Connect with us

Published

on

So far, 2023 has been a tough year for crypto, with a persistent down market and regulatory uncertainty that will likely send many blockchain ventures overseas for more favorable conditions.

Yet the potential of blockchain to improve life for everyone remains with an increasing number of projects with practical use cases. A recent survey by Inmind showed that the majority of 174 venture capital firms from Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the U.S. are looking forward to the end of this crypto winter by the end of 2023.

Capital investment continues to pour into the blockchain space – with GameFi and Metaverse receiving the most at the beginning of the year and Web3 Infrastructure and DeFi projects rising to the top of the list by the time of the survey.

For a closer look at the direction of investment in Web3, we interviewed Cathryn Chen, Founder and CEO of MarketX, a global VC firm focusing on fintech, deeptech, and vertical SaaS.

Chen began her path of successful investments while still in her 20s, and was named among Forbes 30 under 30 Asia, Finance & Venture Capital in 2019. She has facilitated over $250M in investments for more than 30 family offices and funds across Asia and the United States.

We spoke with Chen to learn more about where VCs and investors are looking for the next big thing and how soon they think a recovery will happen.

Also Read:Why Dogecoin Co-Founder Thinks Elon Musk's New AI Company Will Be 'Really Interesting'

Photo Credit: MarketX

BZ: What is the main focus of MarketX?
Chen: We are a global investment platform, starting in 2015, working with family offices, institutional, and retail investors. The goal was to give everyone access to pre-IPO deals through a FinTech platform. Two years ago, we launched a new platform that allows people to invest using crypto, not just in meme coins but also in more proven companies such as SpaceX and Neuralink.

Now we're becoming more of a Web2.5 Private Bank. We also give people the option to buy Treasury Bills with crypto. The platform lets people buy traditional financial products, leveraging their crypto holdings.

BZ: What has been the reaction of affluent investors to the SEC's recent regulatory wranglings?

Chen: For the higher net worth individuals, there are always 10-20% higher-risk products in their portfolio. Over the last few years, higher-net-worth individuals have increased their alternative investment from 10% to approximately 15-20%.

So that has been a transformational change in terms of how our industry works, [and is] why so many more advisors are now spending time talking to their clients about PVC.

BZ: Is the U.S. losing Web3 talent based on its uncertain regulatory structure?

Chen: In the last 6-to-9 months, I have seen many talented founders moving to places like Zurich, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Saudi Arabia because the UAE greenlights crypto platforms much more quickly.

The U.S. is losing its edge when it comes to crypto adoption. If we can implement rules that actually help prevent bad actors, there's still room for us to develop. If we don't, someone else will.

BZ: Is the current blockchain investment client not conducive to early success stories like yours? Would it be the same if you were starting out now?

Chen: I think the reason I have been in the right place at the right time. When I started my career, I wanted to build an international business. In 2012, I decided to go back to Asia. And that was the height of the Hong Kong IPOs. So I hit at the right time there. Then in 2014, based on observing market trends and how my smartest friends were starting companies in Silicon Valley, I decided to move back to California, where I grew up.

I was 24 when I joined a startup, and we raised $80 million. Our first company was founded by Sequoia and Lightspeed. I wanted to be part of the experience where I could see how to grow from zero to one, how to work with major players, and the best of the best in venture capital.

BZ: What do you expect the Web3 landscape to look like in the near future?
Chen: We see a future with more development of stable return investments in crypto. I see the necessity of merging Web2 and Web 3. We need this new generation of investors who have learned that investment matters.

If we can adopt more traditional alternative products and merge that with the world of crypto, we can offer the average investor a much better product that's less risky. I think that the marriage of web 2.0 and 3.0 needs to happen in order for crypto to get on the right path.

BZ: What should investors focus on in this uncertain market?
Chen: We should focus on something more long-term. If you look at the real return over a time horizon of 10 to 20 years, it is always real technology companies solving real problems that deliver those returns.

We are very focused on deeptech. We need to look at transportation infrastructure. We need to reduce waste and look at how to turn waste into aviation fuel. We need to look at how to come up with a cheaper electric grid. We need to lay the foundation for the next 20 to 30 years.

On top of that, the whole AI revolution is happening. I just returned from a trip to Silicon Valley, where in 2 days, I met 40 different companies. You can see the VCs are becoming increasingly optimistic about the future because they see real innovation being built by people.

