Connect with us

Published

on

Worsening disparities — US maternal deaths more than doubled over two decades, study estimates Black people have the highest overall rates of deaths in the US.

Beth Mole – Jul 5, 2023 10:37 pm UTC Enlarge / A pregnant woman holds her belly on September 27, 2016.Getty | Matthew Horwood reader comments 101 with

The number of people in the US dying of pregnancy-related causes more than doubled over two decades, with Black, Native American, and Alaska Native people facing the highest risks, according to a new study in JAMA.

The US has the highest rate of maternal deaths compared to other high-income countries, despite spending far more on health careboth on a per-person and share of gross domestic product basis. And, while US maternal deaths have long been high, they’ve only gotten higher while other high-income countries have seen declines.

Still, digging into US maternal mortality data to understand the trend is difficult. States define maternal deaths differently, some have been slow to add a standard pregnancy-related question on death certificates, and some delay the release of their data.

In the new JAMA study, researchers tried to make up for those differences by modeling state-level trends in maternal mortality using national data, looking specifically at death rates by race and ethnicity for each year between 1999 and 2019. The research was led by Gregory Roth at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.

The big picture findings of the study square with what we already know of maternal mortality in the US: it’s high and getting higher and particularly high for Black people in southern states. But, it also revealed widening disparities in specific states and ethnic groups that had not been previously highlighted.

Overall, the study noted that in 1999 there were an estimated 505 pregnancy-related deathsdefined as deaths related to pregnancy by medical coding that occur up to one year after the end of pregnancy. (Unintentional injuries, homicides, and suicides were excluded). By 2019, the number of pregnancy-related deaths more than doubled to 1,210. The maternal mortality rate (deaths per 100,000 live births) went from 12.7 in 2009 to 32.2 in 2019. Advertisement Trends

Among Black pregnant people, the nationwide mortality rate went from 31.4 to 67.7 in that time. For every year studied, the Black population had the highest state median for maternal mortality rate. Unsurprisingly, many of the states with the highest maternal mortality rates that got higher during the study period were in the Southbut not all. New Jersey and Arizona were among the top five states that saw the largest increases in Black maternal mortality rates over the study period, along with Louisiana, Georgia, and Texas.

The American Indian and Alaska Native populations saw the largest increases in the median state mortality rates. Florida, Kansas, Illinois, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin all saw mortality rates in these populations increase by more than 162 percent during the study period. Asian maternal mortality rates, meanwhile, were high in Wyoming, Montana, and Nevada, which have high proportions of Filipino populations.

Hispanic and White populations saw lower maternal mortality rates than the other groups but still saw increases, particularly in the South and Northeast. The authors note that mental health is a leading factor in maternal deaths in these two groups, and because suicide and overdose deaths were excluded from the study, it may have masked some maternal death estimates in these groups.

Overall, the study paints a bleak picture of maternal health in the US. “Maternal mortality persists as a source of worsening disparities in many US states and prevention efforts during this study period appear to have had a limited impact in addressing this health crisis,” the authors concluded.

Moreover study period ended in 2019 before the CDC reported a pandemic-related spike in pregnancy-related deaths. Maternal morbidity and mortality are also expected to increase after the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the constitutional right to abortion. Bans and restrictions that are now going into effect in roughly half of US states will limit abortion access and pregnancy care.

Editor’s Note: This post has been updated to correct the dates of the study. reader comments 101 with Beth Mole Beth is Ars Technicas Senior Health Reporter. Beth has a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and attended the Science Communication program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She specializes in covering infectious diseases, public health, and microbes. Advertisement Channel Ars Technica ← Previous story Next story → Related Stories Today on Ars

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s lawyers told to stop discussing cases

Published

on

By

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's lawyers told to stop discussing cases

A judge has warned Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s lawyers to stop publicly discussing their competing lawsuits.

Both actors – who co-starred in 2024’s It Ends With Us – have filed lawsuits against each other following an initial legal complaint from Lively.

