Connect with us

Published

on

Bill Clinton turned down an invitation to have tea with the Queen because he “wanted to be a tourist” in London, newly released official papers show.

The US president was visiting the UK in 1997 – four weeks after Tony Blair came to power – and said he wanted to hit the shops and eat Indian food.

Previously classified documents show Mr Clinton, Mr Blair and their wives Hillary and Cherie ended up dining at a French restaurant in London Bridge – complete with beer and fine wine.

The Clintons and the Blairs headed for dinner instead
Image:
The Clintons and the Blairs headed for dinner instead

Memos between Whitehall aides show Mr Clinton was invited to Buckingham Palace to 5pm tea.

But a letter written by Downing Street private secretary Philip Barton said: “The Americans said that the president and Mrs Clinton were very grateful for HM The Queen’s invitation to tea at the palace, but would wish to decline politely.”

The restaurant bill racked up by the Blairs and Clintons is also among the series of files released by the National Archives in Kew, dating back to Mr Blair’s first few months in government.

They spent a total of £298.86 at Le Pont de La Tour – and the bill featured £20 wild salmon, £19.50 grilled sole, £18 halibut, a £2.95 Budvar beer, and a bottle of Mas de Duamas 1995 wine priced at £34.75.

More on Bill Clinton

Tensions were high between Gordon Brown and Tony Blair's aides
Image:
Tensions were high between Gordon Brown and Tony Blair’s aides

Blair and Brown tensions

The latest tranche of official papers from 1997 also shows that Mr Blair’s aides wanted Gordon Brown‘s spin doctor “out on his ear” amid fears that unauthorised briefings were damaging the new Labour government.

Files suggest officials struggled to manage tensions between the administration’s two most dominant figures right from their early days in office.

Peter Mandelson – one of Mr Blair’s ministers – repeatedly complained about the actions of Charles Whelan, who served as Mr Brown’s press secretary.

Mr Whelan was accused of planting a series of hostile stories about Mr Mandelson that were making the government “look foolish, and worse”.

A frank note written to Mr Blair also suggested that Mr Brown was using his chairmanship of cabinet committees to “bludgeon through” his own policies.

A referendum on Scottish devolution was held in 1997
Image:
A referendum on Scottish devolution was held in 1997

Scottish independence worries

The now-unclassified documents from 1997 also show that Downing Street advisers had conceded that Scotland could have a referendum on “anything it wants” without Westminster’s consent.

Even back then, key aides to the prime minister said “a couple of very worried Scottish MPs” were concerned about “the slippery slope to independence”.

Scotland voted in favour of devolution in September 1997, with Labour pledging that the country would be able to set up its own parliament responsible for education, health, transport and other matters.

It was not until 2014 that an independence referendum was held, with 55% voting against proposals for Scotland to break away from the rest of the UK.

Tony Blair greets well-wishers at Downing Street after winning the 1997 election
Image:
Tony Blair greets well-wishers at Downing Street after winning the 1997 election

Blair’s Irish famine message ‘written by aides’

The documents also reveal that Mr Blair’s headline-grabbing admission that the British government was culpable for the Irish Famine was actually hastily ghost-written by his aides.

At the 150th anniversary commemoration in Cork, a message was read on the prime minister’s behalf that said: “That one million people should have died in what was then part of the richest and most powerful nation in the world is something that still causes pain as we reflect on it today.

“Those who governed in London at the time failed their people through standing by while a crop failure turned into a massive human tragedy.”

A request from remarks from Mr Blair was made at the last minute, and they were approved by his private secretary because the prime minister was “not around at the time”.

The Millennium Dome cost £758m and opened on 31 December 1999
Image:
The Millennium Dome cost £758m and opened on 31 December 1999

Millennium Dome could have been tribute to Diana

Records also reveal that plans had been considered to make the Millennium Dome a tribute to Diana, Princess of Wales – and also faced the prospect of being scrapped altogether.

According to the PM’s director of communications Alastair Campbell, a member of the Dome’s board had proposed that the “Millennium project be completely refashioned, the site extended, to accommodate, for example, a hospital, businesses, charities, private residences, and the whole thing named ‘the Princess Diana Centre’.”

Separately, one of Mr Blair’s aides said: “Diana’s death could give us a semi-plausible excuse to cancel.”

