in contrast to the Nasdaq, which is weighted by companies’ market capitalization, and dominated mainly by technology firms. The tech-heavy index fell as shares like Oracle and Palantir slipped — even Advanced Micro Devices’ 9% pop on its growth prospects couldn’t rescue the Nasdaq from the red.

It’s not necessarily a warning sign about overexuberance in AI.

“There’s nothing wrong, in our view, of kind of trimming back, taking some gains and re-diversifying across other spots in the equity markets,” said Josh Chastant, portfolio manager of public investments at GuideStone Fund.

But what investors would really like is if fork in the road merges into one. That tends to be the safer path to take.

What you need to know today

And finally…

People walk by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on June 18, 2024 in New York City. 

Spencer Platt | Getty Images

Why private equity is stuck with ‘zombie companies’ it can’t sell

Private equity firms are facing a new reality: a growing crop of companies that can neither thrive nor die, lingering in portfolios like the undead.

These so-called “zombie companies” refer to businesses that aren’t growing, barely generate enough cash to service debt and are unable to attract buyers even at a discount. They are usually trapped on a fund’s balance sheet beyond its expected holding period.

Lee Ying Shan

Continue Reading

Technology

We’re increasing our Cisco Systems price target after an AI-fueled beat and raise

Published

on

By

We're increasing our Cisco Systems price target after an AI-fueled beat and raise

Continue Reading

Trending