BZ: What is the secret to your early success?
Chen: I think you should not listen to everyone all the time. When I chose my path, leaving JPMorgan to join a two- or three-person startup in Silicon Valley, everyone thought it was career-ending. Then I left that successful company to put all my savings into my own company and pay myself nothing, sleeping in the living room of a San Francisco apartment.

I'm a firm believer that in whatever you do, you have to have conviction. And maybe everybody else will say no because most people don't know your story. I believe in what I do. And I'm going to have some level of resilience and consistency. Every day I put in more work and believe that this is the direction I want to go. I have a unique view of the world. And if it succeeds, it's going to succeed big. I think that's the entrepreneurial journey for a lot of women.

BZ: Is the entrepreneurial journey harder for women in Web3?
Chen: When you go to Silicon Valley, if you just scan through the number of founders who got major backing, they're generally men. That's not a surprise to a lot of people. I couldn't get any funding from Silicon Valley because everyone looked at me and said, "I'm sorry, but you know, you have a great idea, but maybe somebody else." One guy said, "Oh, that's a great idea. But I'm sorry, you're just a girl with an idea."

Some people might not take you seriously. But keep believing, and someday someone will believe in you. Somehow I was able to convince 12 billionaires to back me when I was 24 years old, naive, and honestly made every mistake there is. Somebody will see your hard work, your drive, and ambition and hopefully go on this journey with you.

Now Read:If You Had Invested $100 In Bitcoin 8 Years Ago When Bill Gates Called It 'Better Than Currency', Here's How Much You Would Have Now

Continue Reading

Business

Bank of England issues inflation warning but cuts interest rate to 4%

Published

on

By

Bank of England issues inflation warning but cuts interest rate to 4%

The Bank of England has cut the interest rate for the fifth time in a year to 4% but warned that climbing food prices will cause inflation to jump higher in 2025.

In a tight decision that saw members of the rate-setting committee vote twice to break a deadlock, the Bank cut the rate to the lowest level in more than two-and-a-half years. Households on a variable mortgage of about £140,000 will save about £30 a month.

Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, said: “We’ve cut interest rates today, but it was a finely balanced decision. Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully.”

Money latest: What interest rate cut means for savers and borrowers

The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), the nine-member panel that sets the base interest rate, voted in favour of lowering borrowing costs by 0.25 percentage points.

However, rate-setters failed to reach a unanimous decision, with four members of the committee voting to keep it on hold and another four voting for a 0.25 percentage point cut.

Alan Taylor, an external member of the committee, initially called for a larger 0.5 percentage point cut but after a second vote reduced that to 0.25% to break the deadlock. Had they failed to reach a decision, Mr Bailey, the governor, would have had the decisive vote.

More on Bank Of England

It is the first time the committee has gone to a second vote and highlights the difficulty policymakers face in navigating the current economic climate, in which economic growth is stagnating, with at least one rate-setter fearing a recession, but inflation remains persistent.

Although the central bank voted to cut borrowing costs, it also raised its inflation forecasts on the back of higher food prices.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘We’ve got to get the balance right on tax’

The bank predicted that the headline rate of inflation would hit 4% in September, up from a previous estimate of 3.75%.

The September inflation rate is used to uprate a range of benefits, including pensions.

The increase was driven by food, where the inflation rate could hit 5.5% this year. About a tenth of household spending is devoted to food shopping, which means it can have an outsized impact on inflation.

The Bank said this risked creating “second round effects”, whereby a sense of higher inflation forces people to push for pay rises, which could push inflation even higher.

Economists at the Bank blamed poor harvests, weather conditions, and changes to packaging regulations but also, in a blow to the chancellor, higher labour costs.

It pointed out that a higher proportion of workers in the food retail sector are paid the national living wage, which Rachel Reeves increased by 6.7% in April.

Economists at the Bank also blamed higher employment taxes announced in the autumn budget. “Furthermore, overall labour costs of supermarkets are likely to have been disproportionately affected by the lower threshold at which employers start paying NICs… these material increases in labour costs are likely to have pushed up food prices.”

There is also evidence that employers’ national insurance increases are causing businesses to curtail hiring, the Bank said. It comes as unemployment in the UK rose unexpectedly to a fresh four-year high of 4.7% in May. Separate data shows the number of employees on payroll has contracted for the fifth month in a row,

The Bank said the unemployment rate could hit 5% next year and warned of “subdued” economic growth, with one member – Alan Taylor – warning of an “increased risk of recession” in the coming years.

Continue Reading

Technology

Intel shares drop after Trump calls for CEO to resign immediately

Published

on

By

Intel shares drop after Trump calls for CEO to resign immediately

Intel’s CEO Lip-Bu Tan speaks at the company’s Annual Manufacturing Technology Conference in San Jose, California, U.S. April 29, 2025.

Laure Andrillon | Reuters

Intel shares were under pressure Thursday after President Donald Trump called for the chipmaker’s CEO to resign immediately.

In a Truth Social post, Trump said Intel Chief Executive Lip-Bu Tan “is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem.” Intel dropped in the premarket on the back of that post, last trading 5% lower.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

INTC drops

Tan was named as Intel CEO in March. This week, U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton questioned his ties to Chinese companies and referenced a past criminal case involving Cadence Design, where Tan was CEO until 2021, Reuters reported.

Cotton wrote to Intel’s chair to “express concern about the security and integrity of Intel’s operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security,” Reuters said.

Continue Reading

Technology

What the world’s biggest chipmakers are doing to stave off Trump’s tariffs

Published

on

By

What the world's biggest chipmakers are doing to stave off Trump's tariffs

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an event with Apple CEO Tim Cook in the Oval Office of the White House on August 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Win Mcnamee | Getty Images

U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed 100% tariffs on the import of semiconductors has brought major chip names into the spotlight.

Questions linger about how these duties will be implemented: will they apply to the raw chip itself that is imported, or the end product, like a smartphone or laptop? And how much manufacturing needs to actually be done in the U.S.?

Trump said that, if companies are “building in the United States or have committed to build, without question,” then “there will be no charge.”

A number of chip stocks moved higher on Thursday on investor hopes that pledges of U.S. investment and current footprint Stateside may help them avoid the worst of the semiconductor tariffs.

Based on Trump’s comments, here’s a breakdown of the major chip companies in the world and what their operations and investment commitments to the U.S.

TSMC

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the world’s biggest chipmaker, has pledged a total of $165 billion in investments to the U.S.

This includes an ongoing $65 billion investment in advanced chip making operations in Phoenix, Arizona and a fresh $100 billion announced in March.

TSMC shares rose nearly 5% in Taiwan on Thursday, as investors bet the company will ride out the semiconductor tariffs.

Samsung

Samsung operates chipmaking facilities in Texas and has also committed billions of dollars in investment to the U.S.

Apple on Wednesday said that Samsung would produce image sensors of the iPhone maker out of the Korean tech giant’s facility in Austin, Texas.

Samsung shares also ended the day higher in South Korean trading.

How major chip names could mitigate the effect of Trump's seminconductor tariffs

GlobalFoundries

U.S.-headquartered chipmaker GlobalFoundries saw shares surge nearly 10% in premarket trade on Thursday.

The company has a manufacturing footprint in the U.S., but it does not make cutting-edge chips like TSMC. Instead, it makes less advanced products that are widely used across various industries.

On Wednesday, GlobalFoundries announced an agreement with Apple for a “deeper collaboration that will advance semiconductor technologies and strengthen U.S. manufacturing.”

The company said it will “accelerate” investments at its factory in Malta, New York.

Given its U.S. base, investors see GlobalFoundries as a winner of Trump’s semiconductor tariffs.

SK Hynix

Nvidia

In April, Nvidia said it plans to produce up to $500 billion of AI infrastructure in the U.S. via its manufacturing partnerships over the next four years.

Its Blackwell AI chips have started production at TSMC’s Phoenix facility.

Nvidia shares were 1% higher in premarket trade.

Apple

While not strictly a semiconductor company, Apple does design its own chips. Trump on Wednesday announced that Apple will spend an additional $100 billion on U.S. companies and suppliers over the next four years.

Apple said that its U.S.-based supply chain would produce more than 19 billion chips for its products this year, which includes manufacturing from TSMC in Arizona.

Apple shares rose more than 3% in premarket trade on Thursday, following a 5% jump on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

Trending