The attraction cost £758m and opened on 31 December 1999, but it only drew 6.5 million visitors in 2000 – far fewer than the 12 million that had been budgeted for.

It was later closed and replaced with The O2, which has hosted concerts, sporting events and other entertainment since 2007.

Continue Reading

Politics

Cboe reorganization will merge or eliminate digital arm’s activities

Published

on

By

Cboe reorganization will merge or eliminate digital arm’s activities

The exchange is optimizing operations after acquiring ErisX on the eve of crypto winter and expects to save millions.

Continue Reading

Politics

EU touts health benefits for children in the metaverse despite risks

Published

on

By

EU touts health benefits for children in the metaverse despite risks

The European Union’s in-house think tanks says the metaverse can help children heal from diseases.

Continue Reading

Politics

Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf is battling for political survival. How did we get here – and what happens next?

Published

on

By

Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf is battling for political survival. How did we get here - and what happens next?

Scotland’s First Minister Humza Yousaf is battling to save his job as he faces a knife-edge no-confidence vote.

The SNP leader triggered a crisis at Holyrood after he dramatically brought the power sharing deal with the Scottish Greens to an end.

Follow live updates in the Politics Hub

The backlash has plunged Mr Yousaf’s future into doubt, although party colleagues insist he will not resign.

Watch live as Humza Yousaf gives evidence this afternoon as the Scottish Covid-19 Inquiry continues.

How did we get here?

The Bute House Agreement – signed back in 2021 and named after the first minister’s official residence in Edinburgh – brought the Green Party into government for the first time anywhere in the UK.

It gave the SNP a majority at Holyrood when the votes of its MSPs were combined with those of the seven Green members, and also made Green co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater junior ministers.

More on Humza Yousaf

Without it, the SNP would need to have operated as a minority administration at Holyrood.

What caused the relationship to sour?

There had been mounting tensions between the largest party at Holyrood and their junior partners in government.

The Greens were angered at the SNP-led administration’s recent decision to ditch a key climate change target.

That, combined with the decision to pause the prescription of new puberty blockers to under-18s at Scotland’s only gender clinic, resulted in the Greens announcing they would have a vote on the future of the power sharing deal.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I intend to fight that vote’

What brought things to a head?

Mr Yousaf decided to pull the plug on the agreement – arguing it had “served its purpose” – prompting a major fallout with his former allies, who vowed to back a no-confidence motion in his leadership proposed by Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross.

So how do the numbers stack up?

Tight to say the least.

As the leader of a now minority government, Mr Yousaf’s fate is set to depend on just one vote – that of a former SNP leadership rival.

In the Scottish parliament, the SNP has 63 seats out of 129, two short of an outright majority.

The Greens voting in favour of the no-confidence motion would mean 64 MSPs do not back the first minister.

The presiding officer Alison Johnstone, the equivalent of the Commons speaker, traditionally does not vote and would only so so in the event of a tiebreak and would be expected to support the status quo – so back the first minister.

That leaves Ash Regan, the one-time SNP leadership rival to Mr Yousaf who defected to Alex Salmond’s Alba Party last October.

She has written to the first minister, setting out demands in exchange for her support.

Ash Regan. Pic: PA
Image:
Ash Regan. Pic: PA

When will the vote be held?

Any no-confidence vote in Mr Yousaf is likely to take place next week, with timings to be confirmed by parliamentary business managers who are expected to meet on Tuesday.

What happens if Mr Yousaf loses?

The vote is not binding and so he would not be forced to step down – but he would be under immense pressure to quit, and his position likely to be judged untenable if he did not have the confidence of most MSPs.

However, the resignation of the first minister would not automatically trigger a Holyrood election, with a 28-day grace period for MSPs to choose a replacement.

This means that if Mr Yousaf was to quit, the SNP may seek to have a replacement leader installed in the post – assuming they could muster enough support.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Is that all?

No. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar says he will separately lay a motion of no confidence in the Scottish government.

While this carries more far-reaching implications by compelling ministers to resign and raising the prospect of an election, it is unlikely to succeed.

Alba has already ruled out its pivotal support, accusing Mr Sarwar of “grandstanding”.

Continue Reading

Trending