The first phase of the Scottish government’s safeguards on XL bully dogs has come into force.
Holyrood is replicating regulations introduced by Westminster, which makes it a criminal offence to own an unlicensed XL bully dog without an exemption certificate.
From today, XL bully dogs in Scotland must be kept on a lead and muzzled when out in public. Selling, breeding, abandoning or giving the dogs away is also now illegal.
The rules were recently implemented in England and Wales following a spate of attacks in which people died or were injured by the breed.
The Scottish government said the regulations were being introduced north of the border after the UK government’s controls reportedly “created an unacceptable risk of dogs being moved to Scotland from England and Wales”.
The XL bully rules in Scotland
First stage (from 23 February): •The dogs must now be kept on a lead and muzzled when out in public • Selling, breeding, abandoning or giving the dogs away is now illegal
More on Animals
Related Topics:
Second stage (from 1 August): • Owners will have to apply and pay a fee, yet to be confirmed, for their dog to be added to the exemption index – which will include having the pet microchipped and neutered
The Scottish government said full details of the exemption application process and the support available will be announced in the “coming weeks”.
Advertisement
Compensation will be payable to owners who no longer wish to keep their pet, including reimbursement for euthanasia.
Those that are convicted of breaching the rules could face up to six months in prison and/or a fine of up to £5,000.
Community safety minister Siobhian Brown previously stressed that the new rules would be “safeguards rather than a ban”.
On Monday, Ms Brown said it was “vital” that XL bully owners get ready and prepare for their implementation.
‘He hasn’t really had the chance of a normal life like other dogs’
XL bully owner Lauren Ballantyne, from Fife, previously told Sky News that responsible owners shouldn’t have an issue complying with the regulations.
However, the mum-of-two is opposed to a ban on dog breeds and instead believes irresponsible ownership and low-welfare breeding practices are to blame.
Ms Ballantyne – who owns XL bully puppy Soprano and French bulldog El Chapo – told Sky News that she has relied on her wages to prepare for the new rules.
She said Soprano has had no issues walking with a lead and harness, adding: “Soprano walks right by your side when another dog is passing – he doesn’t even bother. He’s so laid-back.”
Soprano, who is set to begin training next month, has also been microchipped and registered with a vet.
Ms Ballantyne said she understood XL bully dog owners had to comply with the government rules, but feels they are “unfair” on the breed.
She said: “I’m glad Soprano is so young, but he hasn’t really had the chance of a normal life like other dogs – fetching sticks, playing with a ball (in a park) etc. It’s heartbreaking.
“He’ll be thinking ‘what have I done wrong and why are they getting to play’. It’s so unfair.”
Rishi Sunak has admitted the Tories may not win the general election after grim defeats in the local polls.
The prime minister suggested the UK was on course for a hung parliament and claimed voters would not want to see Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer “propped up in Downing Street” by the SNP or smaller parties.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:33
PM on ‘disappointing’ election results
Sunak urged to take party towards right
Former home secretary Suella Braverman urged him to mould the party towards the right in order to win back voters.
But she told the BBC a change of leadership was not a “feasible prospect,” adding: “There is no superman or superwoman out there who can do it.”
Ms Braverman urged the prime minister to adopt several measures to win back voters, including further tax cuts and a cap on legal migration.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:32
Rishi Sunak ‘up for the fight’ in general election
Tories ‘up for the fight,’ minister insists
But Transport Secretary Mark Harper insisted Mr Sunak and the Tories are “up for the fight” of a general election despite their terrible results in the local contests.
Talking to Sky News’ Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, the minister said: “I think the key thing that people need to do now is get behind the prime minister, focus on the things the government is focused on delivering – the British people’s priorities around the economy, dealing with migration – and get out there and take that fight to the country ahead of the general election.”
Labour won 1,158 seats in the 107 councils in England that held elections on 2 May, an increase of more than 232.
The Liberal Democrats won 552 seats, up nearly 100, while the Tories came in third place on 515 seats, down nearly 400.
Rishi Sunak’s internal critics have abandoned their attempt to unseat him because they have run out of time and do not believe Penny Mordaunt would do what is necessary to save the party.
The Politics at Jack and Sam’s podcast this week discusses how the PM is unlikely to face a challenge but will be confronted by an exhausted, sceptical and in parts broken Tory party when Parliament returns on Tuesday.
He faces legislative challenges in the coming weeks, with revolts on the criminal justice bill and sentencing bill, that could be aggravated by the party’s poor performance.
However, efforts by plotters – a loose band co-ordinating to bring down Sunak dominated by ex advisors rather than Tory MPs – have been abandoned.
They are understood to believe the local elections show the Tories still on course for annihilation but they have run out of time, and the window for a challenge was back in December or January.
More on Local Elections 2024
Related Topics:
They had hoped a suitable candidate would emerge and the closest they came to believing someone was interested was with Penny Mordaunt, though she has denied plotting. In the end, rebels concluded she would not do what it takes. They also said the political cost of changing leader increased sharply in recent months.
Sunak is now hoping Britain coming out of recession this Friday will help turn his fortunes around.
According to leaked correspondence between high-ranking officials, the Iraqi returns commitments were made with a “request for discretion” and no publicity.
The country was willing to move forward but did not want a formal or public agreement.
The current travel advice to Iraq on the Foreign Office website simply advises against “all travel to parts of Iraq”. However, according to the document, negotiations were fairly advanced and described in one table as “good recent progress with Iraq”.
More on Home Office
Related Topics:
Other government aims included enhancing cooperation with the Iranian Embassy in order to enhance returns arrangements for migrants and potential asylum seekers.
Returns agreements are also in the works for Eritrea and Ethiopia, according to documents about work undertaken by the Home Office and Foreign Office that relates to countries with the highest number of nationals arriving to the UK by small boats.
Advertisement
In a tranche of internal government documents seen by Sky News, even from the earliest stage of the Rwanda policy, Downing Street advisers knew there were serious problems with their proposals.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:57
First Rwanda relocation raids carried out
There are even private admissions that many people arriving here on small boats did so without the assistance of criminal gangs – despite their communications strategy.
Comparisons were also made to Australia’s response – to what Downing Street officials understood to be a comparable “smaller problem” than in the UK and admitted it had cost billions of Australian dollars in order for their returns processes to be fully operational.
In one document submitted to the Home Office, some of the highest-ranking officials at the time wrote that their guidance was to be “prepared to pay over the odds” to get the policy up and running. And that the initial offer from Rwanda was a “modest sum”.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Whitehall’s official spending watchdog has priced the cost of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda at £1.8m per person for the first 300 people the government deports to Kigali.
It also disclosed that since April 2022 the Home Office has paid £220m into Rwanda’s economic transformation and integration fund, which is designed to support economic growth in Rwanda, and will continue to make payments to cover asylum processing and operational costs for individuals relocated to Rwanda.
It will also pay further amounts of £50m over the next year and an additional £50m the following year.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
A government source said: “The Home Office is spending millions every day accommodating migrants in hotels – that’s not right or fair. We’re taking action to put an end to this costly and dangerous cycle. Doing nothing is not a free option – we must act if we want to stop the boats and save lives.
“The UK is continuing to work with a range of international partners to tackle global illegal migration challenges. Our Rwanda partnership is a pioneering response to the global challenge of illegal migration, and we will get flights off the ground to Rwanda in the next nine to eleven weeks.”