Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has insisted his uplift in defence spending is “fully funded” after Labour branded the announcement a pre-election “gimmick”.

The prime minister was asked by journalists whether he was not “entirely squaring with people” over how the increase in defence spending by 2030 will be funded – and whether it would involve “pain” for taxpayers.

But Mr Sunak, appearing at a joint press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, said that was not a “fair characterisation” and that his pledge was “fully funded”.

Mr Sunak confirmed yesterday that the UK’s defence spending would increase to 2.5% of GDP by 2030 to meet the “growing threats” posed by the likes of Russia, China and Iran.

Politics latest: Angela Rayner labels Rishi Sunak a ‘pint-sized loser’

The government has said the commitment amounted to an additional £75bn in funding over the next six years.

Labour has outlined a desire to match the pledge but some shadow ministers have struck a more cautious tone than others.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Speaking today in Berlin, the prime minister said Chancellor Jeremy Hunt had conducted a “detailed exercise” that “gives us the confidence that we can release the savings needed”.

“We are making a choice to prioritise defence with both of those decisions and I believe that’s the right thing to do,” he said.

“Because whether we like it or not, the world is more dangerous now than at any moment since the Cold War and it falls on leaders – whether that’s Olaf, whether that’s me – to do what’s necessary to keep our continent safe and stand up for our values.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is 2.5% of GDP enough?

Mr Sunak confirmed the reduction in civil service headcount to pre-pandemic levels would partly fund the spending uplift.

The move, which would see around 70,000 job cuts, has been criticised by the PCS union, which accused the government of using civil servants as a “scapegoat”.

“It’s not right for our members to pay for a rise in defence spending with their jobs, so we’ll fight these proposals tooth and nail, just as we fought them under Boris Johnson,” it said, adding: “Cuts have consequences.”

But Mr Sunak defended the plan, saying that since 2019 “we’ve seen a very significant rise that isn’t sustainable or needed”.

While the prime minister spoke at the press conference, his defence secretary informed MPs of the spending change in the Commons.

Earlier, Grant Shapps told Sky News NATO’s defence spending target should rise to 2.5% of GDP, arguing it would make a “real difference” and inject £135bn a year into the alliance’s budget.

Asked whether he agreed that the target should rise, Mr Sunak declined to answer – but he did say the UK needed to adjust to a “new paradigm”.

“It’s clear that the world that we’re living in is increasingly dangerous…. And I think it’s right that in light of that we recognise that we need to do more,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour to ‘match’ PM’s defence pledge

Earlier today Emily Thornberry, Labour’s shadow attorney general, told Sky News her party wanted to “move towards” the government’s 2.5% spending pledge – but it would not commit to the 2030 target “unless there’s a plan that makes sense”.

“When circumstances allow… we want to move towards 2.5%,” she told Kay Burley.

Read more:
Sunak’s defence pledge sets trap for Starmer
‘Confusion reigns’ despite Sunak’s shift in tone on defence spending

But she added: “You wouldn’t expect me to come on and say that we could spend £75bn by 2030 without having a plan as to where we were going to get the money from.”

And she said the government’s document on defence spending did not contain a “single word about how they were going to pay for it”, calling it a “gimmick”.

Her comments appear to row back on claims made by Steve Reed, Labour’s shadow environment secretary, who told Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge yesterday that his party was aiming to match the current government’s figure by the end of the decade.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto banking rule withdrawal by Fed ‘not real progress’ — Senator Lummis

Published

on

By

Crypto banking rule withdrawal by Fed ‘not real progress’ — Senator Lummis

Crypto banking rule withdrawal by Fed ‘not real progress’ — Senator Lummis

United States Senator Cynthia Lummis suggests the crypto industry may be celebrating too soon over the US Federal Reserve softening its crypto guidance for banks.

“The Fed withdrawing crypto guidance is just noise, not real progress,” Lummis said in an April 25 X post. Lummis called the Fed’s April 24 announcement — withdrawing its 2022 supervisory letter that had discouraged banks from engaging with crypto and stablecoin activities — “just lip service.”

Lummis’ tone was different from the rest of the crypto industry

Lummis, a pro-crypto advocate known for introducing the Bitcoin (BTC) Strategic Reserve Bill in July 2024, pointed out several flaws in the Fed’s announcement, even as Strategy founder Michael Saylor and crypto entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano suggested it was a step forward for banks and crypto.

Cryptocurrencies, United States
Source: Anthony Pompliano

She argued that the Fed continues to “illegally flout the law on master accounts” and still relies on reputational risk in its bank supervision practices. It comes as the Federal Insurance Deposit Corporation (FDIC) is working on a rule to stop examiners from considering reputational risk when reviewing a bank’s operations, according to a recent Bloomberg report.

Lummis also highlighted the Fed’s policy statement in Section 9(13), which hasn’t been withdrawn, stating that Bitcoin and digital assets are considered “unsafe and unsound.”

She also reiterated many of the same staff behind Operation Chokepoint 2.0 are still involved in crypto policy today.

“We are NOT fooled. The Fed assassinated companies within the industry and hurt American interests by stifling innovation and shuttering businesses. This fight is far from over.”

“I will continue to hold the Fed accountable until the digital asset industry gets more than a life jacket, Chair Powell — they need a fair shake,” Lummis said.

Related: If Trump fired Powell, what would happen to crypto?

Custodia Bank founder and CEO Caitlin Long seemed to share a similar view to Lummis.

“THANK YOU for seeing this for what it is,” Long said.

Cryptocurrencies, United States
Source: David Sacks

However, many crypto executives praised the Fed’s announcement as a positive development for the industry. Saylor said in an April 25 X post that the Fed’s move means that “banks are now free to begin supporting Bitcoin.”

Anastasija Plotnikova, co-founder and CEO of blockchain regulatory firm Fideum, said the Fed’s decision “is a significant development, as it will simplify the path to institutional adoption.”

Magazine: Ethereum is destroying the competition in the $16.1T TradFi tokenization race

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC chair suggests ‘huge benefits’ in agency’s third crypto roundtable

Published

on

By

<div>SEC chair suggests 'huge benefits' in agency's third crypto roundtable</div>

<div>SEC chair suggests 'huge benefits' in agency's third crypto roundtable</div>

In one of his first appearances as the recently sworn-in chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul Atkins delivered remarks to the agency’s third roundtable discussion of crypto regulation. 

In the “Know Your Custodian” roundtable event on April 25, Atkins said he expected “huge benefits” from blockchain technology through efficiency, risk mitigation, transparency, and cutting costs. He reiterated that among his goals at the SEC would be to facilitate “clear regulatory rules of the road” for digital assets, hinting that the agency under former chair Gary Gensler had contributed to market and regulatory uncertainty. 

“I look forward to engaging with market participants and working with colleagues in President Trump’s administration and Congress to establish a rational fit-for-purpose framework for crypto assets,” said Atkins.

SEC chair suggests 'huge benefits' in agency's third crypto roundtable
SEC chair Paul Atkins addressing the April 25 crypto roundtable. Source: SEC

Some critics of US President Donald Trump see Atkins’ nomination to lead the SEC as a nod to the crypto industry, acting on campaign promises to remove Gensler — the former chair resigned the day Trump took office — and cut back on regulation. Democratic lawmakers on the Senate Banking Committee questioned Atkins on his ties to the industry, potentially presenting conflicts of interest in his role regulating crypto.

Related: Atkins SEC era sparks massive industry optimism, crypto execs speak out

The direction of the SEC under new leadership

“We’ve noticed that we don’t have to be as concerned […] about being accused of things that we’re not doing, like being broker-dealers for securities,” Exodus chief legal officer Veronica McGregor, who participated in the roundtable, told Cointelegraph on April 24.”It’s just a less scary regulatory environment in general. It is, however, still unclear what the ultimate regs are going to look like for crypto.” 

The SEC crypto task force is scheduled to hold two more roundtables in May and June to discuss tokenization and decentralized finance, respectively. Commissioner Hester Peirce, who leads the task force, told Cointelegraph in March that she welcomed the opportunity to work with Atkins to “reorient the agency,” hinting at an SEC with regulations more favorable to the crypto industry.

In addition to the roundtables, the crypto task force has reported several meetings with digital asset firms to discuss various policies and considerations in developing a regulatory framework.

Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered

Continue Reading

Politics

Nasdaq urges SEC to treat certain digital assets as ‘stocks by any other name’

Published

on

By

<div>Nasdaq urges SEC to treat certain digital assets as 'stocks by any other name'</div>

<div>Nasdaq urges SEC to treat certain digital assets as 'stocks by any other name'</div>

Nasdaq has urged the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to hold digital assets to the same regulatory standards as securities if they constitute “stocks by any other name,” according to an April 25 comment letter. 

The exchange said the US financial regulator needs to establish a clearer taxonomy for cryptocurrencies, including categorizing a portion of digital assets as “financial securities.” Those tokens, Nasdaq argued, should continue to be regulated “as they are regulated today regardless of tokenized form.”

“Whether it takes the form of a paper share, a digital share, or a token, an instrument’s underlying nature remains the same and it should be traded and regulated in the same ways,” the letter said. 

It also proposed categorizing a portion of cryptocurrencies as “digital asset investment contracts,” to be subject to “light touch regulation” but still overseen by the SEC.

Nasdaq urges SEC to treat certain digital assets as 'stocks by any other name'
Nasdaq’s April 25 letter to the SEC. Source: Nasdaq

Related: Certain stablecoins aren’t securities, SEC says in new guidance

Regulatory U-turn

The SEC has dramatically pivoted its stance on cryptocurrency oversight since US President Donald Trump took office in January. 

Under the leadership of former Chair Gary Gensler, the SEC took the position that practically all cryptocurrencies, with the exception of Bitcoin (BTC), represent investment contracts and therefore qualify as securities. 

This stance led the agency to bring upwards of 100 lawsuits against crypto firms for alleged securities law violations.

However, under Trump nominee Paul Atkins, who was sworn in as chair on April 21 after a lengthy Senate confirmation, the SEC has claimed jurisdiction over a narrower segment of cryptocurrencies. 

In February, the agency issued guidance stating that memecoins — if clearly identified as purely speculative assets with no intrinsic value — do not qualify as investment contracts pursuant to US law. 

In April, the SEC said that stablecoins — digital tokens pegged to the US dollar — similarly do not qualify as securities if they are marketed solely as a means of making payments.

Nasdaq urges SEC to treat certain digital assets as 'stocks by any other name'
Stablecoin market overview. Source: RWA.xyz

Integrating crypto into TradFi

In its April 21 letter, Nasdaq said existing financial infrastructure “can readily absorb digital assets by establishing the proper taxonomy and calibrating certain rules to reflect what is truly new and novel about digital assets.”

The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) — a private US securities clearinghouse closely overseen by the SEC — has been laying the foundation for integrating blockchain technology into regulated financial markets.

In March, the DTCC committed to promoting Ethereum’s ERC-3643 standard for permissioned securities tokens.

Magazine: Ethereum is destroying the competition in the $16.1T TradFi tokenization race

Continue Reading

Trending