The 37-year-old accused Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of the film – and an alleged subsequent plan to damage her reputation.

Baldoni then sued Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, accusing them of hijacking both the production and marketing of the film, as well as allegedly attempting to smear him and others who worked on the production through false allegations.

New York district court judge Lewis J Liman has scheduled a trial date combining the two claims for March 2026 – but warned both parties on Monday that their comments to the media could impact their cases.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why is Blake Lively suing Justin Baldoni?

Lively’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb complained that Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman violated professional ethics rules for lawyers by accusing the actress of “bullying” in People magazine.

He told a hearing at Manhattan federal court that “it’s very hard to un-ring the bell” and argued such statements could taint a jury pool.

But Mr Freedman complained “this has not been a one-way street”, and claimed his comments to the magazine and on a podcast were a response to a New York Times article from 21 December that “completely devastated” Baldoni.

Judge Liman has now adopted a state rule barring most out-of-court statements that could affect a case’s outcome – with an exception to protect clients from prejudicial adverse publicity. Neither lawyer objected.

Lively’s legal team have previously accused Mr Freedman in a court filing of trying to influence potential jurors by creating a website to release selected documents and communications between her and Baldoni.

Read more from Sky News:
Grammys: Beyonce wins album of the year
Reform tops landmark poll for first time

In late December, Lively sued Baldoni, his production company Wayfarer Studios and others in New York for sexual harassment and attacks on her reputation, asking for unspecified damages.

Baldoni then filed his lawsuit in January, accusing Lively and her husband, Deadpool star and Wrexham FC co-owner Reynolds, of defamation and extortion. He is seeking at least $400m (£321m) in damages.

The actor also sued The New York Times newspaper for libel after it published allegations about him.

Lively starred in the 2005 film The Sisterhood Of The Traveling Pants before rising to fame in the TV series Gossip Girl from 2007 to 2012. She is also known for films including The Town and The Shallows.

Baldoni is known for the TV comedy series Jane The Virgin and for directing the 2019 film Five Feet Apart. He also wrote Man Enough – a book pushing back against traditional notions of masculinity.

Continue Reading

Politics

US Treasury sued for giving Elon Musk’s DOGE access to sensitive info

Published

on

By

US Treasury sued for giving Elon Musk’s DOGE access to sensitive info

The US Treasury was accused of unlawfully allowing Elon Musk and his government efficiency organization access to millions of Americans’ personal and financial data.

Continue Reading

Technology

China to launch probe into Google over alleged antitrust violations

Published

on

By

China to launch probe into Google over alleged antitrust violations

In this photo illustration, a Google logo is displayed on the screen of a smartphone. 

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

China said Tuesday it will launch an investigation into Google over alleged antitrust violations.

The country’s State Administration for Market Regulation said that it would initiate an investigation into the technology giant because of alleged violations of China’s anti-monopoly law, according to a Google translation of the official statement.

The statement followed closed on the heels of China announcing additional tariffs on select U.S. goods.

China’s finance ministry said it will levy tariffs of 15% on coal and liquified natural gas imports from the U.S., starting Feb. 10. It will also impose 10% higher duties on American crude oil, farm equipment and certain cars and trucks.

Google stopped its internet and search engine services in China in 2010, but continues some operations including helping Chinese businesses looking to advertise on Google platforms abroad.

The Google investigation could end without any penalties, Julian Evans Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics said in a note.

Google is facing regulatory scrutiny in several countries including the U.S.

The company lost a lawsuit in August filed by the U.S government in 2020. It accused the firm of having a monopoly in the general search market by creating strong barriers to entry.

Following the ruling, the U.S. Department of Justice pushed in November for Google to divest its Chrome browser. The department also argued that Google should not be allowed to enter into exclusionary agreements with third parties such as Apple and Samsung.

Google is also currently being investigated by the U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority over whether it has “strategic market status” under a new UK law.

— CNBC’s Anniek Bao, Ryan Browne and Jennifer Elias contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending