One of the nations leading Christian-based entertainment websites is urging parents not to take their children to watch the new Barbie movie.
Movieguide, founded by Ted Baehr and his wife, Lili Baehr, posted a warning on Monday to parents, asserting that the PG-13 Barbie film includes adult content LGBT themes, among it that many moms and dads will not want their kids to see.Warning: Dont take your daughter to see Barbie, the headline said.
Many parents will wrongly believe Barbie is a kid-friendly film due to the films ties to the popular Barbie doll franchise, Movieguide said.
The film forgets its core audience of families and children while catering to nostalgic adults and pushing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender character stories, Movieguide added.
They had a built-in market and audience for this franchise that they completely ignored, the site noted. Millions of families would have turned out to the theaters and purchased tickets, but instead, Mattel chose to cater to a small percentage of the population who has proven over and over to abandon the box office. Movieguides 40 years of research indicate this just isnt true, and Mattel has made a grievous mistake.
Movies do best when they promote family and biblical values. Movieguide said.
Even the Barbie cartoon movies promote redemption, compassion, team work, kindness to strangers, self-sacrifice and more, said Movieguide. Parents trust the brand, and that is why they must know the truth about the upcoming movie.
The films director, Greta Gerwig, previously said the films LGBT storyline was essential. Gerwig directed Lady Bird and Little Women (2019) and is set to direct at least two Chronicles of Narnia movies for Netflix, according to Collider.
Theres no way we could have told this story without bringing in the LGBTQ+ community, Gerwig told Out, and it was important for us to represent the diversity that Mattel has created with all of the different Barbies and Kens that exist today.
Barbie is rated PG-13 for suggestive references and brief language.
Related:
Photo courtesy: Warner Brothers, used with permission.
Michael Foust has covered the intersection of faith and news for 20 years. His stories have appeared in Baptist Press, Christianity Today, The Christian Post, the Leaf-Chronicle, the Toronto Star and the Knoxville News-Sentinel.
A woman walks up to the security guards outside a shuttered USAID-funded sexual health clinic in Johannesburg’s inner-city district.
She looks around with confusion as they let her know the clinic is closed.
She tells us it has only been two months since she came here to receive her usual care.
Now, she must scramble to find another safe place for her sexual health screenings and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) – her regular defence against rampant HIV.
On the day he was sworn in as US president for a second time, Donald Trump signed an executive order freezing foreign aid for a 90-day period.
That is being challenged by federal employee unions in court over what it says are “unconstitutional and illegal actions” that have created a “global humanitarian crisis”.
However the order is already having an immediate impact on South Africa’s most vulnerable.
More on South Africa
Related Topics:
Her eyes tear up as she processes the news. Like many sex workers in town, free sexual health clinics are her lifeline.
An HIV-positive sex worker shared her patient transfer letter from the same closed clinic with Sky News and told us with panic that she is still waiting to be registered at an alternative facility.
South Africa is home to one of the world’s worst HIV/AIDS epidemics. At least 8.5 million people here are living with HIV – a quarter of all cases worldwide.
Widespread, free access to antiretroviral treatment in southern Africa was propelled by the introduction of George W. Bush’s US President Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in 2003.
PEPFAR is considered one of the most successful foreign aid programmes in history, and South Africa is the largest recipient of its funds.
Image: A sign for USAID on the clinic’s window
Image: A shuttered USAID-funded sexual health clinic in Johannesburg
The programme has now been halted by President Trump’s foreign aid funding freeze – plunging those who survived South Africa’s HIV epidemic and AIDS denialism in the early 2000s back to a time of scarcity and fear.
“That time, there was no medication. The government would tell us to take beetroot and garlic. It was very difficult for the government to give us treatment but we fought very hard to win this battle. Now, the challenge is that we are going back to the struggle,” says Nelly Zulu, an activist and mother living with HIV in Soweto.
Nelly says access to free treatment has saved her and her 21-year-old son, who tested positive for HIV at four years old.
“It helped me so much because if I didn’t get the treatment, I don’t think I would be alive – even my son.
“My concern is for pregnant women. I don’t want them to go through what I went through – the life I was facing before. I’m scared we will go back to that crisis.”
Image: Nelly Zulu, an activist and mother living with HIV
South African civil society organisations have written a joint open letter calling for their government to provide a coordinated response to address the healthcare emergency created by the US foreign aid freeze.
The letter states that close to a million patients living with HIV have been directly impacted by stop-work orders and that a recent waiver by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio continuing life-saving assistance explicitly excludes “activities that involve abortions, family planning, gender or diversity, equality and inclusion ideology programmes, transgender surgeries or other non-life saving assistance”.
The shuttered clinic we saw in Johannesburg’s central business district (CBD) comes under these categories – built by Witwatersrand University to research reproductive health and cater to vulnerable and marginalised communities.
An activist and healthcare worker at a transgender clinic tells us everyone she knows is utterly afraid.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:48
USAID in turmoil: What you need to know
“Corner to corner, you hear people talking about this. There are people living with chronic diseases who don’t have faith anymore because they don’t know where they are ending up,” says Ambrose, a healthcare worker and activist.
“People keep asking corner to corner – ‘why don’t you go here, why don’t you go there?’ People are crying – they want to be assisted.”
South Africa’s ministry of health insists that only 17% of all HIV/AIDs funding comes from PEPFAR but that statistic is offset by the palpable disruption.
On Monday, minister of health Dr Aaron Motsoaledi met to discuss bilateral health cooperation and new US policy for assistance with US charge d’affaires for South Africa, Dana Brown.
A statement following the meeting says: “Communication channels are open between the Ministry and the Embassy, and we continue to discuss our life-saving health partnership moving forward.
“Until details are available the minister called on all persons on antiretrovirals (ARVs) to under no circumstances stop this life-saving treatment.”
A demand much harder to execute than declare.
“There is already a shortage of the medication – even if you ask for three months’ treatment, they will give you one or two months worth then you have to go back,” says Nelly.
“Now, it is worse because you can see the funding has been cut off.”